All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
To: groug@kaod.org, clg@kaod.org, philmd@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com>,
	qemu-ppc@nongnu.org, Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>,
	Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong.eric@gmail.com>,
	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
	aik@ozlabs.ru, Mark Cave-Ayland <mark.cave-ayland@ilande.co.uk>,
	paulus@samba.org, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>,
	"Edgar E. Iglesias" <edgar.iglesias@gmail.com>,
	David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Subject: [PATCH v4 08/12] target/ppc: Streamline calculation of RMA limit from LPCR[RMLS]
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2020 13:14:05 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200219021409.21332-9-david@gibson.dropbear.id.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200219021409.21332-1-david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>

Currently we use a big switch statement in ppc_hash64_update_rmls() to work
out what the right RMA limit is based on the LPCR[RMLS] field.  There's no
formula for this - it's just an arbitrary mapping defined by the existing
CPU implementations - but we can make it a bit more readable by using a
lookup table rather than a switch.  In addition we can use the MiB/GiB
symbols to make it a bit clearer.

While there we add a bit of clarity and rationale to the comment about
what happens if the LPCR[RMLS] doesn't contain a valid value.

Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
---
 target/ppc/mmu-hash64.c | 71 ++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)

diff --git a/target/ppc/mmu-hash64.c b/target/ppc/mmu-hash64.c
index 8acd1f78ae..4e6c1f722b 100644
--- a/target/ppc/mmu-hash64.c
+++ b/target/ppc/mmu-hash64.c
@@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
  * License along with this library; if not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
  */
 #include "qemu/osdep.h"
+#include "qemu/units.h"
 #include "cpu.h"
 #include "exec/exec-all.h"
 #include "exec/helper-proto.h"
@@ -757,6 +758,39 @@ static void ppc_hash64_set_c(PowerPCCPU *cpu, hwaddr ptex, uint64_t pte1)
     stb_phys(CPU(cpu)->as, base + offset, (pte1 & 0xff) | 0x80);
 }
 
+static target_ulong rmls_limit(PowerPCCPU *cpu)
+{
+    CPUPPCState *env = &cpu->env;
+    /*
+     * This is the full 4 bits encoding of POWER8. Previous
+     * CPUs only support a subset of these but the filtering
+     * is done when writing LPCR
+     */
+    const target_ulong rma_sizes[] = {
+        [0] = 0,
+        [1] = 16 * GiB,
+        [2] = 1 * GiB,
+        [3] = 64 * MiB,
+        [4] = 256 * MiB,
+        [5] = 0,
+        [6] = 0,
+        [7] = 128 * MiB,
+        [8] = 32 * MiB,
+    };
+    target_ulong rmls = (env->spr[SPR_LPCR] & LPCR_RMLS) >> LPCR_RMLS_SHIFT;
+
+    if (rmls < ARRAY_SIZE(rma_sizes)) {
+        return rma_sizes[rmls];
+    } else {
+        /*
+         * Bad value, so the OS has shot itself in the foot.  Return a
+         * 0-sized RMA which we expect to trigger an immediate DSI or
+         * ISI
+         */
+        return 0;
+    }
+}
+
 int ppc_hash64_handle_mmu_fault(PowerPCCPU *cpu, vaddr eaddr,
                                 int rwx, int mmu_idx)
 {
@@ -1006,41 +1040,6 @@ void ppc_hash64_tlb_flush_hpte(PowerPCCPU *cpu, target_ulong ptex,
     cpu->env.tlb_need_flush = TLB_NEED_GLOBAL_FLUSH | TLB_NEED_LOCAL_FLUSH;
 }
 
-static void ppc_hash64_update_rmls(PowerPCCPU *cpu)
-{
-    CPUPPCState *env = &cpu->env;
-    uint64_t lpcr = env->spr[SPR_LPCR];
-
-    /*
-     * This is the full 4 bits encoding of POWER8. Previous
-     * CPUs only support a subset of these but the filtering
-     * is done when writing LPCR
-     */
-    switch ((lpcr & LPCR_RMLS) >> LPCR_RMLS_SHIFT) {
-    case 0x8: /* 32MB */
-        env->rmls = 0x2000000ull;
-        break;
-    case 0x3: /* 64MB */
-        env->rmls = 0x4000000ull;
-        break;
-    case 0x7: /* 128MB */
-        env->rmls = 0x8000000ull;
-        break;
-    case 0x4: /* 256MB */
-        env->rmls = 0x10000000ull;
-        break;
-    case 0x2: /* 1GB */
-        env->rmls = 0x40000000ull;
-        break;
-    case 0x1: /* 16GB */
-        env->rmls = 0x400000000ull;
-        break;
-    default:
-        /* What to do here ??? */
-        env->rmls = 0;
-    }
-}
-
 static void ppc_hash64_update_vrma(PowerPCCPU *cpu)
 {
     CPUPPCState *env = &cpu->env;
@@ -1099,7 +1098,7 @@ void ppc_store_lpcr(PowerPCCPU *cpu, target_ulong val)
     CPUPPCState *env = &cpu->env;
 
     env->spr[SPR_LPCR] = val & pcc->lpcr_mask;
-    ppc_hash64_update_rmls(cpu);
+    env->rmls = rmls_limit(cpu);
     ppc_hash64_update_vrma(cpu);
 }
 
-- 
2.24.1



  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-02-19  2:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-02-19  2:13 [PATCH v4 00/12] target/ppc: Correct some errors with real mode handling David Gibson
2020-02-19  2:13 ` [PATCH v4 01/12] ppc: Remove stub support for 32-bit hypervisor mode David Gibson
2020-02-19  2:13 ` [PATCH v4 02/12] ppc: Remove stub of PPC970 HID4 implementation David Gibson
2020-02-19  2:14 ` [PATCH v4 03/12] target/ppc: Correct handling of real mode accesses with vhyp on hash MMU David Gibson
2020-02-19  2:14 ` [PATCH v4 04/12] target/ppc: Introduce ppc_hash64_use_vrma() helper David Gibson
2020-02-19  2:14 ` [PATCH v4 05/12] spapr, ppc: Remove VPM0/RMLS hacks for POWER9 David Gibson
2020-02-19  2:14 ` [PATCH v4 06/12] target/ppc: Remove RMOR register from POWER9 & POWER10 David Gibson
2020-02-19  2:14 ` [PATCH v4 07/12] target/ppc: Use class fields to simplify LPCR masking David Gibson
2020-02-19  2:14 ` David Gibson [this message]
2020-02-19  2:14 ` [PATCH v4 09/12] target/ppc: Correct RMLS table David Gibson
2020-02-19  2:14 ` [PATCH v4 10/12] target/ppc: Only calculate RMLS derived RMA limit on demand David Gibson
2020-02-19  2:14 ` [PATCH v4 11/12] target/ppc: Streamline construction of VRMA SLB entry David Gibson
2020-02-19  2:14 ` [PATCH v4 12/12] target/ppc: Don't store VRMA SLBE persistently David Gibson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200219021409.21332-9-david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
    --to=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
    --cc=aik@ozlabs.ru \
    --cc=clg@kaod.org \
    --cc=edgar.iglesias@gmail.com \
    --cc=groug@kaod.org \
    --cc=imammedo@redhat.com \
    --cc=lvivier@redhat.com \
    --cc=mark.cave-ayland@ilande.co.uk \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=philmd@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-ppc@nongnu.org \
    --cc=thuth@redhat.com \
    --cc=xiaoguangrong.eric@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.