From: Jingyi Wang <wangjingyi11@huawei.com> To: <drjones@redhat.com>, <kvm@vger.kernel.org>, <kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu>, <wangjingyi11@huawei.com> Cc: <maz@kernel.org>, <wanghaibin.wang@huawei.com>, <yuzenghui@huawei.com>, <eric.auger@redhat.com> Subject: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 2/6] arm64: microbench: Use the funcions for ipi test as the general functions for gic(ipi/lpi/timer) test. Date: Sun, 17 May 2020 18:08:56 +0800 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20200517100900.30792-3-wangjingyi11@huawei.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20200517100900.30792-1-wangjingyi11@huawei.com> The following patches will use that. Signed-off-by: Jingyi Wang <wangjingyi11@huawei.com> --- arm/micro-bench.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++----------------- 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) diff --git a/arm/micro-bench.c b/arm/micro-bench.c index ca022d9..fc4d356 100644 --- a/arm/micro-bench.c +++ b/arm/micro-bench.c @@ -25,24 +25,24 @@ static u32 cntfrq; -static volatile bool ipi_ready, ipi_received; +static volatile bool irq_ready, irq_received; static void *vgic_dist_base; static void (*write_eoir)(u32 irqstat); -static void ipi_irq_handler(struct pt_regs *regs) +static void gic_irq_handler(struct pt_regs *regs) { - ipi_ready = false; - ipi_received = true; + irq_ready = false; + irq_received = true; gic_write_eoir(gic_read_iar()); - ipi_ready = true; + irq_ready = true; } -static void ipi_secondary_entry(void *data) +static void gic_secondary_entry(void *data) { - install_irq_handler(EL1H_IRQ, ipi_irq_handler); + install_irq_handler(EL1H_IRQ, gic_irq_handler); gic_enable_defaults(); local_irq_enable(); - ipi_ready = true; + irq_ready = true; while (true) cpu_relax(); } @@ -72,9 +72,9 @@ static bool test_init(void) break; } - ipi_ready = false; + irq_ready = false; gic_enable_defaults(); - on_cpu_async(1, ipi_secondary_entry, NULL); + on_cpu_async(1, gic_secondary_entry, NULL); cntfrq = get_cntfrq(); printf("Timer Frequency %d Hz (Output in microseconds)\n", cntfrq); @@ -82,13 +82,18 @@ static bool test_init(void) return true; } -static void ipi_prep(void) +static void gic_prep_common(void) { unsigned tries = 1 << 28; - while (!ipi_ready && tries--) + while (!irq_ready && tries--) cpu_relax(); - assert(ipi_ready); + assert(irq_ready); +} + +static void ipi_prep(void) +{ + gic_prep_common(); } static void ipi_exec(void) @@ -96,17 +101,17 @@ static void ipi_exec(void) unsigned tries = 1 << 28; static int received = 0; - ipi_received = false; + irq_received = false; gic_ipi_send_single(1, 1); - while (!ipi_received && tries--) + while (!irq_received && tries--) cpu_relax(); - if (ipi_recieved) + if (irq_received) ++received; - assert_msg(ipi_received, "failed to receive IPI in time, but received %d successfully\n", received); + assert_msg(irq_received, "failed to receive IPI in time, but received %d successfully\n", received); } static void hvc_exec(void) -- 2.19.1
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jingyi Wang <wangjingyi11@huawei.com> To: <drjones@redhat.com>, <kvm@vger.kernel.org>, <kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu>, <wangjingyi11@huawei.com> Cc: maz@kernel.org Subject: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 2/6] arm64: microbench: Use the funcions for ipi test as the general functions for gic(ipi/lpi/timer) test. Date: Sun, 17 May 2020 18:08:56 +0800 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20200517100900.30792-3-wangjingyi11@huawei.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20200517100900.30792-1-wangjingyi11@huawei.com> The following patches will use that. Signed-off-by: Jingyi Wang <wangjingyi11@huawei.com> --- arm/micro-bench.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++----------------- 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) diff --git a/arm/micro-bench.c b/arm/micro-bench.c index ca022d9..fc4d356 100644 --- a/arm/micro-bench.c +++ b/arm/micro-bench.c @@ -25,24 +25,24 @@ static u32 cntfrq; -static volatile bool ipi_ready, ipi_received; +static volatile bool irq_ready, irq_received; static void *vgic_dist_base; static void (*write_eoir)(u32 irqstat); -static void ipi_irq_handler(struct pt_regs *regs) +static void gic_irq_handler(struct pt_regs *regs) { - ipi_ready = false; - ipi_received = true; + irq_ready = false; + irq_received = true; gic_write_eoir(gic_read_iar()); - ipi_ready = true; + irq_ready = true; } -static void ipi_secondary_entry(void *data) +static void gic_secondary_entry(void *data) { - install_irq_handler(EL1H_IRQ, ipi_irq_handler); + install_irq_handler(EL1H_IRQ, gic_irq_handler); gic_enable_defaults(); local_irq_enable(); - ipi_ready = true; + irq_ready = true; while (true) cpu_relax(); } @@ -72,9 +72,9 @@ static bool test_init(void) break; } - ipi_ready = false; + irq_ready = false; gic_enable_defaults(); - on_cpu_async(1, ipi_secondary_entry, NULL); + on_cpu_async(1, gic_secondary_entry, NULL); cntfrq = get_cntfrq(); printf("Timer Frequency %d Hz (Output in microseconds)\n", cntfrq); @@ -82,13 +82,18 @@ static bool test_init(void) return true; } -static void ipi_prep(void) +static void gic_prep_common(void) { unsigned tries = 1 << 28; - while (!ipi_ready && tries--) + while (!irq_ready && tries--) cpu_relax(); - assert(ipi_ready); + assert(irq_ready); +} + +static void ipi_prep(void) +{ + gic_prep_common(); } static void ipi_exec(void) @@ -96,17 +101,17 @@ static void ipi_exec(void) unsigned tries = 1 << 28; static int received = 0; - ipi_received = false; + irq_received = false; gic_ipi_send_single(1, 1); - while (!ipi_received && tries--) + while (!irq_received && tries--) cpu_relax(); - if (ipi_recieved) + if (irq_received) ++received; - assert_msg(ipi_received, "failed to receive IPI in time, but received %d successfully\n", received); + assert_msg(irq_received, "failed to receive IPI in time, but received %d successfully\n", received); } static void hvc_exec(void) -- 2.19.1 _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-17 10:11 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2020-05-17 10:08 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 0/6] arm64: add IPI/LPI/vtimer latency Jingyi Wang 2020-05-17 10:08 ` Jingyi Wang 2020-05-17 10:08 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 1/6] arm64: microbench: get correct ipi recieved num Jingyi Wang 2020-05-17 10:08 ` Jingyi Wang 2020-05-21 14:00 ` Zenghui Yu 2020-05-21 14:00 ` Zenghui Yu 2020-05-22 2:32 ` Jingyi Wang 2020-05-22 2:32 ` Jingyi Wang 2020-05-22 5:34 ` Andrew Jones 2020-05-22 5:34 ` Andrew Jones 2020-05-17 10:08 ` Jingyi Wang [this message] 2020-05-17 10:08 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 2/6] arm64: microbench: Use the funcions for ipi test as the general functions for gic(ipi/lpi/timer) test Jingyi Wang 2020-05-17 10:08 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 3/6] arm64: microbench: gic: Add gicv4.1 support for ipi latency test Jingyi Wang 2020-05-17 10:08 ` Jingyi Wang 2020-05-17 10:08 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 4/6] arm64: its: Handle its command queue wrapping Jingyi Wang 2020-05-17 10:08 ` Jingyi Wang 2020-05-17 10:08 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 5/6] arm64: microbench: its: Add LPI latency test Jingyi Wang 2020-05-17 10:08 ` Jingyi Wang 2020-05-17 10:09 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 6/6] arm64: microbench: Add vtimer " Jingyi Wang 2020-05-17 10:09 ` Jingyi Wang 2020-05-18 7:05 ` Andrew Jones 2020-05-18 7:05 ` Andrew Jones 2020-05-20 4:16 ` Jingyi Wang 2020-05-20 4:16 ` Jingyi Wang
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20200517100900.30792-3-wangjingyi11@huawei.com \ --to=wangjingyi11@huawei.com \ --cc=drjones@redhat.com \ --cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \ --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \ --cc=maz@kernel.org \ --cc=wanghaibin.wang@huawei.com \ --cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.