All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
To: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
	Lorenzo Pieralisi <Lorenzo.Pieralisi@arm.com>,
	linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
	Lina Iyer <ilina@codeaurora.org>,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
	Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
	Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@st.com>,
	Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/4] cpuidle: psci: Some fixes when using the hierarchical layout
Date: Tue,  3 Mar 2020 21:35:55 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200303203559.23995-1-ulf.hansson@linaro.org> (raw)

Changes in v2:
	- Small changes to patch 3 and 4, see their changelogs.

While collaborating with Benjamin Gaignard to deploy the hierarchical layout
for an ST SoC, it has turned that I have clearly missed to test a couple of
corner cases in recently added support to the cpuidle-psci driver.

This series are fixing the issues we have found.

Kind regards
Ulf Hansson


Ulf Hansson (4):
  PM / Domains: Allow no domain-idle-states DT property in genpd when
    parsing
  cpuidle: psci: Fixup support for domain idle states being zero
  cpuidle: psci: Split psci_dt_cpu_init_idle()
  cpuidle: psci: Allow WFI to be the only state for the hierarchical
    topology

 drivers/base/power/domain.c           |  2 +-
 drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-psci-domain.c |  6 ++
 drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-psci.c        | 92 ++++++++++++++++-----------
 3 files changed, 63 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)

-- 
2.20.1


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
To: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
	Lorenzo Pieralisi <Lorenzo.Pieralisi@arm.com>,
	linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>,
	Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@st.com>,
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	Lina Iyer <ilina@codeaurora.org>,
	Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/4] cpuidle: psci: Some fixes when using the hierarchical layout
Date: Tue,  3 Mar 2020 21:35:55 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200303203559.23995-1-ulf.hansson@linaro.org> (raw)

Changes in v2:
	- Small changes to patch 3 and 4, see their changelogs.

While collaborating with Benjamin Gaignard to deploy the hierarchical layout
for an ST SoC, it has turned that I have clearly missed to test a couple of
corner cases in recently added support to the cpuidle-psci driver.

This series are fixing the issues we have found.

Kind regards
Ulf Hansson


Ulf Hansson (4):
  PM / Domains: Allow no domain-idle-states DT property in genpd when
    parsing
  cpuidle: psci: Fixup support for domain idle states being zero
  cpuidle: psci: Split psci_dt_cpu_init_idle()
  cpuidle: psci: Allow WFI to be the only state for the hierarchical
    topology

 drivers/base/power/domain.c           |  2 +-
 drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-psci-domain.c |  6 ++
 drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-psci.c        | 92 ++++++++++++++++-----------
 3 files changed, 63 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)

-- 
2.20.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

             reply	other threads:[~2020-03-03 20:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-03-03 20:35 Ulf Hansson [this message]
2020-03-03 20:35 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] cpuidle: psci: Some fixes when using the hierarchical layout Ulf Hansson
2020-03-03 20:35 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] PM / Domains: Allow no domain-idle-states DT property in genpd when parsing Ulf Hansson
2020-03-03 20:35   ` Ulf Hansson
2020-03-04 10:48   ` Sudeep Holla
2020-03-04 10:48     ` Sudeep Holla
2020-03-03 20:35 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] cpuidle: psci: Fixup support for domain idle states being zero Ulf Hansson
2020-03-03 20:35   ` Ulf Hansson
2020-03-04 10:50   ` Sudeep Holla
2020-03-04 10:50     ` Sudeep Holla
2020-03-04 12:17     ` Ulf Hansson
2020-03-04 12:17       ` Ulf Hansson
2020-03-03 20:35 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] cpuidle: psci: Split psci_dt_cpu_init_idle() Ulf Hansson
2020-03-03 20:35   ` Ulf Hansson
2020-03-04 12:12   ` Sudeep Holla
2020-03-04 12:12     ` Sudeep Holla
2020-03-04 12:20     ` Ulf Hansson
2020-03-04 12:20       ` Ulf Hansson
2020-03-03 20:35 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] cpuidle: psci: Allow WFI to be the only state for the hierarchical topology Ulf Hansson
2020-03-03 20:35   ` Ulf Hansson
2020-03-04 12:23   ` Sudeep Holla
2020-03-04 12:23     ` Sudeep Holla
2020-03-05 14:17     ` Ulf Hansson
2020-03-05 14:17       ` Ulf Hansson
2020-03-05 16:23       ` Sudeep Holla
2020-03-05 16:23         ` Sudeep Holla
2020-03-06  9:28         ` Ulf Hansson
2020-03-06  9:28           ` Ulf Hansson
2020-03-06 10:04           ` Sudeep Holla
2020-03-06 10:04             ` Sudeep Holla
2020-03-06 10:47             ` Benjamin Gaignard
2020-03-06 10:47               ` Benjamin Gaignard
2020-03-06 12:06               ` Sudeep Holla
2020-03-06 12:06                 ` Sudeep Holla
2020-03-06 12:32                 ` Benjamin Gaignard
2020-03-06 12:32                   ` Benjamin Gaignard
2020-03-06 14:23                   ` Sudeep Holla
2020-03-06 14:23                     ` Sudeep Holla
2020-03-06 14:44                     ` Benjamin Gaignard
2020-03-06 14:44                       ` Benjamin Gaignard
2020-03-06 14:50                       ` Sudeep Holla
2020-03-06 14:50                         ` Sudeep Holla
2020-03-06 15:35                         ` Benjamin Gaignard
2020-03-06 15:35                           ` Benjamin Gaignard
2020-03-06 15:55                           ` Sudeep Holla
2020-03-06 15:55                             ` Sudeep Holla
2020-03-03 22:27 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] cpuidle: psci: Some fixes when using the hierarchical layout Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-03-03 22:27   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-03-09  7:20   ` Ulf Hansson
2020-03-09  7:20     ` Ulf Hansson
2020-03-10  8:37     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-03-10  8:37       ` Rafael J. Wysocki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200303203559.23995-1-ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
    --to=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
    --cc=Lorenzo.Pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=benjamin.gaignard@st.com \
    --cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
    --cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
    --cc=ilina@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
    --cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.