All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
To: Dave Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
	Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
	Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>,
	Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
	Intel Graphics <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	DRI <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the drm tree with the drm-intel-fixes tree
Date: Fri, 8 May 2020 13:50:38 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200508135038.7b6547bd@canb.auug.org.au> (raw)

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1331 bytes --]

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the drm tree got a conflict in:

  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_domain.c

between commit:

  47bf7b7a7151 ("drm/i915/gem: Remove object_is_locked assertion from unpin_from_display_plane")

from the drm-intel-fixes tree and commit:

  9da0ea09639f ("drm/i915/gem: Drop cached obj->bind_count")

from the drm tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

diff --cc drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_domain.c
index 4f96c8788a2e,af43e82f45c7..000000000000
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_domain.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_domain.c
@@@ -368,7 -368,8 +368,7 @@@ static void i915_gem_object_bump_inacti
  	struct drm_i915_private *i915 = to_i915(obj->base.dev);
  	struct i915_vma *vma;
  
- 	if (!atomic_read(&obj->bind_count))
 -	GEM_BUG_ON(!i915_gem_object_has_pinned_pages(obj));
+ 	if (list_empty(&obj->vma.list))
  		return;
  
  	mutex_lock(&i915->ggtt.vm.mutex);

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
To: Dave Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
	Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
	Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>,
	Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
	Intel Graphics <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	DRI <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the drm tree with the drm-intel-fixes tree
Date: Fri, 8 May 2020 13:50:38 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200508135038.7b6547bd@canb.auug.org.au> (raw)


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1331 bytes --]

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the drm tree got a conflict in:

  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_domain.c

between commit:

  47bf7b7a7151 ("drm/i915/gem: Remove object_is_locked assertion from unpin_from_display_plane")

from the drm-intel-fixes tree and commit:

  9da0ea09639f ("drm/i915/gem: Drop cached obj->bind_count")

from the drm tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

diff --cc drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_domain.c
index 4f96c8788a2e,af43e82f45c7..000000000000
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_domain.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_domain.c
@@@ -368,7 -368,8 +368,7 @@@ static void i915_gem_object_bump_inacti
  	struct drm_i915_private *i915 = to_i915(obj->base.dev);
  	struct i915_vma *vma;
  
- 	if (!atomic_read(&obj->bind_count))
 -	GEM_BUG_ON(!i915_gem_object_has_pinned_pages(obj));
+ 	if (list_empty(&obj->vma.list))
  		return;
  
  	mutex_lock(&i915->ggtt.vm.mutex);

[-- Attachment #1.2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 160 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
To: Dave Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
	Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
	Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>,
	Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
	Intel Graphics <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	DRI <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Subject: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: manual merge of the drm tree with the drm-intel-fixes tree
Date: Fri, 8 May 2020 13:50:38 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200508135038.7b6547bd@canb.auug.org.au> (raw)


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1331 bytes --]

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the drm tree got a conflict in:

  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_domain.c

between commit:

  47bf7b7a7151 ("drm/i915/gem: Remove object_is_locked assertion from unpin_from_display_plane")

from the drm-intel-fixes tree and commit:

  9da0ea09639f ("drm/i915/gem: Drop cached obj->bind_count")

from the drm tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

diff --cc drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_domain.c
index 4f96c8788a2e,af43e82f45c7..000000000000
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_domain.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_domain.c
@@@ -368,7 -368,8 +368,7 @@@ static void i915_gem_object_bump_inacti
  	struct drm_i915_private *i915 = to_i915(obj->base.dev);
  	struct i915_vma *vma;
  
- 	if (!atomic_read(&obj->bind_count))
 -	GEM_BUG_ON(!i915_gem_object_has_pinned_pages(obj));
+ 	if (list_empty(&obj->vma.list))
  		return;
  
  	mutex_lock(&i915->ggtt.vm.mutex);

[-- Attachment #1.2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 160 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

             reply	other threads:[~2020-05-08  3:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 89+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-05-08  3:50 Stephen Rothwell [this message]
2020-05-08  3:50 ` [Intel-gfx] linux-next: manual merge of the drm tree with the drm-intel-fixes tree Stephen Rothwell
2020-05-08  3:50 ` Stephen Rothwell
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-03-07  2:10 Stephen Rothwell
2024-03-07  8:27 ` Joonas Lahtinen
2023-04-17 14:39 broonie
2023-04-17 14:39 ` broonie
2022-05-17  1:26 Stephen Rothwell
2022-05-17  1:26 ` Stephen Rothwell
2022-02-25 16:14 broonie
2022-02-25 16:14 ` broonie
2022-02-22 17:03 broonie
2022-02-22 17:03 ` broonie
2020-05-07  2:43 Stephen Rothwell
2020-05-07  2:43 ` Stephen Rothwell
2020-01-22  0:37 Stephen Rothwell
2020-01-22  0:37 ` Stephen Rothwell
2020-01-08  1:15 Stephen Rothwell
2020-01-08  1:15 ` Stephen Rothwell
2020-01-08  1:10 Stephen Rothwell
2020-01-08  1:10 ` Stephen Rothwell
2020-01-08  1:04 Stephen Rothwell
2020-01-08  1:04 ` Stephen Rothwell
2020-01-08  2:28 ` Stephen Rothwell
2020-01-08  2:28   ` Stephen Rothwell
2019-10-31  0:33 Stephen Rothwell
2019-10-31  0:33 ` Stephen Rothwell
2019-11-08  0:42 ` Stephen Rothwell
2019-11-08  0:42   ` Stephen Rothwell
2019-11-08  0:42   ` Stephen Rothwell
2018-01-05  1:00 Stephen Rothwell
2018-01-05  1:00 ` Stephen Rothwell
2017-07-21  1:26 Stephen Rothwell
2017-07-21  1:26 ` Stephen Rothwell
2017-06-14  0:56 Stephen Rothwell
2017-06-14  0:56 ` Stephen Rothwell
2017-06-14  0:50 Stephen Rothwell
2017-06-09  2:26 Stephen Rothwell
2017-06-08  2:53 Stephen Rothwell
2017-06-08  2:53 ` Stephen Rothwell
2017-03-30  1:14 Stephen Rothwell
2017-03-30  1:08 Stephen Rothwell
2017-03-30  1:08 ` Stephen Rothwell
2017-03-22  0:00 Stephen Rothwell
2017-03-22  0:00 ` Stephen Rothwell
2017-03-27 17:14 ` Paul McKenney
2017-03-21 23:57 Stephen Rothwell
2017-03-21 23:57 ` Stephen Rothwell
2017-03-21  0:28 Stephen Rothwell
2017-03-21  0:28 ` Stephen Rothwell
2016-06-14  2:10 Stephen Rothwell
2016-06-14  2:10 ` Stephen Rothwell
2015-12-22 23:06 Stephen Rothwell
2015-12-22 23:06 ` Stephen Rothwell
2015-12-09  2:35 Stephen Rothwell
2015-12-09  2:35 ` Stephen Rothwell
2015-12-03 14:51 Mark Brown
2015-12-03 15:49 ` Jani Nikula
2015-12-03 15:49   ` Jani Nikula
2015-12-03 14:47 Mark Brown
2015-12-03 14:52 ` Imre Deak
2015-08-17  3:23 Stephen Rothwell
2015-08-17  3:23 ` Stephen Rothwell
2015-06-05  5:46 mpe@ellerman.id.au
2015-06-05  8:03 ` Jani Nikula
2015-06-05  8:03   ` Jani Nikula
2015-06-09  1:58   ` Stephen Rothwell
2015-06-09  1:58     ` Stephen Rothwell
2015-03-16  2:30 Stephen Rothwell
2015-03-16  2:30 ` Stephen Rothwell
2015-03-16 13:43 ` Xi Ruoyao
2015-03-16 15:04   ` Jani Nikula
2014-12-03  2:27 Stephen Rothwell
2014-12-03  2:27 ` Stephen Rothwell
2014-12-03  8:24 ` Jani Nikula
2014-12-03  8:24   ` Jani Nikula
2014-12-03  8:28   ` Stephen Rothwell
2014-11-17  3:04 Stephen Rothwell
2014-11-17  3:04 ` Stephen Rothwell
2014-07-23  2:38 Stephen Rothwell
2014-07-23  2:38 ` Stephen Rothwell
2014-07-09  4:06 Stephen Rothwell
2014-05-22  5:44 Stephen Rothwell
2014-05-22  5:40 Stephen Rothwell
2014-05-07  3:24 Stephen Rothwell
2013-10-28  5:46 Stephen Rothwell
2013-10-28  5:46 ` Stephen Rothwell
2013-10-28  6:12 ` Stephen Rothwell
2013-10-28  6:12   ` Stephen Rothwell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200508135038.7b6547bd@canb.auug.org.au \
    --to=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --cc=airlied@linux.ie \
    --cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
    --cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.