All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
To: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
	Lorenzo Pieralisi <Lorenzo.Pieralisi@arm.com>,
	linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
	Lina Iyer <ilina@codeaurora.org>,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
	Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
	Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@st.com>,
	Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] cpuidle: psci: Fixup execution order when entering a domain idle state
Date: Mon, 11 May 2020 15:33:46 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200511133346.21706-1-ulf.hansson@linaro.org> (raw)

Moving forward, platforms are going to need to execute specific "last-man"
operations before a domain idle state can be entered. In one way or the
other, these operations needs to be triggered while walking the
hierarchical topology via runtime PM and genpd, as it's at that point the
last-man becomes known.

Moreover, executing last-man operations needs to be done after the CPU PM
notifications are sent through cpu_pm_enter(), as otherwise it's likely
that some notifications would fail. Therefore, let's re-order the sequence
in psci_enter_domain_idle_state(), so cpu_pm_enter() gets called prior
pm_runtime_put_sync().

Fixes: ce85aef570df ("cpuidle: psci: Manage runtime PM in the idle path")
Reported-by: Lina Iyer <ilina@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-psci.c | 8 +++++++-
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-psci.c b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-psci.c
index bae9140a65a5..d0fb585073c6 100644
--- a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-psci.c
+++ b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-psci.c
@@ -58,6 +58,10 @@ static int psci_enter_domain_idle_state(struct cpuidle_device *dev,
 	u32 state;
 	int ret;
 
+	ret = cpu_pm_enter();
+	if (ret)
+		return -1;
+
 	/* Do runtime PM to manage a hierarchical CPU toplogy. */
 	pm_runtime_put_sync_suspend(pd_dev);
 
@@ -65,10 +69,12 @@ static int psci_enter_domain_idle_state(struct cpuidle_device *dev,
 	if (!state)
 		state = states[idx];
 
-	ret = psci_enter_state(idx, state);
+	ret = psci_cpu_suspend_enter(state) ? -1 : idx;
 
 	pm_runtime_get_sync(pd_dev);
 
+	cpu_pm_exit();
+
 	/* Clear the domain state to start fresh when back from idle. */
 	psci_set_domain_state(0);
 	return ret;
-- 
2.20.1


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
To: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
	Lorenzo Pieralisi <Lorenzo.Pieralisi@arm.com>,
	linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>,
	Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@st.com>,
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	Lina Iyer <ilina@codeaurora.org>,
	Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] cpuidle: psci: Fixup execution order when entering a domain idle state
Date: Mon, 11 May 2020 15:33:46 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200511133346.21706-1-ulf.hansson@linaro.org> (raw)

Moving forward, platforms are going to need to execute specific "last-man"
operations before a domain idle state can be entered. In one way or the
other, these operations needs to be triggered while walking the
hierarchical topology via runtime PM and genpd, as it's at that point the
last-man becomes known.

Moreover, executing last-man operations needs to be done after the CPU PM
notifications are sent through cpu_pm_enter(), as otherwise it's likely
that some notifications would fail. Therefore, let's re-order the sequence
in psci_enter_domain_idle_state(), so cpu_pm_enter() gets called prior
pm_runtime_put_sync().

Fixes: ce85aef570df ("cpuidle: psci: Manage runtime PM in the idle path")
Reported-by: Lina Iyer <ilina@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-psci.c | 8 +++++++-
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-psci.c b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-psci.c
index bae9140a65a5..d0fb585073c6 100644
--- a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-psci.c
+++ b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-psci.c
@@ -58,6 +58,10 @@ static int psci_enter_domain_idle_state(struct cpuidle_device *dev,
 	u32 state;
 	int ret;
 
+	ret = cpu_pm_enter();
+	if (ret)
+		return -1;
+
 	/* Do runtime PM to manage a hierarchical CPU toplogy. */
 	pm_runtime_put_sync_suspend(pd_dev);
 
@@ -65,10 +69,12 @@ static int psci_enter_domain_idle_state(struct cpuidle_device *dev,
 	if (!state)
 		state = states[idx];
 
-	ret = psci_enter_state(idx, state);
+	ret = psci_cpu_suspend_enter(state) ? -1 : idx;
 
 	pm_runtime_get_sync(pd_dev);
 
+	cpu_pm_exit();
+
 	/* Clear the domain state to start fresh when back from idle. */
 	psci_set_domain_state(0);
 	return ret;
-- 
2.20.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

             reply	other threads:[~2020-05-11 13:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-05-11 13:33 Ulf Hansson [this message]
2020-05-11 13:33 ` [PATCH] cpuidle: psci: Fixup execution order when entering a domain idle state Ulf Hansson
2020-05-14 11:52 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-05-14 11:52   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-05-14 14:20 ` Sudeep Holla
2020-05-14 14:20   ` Sudeep Holla
2020-05-14 15:41   ` Ulf Hansson
2020-05-14 15:41     ` Ulf Hansson
2020-05-14 17:28     ` Sudeep Holla
2020-05-14 17:28       ` Sudeep Holla
2020-05-14 19:11       ` Ulf Hansson
2020-05-14 19:11         ` Ulf Hansson
2020-05-15 10:22         ` Sudeep Holla
2020-05-15 10:22           ` Sudeep Holla
2020-05-15 11:29           ` Ulf Hansson
2020-05-15 11:29             ` Ulf Hansson
2020-05-15 12:42             ` Sudeep Holla
2020-05-15 12:42               ` Sudeep Holla
2020-05-15 16:38             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-05-15 16:38               ` Rafael J. Wysocki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200511133346.21706-1-ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
    --to=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
    --cc=Lorenzo.Pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=benjamin.gaignard@st.com \
    --cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
    --cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
    --cc=ilina@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
    --cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.