All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 11/15] drm/i915: Export a preallocate variant of i915_active_acquire()
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2020 11:42:33 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200316114237.5436-11-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200316114237.5436-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>

Sometimes we have to be very careful not to allocate underneath a mutex
(or spinlock) and yet still want to track activity. Enter
i915_active_acquire_for_context(). This raises the activity counter on
i915_active prior to use and ensures that the fence-tree contains a slot
for the context.

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c | 107 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.h |   5 ++
 2 files changed, 103 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c
index c4048628188a..6bb09f3020e2 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c
@@ -217,11 +217,10 @@ excl_retire(struct dma_fence *fence, struct dma_fence_cb *cb)
 }
 
 static struct i915_active_fence *
-active_instance(struct i915_active *ref, struct intel_timeline *tl)
+active_instance(struct i915_active *ref, u64 idx)
 {
 	struct active_node *node, *prealloc;
 	struct rb_node **p, *parent;
-	u64 idx = tl->fence_context;
 
 	/*
 	 * We track the most recently used timeline to skip a rbtree search
@@ -367,7 +366,7 @@ int i915_active_ref(struct i915_active *ref,
 	if (err)
 		return err;
 
-	active = active_instance(ref, tl);
+	active = active_instance(ref, tl->fence_context);
 	if (!active) {
 		err = -ENOMEM;
 		goto out;
@@ -384,32 +383,104 @@ int i915_active_ref(struct i915_active *ref,
 		atomic_dec(&ref->count);
 	}
 	if (!__i915_active_fence_set(active, fence))
-		atomic_inc(&ref->count);
+		__i915_active_acquire(ref);
 
 out:
 	i915_active_release(ref);
 	return err;
 }
 
-struct dma_fence *
-i915_active_set_exclusive(struct i915_active *ref, struct dma_fence *f)
+static struct dma_fence *
+__i915_active_set_fence(struct i915_active *ref,
+			struct i915_active_fence *active,
+			struct dma_fence *fence)
 {
 	struct dma_fence *prev;
 
 	/* We expect the caller to manage the exclusive timeline ordering */
 	GEM_BUG_ON(i915_active_is_idle(ref));
 
+	if (is_barrier(active)) { /* proto-node used by our idle barrier */
+		/*
+		 * This request is on the kernel_context timeline, and so
+		 * we can use it to substitute for the pending idle-barrer
+		 * request that we want to emit on the kernel_context.
+		 */
+		__active_del_barrier(ref, node_from_active(active));
+		RCU_INIT_POINTER(active->fence, NULL);
+		atomic_dec(&ref->count);
+	}
+
 	rcu_read_lock();
-	prev = __i915_active_fence_set(&ref->excl, f);
+	prev = __i915_active_fence_set(active, fence);
 	if (prev)
 		prev = dma_fence_get_rcu(prev);
 	else
-		atomic_inc(&ref->count);
+		__i915_active_acquire(ref);
 	rcu_read_unlock();
 
 	return prev;
 }
 
+static struct i915_active_fence *
+__active_lookup(struct i915_active *ref, u64 idx)
+{
+	struct active_node *node;
+	struct rb_node *p;
+
+	/* Like active_instance() but with no malloc */
+
+	node = READ_ONCE(ref->cache);
+	if (node && node->timeline == idx)
+		return &node->base;
+
+	spin_lock_irq(&ref->tree_lock);
+	GEM_BUG_ON(i915_active_is_idle(ref));
+
+	p = ref->tree.rb_node;
+	while (p) {
+		node = rb_entry(p, struct active_node, node);
+		if (node->timeline == idx) {
+			ref->cache = node;
+			spin_unlock_irq(&ref->tree_lock);
+			return &node->base;
+		}
+
+		if (node->timeline < idx)
+			p = p->rb_right;
+		else
+			p = p->rb_left;
+	}
+
+	spin_unlock_irq(&ref->tree_lock);
+
+	return NULL;
+}
+
+struct dma_fence *
+__i915_active_ref(struct i915_active *ref, u64 idx, struct dma_fence *fence)
+{
+	struct dma_fence *prev = ERR_PTR(-ENOENT);
+	struct i915_active_fence *active;
+
+	if (!i915_active_acquire_if_busy(ref))
+		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
+
+	active = __active_lookup(ref, idx);
+	if (active)
+		prev = __i915_active_set_fence(ref, active, fence);
+
+	i915_active_release(ref);
+	return prev;
+}
+
+struct dma_fence *
+i915_active_set_exclusive(struct i915_active *ref, struct dma_fence *f)
+{
+	/* We expect the caller to manage the exclusive timeline ordering */
+	return __i915_active_set_fence(ref, &ref->excl, f);
+}
+
 bool i915_active_acquire_if_busy(struct i915_active *ref)
 {
 	debug_active_assert(ref);
@@ -443,6 +514,24 @@ int i915_active_acquire(struct i915_active *ref)
 	return err;
 }
 
+int i915_active_acquire_for_context(struct i915_active *ref, u64 idx)
+{
+	struct i915_active_fence *active;
+	int err;
+
+	err = i915_active_acquire(ref);
+	if (err)
+		return err;
+
+	active = active_instance(ref, idx);
+	if (!active) {
+		i915_active_release(ref);
+		return -ENOMEM;
+	}
+
+	return 0; /* return with active ref */
+}
+
 void i915_active_release(struct i915_active *ref)
 {
 	debug_active_assert(ref);
@@ -748,7 +837,7 @@ int i915_active_acquire_preallocate_barrier(struct i915_active *ref,
 			 */
 			RCU_INIT_POINTER(node->base.fence, ERR_PTR(-EAGAIN));
 			node->base.cb.node.prev = (void *)engine;
-			atomic_inc(&ref->count);
+			__i915_active_acquire(ref);
 		}
 		GEM_BUG_ON(rcu_access_pointer(node->base.fence) != ERR_PTR(-EAGAIN));
 
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.h
index b3282ae7913c..65a9c560483b 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.h
@@ -163,6 +163,9 @@ void __i915_active_init(struct i915_active *ref,
 	__i915_active_init(ref, active, retire, &__mkey, &__wkey);	\
 } while (0)
 
+struct dma_fence *
+__i915_active_ref(struct i915_active *ref, u64 idx, struct dma_fence *fence);
+
 int i915_active_ref(struct i915_active *ref,
 		    struct intel_timeline *tl,
 		    struct dma_fence *fence);
@@ -192,7 +195,9 @@ int i915_request_await_active(struct i915_request *rq,
 #define I915_ACTIVE_AWAIT_ALL BIT(0)
 
 int i915_active_acquire(struct i915_active *ref);
+int i915_active_acquire_for_context(struct i915_active *ref, u64 idx);
 bool i915_active_acquire_if_busy(struct i915_active *ref);
+
 void i915_active_release(struct i915_active *ref);
 
 static inline void __i915_active_acquire(struct i915_active *ref)
-- 
2.20.1

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-03-16 11:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-03-16 11:42 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/15] drm/i915: Move GGTT fence registers under gt/ Chris Wilson
2020-03-16 11:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 02/15] drm/i915/gt: Pull restoration of GGTT fences underneath the GT Chris Wilson
2020-03-16 11:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 03/15] drm/i915: Remove manual save/resume of fence register state Chris Wilson
2020-03-16 11:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/15] drm/i915/gt: Allocate i915_fence_reg array Chris Wilson
2020-03-16 11:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 05/15] drm/i915/gt: Only wait for GPU activity before unbinding a GGTT fence Chris Wilson
2020-03-16 11:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/15] drm/i915/gt: Store the fence details on the fence Chris Wilson
2020-03-16 11:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 07/15] drm/i915/gt: Make fence revocation unequivocal Chris Wilson
2020-03-16 11:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 08/15] drm/i915/gem: Drop cached obj->bind_count Chris Wilson
2020-03-16 11:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 09/15] drm/i915: Immediately execute the fenced work Chris Wilson
2020-03-16 11:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 10/15] drm/i915/gem: Assign context id for async work Chris Wilson
2020-03-16 11:42 ` Chris Wilson [this message]
2020-03-16 11:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 12/15] drm/i915/gem: Split eb_vma into its own allocation Chris Wilson
2020-03-16 11:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 13/15] drm/i915/gem: Separate the ww_mutex walker into its own list Chris Wilson
2020-03-16 11:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 14/15] drm/i915/gem: Asynchronous GTT unbinding Chris Wilson
2020-03-16 11:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 15/15] drm/i915/gem: Bind the fence async for execbuf Chris Wilson
2020-03-16 20:34 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for series starting with [01/15] drm/i915: Move GGTT fence registers under gt/ Patchwork
2020-03-16 20:54 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.DOCS: " Patchwork
2020-03-16 21:02 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200316114237.5436-11-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
    --to=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.