All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: KVM <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
	Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>,
	Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>,
	Michael Mueller <mimu@linux.ibm.com>,
	Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
	Ulrich Weigand <uweigand@de.ibm.com>,
	linux-s390 <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>,
	Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Subject: [GIT PULL 15/36] KVM: s390: protvirt: Add SCLP interrupt handling
Date: Mon,  9 Mar 2020 09:51:05 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200309085126.3334302-16-borntraeger@de.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200309085126.3334302-1-borntraeger@de.ibm.com>

The sclp interrupt is kind of special. The ultravisor polices that we
do not inject an sclp interrupt with payload if no sccb is outstanding.
On the other hand we have "asynchronous" event interrupts, e.g. for
console input.
We separate both variants into sclp interrupt and sclp event interrupt.
The sclp interrupt is masked until a previous servc instruction has
finished (sie exit 108).

[frankja@linux.ibm.com: factoring out write_sclp]
Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
---
 arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h |  6 +-
 arch/s390/kvm/intercept.c        | 27 +++++++++
 arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c        | 95 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
 arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c         |  6 ++
 4 files changed, 115 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h
index a13dc77f8b07..ba3364b37159 100644
--- a/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h
+++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h
@@ -518,6 +518,7 @@ enum irq_types {
 	IRQ_PEND_PFAULT_INIT,
 	IRQ_PEND_EXT_HOST,
 	IRQ_PEND_EXT_SERVICE,
+	IRQ_PEND_EXT_SERVICE_EV,
 	IRQ_PEND_EXT_TIMING,
 	IRQ_PEND_EXT_CPU_TIMER,
 	IRQ_PEND_EXT_CLOCK_COMP,
@@ -562,6 +563,7 @@ enum irq_types {
 			   (1UL << IRQ_PEND_EXT_TIMING)     | \
 			   (1UL << IRQ_PEND_EXT_HOST)       | \
 			   (1UL << IRQ_PEND_EXT_SERVICE)    | \
+			   (1UL << IRQ_PEND_EXT_SERVICE_EV) | \
 			   (1UL << IRQ_PEND_VIRTIO)         | \
 			   (1UL << IRQ_PEND_PFAULT_INIT)    | \
 			   (1UL << IRQ_PEND_PFAULT_DONE))
@@ -582,7 +584,8 @@ enum irq_types {
 			      (1UL << IRQ_PEND_EXT_CLOCK_COMP) | \
 			      (1UL << IRQ_PEND_EXT_EMERGENCY)  | \
 			      (1UL << IRQ_PEND_EXT_EXTERNAL)   | \
-			      (1UL << IRQ_PEND_EXT_SERVICE))
+			      (1UL << IRQ_PEND_EXT_SERVICE)    | \
+			      (1UL << IRQ_PEND_EXT_SERVICE_EV))
 
 struct kvm_s390_interrupt_info {
 	struct list_head list;
@@ -642,6 +645,7 @@ struct kvm_s390_local_interrupt {
 
 struct kvm_s390_float_interrupt {
 	unsigned long pending_irqs;
+	unsigned long masked_irqs;
 	spinlock_t lock;
 	struct list_head lists[FIRQ_LIST_COUNT];
 	int counters[FIRQ_MAX_COUNT];
diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/intercept.c b/arch/s390/kvm/intercept.c
index 9966c43c6035..00a79442a428 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kvm/intercept.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kvm/intercept.c
@@ -444,8 +444,35 @@ static int handle_operexc(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	return kvm_s390_inject_program_int(vcpu, PGM_OPERATION);
 }
 
+static int handle_pv_sclp(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+	struct kvm_s390_float_interrupt *fi = &vcpu->kvm->arch.float_int;
+
+	spin_lock(&fi->lock);
+	/*
+	 * 2 cases:
+	 * a: an sccb answering interrupt was already pending or in flight.
+	 *    As the sccb value is not known we can simply set some value to
+	 *    trigger delivery of a saved SCCB. UV will then use its saved
+	 *    copy of the SCCB value.
+	 * b: an error SCCB interrupt needs to be injected so we also inject
+	 *    a fake SCCB address. Firmware will use the proper one.
+	 * This makes sure, that both errors and real sccb returns will only
+	 * be delivered after a notification intercept (instruction has
+	 * finished) but not after others.
+	 */
+	fi->srv_signal.ext_params |= 0x43000;
+	set_bit(IRQ_PEND_EXT_SERVICE, &fi->pending_irqs);
+	clear_bit(IRQ_PEND_EXT_SERVICE, &fi->masked_irqs);
+	spin_unlock(&fi->lock);
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static int handle_pv_notification(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 {
+	if (vcpu->arch.sie_block->ipa == 0xb220)
+		return handle_pv_sclp(vcpu);
+
 	return handle_instruction(vcpu);
 }
 
diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c b/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c
index fc55f09938eb..145cccd498d7 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c
@@ -324,8 +324,11 @@ static inline int gisa_tac_ipm_gisc(struct kvm_s390_gisa *gisa, u32 gisc)
 
 static inline unsigned long pending_irqs_no_gisa(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 {
-	return vcpu->kvm->arch.float_int.pending_irqs |
-		vcpu->arch.local_int.pending_irqs;
+	unsigned long pending = vcpu->kvm->arch.float_int.pending_irqs |
+				vcpu->arch.local_int.pending_irqs;
+
+	pending &= ~vcpu->kvm->arch.float_int.masked_irqs;
+	return pending;
 }
 
 static inline unsigned long pending_irqs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
@@ -383,8 +386,10 @@ static unsigned long deliverable_irqs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 		__clear_bit(IRQ_PEND_EXT_CLOCK_COMP, &active_mask);
 	if (!(vcpu->arch.sie_block->gcr[0] & CR0_CPU_TIMER_SUBMASK))
 		__clear_bit(IRQ_PEND_EXT_CPU_TIMER, &active_mask);
-	if (!(vcpu->arch.sie_block->gcr[0] & CR0_SERVICE_SIGNAL_SUBMASK))
+	if (!(vcpu->arch.sie_block->gcr[0] & CR0_SERVICE_SIGNAL_SUBMASK)) {
 		__clear_bit(IRQ_PEND_EXT_SERVICE, &active_mask);
+		__clear_bit(IRQ_PEND_EXT_SERVICE_EV, &active_mask);
+	}
 	if (psw_mchk_disabled(vcpu))
 		active_mask &= ~IRQ_PEND_MCHK_MASK;
 	/* PV guest cpus can have a single interruption injected at a time. */
@@ -946,20 +951,49 @@ static int __must_check __deliver_prog(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	return rc ? -EFAULT : 0;
 }
 
+#define SCCB_MASK 0xFFFFFFF8
+#define SCCB_EVENT_PENDING 0x3
+
+static int write_sclp(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 parm)
+{
+	int rc;
+
+	if (kvm_s390_pv_cpu_get_handle(vcpu)) {
+		vcpu->arch.sie_block->iictl = IICTL_CODE_EXT;
+		vcpu->arch.sie_block->eic = EXT_IRQ_SERVICE_SIG;
+		vcpu->arch.sie_block->eiparams = parm;
+		return 0;
+	}
+
+	rc  = put_guest_lc(vcpu, EXT_IRQ_SERVICE_SIG, (u16 *)__LC_EXT_INT_CODE);
+	rc |= put_guest_lc(vcpu, 0, (u16 *)__LC_EXT_CPU_ADDR);
+	rc |= write_guest_lc(vcpu, __LC_EXT_OLD_PSW,
+			     &vcpu->arch.sie_block->gpsw, sizeof(psw_t));
+	rc |= read_guest_lc(vcpu, __LC_EXT_NEW_PSW,
+			    &vcpu->arch.sie_block->gpsw, sizeof(psw_t));
+	rc |= put_guest_lc(vcpu, parm,
+			   (u32 *)__LC_EXT_PARAMS);
+
+	return rc ? -EFAULT : 0;
+}
+
 static int __must_check __deliver_service(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 {
 	struct kvm_s390_float_interrupt *fi = &vcpu->kvm->arch.float_int;
 	struct kvm_s390_ext_info ext;
-	int rc = 0;
 
 	spin_lock(&fi->lock);
-	if (!(test_bit(IRQ_PEND_EXT_SERVICE, &fi->pending_irqs))) {
+	if (test_bit(IRQ_PEND_EXT_SERVICE, &fi->masked_irqs) ||
+	    !(test_bit(IRQ_PEND_EXT_SERVICE, &fi->pending_irqs))) {
 		spin_unlock(&fi->lock);
 		return 0;
 	}
 	ext = fi->srv_signal;
 	memset(&fi->srv_signal, 0, sizeof(ext));
 	clear_bit(IRQ_PEND_EXT_SERVICE, &fi->pending_irqs);
+	clear_bit(IRQ_PEND_EXT_SERVICE_EV, &fi->pending_irqs);
+	if (kvm_s390_pv_cpu_is_protected(vcpu))
+		set_bit(IRQ_PEND_EXT_SERVICE, &fi->masked_irqs);
 	spin_unlock(&fi->lock);
 
 	VCPU_EVENT(vcpu, 4, "deliver: sclp parameter 0x%x",
@@ -968,16 +1002,31 @@ static int __must_check __deliver_service(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	trace_kvm_s390_deliver_interrupt(vcpu->vcpu_id, KVM_S390_INT_SERVICE,
 					 ext.ext_params, 0);
 
-	rc  = put_guest_lc(vcpu, EXT_IRQ_SERVICE_SIG, (u16 *)__LC_EXT_INT_CODE);
-	rc |= put_guest_lc(vcpu, 0, (u16 *)__LC_EXT_CPU_ADDR);
-	rc |= write_guest_lc(vcpu, __LC_EXT_OLD_PSW,
-			     &vcpu->arch.sie_block->gpsw, sizeof(psw_t));
-	rc |= read_guest_lc(vcpu, __LC_EXT_NEW_PSW,
-			    &vcpu->arch.sie_block->gpsw, sizeof(psw_t));
-	rc |= put_guest_lc(vcpu, ext.ext_params,
-			   (u32 *)__LC_EXT_PARAMS);
+	return write_sclp(vcpu, ext.ext_params);
+}
 
-	return rc ? -EFAULT : 0;
+static int __must_check __deliver_service_ev(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+	struct kvm_s390_float_interrupt *fi = &vcpu->kvm->arch.float_int;
+	struct kvm_s390_ext_info ext;
+
+	spin_lock(&fi->lock);
+	if (!(test_bit(IRQ_PEND_EXT_SERVICE_EV, &fi->pending_irqs))) {
+		spin_unlock(&fi->lock);
+		return 0;
+	}
+	ext = fi->srv_signal;
+	/* only clear the event bit */
+	fi->srv_signal.ext_params &= ~SCCB_EVENT_PENDING;
+	clear_bit(IRQ_PEND_EXT_SERVICE_EV, &fi->pending_irqs);
+	spin_unlock(&fi->lock);
+
+	VCPU_EVENT(vcpu, 4, "%s", "deliver: sclp parameter event");
+	vcpu->stat.deliver_service_signal++;
+	trace_kvm_s390_deliver_interrupt(vcpu->vcpu_id, KVM_S390_INT_SERVICE,
+					 ext.ext_params, 0);
+
+	return write_sclp(vcpu, SCCB_EVENT_PENDING);
 }
 
 static int __must_check __deliver_pfault_done(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
@@ -1382,6 +1431,9 @@ int __must_check kvm_s390_deliver_pending_interrupts(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 		case IRQ_PEND_EXT_SERVICE:
 			rc = __deliver_service(vcpu);
 			break;
+		case IRQ_PEND_EXT_SERVICE_EV:
+			rc = __deliver_service_ev(vcpu);
+			break;
 		case IRQ_PEND_PFAULT_DONE:
 			rc = __deliver_pfault_done(vcpu);
 			break;
@@ -1734,9 +1786,6 @@ struct kvm_s390_interrupt_info *kvm_s390_get_io_int(struct kvm *kvm,
 	return inti;
 }
 
-#define SCCB_MASK 0xFFFFFFF8
-#define SCCB_EVENT_PENDING 0x3
-
 static int __inject_service(struct kvm *kvm,
 			     struct kvm_s390_interrupt_info *inti)
 {
@@ -1745,6 +1794,11 @@ static int __inject_service(struct kvm *kvm,
 	kvm->stat.inject_service_signal++;
 	spin_lock(&fi->lock);
 	fi->srv_signal.ext_params |= inti->ext.ext_params & SCCB_EVENT_PENDING;
+
+	/* We always allow events, track them separately from the sccb ints */
+	if (fi->srv_signal.ext_params & SCCB_EVENT_PENDING)
+		set_bit(IRQ_PEND_EXT_SERVICE_EV, &fi->pending_irqs);
+
 	/*
 	 * Early versions of the QEMU s390 bios will inject several
 	 * service interrupts after another without handling a
@@ -2141,6 +2195,10 @@ void kvm_s390_clear_float_irqs(struct kvm *kvm)
 	struct kvm_s390_float_interrupt *fi = &kvm->arch.float_int;
 	int i;
 
+	mutex_lock(&kvm->lock);
+	if (!kvm_s390_pv_is_protected(kvm))
+		fi->masked_irqs = 0;
+	mutex_unlock(&kvm->lock);
 	spin_lock(&fi->lock);
 	fi->pending_irqs = 0;
 	memset(&fi->srv_signal, 0, sizeof(fi->srv_signal));
@@ -2207,7 +2265,8 @@ static int get_all_floating_irqs(struct kvm *kvm, u8 __user *usrbuf, u64 len)
 			n++;
 		}
 	}
-	if (test_bit(IRQ_PEND_EXT_SERVICE, &fi->pending_irqs)) {
+	if (test_bit(IRQ_PEND_EXT_SERVICE, &fi->pending_irqs) ||
+	    test_bit(IRQ_PEND_EXT_SERVICE_EV, &fi->pending_irqs)) {
 		if (n == max_irqs) {
 			/* signal userspace to try again */
 			ret = -ENOMEM;
diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
index bf61f48e9a3d..2881151fd773 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
@@ -2247,6 +2247,9 @@ static int kvm_s390_handle_pv(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_pv_cmd *cmd)
 		r = kvm_s390_cpus_to_pv(kvm, &cmd->rc, &cmd->rrc);
 		if (r)
 			kvm_s390_pv_deinit_vm(kvm, &dummy, &dummy);
+
+		/* we need to block service interrupts from now on */
+		set_bit(IRQ_PEND_EXT_SERVICE, &kvm->arch.float_int.masked_irqs);
 		break;
 	}
 	case KVM_PV_DISABLE: {
@@ -2263,6 +2266,9 @@ static int kvm_s390_handle_pv(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_pv_cmd *cmd)
 		if (r)
 			break;
 		r = kvm_s390_pv_deinit_vm(kvm, &cmd->rc, &cmd->rrc);
+
+		/* no need to block service interrupts any more */
+		clear_bit(IRQ_PEND_EXT_SERVICE, &kvm->arch.float_int.masked_irqs);
 		break;
 	}
 	case KVM_PV_SET_SEC_PARMS: {
-- 
2.24.1

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-03-09  8:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-03-09  8:50 [GIT PULL 00/36] KVM: s390: Features and Enhancements for 5.7 part1 Christian Borntraeger
2020-03-09  8:50 ` [GIT PULL 01/36] s390/protvirt: introduce host side setup Christian Borntraeger
2020-03-09  8:50 ` [GIT PULL 02/36] s390/protvirt: add ultravisor initialization Christian Borntraeger
2020-03-09  8:50 ` [GIT PULL 03/36] s390/mm: provide memory management functions for protected KVM guests Christian Borntraeger
2020-03-09  8:50 ` [GIT PULL 04/36] s390/mm: add (non)secure page access exceptions handlers Christian Borntraeger
2020-03-09  8:50 ` [GIT PULL 05/36] s390/protvirt: Add sysfs firmware interface for Ultravisor information Christian Borntraeger
2020-03-09  8:50 ` [GIT PULL 06/36] KVM: s390/interrupt: do not pin adapter interrupt pages Christian Borntraeger
2020-03-09  8:50 ` [GIT PULL 07/36] KVM: s390: protvirt: Add UV debug trace Christian Borntraeger
2020-03-09  8:50 ` [GIT PULL 08/36] KVM: s390: add new variants of UV CALL Christian Borntraeger
2020-03-09  8:50 ` [GIT PULL 09/36] KVM: s390: protvirt: Add initial vm and cpu lifecycle handling Christian Borntraeger
2020-03-09  8:51 ` [GIT PULL 10/36] KVM: s390: protvirt: Secure memory is not mergeable Christian Borntraeger
2020-03-09  8:51 ` [GIT PULL 11/36] KVM: s390/mm: Make pages accessible before destroying the guest Christian Borntraeger
2020-03-09  8:51 ` [GIT PULL 12/36] KVM: s390: protvirt: Handle SE notification interceptions Christian Borntraeger
2020-03-09  8:51 ` [GIT PULL 13/36] KVM: s390: protvirt: Instruction emulation Christian Borntraeger
2020-03-09  8:51 ` [GIT PULL 14/36] KVM: s390: protvirt: Implement interrupt injection Christian Borntraeger
2020-03-09  8:51 ` Christian Borntraeger [this message]
2020-03-09  8:51 ` [GIT PULL 16/36] KVM: s390: protvirt: Handle spec exception loops Christian Borntraeger
2020-03-09  8:51 ` [GIT PULL 17/36] KVM: s390: protvirt: Add new gprs location handling Christian Borntraeger
2020-03-09  8:51 ` [GIT PULL 18/36] KVM: S390: protvirt: Introduce instruction data area bounce buffer Christian Borntraeger
2020-03-09  8:51 ` [GIT PULL 19/36] KVM: s390: protvirt: handle secure guest prefix pages Christian Borntraeger
2020-03-09  8:51 ` [GIT PULL 20/36] KVM: s390/mm: handle guest unpin events Christian Borntraeger
2020-03-09  8:51 ` [GIT PULL 21/36] KVM: s390: protvirt: Write sthyi data to instruction data area Christian Borntraeger
2020-03-09  8:51 ` [GIT PULL 22/36] KVM: s390: protvirt: STSI handling Christian Borntraeger
2020-03-09  8:51 ` [GIT PULL 23/36] KVM: s390: protvirt: disallow one_reg Christian Borntraeger
2020-03-09  8:51 ` [GIT PULL 24/36] KVM: s390: protvirt: Do only reset registers that are accessible Christian Borntraeger
2020-03-09  8:51 ` [GIT PULL 25/36] KVM: s390: protvirt: Only sync fmt4 registers Christian Borntraeger
2020-03-09  8:51 ` [GIT PULL 26/36] KVM: s390: protvirt: Add program exception injection Christian Borntraeger
2020-03-09  8:51 ` [GIT PULL 27/36] KVM: s390: protvirt: UV calls in support of diag308 0, 1 Christian Borntraeger
2020-03-09  8:51 ` [GIT PULL 28/36] KVM: s390: protvirt: Report CPU state to Ultravisor Christian Borntraeger
2020-03-09  8:51 ` [GIT PULL 29/36] KVM: s390: protvirt: Support cmd 5 operation state Christian Borntraeger
2020-03-09  8:51 ` [GIT PULL 30/36] KVM: s390: protvirt: Mask PSW interrupt bits for interception 104 and 112 Christian Borntraeger
2020-03-09  8:51 ` [GIT PULL 31/36] KVM: s390: protvirt: do not inject interrupts after start Christian Borntraeger
2020-03-09  8:51 ` [GIT PULL 32/36] KVM: s390: protvirt: Add UV cpu reset calls Christian Borntraeger
2020-03-09  8:51 ` [GIT PULL 33/36] DOCUMENTATION: Protected virtual machine introduction and IPL Christian Borntraeger
2020-03-09  8:51 ` [GIT PULL 34/36] KVM: s390: protvirt: introduce and enable KVM_CAP_S390_PROTECTED Christian Borntraeger
2020-03-09  8:51 ` [GIT PULL 35/36] KVM: s390: protvirt: Add KVM api documentation Christian Borntraeger
2020-03-09  8:51 ` [GIT PULL 36/36] KVM: s390: introduce module parameter kvm.use_gisa Christian Borntraeger
2020-03-10 16:21 ` [GIT PULL 00/36] KVM: s390: Features and Enhancements for 5.7 part1 Christian Borntraeger
2020-03-14 15:58 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-03-15 18:15   ` Paolo Bonzini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200309085126.3334302-16-borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --to=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=frankja@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mimu@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=uweigand@de.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.