From: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@linux.microsoft.com>
To: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>,
Dmitry Kasatkin <dmitry.kasatkin@gmail.com>
Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>,
"Serge E . Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>,
Lakshmi Ramasubramanian <nramas@linux.microsoft.com>,
Prakhar Srivastava <prsriva02@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
Janne Karhunen <janne.karhunen@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH 01/12] ima: Have the LSM free its audit rule
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 19:32:25 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200623003236.830149-2-tyhicks@linux.microsoft.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200623003236.830149-1-tyhicks@linux.microsoft.com>
Ask the LSM to free its audit rule rather than directly calling kfree().
Both AppArmor and SELinux do additional work in their audit_rule_free()
hooks. Fix memory leaks by allowing the LSMs to perform necessary work.
Fixes: b16942455193 ("ima: use the lsm policy update notifier")
Signed-off-by: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@linux.microsoft.com>
Cc: Janne Karhunen <janne.karhunen@gmail.com>
---
security/integrity/ima/ima.h | 6 ++++++
security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima.h b/security/integrity/ima/ima.h
index df93ac258e01..de05d7f1d3ec 100644
--- a/security/integrity/ima/ima.h
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima.h
@@ -404,6 +404,7 @@ static inline void ima_free_modsig(struct modsig *modsig)
#ifdef CONFIG_IMA_LSM_RULES
#define security_filter_rule_init security_audit_rule_init
+#define security_filter_rule_free security_audit_rule_free
#define security_filter_rule_match security_audit_rule_match
#else
@@ -414,6 +415,11 @@ static inline int security_filter_rule_init(u32 field, u32 op, char *rulestr,
return -EINVAL;
}
+static inline void security_filter_rule_free(void *lsmrule)
+{
+ return -EINVAL;
+}
+
static inline int security_filter_rule_match(u32 secid, u32 field, u32 op,
void *lsmrule)
{
diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
index e493063a3c34..236a731492d1 100644
--- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
@@ -258,7 +258,7 @@ static void ima_lsm_free_rule(struct ima_rule_entry *entry)
int i;
for (i = 0; i < MAX_LSM_RULES; i++) {
- kfree(entry->lsm[i].rule);
+ security_filter_rule_free(entry->lsm[i].rule);
kfree(entry->lsm[i].args_p);
}
kfree(entry);
--
2.25.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-06-23 0:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-23 0:32 [PATCH 00/12] ima: Fix rule parsing bugs and extend KEXEC_CMDLINE rule support Tyler Hicks
2020-06-23 0:32 ` Tyler Hicks
2020-06-23 0:32 ` Tyler Hicks [this message]
2020-06-23 0:55 ` [PATCH 01/12] ima: Have the LSM free its audit rule Casey Schaufler
2020-06-23 3:04 ` Tyler Hicks
2020-06-23 23:04 ` Tyler Hicks
2020-06-25 19:41 ` Mimi Zohar
2020-06-23 0:32 ` [PATCH 02/12] ima: Create a function to free a rule entry Tyler Hicks
2020-06-25 19:33 ` Mimi Zohar
2020-06-25 19:56 ` Tyler Hicks
2020-06-25 20:32 ` Mimi Zohar
2020-06-23 0:32 ` [PATCH 03/12] ima: Free the entire rule when deleting a list of rules Tyler Hicks
2020-06-25 21:05 ` Mimi Zohar
2020-06-25 21:07 ` Mimi Zohar
2020-06-25 21:08 ` Mimi Zohar
2020-06-23 0:32 ` [PATCH 04/12] ima: Free the entire rule if it fails to parse Tyler Hicks
2020-06-23 0:32 ` [PATCH 05/12] ima: Fail rule parsing when buffer hook functions have an invalid action Tyler Hicks
2020-06-25 21:51 ` Mimi Zohar
2020-06-23 0:32 ` [PATCH 06/12] ima: Fail rule parsing when the KEXEC_CMDLINE hook is combined with an invalid cond Tyler Hicks
2020-06-25 21:53 ` Mimi Zohar
2020-06-23 0:32 ` [PATCH 07/12] ima: Fail rule parsing when the KEY_CHECK " Tyler Hicks
2020-06-23 0:32 ` [PATCH 08/12] ima: Shallow copy the args_p member of ima_rule_entry.lsm elements Tyler Hicks
2020-06-25 21:18 ` Mimi Zohar
2020-06-23 0:32 ` [PATCH 09/12] ima: Use correct type for " Tyler Hicks
2020-06-25 21:20 ` Mimi Zohar
2020-06-23 0:32 ` [PATCH 10/12] ima: Move validation of the keyrings conditional into ima_validate_rule() Tyler Hicks
2020-06-25 19:50 ` Tyler Hicks
2020-06-25 20:46 ` Mimi Zohar
2020-06-23 0:32 ` [PATCH 11/12] ima: Use the common function to detect LSM conditionals in a rule Tyler Hicks
2020-06-25 22:45 ` Mimi Zohar
2020-06-23 0:32 ` [PATCH 12/12] ima: Support additional conditionals in the KEXEC_CMDLINE hook function Tyler Hicks
2020-06-23 0:32 ` Tyler Hicks
2020-06-25 22:56 ` Mimi Zohar
2020-06-25 22:56 ` Mimi Zohar
2020-06-25 22:59 ` Tyler Hicks
2020-06-25 22:59 ` Tyler Hicks
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200623003236.830149-2-tyhicks@linux.microsoft.com \
--to=tyhicks@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=dmitry.kasatkin@gmail.com \
--cc=janne.karhunen@gmail.com \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nramas@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=prsriva02@gmail.com \
--cc=serge@hallyn.com \
--cc=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.