All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3] powerpc/uaccess: evaluate macro arguments once, before user access is allowed
Date: Tue,  7 Apr 2020 14:12:45 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200407041245.600651-1-npiggin@gmail.com> (raw)

get/put_user can be called with nontrivial arguments. fs/proc/page.c
has a good example:

    if (put_user(stable_page_flags(ppage), out)) {

stable_page_flags is quite a lot of code, including spin locks in the
page allocator.

Ensure these arguments are evaluated before user access is allowed.
This improves security by reducing code with access to userspace, but
it also fixes a PREEMPT bug with KUAP on powerpc/64s:
stable_page_flags is currently called with AMR set to allow writes,
it ends up calling spin_unlock(), which can call preempt_schedule. But
the task switch code can not be called with AMR set (it relies on
interrupts saving the register), so this blows up.

It's fine if the code inside allow_user_access is preemptible, because
a timer or IPI will save the AMR, but it's not okay to explicitly
cause a reschedule.

Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
---

I took this patch out of the series because there is some discussion
about the other patches, and if we enable KUAP over probe_kernel_*
functions then it's technically a change of behaviour so I'm happy to
wait until next merge window or this discussion resolves itself.

This patch should fix the bugs and cause for security concern of running
arbitrary argument evaluation with user access allowed.

 arch/powerpc/include/asm/uaccess.h | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/uaccess.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/uaccess.h
index 2f500debae21..0969285996cb 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/uaccess.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/uaccess.h
@@ -166,13 +166,17 @@ do {								\
 ({								\
 	long __pu_err;						\
 	__typeof__(*(ptr)) __user *__pu_addr = (ptr);		\
+	__typeof__(*(ptr)) __pu_val = (x);			\
+	__typeof__(size) __pu_size = (size);			\
+								\
 	if (!is_kernel_addr((unsigned long)__pu_addr))		\
 		might_fault();					\
-	__chk_user_ptr(ptr);					\
+	__chk_user_ptr(__pu_addr);				\
 	if (do_allow)								\
-		__put_user_size((x), __pu_addr, (size), __pu_err);		\
+		__put_user_size(__pu_val, __pu_addr, __pu_size, __pu_err);	\
 	else									\
-		__put_user_size_allowed((x), __pu_addr, (size), __pu_err);	\
+		__put_user_size_allowed(__pu_val, __pu_addr, __pu_size, __pu_err); \
+								\
 	__pu_err;						\
 })
 
@@ -180,9 +184,13 @@ do {								\
 ({									\
 	long __pu_err = -EFAULT;					\
 	__typeof__(*(ptr)) __user *__pu_addr = (ptr);			\
+	__typeof__(*(ptr)) __pu_val = (x);				\
+	__typeof__(size) __pu_size = (size);				\
+									\
 	might_fault();							\
-	if (access_ok(__pu_addr, size))			\
-		__put_user_size((x), __pu_addr, (size), __pu_err);	\
+	if (access_ok(__pu_addr, __pu_size))				\
+		__put_user_size(__pu_val, __pu_addr, __pu_size, __pu_err); \
+									\
 	__pu_err;							\
 })
 
@@ -190,8 +198,12 @@ do {								\
 ({								\
 	long __pu_err;						\
 	__typeof__(*(ptr)) __user *__pu_addr = (ptr);		\
-	__chk_user_ptr(ptr);					\
-	__put_user_size((x), __pu_addr, (size), __pu_err);	\
+	__typeof__(*(ptr)) __pu_val = (x);			\
+	__typeof__(size) __pu_size = (size);			\
+								\
+	__chk_user_ptr(__pu_addr);				\
+	__put_user_size(__pu_val, __pu_addr, __pu_size, __pu_err); \
+								\
 	__pu_err;						\
 })
 
@@ -283,15 +295,18 @@ do {								\
 	long __gu_err;						\
 	__long_type(*(ptr)) __gu_val;				\
 	__typeof__(*(ptr)) __user *__gu_addr = (ptr);	\
-	__chk_user_ptr(ptr);					\
+	__typeof__(size) __gu_size = (size);			\
+								\
+	__chk_user_ptr(__gu_addr);				\
 	if (!is_kernel_addr((unsigned long)__gu_addr))		\
 		might_fault();					\
 	barrier_nospec();					\
 	if (do_allow)								\
-		__get_user_size(__gu_val, __gu_addr, (size), __gu_err);		\
+		__get_user_size(__gu_val, __gu_addr, __gu_size, __gu_err);	\
 	else									\
-		__get_user_size_allowed(__gu_val, __gu_addr, (size), __gu_err);	\
+		__get_user_size_allowed(__gu_val, __gu_addr, __gu_size, __gu_err); \
 	(x) = (__typeof__(*(ptr)))__gu_val;			\
+								\
 	__gu_err;						\
 })
 
@@ -300,12 +315,15 @@ do {								\
 	long __gu_err = -EFAULT;					\
 	__long_type(*(ptr)) __gu_val = 0;				\
 	__typeof__(*(ptr)) __user *__gu_addr = (ptr);		\
+	__typeof__(size) __gu_size = (size);				\
+									\
 	might_fault();							\
-	if (access_ok(__gu_addr, (size))) {		\
+	if (access_ok(__gu_addr, __gu_size)) {				\
 		barrier_nospec();					\
-		__get_user_size(__gu_val, __gu_addr, (size), __gu_err);	\
+		__get_user_size(__gu_val, __gu_addr, __gu_size, __gu_err); \
 	}								\
 	(x) = (__force __typeof__(*(ptr)))__gu_val;				\
+									\
 	__gu_err;							\
 })
 
@@ -314,10 +332,13 @@ do {								\
 	long __gu_err;						\
 	__long_type(*(ptr)) __gu_val;				\
 	__typeof__(*(ptr)) __user *__gu_addr = (ptr);	\
-	__chk_user_ptr(ptr);					\
+	__typeof__(size) __gu_size = (size);			\
+								\
+	__chk_user_ptr(__gu_addr);				\
 	barrier_nospec();					\
-	__get_user_size(__gu_val, __gu_addr, (size), __gu_err);	\
+	__get_user_size(__gu_val, __gu_addr, __gu_size, __gu_err); \
 	(x) = (__force __typeof__(*(ptr)))__gu_val;			\
+								\
 	__gu_err;						\
 })
 
-- 
2.23.0


             reply	other threads:[~2020-04-07  4:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-04-07  4:12 Nicholas Piggin [this message]
2020-05-13 12:43 ` [PATCH v3] powerpc/uaccess: evaluate macro arguments once, before user access is allowed Michael Ellerman
2020-05-29  4:24 ` Michael Ellerman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200407041245.600651-1-npiggin@gmail.com \
    --to=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.