All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@arm.com>
To: catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com,
	maz@kernel.org, suzuki.poulose@arm.com, sudeep.holla@arm.com,
	lukasz.luba@arm.com, valentin.schneider@arm.com,
	rjw@rjwysocki.net, ionela.voinescu@arm.com
Cc: peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com,
	vincent.guittot@linaro.org, viresh.kumar@linaro.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 7/7] clocksource/drivers/arm_arch_timer: validate arch_timer_rate
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2020 18:45:42 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200211184542.29585-8-ionela.voinescu@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200211184542.29585-1-ionela.voinescu@arm.com>

From: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>

Using an arch timer with a frequency of less than 1MHz can result in an
incorrect functionality of the system which assumes a reasonable rate.

One example is the use of activity monitors for frequency invariance
which uses the rate of the arch timer as the known rate of the constant
cycle counter in computing its ratio compared to the maximum frequency
of a CPU. For arch timer frequencies less than 1MHz this ratio could
end up being 0 which is an invalid value for its use.

Therefore, warn if the arch timer rate is below 1MHz which contravenes
the recommended architecture interval of 1 to 50MHz.

Signed-off-by: Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@arm.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c | 18 +++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c b/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
index 9a5464c625b4..4faa930eabf8 100644
--- a/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
+++ b/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
@@ -885,6 +885,17 @@ static int arch_timer_starting_cpu(unsigned int cpu)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static int validate_timer_rate(void)
+{
+	if (!arch_timer_rate)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	/* Arch timer frequency < 1MHz can cause trouble */
+	WARN_ON(arch_timer_rate < 1000000);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 /*
  * For historical reasons, when probing with DT we use whichever (non-zero)
  * rate was probed first, and don't verify that others match. If the first node
@@ -900,7 +911,7 @@ static void arch_timer_of_configure_rate(u32 rate, struct device_node *np)
 		arch_timer_rate = rate;
 
 	/* Check the timer frequency. */
-	if (arch_timer_rate == 0)
+	if (validate_timer_rate())
 		pr_warn("frequency not available\n");
 }
 
@@ -1594,9 +1605,10 @@ static int __init arch_timer_acpi_init(struct acpi_table_header *table)
 	 * CNTFRQ value. This *must* be correct.
 	 */
 	arch_timer_rate = arch_timer_get_cntfrq();
-	if (!arch_timer_rate) {
+	ret = validate_timer_rate();
+	if (ret) {
 		pr_err(FW_BUG "frequency not available.\n");
-		return -EINVAL;
+		return ret;
 	}
 
 	arch_timer_uses_ppi = arch_timer_select_ppi();
-- 
2.17.1


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@arm.com>
To: catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com,
	maz@kernel.org, suzuki.poulose@arm.com, sudeep.holla@arm.com,
	lukasz.luba@arm.com, valentin.schneider@arm.com,
	rjw@rjwysocki.net, ionela.voinescu@arm.com
Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org,
	viresh.kumar@linaro.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 7/7] clocksource/drivers/arm_arch_timer: validate arch_timer_rate
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2020 18:45:42 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200211184542.29585-8-ionela.voinescu@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200211184542.29585-1-ionela.voinescu@arm.com>

From: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>

Using an arch timer with a frequency of less than 1MHz can result in an
incorrect functionality of the system which assumes a reasonable rate.

One example is the use of activity monitors for frequency invariance
which uses the rate of the arch timer as the known rate of the constant
cycle counter in computing its ratio compared to the maximum frequency
of a CPU. For arch timer frequencies less than 1MHz this ratio could
end up being 0 which is an invalid value for its use.

Therefore, warn if the arch timer rate is below 1MHz which contravenes
the recommended architecture interval of 1 to 50MHz.

Signed-off-by: Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@arm.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c | 18 +++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c b/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
index 9a5464c625b4..4faa930eabf8 100644
--- a/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
+++ b/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
@@ -885,6 +885,17 @@ static int arch_timer_starting_cpu(unsigned int cpu)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static int validate_timer_rate(void)
+{
+	if (!arch_timer_rate)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	/* Arch timer frequency < 1MHz can cause trouble */
+	WARN_ON(arch_timer_rate < 1000000);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 /*
  * For historical reasons, when probing with DT we use whichever (non-zero)
  * rate was probed first, and don't verify that others match. If the first node
@@ -900,7 +911,7 @@ static void arch_timer_of_configure_rate(u32 rate, struct device_node *np)
 		arch_timer_rate = rate;
 
 	/* Check the timer frequency. */
-	if (arch_timer_rate == 0)
+	if (validate_timer_rate())
 		pr_warn("frequency not available\n");
 }
 
@@ -1594,9 +1605,10 @@ static int __init arch_timer_acpi_init(struct acpi_table_header *table)
 	 * CNTFRQ value. This *must* be correct.
 	 */
 	arch_timer_rate = arch_timer_get_cntfrq();
-	if (!arch_timer_rate) {
+	ret = validate_timer_rate();
+	if (ret) {
 		pr_err(FW_BUG "frequency not available.\n");
-		return -EINVAL;
+		return ret;
 	}
 
 	arch_timer_uses_ppi = arch_timer_select_ppi();
-- 
2.17.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-02-11 18:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 84+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-02-11 18:45 [PATCH v3 0/7] arm64: ARMv8.4 Activity Monitors support Ionela Voinescu
2020-02-11 18:45 ` Ionela Voinescu
2020-02-11 18:45 ` [PATCH v3 1/7] arm64: add support for the AMU extension v1 Ionela Voinescu
2020-02-11 18:45   ` Ionela Voinescu
2020-02-12 11:30   ` Suzuki Kuruppassery Poulose
2020-02-12 11:30     ` Suzuki Kuruppassery Poulose
2020-02-12 14:54     ` Valentin Schneider
2020-02-12 14:54       ` Valentin Schneider
2020-02-12 16:10     ` Ionela Voinescu
2020-02-12 16:10       ` Ionela Voinescu
2020-02-12 16:20       ` Suzuki Kuruppassery Poulose
2020-02-12 16:20         ` Suzuki Kuruppassery Poulose
2020-02-12 18:20         ` Ionela Voinescu
2020-02-12 18:20           ` Ionela Voinescu
2020-02-12 19:24           ` Suzuki K Poulose
2020-02-12 19:24             ` Suzuki K Poulose
2020-02-12 20:19         ` Ionela Voinescu
2020-02-12 20:19           ` Ionela Voinescu
2020-02-12 16:24       ` Vladimir Murzin
2020-02-12 16:24         ` Vladimir Murzin
2020-02-12 18:27         ` Ionela Voinescu
2020-02-12 18:27           ` Ionela Voinescu
2020-02-11 18:45 ` [PATCH v3 2/7] arm64: trap to EL1 accesses to AMU counters from EL0 Ionela Voinescu
2020-02-11 18:45   ` Ionela Voinescu
2020-02-12 11:44   ` Suzuki Kuruppassery Poulose
2020-02-12 11:44     ` Suzuki Kuruppassery Poulose
2020-02-12 15:36   ` Valentin Schneider
2020-02-12 15:36     ` Valentin Schneider
2020-02-11 18:45 ` [PATCH v3 3/7] arm64/kvm: disable access to AMU registers from kvm guests Ionela Voinescu
2020-02-11 18:45   ` Ionela Voinescu
2020-02-12 15:36   ` Valentin Schneider
2020-02-12 15:36     ` Valentin Schneider
2020-02-12 16:33   ` Suzuki Kuruppassery Poulose
2020-02-12 16:33     ` Suzuki Kuruppassery Poulose
2020-02-11 18:45 ` [PATCH v3 4/7] Documentation: arm64: document support for the AMU extension Ionela Voinescu
2020-02-11 18:45   ` Ionela Voinescu
2020-02-12 15:36   ` Valentin Schneider
2020-02-12 15:36     ` Valentin Schneider
2020-02-11 18:45 ` [PATCH v3 5/7] cpufreq: add function to get the hardware max frequency Ionela Voinescu
2020-02-11 18:45   ` Ionela Voinescu
2020-02-12  4:14   ` Viresh Kumar
2020-02-12  4:14     ` Viresh Kumar
2020-02-13 11:59   ` Valentin Schneider
2020-02-13 11:59     ` Valentin Schneider
2020-02-13 12:59     ` Ionela Voinescu
2020-02-13 12:59       ` Ionela Voinescu
2020-02-13 15:22       ` Valentin Schneider
2020-02-13 15:22         ` Valentin Schneider
2020-02-11 18:45 ` [PATCH v3 6/7] arm64: use activity monitors for frequency invariance Ionela Voinescu
2020-02-11 18:45   ` Ionela Voinescu
2020-02-12 18:59   ` Lukasz Luba
2020-02-12 18:59     ` Lukasz Luba
2020-02-13  9:47     ` Ionela Voinescu
2020-02-13  9:47       ` Ionela Voinescu
2020-02-17 16:59   ` Valentin Schneider
2020-02-17 16:59     ` Valentin Schneider
2020-02-23 18:49     ` Ionela Voinescu
2020-02-23 18:49       ` Ionela Voinescu
2020-02-11 18:45 ` Ionela Voinescu [this message]
2020-02-11 18:45   ` [PATCH v3 7/7] clocksource/drivers/arm_arch_timer: validate arch_timer_rate Ionela Voinescu
2020-02-12  9:30   ` Valentin Schneider
2020-02-12  9:30     ` Valentin Schneider
2020-02-12 10:32     ` Ionela Voinescu
2020-02-12 10:32       ` Ionela Voinescu
2020-02-12 10:01   ` Lukasz Luba
2020-02-12 10:01     ` Lukasz Luba
2020-02-12 10:12     ` Marc Zyngier
2020-02-12 10:12       ` Marc Zyngier
2020-02-12 10:54       ` Ionela Voinescu
2020-02-12 10:54         ` Ionela Voinescu
2020-02-12 10:55       ` Lukasz Luba
2020-02-12 10:55         ` Lukasz Luba
2020-02-12 11:10         ` Marc Zyngier
2020-02-12 11:10           ` Marc Zyngier
2020-02-12 11:43           ` Lukasz Luba
2020-02-12 11:43             ` Lukasz Luba
2020-02-12 11:12         ` Valentin Schneider
2020-02-12 11:12           ` Valentin Schneider
2020-02-14  0:35   ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-02-14  0:35     ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-02-14 15:45     ` Ionela Voinescu
2020-02-14 15:45       ` Ionela Voinescu
2020-02-14 15:57       ` Ionela Voinescu
2020-02-14 15:57         ` Ionela Voinescu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200211184542.29585-8-ionela.voinescu@arm.com \
    --to=ionela.voinescu@arm.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lukasz.luba@arm.com \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=valentin.schneider@arm.com \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.