From: Pankaj Bharadiya <pankaj.laxminarayan.bharadiya@intel.com>
To: jani.nikula@linux.intel.com, daniel@ffwll.ch,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: pankaj.laxminarayan.bharadiya@intel.com
Subject: [Intel-gfx][PATCH 00/10] drm/i915: Introduce i915 based i915_MISSING_CASE macro and us it in i915
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2020 19:16:59 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200225134709.6153-1-pankaj.laxminarayan.bharadiya@intel.com> (raw)
Existing MISSING_CASE macro uses WARN call to dump the stack trace.
Now that we have struct drm_device based drm_WARN, introduce struct
drm_i915_private based i915_MISSING_CASE macro which uses drm_WARN so
that device specific information will also get printed in backtrace.
Also, automatically convert the MISSING_CASE with i915 specific
i915_MISSING_CASE variant using coccinelle semantic patch scripts.
i915_MISSING_CASE macro should be preferred over MISSING_CASE,
wherever possible.
Pankaj Bharadiya (10):
drm/i915: Add i915 device based MISSING_CASE macro
drm/i915/display/cdclk: Make MISSING_CASE backtrace i915 specific
drm/i915/display/ddi: Make MISSING_CASE backtrace i915 specific
drm/i915/display/display: Make MISSING_CASE backtrace i915 specific
drm/i915/dp: Make MISSING_CASE backtrace i915 specific
drm/i915/display/hdmi: Make MISSING_CASE backtrace i915 specific
drm/i915/display: Make MISSING_CASE backtrace i915 specific
drm/i915/gem: Make MISSING_CASE backtrace i915 specific
drm/i915/gt: Make MISSING_CASE backtrace i915 specific
drm/i915: Make MISSING_CASE backtrace i915 specific
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/icl_dsi.c | 8 +++--
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c | 4 +--
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c | 6 ++--
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c | 19 +++++++-----
.../gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_combo_phy.c | 6 ++--
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c | 19 ++++++------
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 29 ++++++++++---------
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c | 28 +++++++++---------
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c | 10 +++----
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdmi.c | 12 ++++----
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hotplug.c | 2 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_sprite.c | 4 +--
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tc.c | 2 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_stolen.c | 17 +++++++----
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c | 6 ++--
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c | 3 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c | 2 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_fence_reg.c | 2 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c | 2 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_utils.h | 4 +++
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c | 13 +++++----
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 10 +++----
22 files changed, 113 insertions(+), 95 deletions(-)
--
2.23.0
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Pankaj Bharadiya <pankaj.laxminarayan.bharadiya@intel.com>
To: jani.nikula@linux.intel.com, daniel@ffwll.ch,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/10] drm/i915: Introduce i915 based i915_MISSING_CASE macro and us it in i915
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2020 19:16:59 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200225134709.6153-1-pankaj.laxminarayan.bharadiya@intel.com> (raw)
Existing MISSING_CASE macro uses WARN call to dump the stack trace.
Now that we have struct drm_device based drm_WARN, introduce struct
drm_i915_private based i915_MISSING_CASE macro which uses drm_WARN so
that device specific information will also get printed in backtrace.
Also, automatically convert the MISSING_CASE with i915 specific
i915_MISSING_CASE variant using coccinelle semantic patch scripts.
i915_MISSING_CASE macro should be preferred over MISSING_CASE,
wherever possible.
Pankaj Bharadiya (10):
drm/i915: Add i915 device based MISSING_CASE macro
drm/i915/display/cdclk: Make MISSING_CASE backtrace i915 specific
drm/i915/display/ddi: Make MISSING_CASE backtrace i915 specific
drm/i915/display/display: Make MISSING_CASE backtrace i915 specific
drm/i915/dp: Make MISSING_CASE backtrace i915 specific
drm/i915/display/hdmi: Make MISSING_CASE backtrace i915 specific
drm/i915/display: Make MISSING_CASE backtrace i915 specific
drm/i915/gem: Make MISSING_CASE backtrace i915 specific
drm/i915/gt: Make MISSING_CASE backtrace i915 specific
drm/i915: Make MISSING_CASE backtrace i915 specific
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/icl_dsi.c | 8 +++--
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c | 4 +--
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c | 6 ++--
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c | 19 +++++++-----
.../gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_combo_phy.c | 6 ++--
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c | 19 ++++++------
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 29 ++++++++++---------
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c | 28 +++++++++---------
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c | 10 +++----
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdmi.c | 12 ++++----
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hotplug.c | 2 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_sprite.c | 4 +--
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tc.c | 2 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_stolen.c | 17 +++++++----
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c | 6 ++--
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c | 3 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c | 2 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_fence_reg.c | 2 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c | 2 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_utils.h | 4 +++
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c | 13 +++++----
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 10 +++----
22 files changed, 113 insertions(+), 95 deletions(-)
--
2.23.0
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next reply other threads:[~2020-02-25 13:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-25 13:46 Pankaj Bharadiya [this message]
2020-02-25 13:46 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/10] drm/i915: Introduce i915 based i915_MISSING_CASE macro and us it in i915 Pankaj Bharadiya
2020-02-25 13:47 ` [Intel-gfx][PATCH 01/10] drm/i915: Add i915 device based MISSING_CASE macro Pankaj Bharadiya
2020-02-25 13:47 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH " Pankaj Bharadiya
2020-02-25 14:01 ` [Intel-gfx][PATCH " Chris Wilson
2020-02-25 14:01 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH " Chris Wilson
2020-02-27 6:33 ` [Intel-gfx][PATCH " Laxminarayan Bharadiya, Pankaj
2020-02-27 6:33 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH " Laxminarayan Bharadiya, Pankaj
2020-02-27 8:29 ` [Intel-gfx][PATCH " Jani Nikula
2020-02-27 8:29 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH " Jani Nikula
2020-02-28 5:02 ` [Intel-gfx][PATCH " Laxminarayan Bharadiya, Pankaj
2020-02-28 5:02 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH " Laxminarayan Bharadiya, Pankaj
2020-02-25 13:47 ` [Intel-gfx][PATCH 02/10] drm/i915/display/cdclk: Make MISSING_CASE backtrace i915 specific Pankaj Bharadiya
2020-02-25 13:47 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH " Pankaj Bharadiya
2020-02-25 13:47 ` [Intel-gfx][PATCH 03/10] drm/i915/display/ddi: " Pankaj Bharadiya
2020-02-25 13:47 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH " Pankaj Bharadiya
2020-02-25 13:47 ` [Intel-gfx][PATCH 04/10] drm/i915/display/display: " Pankaj Bharadiya
2020-02-25 13:47 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH " Pankaj Bharadiya
2020-02-25 13:47 ` [Intel-gfx][PATCH 05/10] drm/i915/dp: " Pankaj Bharadiya
2020-02-25 13:47 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH " Pankaj Bharadiya
2020-02-25 13:47 ` [Intel-gfx][PATCH 06/10] drm/i915/display/hdmi: " Pankaj Bharadiya
2020-02-25 13:47 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH " Pankaj Bharadiya
2020-02-25 13:47 ` [Intel-gfx][PATCH 07/10] drm/i915/display: " Pankaj Bharadiya
2020-02-25 13:47 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH " Pankaj Bharadiya
2020-02-25 13:47 ` [Intel-gfx][PATCH 08/10] drm/i915/gem: " Pankaj Bharadiya
2020-02-25 13:47 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH " Pankaj Bharadiya
2020-02-25 13:47 ` [Intel-gfx][PATCH 09/10] drm/i915/gt: " Pankaj Bharadiya
2020-02-25 13:47 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH " Pankaj Bharadiya
2020-02-25 13:47 ` [Intel-gfx][PATCH 10/10] drm/i915: " Pankaj Bharadiya
2020-02-25 13:47 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH " Pankaj Bharadiya
2020-02-26 16:04 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915: Introduce i915 based i915_MISSING_CASE macro and us it in i915 Patchwork
2020-02-26 17:22 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2020-02-27 6:37 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200225134709.6153-1-pankaj.laxminarayan.bharadiya@intel.com \
--to=pankaj.laxminarayan.bharadiya@intel.com \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.