All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	Julien Thierry <julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>,
	Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>
Subject: [PATCH] KVM: arm64: kvm_reset_vcpu() return code incorrect with SVE
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2020 11:43:39 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200617104339.35094-1-steven.price@arm.com> (raw)

If SVE is enabled then 'ret' can be assigned the return value of
kvm_vcpu_enable_sve() which may be 0 causing future "goto out" sites to
erroneously return 0 on failure rather than -EINVAL as expected.

Remove the initialisation of 'ret' and make setting the return value
explicit to avoid this situation in the future.

Fixes: 9a3cdf26e336 ("KVM: arm64/sve: Allow userspace to enable SVE for vcpus")
Reported-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>
---
The problematic chunk isn't visible in the diff, so reproduced here:

	if (!kvm_arm_vcpu_sve_finalized(vcpu)) {
		if (test_bit(KVM_ARM_VCPU_SVE, vcpu->arch.features)) {
			ret = kvm_vcpu_enable_sve(vcpu);
			if (ret)
				goto out;
		}
	} else {
		kvm_vcpu_reset_sve(vcpu);
	}

 arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c | 10 +++++++---
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c
index d3b209023727..f1057603b756 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c
@@ -245,7 +245,7 @@ static int kvm_vcpu_enable_ptrauth(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
  */
 int kvm_reset_vcpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 {
-	int ret = -EINVAL;
+	int ret;
 	bool loaded;
 	u32 pstate;
 
@@ -269,15 +269,19 @@ int kvm_reset_vcpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 
 	if (test_bit(KVM_ARM_VCPU_PTRAUTH_ADDRESS, vcpu->arch.features) ||
 	    test_bit(KVM_ARM_VCPU_PTRAUTH_GENERIC, vcpu->arch.features)) {
-		if (kvm_vcpu_enable_ptrauth(vcpu))
+		if (kvm_vcpu_enable_ptrauth(vcpu)) {
+			ret = -EINVAL;
 			goto out;
+		}
 	}
 
 	switch (vcpu->arch.target) {
 	default:
 		if (test_bit(KVM_ARM_VCPU_EL1_32BIT, vcpu->arch.features)) {
-			if (!cpus_have_const_cap(ARM64_HAS_32BIT_EL1))
+			if (cpus_have_const_cap(ARM64_HAS_32BIT_EL1)) {
+				ret = -EINVAL;
 				goto out;
+			}
 			pstate = VCPU_RESET_PSTATE_SVC;
 		} else {
 			pstate = VCPU_RESET_PSTATE_EL1;
-- 
2.20.1


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>,
	Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] KVM: arm64: kvm_reset_vcpu() return code incorrect with SVE
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2020 11:43:39 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200617104339.35094-1-steven.price@arm.com> (raw)

If SVE is enabled then 'ret' can be assigned the return value of
kvm_vcpu_enable_sve() which may be 0 causing future "goto out" sites to
erroneously return 0 on failure rather than -EINVAL as expected.

Remove the initialisation of 'ret' and make setting the return value
explicit to avoid this situation in the future.

Fixes: 9a3cdf26e336 ("KVM: arm64/sve: Allow userspace to enable SVE for vcpus")
Reported-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>
---
The problematic chunk isn't visible in the diff, so reproduced here:

	if (!kvm_arm_vcpu_sve_finalized(vcpu)) {
		if (test_bit(KVM_ARM_VCPU_SVE, vcpu->arch.features)) {
			ret = kvm_vcpu_enable_sve(vcpu);
			if (ret)
				goto out;
		}
	} else {
		kvm_vcpu_reset_sve(vcpu);
	}

 arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c | 10 +++++++---
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c
index d3b209023727..f1057603b756 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c
@@ -245,7 +245,7 @@ static int kvm_vcpu_enable_ptrauth(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
  */
 int kvm_reset_vcpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 {
-	int ret = -EINVAL;
+	int ret;
 	bool loaded;
 	u32 pstate;
 
@@ -269,15 +269,19 @@ int kvm_reset_vcpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 
 	if (test_bit(KVM_ARM_VCPU_PTRAUTH_ADDRESS, vcpu->arch.features) ||
 	    test_bit(KVM_ARM_VCPU_PTRAUTH_GENERIC, vcpu->arch.features)) {
-		if (kvm_vcpu_enable_ptrauth(vcpu))
+		if (kvm_vcpu_enable_ptrauth(vcpu)) {
+			ret = -EINVAL;
 			goto out;
+		}
 	}
 
 	switch (vcpu->arch.target) {
 	default:
 		if (test_bit(KVM_ARM_VCPU_EL1_32BIT, vcpu->arch.features)) {
-			if (!cpus_have_const_cap(ARM64_HAS_32BIT_EL1))
+			if (cpus_have_const_cap(ARM64_HAS_32BIT_EL1)) {
+				ret = -EINVAL;
 				goto out;
+			}
 			pstate = VCPU_RESET_PSTATE_SVC;
 		} else {
 			pstate = VCPU_RESET_PSTATE_EL1;
-- 
2.20.1

_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>,
	James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	Julien Thierry <julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com>,
	Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] KVM: arm64: kvm_reset_vcpu() return code incorrect with SVE
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2020 11:43:39 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200617104339.35094-1-steven.price@arm.com> (raw)

If SVE is enabled then 'ret' can be assigned the return value of
kvm_vcpu_enable_sve() which may be 0 causing future "goto out" sites to
erroneously return 0 on failure rather than -EINVAL as expected.

Remove the initialisation of 'ret' and make setting the return value
explicit to avoid this situation in the future.

Fixes: 9a3cdf26e336 ("KVM: arm64/sve: Allow userspace to enable SVE for vcpus")
Reported-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>
---
The problematic chunk isn't visible in the diff, so reproduced here:

	if (!kvm_arm_vcpu_sve_finalized(vcpu)) {
		if (test_bit(KVM_ARM_VCPU_SVE, vcpu->arch.features)) {
			ret = kvm_vcpu_enable_sve(vcpu);
			if (ret)
				goto out;
		}
	} else {
		kvm_vcpu_reset_sve(vcpu);
	}

 arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c | 10 +++++++---
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c
index d3b209023727..f1057603b756 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c
@@ -245,7 +245,7 @@ static int kvm_vcpu_enable_ptrauth(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
  */
 int kvm_reset_vcpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 {
-	int ret = -EINVAL;
+	int ret;
 	bool loaded;
 	u32 pstate;
 
@@ -269,15 +269,19 @@ int kvm_reset_vcpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 
 	if (test_bit(KVM_ARM_VCPU_PTRAUTH_ADDRESS, vcpu->arch.features) ||
 	    test_bit(KVM_ARM_VCPU_PTRAUTH_GENERIC, vcpu->arch.features)) {
-		if (kvm_vcpu_enable_ptrauth(vcpu))
+		if (kvm_vcpu_enable_ptrauth(vcpu)) {
+			ret = -EINVAL;
 			goto out;
+		}
 	}
 
 	switch (vcpu->arch.target) {
 	default:
 		if (test_bit(KVM_ARM_VCPU_EL1_32BIT, vcpu->arch.features)) {
-			if (!cpus_have_const_cap(ARM64_HAS_32BIT_EL1))
+			if (cpus_have_const_cap(ARM64_HAS_32BIT_EL1)) {
+				ret = -EINVAL;
 				goto out;
+			}
 			pstate = VCPU_RESET_PSTATE_SVC;
 		} else {
 			pstate = VCPU_RESET_PSTATE_EL1;
-- 
2.20.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

             reply	other threads:[~2020-06-17 10:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-06-17 10:43 Steven Price [this message]
2020-06-17 10:43 ` [PATCH] KVM: arm64: kvm_reset_vcpu() return code incorrect with SVE Steven Price
2020-06-17 10:43 ` Steven Price
2020-06-17 10:47 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-06-17 10:47   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-06-17 10:47   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-06-17 10:50   ` Steven Price
2020-06-17 10:50     ` Steven Price
2020-06-17 10:50     ` Steven Price

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200617104339.35094-1-steven.price@arm.com \
    --to=steven.price@arm.com \
    --cc=Dave.Martin@arm.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.