All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
	Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Sai Prakash Ranjan <saiprakash.ranjan@codeaurora.org>,
	Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>,
	kernel-team@android.com
Subject: [PATCH v2 4/8] arm64: cpufeature: Remove redundant call to id_aa64pfr0_32bit_el0()
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2020 15:29:18 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200421142922.18950-5-will@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200421142922.18950-1-will@kernel.org>

There's no need to call id_aa64pfr0_32bit_el0() twice because the
sanitised value of ID_AA64PFR0_EL1 has already been updated for the CPU
being onlined.

Remove the redundant function call.

Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Tested-by: Sai Prakash Ranjan <saiprakash.ranjan@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
---
 arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c | 4 +---
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
index 838fe5cc8d7e..7dfcdd9e75c1 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
@@ -792,9 +792,7 @@ void update_cpu_features(int cpu,
 	 * If we have AArch32, we care about 32-bit features for compat.
 	 * If the system doesn't support AArch32, don't update them.
 	 */
-	if (id_aa64pfr0_32bit_el0(read_sanitised_ftr_reg(SYS_ID_AA64PFR0_EL1)) &&
-		id_aa64pfr0_32bit_el0(info->reg_id_aa64pfr0)) {
-
+	if (id_aa64pfr0_32bit_el0(read_sanitised_ftr_reg(SYS_ID_AA64PFR0_EL1))) {
 		taint |= check_update_ftr_reg(SYS_ID_DFR0_EL1, cpu,
 					info->reg_id_dfr0, boot->reg_id_dfr0);
 		taint |= check_update_ftr_reg(SYS_ID_ISAR0_EL1, cpu,
-- 
2.26.1.301.g55bc3eb7cb9-goog


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Cc: Sai Prakash Ranjan <saiprakash.ranjan@codeaurora.org>,
	kernel-team@android.com,
	Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>,
	Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2 4/8] arm64: cpufeature: Remove redundant call to id_aa64pfr0_32bit_el0()
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2020 15:29:18 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200421142922.18950-5-will@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200421142922.18950-1-will@kernel.org>

There's no need to call id_aa64pfr0_32bit_el0() twice because the
sanitised value of ID_AA64PFR0_EL1 has already been updated for the CPU
being onlined.

Remove the redundant function call.

Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Tested-by: Sai Prakash Ranjan <saiprakash.ranjan@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
---
 arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c | 4 +---
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
index 838fe5cc8d7e..7dfcdd9e75c1 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
@@ -792,9 +792,7 @@ void update_cpu_features(int cpu,
 	 * If we have AArch32, we care about 32-bit features for compat.
 	 * If the system doesn't support AArch32, don't update them.
 	 */
-	if (id_aa64pfr0_32bit_el0(read_sanitised_ftr_reg(SYS_ID_AA64PFR0_EL1)) &&
-		id_aa64pfr0_32bit_el0(info->reg_id_aa64pfr0)) {
-
+	if (id_aa64pfr0_32bit_el0(read_sanitised_ftr_reg(SYS_ID_AA64PFR0_EL1))) {
 		taint |= check_update_ftr_reg(SYS_ID_DFR0_EL1, cpu,
 					info->reg_id_dfr0, boot->reg_id_dfr0);
 		taint |= check_update_ftr_reg(SYS_ID_ISAR0_EL1, cpu,
-- 
2.26.1.301.g55bc3eb7cb9-goog

_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Sai Prakash Ranjan <saiprakash.ranjan@codeaurora.org>,
	kernel-team@android.com,
	Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>,
	Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2 4/8] arm64: cpufeature: Remove redundant call to id_aa64pfr0_32bit_el0()
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2020 15:29:18 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200421142922.18950-5-will@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200421142922.18950-1-will@kernel.org>

There's no need to call id_aa64pfr0_32bit_el0() twice because the
sanitised value of ID_AA64PFR0_EL1 has already been updated for the CPU
being onlined.

Remove the redundant function call.

Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Tested-by: Sai Prakash Ranjan <saiprakash.ranjan@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
---
 arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c | 4 +---
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
index 838fe5cc8d7e..7dfcdd9e75c1 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
@@ -792,9 +792,7 @@ void update_cpu_features(int cpu,
 	 * If we have AArch32, we care about 32-bit features for compat.
 	 * If the system doesn't support AArch32, don't update them.
 	 */
-	if (id_aa64pfr0_32bit_el0(read_sanitised_ftr_reg(SYS_ID_AA64PFR0_EL1)) &&
-		id_aa64pfr0_32bit_el0(info->reg_id_aa64pfr0)) {
-
+	if (id_aa64pfr0_32bit_el0(read_sanitised_ftr_reg(SYS_ID_AA64PFR0_EL1))) {
 		taint |= check_update_ftr_reg(SYS_ID_DFR0_EL1, cpu,
 					info->reg_id_dfr0, boot->reg_id_dfr0);
 		taint |= check_update_ftr_reg(SYS_ID_ISAR0_EL1, cpu,
-- 
2.26.1.301.g55bc3eb7cb9-goog


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-04-21 14:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-04-21 14:29 [PATCH v2 0/8] Relax sanity checking for mismatched AArch32 EL1 Will Deacon
2020-04-21 14:29 ` Will Deacon
2020-04-21 14:29 ` Will Deacon
2020-04-21 14:29 ` [PATCH v2 1/8] arm64: cpufeature: Relax check for IESB support Will Deacon
2020-04-21 14:29   ` Will Deacon
2020-04-21 14:29   ` Will Deacon
2020-04-21 14:29 ` [PATCH v2 2/8] arm64: cpufeature: Spell out register fields for ID_ISAR4 and ID_PFR1 Will Deacon
2020-04-21 14:29   ` Will Deacon
2020-04-21 14:29   ` Will Deacon
2020-04-21 14:29 ` [PATCH v2 3/8] arm64: cpufeature: Add CPU capability for AArch32 EL1 support Will Deacon
2020-04-21 14:29   ` Will Deacon
2020-04-21 14:29   ` Will Deacon
2020-04-21 14:29 ` Will Deacon [this message]
2020-04-21 14:29   ` [PATCH v2 4/8] arm64: cpufeature: Remove redundant call to id_aa64pfr0_32bit_el0() Will Deacon
2020-04-21 14:29   ` Will Deacon
2020-04-21 14:29 ` [PATCH v2 5/8] arm64: cpufeature: Factor out checking of AArch32 features Will Deacon
2020-04-21 14:29   ` Will Deacon
2020-04-21 14:29   ` Will Deacon
2020-04-21 14:29 ` [PATCH v2 6/8] arm64: cpufeature: Relax AArch32 system checks if EL1 is 64-bit only Will Deacon
2020-04-21 14:29   ` Will Deacon
2020-04-21 14:29   ` Will Deacon
2020-04-21 14:29 ` [PATCH v2 7/8] arm64: cpufeature: Relax checks for AArch32 support at EL[0-2] Will Deacon
2020-04-21 14:29   ` Will Deacon
2020-04-21 14:29   ` Will Deacon
2020-04-21 14:29 ` [PATCH v2 8/8] arm64: cpufeature: Add an overview comment for the cpufeature framework Will Deacon
2020-04-21 14:29   ` Will Deacon
2020-04-21 14:29   ` Will Deacon
2020-04-21 15:15   ` Suzuki K Poulose
2020-04-21 15:15     ` Suzuki K Poulose
2020-04-21 15:15     ` Suzuki K Poulose

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200421142922.18950-5-will@kernel.org \
    --to=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=dianders@chromium.org \
    --cc=kernel-team@android.com \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=saiprakash.ranjan@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.