All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Adalbert Lazăr" <alazar@bitdefender.com>
To: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	"Adalbert Lazăr" <alazar@bitdefender.com>
Subject: [PATCH v8 41/81] KVM: introspection: add the read/dispatch message function
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2020 13:12:28 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200330101308.21702-42-alazar@bitdefender.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200330101308.21702-1-alazar@bitdefender.com>

Based on the common header (struct kvmi_msg_hdr), the receiving thread
will read/validate all messages, execute the VM introspection commands
(eg. KVMI_VM_GET_INFO) and dispatch the vCPU introspection commands
(eg. KVMI_VCPU_GET_REGISTERS) and the replies to vCPU events.

The vCPU threads will reply to vCPU introspection commands without the
help of the receiving thread.

This thread will end when the socket is closed (by userspace or the
introspection tool) or on the first API error (eg. wrong message size).

Signed-off-by: Adalbert Lazăr <alazar@bitdefender.com>
---
 Documentation/virt/kvm/kvmi.rst               |  86 ++++++++++
 include/uapi/linux/kvmi.h                     |  22 +++
 .../testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/kvmi_test.c  |  98 ++++++++++++
 virt/kvm/introspection/kvmi.c                 |  38 ++++-
 virt/kvm/introspection/kvmi_int.h             |   4 +
 virt/kvm/introspection/kvmi_msg.c             | 149 +++++++++++++++++-
 6 files changed, 395 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/virt/kvm/kvmi.rst b/Documentation/virt/kvm/kvmi.rst
index 2ee37c03585a..efde4b771586 100644
--- a/Documentation/virt/kvm/kvmi.rst
+++ b/Documentation/virt/kvm/kvmi.rst
@@ -65,6 +65,85 @@ used on that guest. Obviously, whether the guest can really continue
 normal execution depends on whether the introspection tool has made any
 modifications that require an active KVMI channel.
 
+All messages (commands or events) have a common header::
+
+	struct kvmi_msg_hdr {
+		__u16 id;
+		__u16 size;
+		__u32 seq;
+	};
+
+The replies have the same header, with the sequence number (``seq``)
+and message id (``id``) matching the command/event.
+
+After ``kvmi_msg_hdr``, ``id`` specific data of ``size`` bytes will
+follow.
+
+The message header and its data must be sent with one ``sendmsg()`` call
+to the socket. This simplifies the receiver loop and avoids
+the reconstruction of messages on the other side.
+
+The wire protocol uses the host native byte-order. The introspection tool
+must check this during the handshake and do the necessary conversion.
+
+A command reply begins with::
+
+	struct kvmi_error_code {
+		__s32 err;
+		__u32 padding;
+	}
+
+followed by the command specific data if the error code ``err`` is zero.
+
+The error code -KVM_ENOSYS is returned for unsupported commands.
+
+The error code -KVM_EPERM is returned for disallowed commands (see **Hooking**).
+
+The error code is related to the message processing, including unsupported
+commands. For all the other errors (incomplete messages, wrong sequence
+numbers, socket errors etc.) the socket will be closed. The device
+manager should reconnect.
+
+While all commands will have a reply as soon as possible, the replies
+to events will probably be delayed until a set of (new) commands will
+complete::
+
+   Host kernel               Tool
+   -----------               ----
+   event 1 ->
+                             <- command 1
+   command 1 reply ->
+                             <- command 2
+   command 2 reply ->
+                             <- event 1 reply
+
+If both ends send a message at the same time::
+
+   Host kernel               Tool
+   -----------               ----
+   event X ->                <- command X
+
+the host kernel will reply to 'command X', regardless of the receive time
+(before or after the 'event X' was sent).
+
+As it can be seen below, the wire protocol specifies occasional padding. This
+is to permit working with the data by directly using C structures or to round
+the structure size to a multiple of 8 bytes (64bit) to improve the copy
+operations that happen during ``recvmsg()`` or ``sendmsg()``. The members
+should have the native alignment of the host (4 bytes on x86). All padding
+must be initialized with zero otherwise the respective commands will fail
+with -KVM_EINVAL.
+
+To describe the commands/events, we reuse some conventions from api.txt:
+
+  - Architectures: which instruction set architectures provide this command/event
+
+  - Versions: which versions provide this command/event
+
+  - Parameters: incoming message data
+
+  - Returns: outgoing/reply message data
+
 Handshake
 ---------
 
@@ -99,6 +178,13 @@ In the end, the device manager will pass the file handle (plus the allowed
 commands/events) to KVM. It will detect when the socket is shutdown
 and it will reinitiate the handshake.
 
+Once the file handle reaches KVM, the introspection tool should
+use the *KVMI_GET_VERSION* command to get the API version and/or the
+*KVMI_VM_CHECK_COMMAND* and *KVMI_VM_CHECK_EVENT* commands to see which
+commands/events are allowed for this guest. The error code -KVM_EPERM
+will be returned if the introspection tool uses a command or enables an
+event which is disallowed.
+
 Unhooking
 ---------
 
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/kvmi.h b/include/uapi/linux/kvmi.h
index d7b18ffef4fa..6fdaa92393a4 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/kvmi.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/kvmi.h
@@ -18,4 +18,26 @@ enum {
 	KVMI_NUM_EVENTS
 };
 
+struct kvmi_msg_hdr {
+	__u16 id;
+	__u16 size;
+	__u32 seq;
+};
+
+/*
+ * kvmi_msg_hdr.size is limited to KVMI_MSG_SIZE.
+ * The kernel side will close the socket if userspace
+ * uses a bigger value.
+ * This limit is used to accommodate the biggest known message,
+ * the commands to read/write a 4K page from/to guest memory.
+ */
+enum {
+	KVMI_MSG_SIZE = (4096 * 2 - sizeof(struct kvmi_msg_hdr))
+};
+
+struct kvmi_error_code {
+	__s32 err;
+	__u32 padding;
+};
+
 #endif /* _UAPI__LINUX_KVMI_H */
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/kvmi_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/kvmi_test.c
index d1d02e067393..4c1fe67c8e35 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/kvmi_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/kvmi_test.c
@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
 #include "processor.h"
 #include "../lib/kvm_util_internal.h"
 
+#include "linux/kvm_para.h"
 #include "linux/kvmi.h"
 
 #define VCPU_ID         5
@@ -82,10 +83,107 @@ static void unhook_introspection(struct kvm_vm *vm)
 		errno, strerror(errno));
 }
 
+static void receive_data(void *dest, size_t size)
+{
+	ssize_t r;
+
+	r = recv(Userspace_socket, dest, size, MSG_WAITALL);
+	TEST_ASSERT(r == size,
+		"recv() failed, expected %d, result %d, errno %d (%s)\n",
+		size, r, errno, strerror(errno));
+}
+
+static int receive_cmd_reply(struct kvmi_msg_hdr *req, void *rpl,
+			     size_t rpl_size)
+{
+	struct kvmi_msg_hdr hdr;
+	struct kvmi_error_code ec;
+
+	receive_data(&hdr, sizeof(hdr));
+
+	TEST_ASSERT(hdr.seq == req->seq,
+		"Unexpected messages sequence 0x%x, expected 0x%x\n",
+		hdr.seq, req->seq);
+
+	TEST_ASSERT(hdr.size >= sizeof(ec),
+		"Invalid message size %d, expected %d bytes (at least)\n",
+		hdr.size, sizeof(ec));
+
+	receive_data(&ec, sizeof(ec));
+
+	if (ec.err) {
+		TEST_ASSERT(hdr.size == sizeof(ec),
+			"Invalid command reply on error\n");
+	} else {
+		TEST_ASSERT(hdr.size == sizeof(ec) + rpl_size,
+			"Invalid command reply\n");
+
+		if (rpl && rpl_size)
+			receive_data(rpl, rpl_size);
+	}
+
+	return ec.err;
+}
+
+static unsigned int new_seq(void)
+{
+	static unsigned int seq;
+
+	return seq++;
+}
+
+static void send_message(int msg_id, struct kvmi_msg_hdr *hdr, size_t size)
+{
+	ssize_t r;
+
+	hdr->id = msg_id;
+	hdr->seq = new_seq();
+	hdr->size = size - sizeof(*hdr);
+
+	r = send(Userspace_socket, hdr, size, 0);
+	TEST_ASSERT(r == size,
+		"send() failed, sending %d, result %d, errno %d (%s)\n",
+		size, r, errno, strerror(errno));
+}
+
+static const char *kvm_strerror(int error)
+{
+	switch (error) {
+	case KVM_ENOSYS:
+		return "Invalid system call number";
+	case KVM_EOPNOTSUPP:
+		return "Operation not supported on transport endpoint";
+	default:
+		return strerror(error);
+	}
+}
+
+static int do_command(int cmd_id, struct kvmi_msg_hdr *req,
+		      size_t req_size, void *rpl, size_t rpl_size)
+{
+	send_message(cmd_id, req, req_size);
+	return receive_cmd_reply(req, rpl, rpl_size);
+}
+
+static void test_cmd_invalid(void)
+{
+	int invalid_msg_id = 0xffff;
+	struct kvmi_msg_hdr req;
+	int r;
+
+	r = do_command(invalid_msg_id, &req, sizeof(req), NULL, 0);
+	TEST_ASSERT(r == -KVM_ENOSYS,
+		"Invalid command didn't failed with KVM_ENOSYS, error %d (%s)\n",
+		-r, kvm_strerror(-r));
+}
+
 static void test_introspection(struct kvm_vm *vm)
 {
 	setup_socket();
 	hook_introspection(vm);
+
+	test_cmd_invalid();
+
 	unhook_introspection(vm);
 }
 
diff --git a/virt/kvm/introspection/kvmi.c b/virt/kvm/introspection/kvmi.c
index 95b08a40d814..88d29408fbf1 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/introspection/kvmi.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/introspection/kvmi.c
@@ -8,13 +8,49 @@
 #include "kvmi_int.h"
 #include <linux/kthread.h>
 
+#define KVMI_MSG_SIZE_ALLOC (sizeof(struct kvmi_msg_hdr) + KVMI_MSG_SIZE)
+
+static struct kmem_cache *msg_cache;
+
+void *kvmi_msg_alloc(void)
+{
+	return kmem_cache_zalloc(msg_cache, GFP_KERNEL);
+}
+
+void kvmi_msg_free(void *addr)
+{
+	if (addr)
+		kmem_cache_free(msg_cache, addr);
+}
+
+static void kvmi_cache_destroy(void)
+{
+	kmem_cache_destroy(msg_cache);
+	msg_cache = NULL;
+}
+
+static int kvmi_cache_create(void)
+{
+	msg_cache = kmem_cache_create("kvmi_msg", KVMI_MSG_SIZE_ALLOC,
+				      4096, SLAB_ACCOUNT, NULL);
+
+	if (!msg_cache) {
+		kvmi_cache_destroy();
+
+		return -1;
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 int kvmi_init(void)
 {
-	return 0;
+	return kvmi_cache_create();
 }
 
 void kvmi_uninit(void)
 {
+	kvmi_cache_destroy();
 }
 
 static void free_kvmi(struct kvm *kvm)
diff --git a/virt/kvm/introspection/kvmi_int.h b/virt/kvm/introspection/kvmi_int.h
index 1c9cc15ab4d9..36f5e504e791 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/introspection/kvmi_int.h
+++ b/virt/kvm/introspection/kvmi_int.h
@@ -24,4 +24,8 @@ void kvmi_sock_shutdown(struct kvm_introspection *kvmi);
 void kvmi_sock_put(struct kvm_introspection *kvmi);
 bool kvmi_msg_process(struct kvm_introspection *kvmi);
 
+/* kvmi.c */
+void *kvmi_msg_alloc(void);
+void kvmi_msg_free(void *addr);
+
 #endif
diff --git a/virt/kvm/introspection/kvmi_msg.c b/virt/kvm/introspection/kvmi_msg.c
index f9e66274fb43..02fc5d95fef6 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/introspection/kvmi_msg.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/introspection/kvmi_msg.c
@@ -33,7 +33,154 @@ void kvmi_sock_shutdown(struct kvm_introspection *kvmi)
 	kernel_sock_shutdown(kvmi->sock, SHUT_RDWR);
 }
 
+static int kvmi_sock_read(struct kvm_introspection *kvmi, void *buf,
+			  size_t size)
+{
+	struct kvec i = {
+		.iov_base = buf,
+		.iov_len = size,
+	};
+	struct msghdr m = { };
+	int rc;
+
+	rc = kernel_recvmsg(kvmi->sock, &m, &i, 1, size, MSG_WAITALL);
+
+	if (unlikely(rc != size && rc >= 0))
+		rc = -EPIPE;
+
+	return rc >= 0 ? 0 : rc;
+}
+
+static int kvmi_sock_write(struct kvm_introspection *kvmi, struct kvec *i,
+			   size_t n, size_t size)
+{
+	struct msghdr m = { };
+	int rc;
+
+	rc = kernel_sendmsg(kvmi->sock, &m, i, n, size);
+
+	if (unlikely(rc != size && rc >= 0))
+		rc = -EPIPE;
+
+	return rc >= 0 ? 0 : rc;
+}
+
+static int kvmi_msg_reply(struct kvm_introspection *kvmi,
+			  const struct kvmi_msg_hdr *msg, int err,
+			  const void *rpl, size_t rpl_size)
+{
+	struct kvmi_error_code ec;
+	struct kvmi_msg_hdr h;
+	struct kvec vec[3] = {
+		{ .iov_base = &h, .iov_len = sizeof(h) },
+		{ .iov_base = &ec, .iov_len = sizeof(ec) },
+		{ .iov_base = (void *)rpl, .iov_len = rpl_size },
+	};
+	size_t size = sizeof(h) + sizeof(ec) + (err ? 0 : rpl_size);
+	size_t n = err ? ARRAY_SIZE(vec) - 1 : ARRAY_SIZE(vec);
+
+	memset(&h, 0, sizeof(h));
+	h.id = msg->id;
+	h.seq = msg->seq;
+	h.size = size - sizeof(h);
+
+	memset(&ec, 0, sizeof(ec));
+	ec.err = err;
+
+	return kvmi_sock_write(kvmi, vec, n, size);
+}
+
+static int kvmi_msg_vm_reply(struct kvm_introspection *kvmi,
+			     const struct kvmi_msg_hdr *msg,
+			     int err, const void *rpl,
+			     size_t rpl_size)
+{
+	return kvmi_msg_reply(kvmi, msg, err, rpl, rpl_size);
+}
+
+static bool is_command_allowed(struct kvm_introspection *kvmi, u16 id)
+{
+	return id < KVMI_NUM_COMMANDS && test_bit(id, kvmi->cmd_allow_mask);
+}
+
+/*
+ * These commands are executed by the receiving thread/worker.
+ */
+static int(*const msg_vm[])(struct kvm_introspection *,
+			    const struct kvmi_msg_hdr *, const void *) = {
+};
+
+static bool is_vm_command(u16 id)
+{
+	return id < ARRAY_SIZE(msg_vm) && !!msg_vm[id];
+}
+
+static struct kvmi_msg_hdr *kvmi_msg_recv(struct kvm_introspection *kvmi)
+{
+	struct kvmi_msg_hdr *msg;
+	int err;
+
+	msg = kvmi_msg_alloc();
+	if (!msg)
+		goto out_err;
+
+	err = kvmi_sock_read(kvmi, msg, sizeof(*msg));
+	if (err)
+		goto out_err;
+
+	if (msg->size) {
+		if (msg->size > KVMI_MSG_SIZE)
+			goto out_err;
+
+		err = kvmi_sock_read(kvmi, msg + 1, msg->size);
+		if (err)
+			goto out_err;
+	}
+
+	return msg;
+
+out_err:
+	kvmi_msg_free(msg);
+
+	return NULL;
+}
+
+static int kvmi_msg_dispatch_vm_cmd(struct kvm_introspection *kvmi,
+				    const struct kvmi_msg_hdr *msg)
+{
+	return msg_vm[msg->id](kvmi, msg, msg + 1);
+}
+
+static bool is_message_allowed(struct kvm_introspection *kvmi, u16 id)
+{
+	return is_command_allowed(kvmi, id);
+}
+
+static int kvmi_msg_vm_reply_ec(struct kvm_introspection *kvmi,
+				const struct kvmi_msg_hdr *msg, int ec)
+{
+	return kvmi_msg_vm_reply(kvmi, msg, ec, NULL, 0);
+}
+
 bool kvmi_msg_process(struct kvm_introspection *kvmi)
 {
-	return false;
+	struct kvmi_msg_hdr *msg;
+	int err = -1;
+
+	msg = kvmi_msg_recv(kvmi);
+	if (!msg)
+		goto out;
+
+	if (is_vm_command(msg->id)) {
+		if (is_message_allowed(kvmi, msg->id))
+			err = kvmi_msg_dispatch_vm_cmd(kvmi, msg);
+		else
+			err = kvmi_msg_vm_reply_ec(kvmi, msg, -KVM_EPERM);
+	} else {
+		err = kvmi_msg_vm_reply_ec(kvmi, msg, -KVM_ENOSYS);
+	}
+
+	kvmi_msg_free(msg);
+out:
+	return err == 0;
 }

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Adalbert Lazăr" <alazar@bitdefender.com>
To: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Adalbert Lazăr" <alazar@bitdefender.com>,
	"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: [PATCH v8 41/81] KVM: introspection: add the read/dispatch message function
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2020 13:12:28 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200330101308.21702-42-alazar@bitdefender.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200330101308.21702-1-alazar@bitdefender.com>

Based on the common header (struct kvmi_msg_hdr), the receiving thread
will read/validate all messages, execute the VM introspection commands
(eg. KVMI_VM_GET_INFO) and dispatch the vCPU introspection commands
(eg. KVMI_VCPU_GET_REGISTERS) and the replies to vCPU events.

The vCPU threads will reply to vCPU introspection commands without the
help of the receiving thread.

This thread will end when the socket is closed (by userspace or the
introspection tool) or on the first API error (eg. wrong message size).

Signed-off-by: Adalbert Lazăr <alazar@bitdefender.com>
---
 Documentation/virt/kvm/kvmi.rst               |  86 ++++++++++
 include/uapi/linux/kvmi.h                     |  22 +++
 .../testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/kvmi_test.c  |  98 ++++++++++++
 virt/kvm/introspection/kvmi.c                 |  38 ++++-
 virt/kvm/introspection/kvmi_int.h             |   4 +
 virt/kvm/introspection/kvmi_msg.c             | 149 +++++++++++++++++-
 6 files changed, 395 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/virt/kvm/kvmi.rst b/Documentation/virt/kvm/kvmi.rst
index 2ee37c03585a..efde4b771586 100644
--- a/Documentation/virt/kvm/kvmi.rst
+++ b/Documentation/virt/kvm/kvmi.rst
@@ -65,6 +65,85 @@ used on that guest. Obviously, whether the guest can really continue
 normal execution depends on whether the introspection tool has made any
 modifications that require an active KVMI channel.
 
+All messages (commands or events) have a common header::
+
+	struct kvmi_msg_hdr {
+		__u16 id;
+		__u16 size;
+		__u32 seq;
+	};
+
+The replies have the same header, with the sequence number (``seq``)
+and message id (``id``) matching the command/event.
+
+After ``kvmi_msg_hdr``, ``id`` specific data of ``size`` bytes will
+follow.
+
+The message header and its data must be sent with one ``sendmsg()`` call
+to the socket. This simplifies the receiver loop and avoids
+the reconstruction of messages on the other side.
+
+The wire protocol uses the host native byte-order. The introspection tool
+must check this during the handshake and do the necessary conversion.
+
+A command reply begins with::
+
+	struct kvmi_error_code {
+		__s32 err;
+		__u32 padding;
+	}
+
+followed by the command specific data if the error code ``err`` is zero.
+
+The error code -KVM_ENOSYS is returned for unsupported commands.
+
+The error code -KVM_EPERM is returned for disallowed commands (see **Hooking**).
+
+The error code is related to the message processing, including unsupported
+commands. For all the other errors (incomplete messages, wrong sequence
+numbers, socket errors etc.) the socket will be closed. The device
+manager should reconnect.
+
+While all commands will have a reply as soon as possible, the replies
+to events will probably be delayed until a set of (new) commands will
+complete::
+
+   Host kernel               Tool
+   -----------               ----
+   event 1 ->
+                             <- command 1
+   command 1 reply ->
+                             <- command 2
+   command 2 reply ->
+                             <- event 1 reply
+
+If both ends send a message at the same time::
+
+   Host kernel               Tool
+   -----------               ----
+   event X ->                <- command X
+
+the host kernel will reply to 'command X', regardless of the receive time
+(before or after the 'event X' was sent).
+
+As it can be seen below, the wire protocol specifies occasional padding. This
+is to permit working with the data by directly using C structures or to round
+the structure size to a multiple of 8 bytes (64bit) to improve the copy
+operations that happen during ``recvmsg()`` or ``sendmsg()``. The members
+should have the native alignment of the host (4 bytes on x86). All padding
+must be initialized with zero otherwise the respective commands will fail
+with -KVM_EINVAL.
+
+To describe the commands/events, we reuse some conventions from api.txt:
+
+  - Architectures: which instruction set architectures provide this command/event
+
+  - Versions: which versions provide this command/event
+
+  - Parameters: incoming message data
+
+  - Returns: outgoing/reply message data
+
 Handshake
 ---------
 
@@ -99,6 +178,13 @@ In the end, the device manager will pass the file handle (plus the allowed
 commands/events) to KVM. It will detect when the socket is shutdown
 and it will reinitiate the handshake.
 
+Once the file handle reaches KVM, the introspection tool should
+use the *KVMI_GET_VERSION* command to get the API version and/or the
+*KVMI_VM_CHECK_COMMAND* and *KVMI_VM_CHECK_EVENT* commands to see which
+commands/events are allowed for this guest. The error code -KVM_EPERM
+will be returned if the introspection tool uses a command or enables an
+event which is disallowed.
+
 Unhooking
 ---------
 
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/kvmi.h b/include/uapi/linux/kvmi.h
index d7b18ffef4fa..6fdaa92393a4 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/kvmi.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/kvmi.h
@@ -18,4 +18,26 @@ enum {
 	KVMI_NUM_EVENTS
 };
 
+struct kvmi_msg_hdr {
+	__u16 id;
+	__u16 size;
+	__u32 seq;
+};
+
+/*
+ * kvmi_msg_hdr.size is limited to KVMI_MSG_SIZE.
+ * The kernel side will close the socket if userspace
+ * uses a bigger value.
+ * This limit is used to accommodate the biggest known message,
+ * the commands to read/write a 4K page from/to guest memory.
+ */
+enum {
+	KVMI_MSG_SIZE = (4096 * 2 - sizeof(struct kvmi_msg_hdr))
+};
+
+struct kvmi_error_code {
+	__s32 err;
+	__u32 padding;
+};
+
 #endif /* _UAPI__LINUX_KVMI_H */
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/kvmi_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/kvmi_test.c
index d1d02e067393..4c1fe67c8e35 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/kvmi_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/kvmi_test.c
@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
 #include "processor.h"
 #include "../lib/kvm_util_internal.h"
 
+#include "linux/kvm_para.h"
 #include "linux/kvmi.h"
 
 #define VCPU_ID         5
@@ -82,10 +83,107 @@ static void unhook_introspection(struct kvm_vm *vm)
 		errno, strerror(errno));
 }
 
+static void receive_data(void *dest, size_t size)
+{
+	ssize_t r;
+
+	r = recv(Userspace_socket, dest, size, MSG_WAITALL);
+	TEST_ASSERT(r == size,
+		"recv() failed, expected %d, result %d, errno %d (%s)\n",
+		size, r, errno, strerror(errno));
+}
+
+static int receive_cmd_reply(struct kvmi_msg_hdr *req, void *rpl,
+			     size_t rpl_size)
+{
+	struct kvmi_msg_hdr hdr;
+	struct kvmi_error_code ec;
+
+	receive_data(&hdr, sizeof(hdr));
+
+	TEST_ASSERT(hdr.seq == req->seq,
+		"Unexpected messages sequence 0x%x, expected 0x%x\n",
+		hdr.seq, req->seq);
+
+	TEST_ASSERT(hdr.size >= sizeof(ec),
+		"Invalid message size %d, expected %d bytes (at least)\n",
+		hdr.size, sizeof(ec));
+
+	receive_data(&ec, sizeof(ec));
+
+	if (ec.err) {
+		TEST_ASSERT(hdr.size == sizeof(ec),
+			"Invalid command reply on error\n");
+	} else {
+		TEST_ASSERT(hdr.size == sizeof(ec) + rpl_size,
+			"Invalid command reply\n");
+
+		if (rpl && rpl_size)
+			receive_data(rpl, rpl_size);
+	}
+
+	return ec.err;
+}
+
+static unsigned int new_seq(void)
+{
+	static unsigned int seq;
+
+	return seq++;
+}
+
+static void send_message(int msg_id, struct kvmi_msg_hdr *hdr, size_t size)
+{
+	ssize_t r;
+
+	hdr->id = msg_id;
+	hdr->seq = new_seq();
+	hdr->size = size - sizeof(*hdr);
+
+	r = send(Userspace_socket, hdr, size, 0);
+	TEST_ASSERT(r == size,
+		"send() failed, sending %d, result %d, errno %d (%s)\n",
+		size, r, errno, strerror(errno));
+}
+
+static const char *kvm_strerror(int error)
+{
+	switch (error) {
+	case KVM_ENOSYS:
+		return "Invalid system call number";
+	case KVM_EOPNOTSUPP:
+		return "Operation not supported on transport endpoint";
+	default:
+		return strerror(error);
+	}
+}
+
+static int do_command(int cmd_id, struct kvmi_msg_hdr *req,
+		      size_t req_size, void *rpl, size_t rpl_size)
+{
+	send_message(cmd_id, req, req_size);
+	return receive_cmd_reply(req, rpl, rpl_size);
+}
+
+static void test_cmd_invalid(void)
+{
+	int invalid_msg_id = 0xffff;
+	struct kvmi_msg_hdr req;
+	int r;
+
+	r = do_command(invalid_msg_id, &req, sizeof(req), NULL, 0);
+	TEST_ASSERT(r == -KVM_ENOSYS,
+		"Invalid command didn't failed with KVM_ENOSYS, error %d (%s)\n",
+		-r, kvm_strerror(-r));
+}
+
 static void test_introspection(struct kvm_vm *vm)
 {
 	setup_socket();
 	hook_introspection(vm);
+
+	test_cmd_invalid();
+
 	unhook_introspection(vm);
 }
 
diff --git a/virt/kvm/introspection/kvmi.c b/virt/kvm/introspection/kvmi.c
index 95b08a40d814..88d29408fbf1 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/introspection/kvmi.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/introspection/kvmi.c
@@ -8,13 +8,49 @@
 #include "kvmi_int.h"
 #include <linux/kthread.h>
 
+#define KVMI_MSG_SIZE_ALLOC (sizeof(struct kvmi_msg_hdr) + KVMI_MSG_SIZE)
+
+static struct kmem_cache *msg_cache;
+
+void *kvmi_msg_alloc(void)
+{
+	return kmem_cache_zalloc(msg_cache, GFP_KERNEL);
+}
+
+void kvmi_msg_free(void *addr)
+{
+	if (addr)
+		kmem_cache_free(msg_cache, addr);
+}
+
+static void kvmi_cache_destroy(void)
+{
+	kmem_cache_destroy(msg_cache);
+	msg_cache = NULL;
+}
+
+static int kvmi_cache_create(void)
+{
+	msg_cache = kmem_cache_create("kvmi_msg", KVMI_MSG_SIZE_ALLOC,
+				      4096, SLAB_ACCOUNT, NULL);
+
+	if (!msg_cache) {
+		kvmi_cache_destroy();
+
+		return -1;
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 int kvmi_init(void)
 {
-	return 0;
+	return kvmi_cache_create();
 }
 
 void kvmi_uninit(void)
 {
+	kvmi_cache_destroy();
 }
 
 static void free_kvmi(struct kvm *kvm)
diff --git a/virt/kvm/introspection/kvmi_int.h b/virt/kvm/introspection/kvmi_int.h
index 1c9cc15ab4d9..36f5e504e791 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/introspection/kvmi_int.h
+++ b/virt/kvm/introspection/kvmi_int.h
@@ -24,4 +24,8 @@ void kvmi_sock_shutdown(struct kvm_introspection *kvmi);
 void kvmi_sock_put(struct kvm_introspection *kvmi);
 bool kvmi_msg_process(struct kvm_introspection *kvmi);
 
+/* kvmi.c */
+void *kvmi_msg_alloc(void);
+void kvmi_msg_free(void *addr);
+
 #endif
diff --git a/virt/kvm/introspection/kvmi_msg.c b/virt/kvm/introspection/kvmi_msg.c
index f9e66274fb43..02fc5d95fef6 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/introspection/kvmi_msg.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/introspection/kvmi_msg.c
@@ -33,7 +33,154 @@ void kvmi_sock_shutdown(struct kvm_introspection *kvmi)
 	kernel_sock_shutdown(kvmi->sock, SHUT_RDWR);
 }
 
+static int kvmi_sock_read(struct kvm_introspection *kvmi, void *buf,
+			  size_t size)
+{
+	struct kvec i = {
+		.iov_base = buf,
+		.iov_len = size,
+	};
+	struct msghdr m = { };
+	int rc;
+
+	rc = kernel_recvmsg(kvmi->sock, &m, &i, 1, size, MSG_WAITALL);
+
+	if (unlikely(rc != size && rc >= 0))
+		rc = -EPIPE;
+
+	return rc >= 0 ? 0 : rc;
+}
+
+static int kvmi_sock_write(struct kvm_introspection *kvmi, struct kvec *i,
+			   size_t n, size_t size)
+{
+	struct msghdr m = { };
+	int rc;
+
+	rc = kernel_sendmsg(kvmi->sock, &m, i, n, size);
+
+	if (unlikely(rc != size && rc >= 0))
+		rc = -EPIPE;
+
+	return rc >= 0 ? 0 : rc;
+}
+
+static int kvmi_msg_reply(struct kvm_introspection *kvmi,
+			  const struct kvmi_msg_hdr *msg, int err,
+			  const void *rpl, size_t rpl_size)
+{
+	struct kvmi_error_code ec;
+	struct kvmi_msg_hdr h;
+	struct kvec vec[3] = {
+		{ .iov_base = &h, .iov_len = sizeof(h) },
+		{ .iov_base = &ec, .iov_len = sizeof(ec) },
+		{ .iov_base = (void *)rpl, .iov_len = rpl_size },
+	};
+	size_t size = sizeof(h) + sizeof(ec) + (err ? 0 : rpl_size);
+	size_t n = err ? ARRAY_SIZE(vec) - 1 : ARRAY_SIZE(vec);
+
+	memset(&h, 0, sizeof(h));
+	h.id = msg->id;
+	h.seq = msg->seq;
+	h.size = size - sizeof(h);
+
+	memset(&ec, 0, sizeof(ec));
+	ec.err = err;
+
+	return kvmi_sock_write(kvmi, vec, n, size);
+}
+
+static int kvmi_msg_vm_reply(struct kvm_introspection *kvmi,
+			     const struct kvmi_msg_hdr *msg,
+			     int err, const void *rpl,
+			     size_t rpl_size)
+{
+	return kvmi_msg_reply(kvmi, msg, err, rpl, rpl_size);
+}
+
+static bool is_command_allowed(struct kvm_introspection *kvmi, u16 id)
+{
+	return id < KVMI_NUM_COMMANDS && test_bit(id, kvmi->cmd_allow_mask);
+}
+
+/*
+ * These commands are executed by the receiving thread/worker.
+ */
+static int(*const msg_vm[])(struct kvm_introspection *,
+			    const struct kvmi_msg_hdr *, const void *) = {
+};
+
+static bool is_vm_command(u16 id)
+{
+	return id < ARRAY_SIZE(msg_vm) && !!msg_vm[id];
+}
+
+static struct kvmi_msg_hdr *kvmi_msg_recv(struct kvm_introspection *kvmi)
+{
+	struct kvmi_msg_hdr *msg;
+	int err;
+
+	msg = kvmi_msg_alloc();
+	if (!msg)
+		goto out_err;
+
+	err = kvmi_sock_read(kvmi, msg, sizeof(*msg));
+	if (err)
+		goto out_err;
+
+	if (msg->size) {
+		if (msg->size > KVMI_MSG_SIZE)
+			goto out_err;
+
+		err = kvmi_sock_read(kvmi, msg + 1, msg->size);
+		if (err)
+			goto out_err;
+	}
+
+	return msg;
+
+out_err:
+	kvmi_msg_free(msg);
+
+	return NULL;
+}
+
+static int kvmi_msg_dispatch_vm_cmd(struct kvm_introspection *kvmi,
+				    const struct kvmi_msg_hdr *msg)
+{
+	return msg_vm[msg->id](kvmi, msg, msg + 1);
+}
+
+static bool is_message_allowed(struct kvm_introspection *kvmi, u16 id)
+{
+	return is_command_allowed(kvmi, id);
+}
+
+static int kvmi_msg_vm_reply_ec(struct kvm_introspection *kvmi,
+				const struct kvmi_msg_hdr *msg, int ec)
+{
+	return kvmi_msg_vm_reply(kvmi, msg, ec, NULL, 0);
+}
+
 bool kvmi_msg_process(struct kvm_introspection *kvmi)
 {
-	return false;
+	struct kvmi_msg_hdr *msg;
+	int err = -1;
+
+	msg = kvmi_msg_recv(kvmi);
+	if (!msg)
+		goto out;
+
+	if (is_vm_command(msg->id)) {
+		if (is_message_allowed(kvmi, msg->id))
+			err = kvmi_msg_dispatch_vm_cmd(kvmi, msg);
+		else
+			err = kvmi_msg_vm_reply_ec(kvmi, msg, -KVM_EPERM);
+	} else {
+		err = kvmi_msg_vm_reply_ec(kvmi, msg, -KVM_ENOSYS);
+	}
+
+	kvmi_msg_free(msg);
+out:
+	return err == 0;
 }
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-03-30 10:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 156+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-03-30 10:11 [PATCH v8 00/81] VM introspection Adalbert Lazăr
2020-03-30 10:11 ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-03-30 10:11 ` [PATCH v8 01/81] sched/swait: add swait_event_killable_exclusive() Adalbert Lazăr
2020-03-30 10:11   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-03-30 10:11 ` [PATCH v8 02/81] export kill_pid_info() Adalbert Lazăr
2020-03-30 10:11   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-03-30 10:11 ` [PATCH v8 03/81] KVM: add new error codes for VM introspection Adalbert Lazăr
2020-03-30 10:11   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-03-30 10:11 ` [PATCH v8 04/81] KVM: add kvm_vcpu_kick_and_wait() Adalbert Lazăr
2020-03-30 10:11   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-03-30 10:11 ` [PATCH v8 05/81] KVM: add kvm_get_max_gfn() Adalbert Lazăr
2020-03-30 10:11   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-03-30 10:11 ` [PATCH v8 06/81] KVM: doc: fix the hypercall numbering Adalbert Lazăr
2020-03-30 10:11   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-03-30 10:11 ` [PATCH v8 07/81] KVM: x86: add kvm_arch_vcpu_get_regs() and kvm_arch_vcpu_get_sregs() Adalbert Lazăr
2020-03-30 10:11   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-03-30 10:11 ` [PATCH v8 08/81] KVM: x86: add kvm_arch_vcpu_set_regs() Adalbert Lazăr
2020-03-30 10:11   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-03-30 10:11 ` [PATCH v8 09/81] KVM: x86: avoid injecting #PF when emulate the VMCALL instruction Adalbert Lazăr
2020-03-30 10:11   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-03-30 10:11 ` [PATCH v8 10/81] KVM: x86: add .bp_intercepted() to struct kvm_x86_ops Adalbert Lazăr
2020-03-30 10:11   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-03-30 10:11 ` [PATCH v8 11/81] KVM: x86: add .control_cr3_intercept() " Adalbert Lazăr
2020-03-30 10:11   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-03-30 10:11 ` [PATCH v8 12/81] KVM: x86: add .cr3_write_intercepted() Adalbert Lazăr
2020-03-30 10:11   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-03-30 10:12 ` [PATCH v8 13/81] KVM: x86: add .desc_ctrl_supported() Adalbert Lazăr
2020-03-30 10:12   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-03-30 10:12 ` [PATCH v8 14/81] KVM: svm: add support for descriptor-table exits Adalbert Lazăr
2020-03-30 10:12   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-03-30 10:12 ` [PATCH v8 15/81] KVM: x86: add .control_desc_intercept() Adalbert Lazăr
2020-03-30 10:12   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-03-30 10:12 ` [PATCH v8 16/81] KVM: x86: add .desc_intercepted() Adalbert Lazăr
2020-03-30 10:12   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-03-30 10:12 ` [PATCH v8 17/81] KVM: x86: export .msr_write_intercepted() Adalbert Lazăr
2020-03-30 10:12   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-03-30 10:12 ` [PATCH v8 18/81] KVM: x86: use MSR_TYPE_R, MSR_TYPE_W and MSR_TYPE_RW with AMD code too Adalbert Lazăr
2020-03-30 10:12   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-03-30 10:12 ` [PATCH v8 19/81] KVM: svm: pass struct kvm_vcpu to set_msr_interception() Adalbert Lazăr
2020-03-30 10:12   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-03-30 10:12 ` [PATCH v8 20/81] KVM: vmx: pass struct kvm_vcpu to the intercept msr related functions Adalbert Lazăr
2020-03-30 10:12   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-03-30 10:12 ` [PATCH v8 21/81] KVM: x86: add .control_msr_intercept() Adalbert Lazăr
2020-03-30 10:12   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-03-30 10:12 ` [PATCH v8 22/81] KVM: x86: vmx: use a symbolic constant when checking the exit qualifications Adalbert Lazăr
2020-03-30 10:12   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-03-30 10:12 ` [PATCH v8 23/81] KVM: x86: save the error code during EPT/NPF exits handling Adalbert Lazăr
2020-03-30 10:12   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-03-30 10:12 ` [PATCH v8 24/81] KVM: x86: add .fault_gla() Adalbert Lazăr
2020-03-30 10:12   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-03-30 10:12 ` [PATCH v8 25/81] KVM: x86: add .spt_fault() Adalbert Lazăr
2020-03-30 10:12   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-03-30 10:12 ` [PATCH v8 26/81] KVM: x86: add .gpt_translation_fault() Adalbert Lazăr
2020-03-30 10:12   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-03-30 10:12 ` [PATCH v8 27/81] KVM: x86: add .control_singlestep() Adalbert Lazăr
2020-03-30 10:12   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-03-30 10:12 ` [PATCH v8 28/81] KVM: x86: export kvm_arch_vcpu_set_guest_debug() Adalbert Lazăr
2020-03-30 10:12   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-03-30 10:12 ` [PATCH v8 29/81] KVM: x86: extend kvm_mmu_gva_to_gpa_system() with the 'access' parameter Adalbert Lazăr
2020-03-30 10:12   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-03-30 10:12 ` [PATCH v8 30/81] KVM: x86: export kvm_inject_pending_exception() Adalbert Lazăr
2020-03-30 10:12   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-03-30 10:12 ` [PATCH v8 31/81] KVM: x86: export kvm_vcpu_ioctl_x86_get_xsave() Adalbert Lazăr
2020-03-30 10:12   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-03-30 10:12 ` [PATCH v8 32/81] KVM: x86: page track: provide all page tracking hooks with the guest virtual address Adalbert Lazăr
2020-03-30 10:12   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-03-30 10:12 ` [PATCH v8 33/81] KVM: x86: page track: add track_create_slot() callback Adalbert Lazăr
2020-03-30 10:12   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-03-30 10:12 ` [PATCH v8 34/81] KVM: x86: page_track: add support for preread, prewrite and preexec Adalbert Lazăr
2020-03-30 10:12   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-03-30 10:12 ` [PATCH v8 35/81] KVM: x86: wire in the preread/prewrite/preexec page trackers Adalbert Lazăr
2020-03-30 10:12   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-03-30 10:12 ` [PATCH v8 36/81] KVM: x86: intercept the write access on sidt and other emulated instructions Adalbert Lazăr
2020-03-30 10:12   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-03-30 10:12 ` [PATCH v8 37/81] KVM: x86: disable gpa_available optimization for fetch and page-walk NPF/EPT violations Adalbert Lazăr
2020-03-30 10:12   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-03-30 10:12 ` [PATCH v8 38/81] KVM: introduce VM introspection Adalbert Lazăr
2020-03-30 10:12   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-03-30 10:12 ` [PATCH v8 39/81] KVM: introspection: add hook/unhook ioctls Adalbert Lazăr
2020-03-30 10:12   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-03-30 10:12 ` [PATCH v8 40/81] KVM: introspection: add permission access ioctls Adalbert Lazăr
2020-03-30 10:12   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-03-30 10:12 ` Adalbert Lazăr [this message]
2020-03-30 10:12   ` [PATCH v8 41/81] KVM: introspection: add the read/dispatch message function Adalbert Lazăr
2020-03-30 10:12 ` [PATCH v8 42/81] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_GET_VERSION Adalbert Lazăr
2020-03-30 10:12   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-03-30 10:12 ` [PATCH v8 43/81] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VM_CHECK_COMMAND and KVMI_VM_CHECK_EVENT Adalbert Lazăr
2020-03-30 10:12   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-03-30 10:12 ` [PATCH v8 44/81] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VM_GET_INFO Adalbert Lazăr
2020-03-30 10:12   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-03-30 10:12 ` [PATCH v8 45/81] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_EVENT_UNHOOK Adalbert Lazăr
2020-03-30 10:12   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-03-31  1:16   ` kbuild test robot
2020-03-31  1:16     ` kbuild test robot
2020-03-30 10:12 ` [PATCH v8 46/81] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VM_CONTROL_EVENTS Adalbert Lazăr
2020-03-30 10:12 ` [PATCH v8 47/81] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VM_READ_PHYSICAL/KVMI_VM_WRITE_PHYSICAL Adalbert Lazăr
2020-03-30 10:12   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-03-30 10:12 ` [PATCH v8 48/81] KVM: introspection: add vCPU related data Adalbert Lazăr
2020-03-30 10:12 ` [PATCH v8 49/81] KVM: introspection: add a jobs list to every introspected vCPU Adalbert Lazăr
2020-03-30 10:12   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-03-30 10:12 ` [PATCH v8 50/81] KVM: introspection: handle vCPU introspection requests Adalbert Lazăr
2020-03-30 10:12 ` [PATCH v8 51/81] KVM: introspection: handle vCPU commands Adalbert Lazăr
2020-03-30 10:12 ` [PATCH v8 52/81] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VCPU_GET_INFO Adalbert Lazăr
2020-03-30 10:12   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-03-30 10:12 ` [PATCH v8 53/81] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VCPU_PAUSE Adalbert Lazăr
2020-03-30 10:12   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-03-30 10:12 ` [PATCH v8 54/81] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_EVENT_PAUSE_VCPU Adalbert Lazăr
2020-03-30 10:12   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-03-30 10:12 ` [PATCH v8 55/81] KVM: introspection: add crash action handling on event reply Adalbert Lazăr
2020-03-30 10:12   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-03-30 10:12 ` [PATCH v8 56/81] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VCPU_CONTROL_EVENTS Adalbert Lazăr
2020-03-30 10:12 ` [PATCH v8 57/81] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VCPU_GET_REGISTERS Adalbert Lazăr
2020-03-30 10:12 ` [PATCH v8 58/81] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VCPU_SET_REGISTERS Adalbert Lazăr
2020-03-30 10:12 ` [PATCH v8 59/81] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VCPU_GET_CPUID Adalbert Lazăr
2020-03-30 10:12   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-03-30 10:12 ` [PATCH v8 60/81] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_EVENT_HYPERCALL Adalbert Lazăr
2020-03-30 10:12   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-03-30 10:12 ` [PATCH v8 61/81] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_EVENT_BREAKPOINT Adalbert Lazăr
2020-03-30 10:12   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-03-30 10:12 ` [PATCH v8 62/81] KVM: introspection: restore the state of #BP interception on unhook Adalbert Lazăr
2020-03-30 10:12   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-03-30 10:12 ` [PATCH v8 63/81] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VCPU_CONTROL_CR and KVMI_EVENT_CR Adalbert Lazăr
2020-03-30 10:12 ` [PATCH v8 64/81] KVM: introspection: restore the state of CR3 interception on unhook Adalbert Lazăr
2020-03-30 10:12   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-03-30 10:12 ` [PATCH v8 65/81] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VCPU_INJECT_EXCEPTION + KVMI_EVENT_TRAP Adalbert Lazăr
2020-03-30 10:12   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-03-30 10:12 ` [PATCH v8 66/81] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VM_GET_MAX_GFN Adalbert Lazăr
2020-03-30 10:12 ` [PATCH v8 67/81] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_EVENT_XSETBV Adalbert Lazăr
2020-03-30 10:12   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-03-30 10:12 ` [PATCH v8 68/81] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VCPU_GET_XSAVE Adalbert Lazăr
2020-03-30 10:12   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-03-30 10:12 ` [PATCH v8 69/81] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VCPU_GET_MTRR_TYPE Adalbert Lazăr
2020-03-30 10:12   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-03-30 10:12 ` [PATCH v8 70/81] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_EVENT_DESCRIPTOR Adalbert Lazăr
2020-03-30 10:12 ` [PATCH v8 71/81] KVM: introspection: restore the state of descriptor-table register interception on unhook Adalbert Lazăr
2020-03-30 10:12 ` [PATCH v8 72/81] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VCPU_CONTROL_MSR and KVMI_EVENT_MSR Adalbert Lazăr
2020-03-30 10:12   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-03-30 10:13 ` [PATCH v8 73/81] KVM: introspection: restore the state of MSR interception on unhook Adalbert Lazăr
2020-03-30 10:13   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-03-30 10:13 ` [PATCH v8 74/81] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VM_SET_PAGE_ACCESS Adalbert Lazăr
2020-03-30 10:13   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-03-30 10:13 ` [PATCH v8 75/81] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_EVENT_PF Adalbert Lazăr
2020-03-30 10:13 ` [PATCH v8 76/81] KVM: introspection: extend KVMI_GET_VERSION with struct kvmi_features Adalbert Lazăr
2020-03-30 10:13   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-03-30 10:13 ` [PATCH v8 77/81] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VCPU_CONTROL_SINGLESTEP Adalbert Lazăr
2020-03-30 10:13   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-03-30 10:13 ` [PATCH v8 78/81] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_EVENT_SINGLESTEP Adalbert Lazăr
2020-03-30 10:13   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-03-30 10:13 ` [PATCH v8 79/81] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VCPU_TRANSLATE_GVA Adalbert Lazăr
2020-03-30 10:13   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-03-30 10:13 ` [PATCH v8 80/81] KVM: introspection: emulate a guest page table walk on SPT violations due to A/D bit updates Adalbert Lazăr
2020-03-30 10:13   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-03-31  5:32   ` kbuild test robot
2020-03-31  5:32     ` kbuild test robot
2020-03-30 10:13 ` [PATCH v8 81/81] KVM: x86: call the page tracking code on emulation failure Adalbert Lazăr
2020-03-30 10:13   ` Adalbert Lazăr

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200330101308.21702-42-alazar@bitdefender.com \
    --to=alazar@bitdefender.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.