All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
To: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] xfs: don't fail verifier on empty attr3 leaf block
Date: Fri, 15 May 2020 12:06:48 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200515160648.56487-1-bfoster@redhat.com> (raw)

The attr fork can transition from shortform to leaf format while
empty if the first xattr doesn't fit in shortform. While this empty
leaf block state is intended to be transient, it is technically not
due to the transactional implementation of the xattr set operation.

We historically have a couple of bandaids to work around this
problem. The first is to hold the buffer after the format conversion
to prevent premature writeback of the empty leaf buffer and the
second is to bypass the xattr count check in the verifier during
recovery. The latter assumes that the xattr set is also in the log
and will be recovered into the buffer soon after the empty leaf
buffer is reconstructed. This is not guaranteed, however.

If the filesystem crashes after the format conversion but before the
xattr set that induced it, only the format conversion may exist in
the log. When recovered, this creates a latent corrupted state on
the inode as any subsequent attempts to read the buffer fail due to
verifier failure. This includes further attempts to set xattrs on
the inode or attempts to destroy the attr fork, which prevents the
inode from ever being removed from the unlinked list.

To avoid this condition, accept that an empty attr leaf block is a
valid state and remove the count check from the verifier. This means
that on rare occasions an attr fork might exist in an unexpected
state, but is otherwise consistent and functional. Note that we
retain the logic to avoid racing with metadata writeback to reduce
the window where this can occur.

Signed-off-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
---

v2:
- Add comment.
v1: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-xfs/20200513145343.45855-1-bfoster@redhat.com/
- Remove the verifier check instead of warn.
rfc: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-xfs/20200511185016.33684-1-bfoster@redhat.com/

 fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_attr_leaf.c | 15 +++++++--------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_attr_leaf.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_attr_leaf.c
index 863444e2dda7..6d18e86bb9c7 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_attr_leaf.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_attr_leaf.c
@@ -308,14 +308,6 @@ xfs_attr3_leaf_verify(
 	if (fa)
 		return fa;
 
-	/*
-	 * In recovery there is a transient state where count == 0 is valid
-	 * because we may have transitioned an empty shortform attr to a leaf
-	 * if the attr didn't fit in shortform.
-	 */
-	if (!xfs_log_in_recovery(mp) && ichdr.count == 0)
-		return __this_address;
-
 	/*
 	 * firstused is the block offset of the first name info structure.
 	 * Make sure it doesn't go off the block or crash into the header.
@@ -331,6 +323,13 @@ xfs_attr3_leaf_verify(
 	    (char *)bp->b_addr + ichdr.firstused)
 		return __this_address;
 
+	/*
+	 * NOTE: This verifier historically failed empty leaf buffers because
+	 * we expect the fork to be in another format. Empty attr fork format
+	 * conversions are possible during xattr set, however, and format
+	 * conversion is not atomic with the xattr set that triggers it. We
+	 * cannot assume leaf blocks are non-empty until that is addressed.
+	*/
 	buf_end = (char *)bp->b_addr + mp->m_attr_geo->blksize;
 	for (i = 0, ent = entries; i < ichdr.count; ent++, i++) {
 		fa = xfs_attr3_leaf_verify_entry(mp, buf_end, leaf, &ichdr,
-- 
2.21.1


             reply	other threads:[~2020-05-15 16:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-05-15 16:06 Brian Foster [this message]
2020-05-16  0:18 ` [PATCH v2] xfs: don't fail verifier on empty attr3 leaf block Darrick J. Wong
2020-05-17  7:34 ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200515160648.56487-1-bfoster@redhat.com \
    --to=bfoster@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.