From: Jingyi Wang <wangjingyi11@huawei.com> To: <drjones@redhat.com>, <kvm@vger.kernel.org>, <kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu> Cc: <maz@kernel.org>, <wanghaibin.wang@huawei.com>, <yuzenghui@huawei.com>, <eric.auger@redhat.com>, <wangjingyi11@huawei.com>, <prime.zeng@hisilicon.com> Subject: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 06/10] arm64: microbench: Allow each test to specify its running times Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2020 15:42:40 +0800 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20200731074244.20432-7-wangjingyi11@huawei.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20200731074244.20432-1-wangjingyi11@huawei.com> For some test in micro-bench can be time consuming, we add a micro-bench test parameter to allow each individual test to specify its running times. Signed-off-by: Jingyi Wang <wangjingyi11@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com> --- arm/micro-bench.c | 27 ++++++++++++++------------- 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) diff --git a/arm/micro-bench.c b/arm/micro-bench.c index 82f3c07..93bd855 100644 --- a/arm/micro-bench.c +++ b/arm/micro-bench.c @@ -22,8 +22,6 @@ #include <asm/gic.h> #include <asm/gic-v3-its.h> -#define NTIMES (1U << 16) - static u32 cntfrq; static volatile bool irq_ready, irq_received; @@ -234,17 +232,18 @@ struct exit_test { const char *name; bool (*prep)(void); void (*exec)(void); + u32 times; bool run; }; static struct exit_test tests[] = { - {"hvc", NULL, hvc_exec, true}, - {"mmio_read_user", NULL, mmio_read_user_exec, true}, - {"mmio_read_vgic", NULL, mmio_read_vgic_exec, true}, - {"eoi", NULL, eoi_exec, true}, - {"ipi", ipi_prep, ipi_exec, true}, - {"ipi_hw", ipi_hw_prep, ipi_exec, true}, - {"lpi", lpi_prep, lpi_exec, true}, + {"hvc", NULL, hvc_exec, 65536, true}, + {"mmio_read_user", NULL, mmio_read_user_exec, 65536, true}, + {"mmio_read_vgic", NULL, mmio_read_vgic_exec, 65536, true}, + {"eoi", NULL, eoi_exec, 65536, true}, + {"ipi", ipi_prep, ipi_exec, 65536, true}, + {"ipi_hw", ipi_hw_prep, ipi_exec, 65536, true}, + {"lpi", lpi_prep, lpi_exec, 65536, true}, }; struct ns_time { @@ -265,7 +264,7 @@ static void ticks_to_ns_time(uint64_t ticks, struct ns_time *ns_time) static void loop_test(struct exit_test *test) { - uint64_t start, end, total_ticks, ntimes = NTIMES; + uint64_t start, end, total_ticks, ntimes = 0; struct ns_time total_ns, avg_ns; if (test->prep) { @@ -276,15 +275,17 @@ static void loop_test(struct exit_test *test) } isb(); start = read_sysreg(cntpct_el0); - while (ntimes--) + while (ntimes < test->times) { test->exec(); + ntimes++; + } isb(); end = read_sysreg(cntpct_el0); total_ticks = end - start; ticks_to_ns_time(total_ticks, &total_ns); - avg_ns.ns = total_ns.ns / NTIMES; - avg_ns.ns_frac = total_ns.ns_frac / NTIMES; + avg_ns.ns = total_ns.ns / ntimes; + avg_ns.ns_frac = total_ns.ns_frac / ntimes; printf("%-30s%15" PRId64 ".%-15" PRId64 "%15" PRId64 ".%-15" PRId64 "\n", test->name, total_ns.ns, total_ns.ns_frac, avg_ns.ns, avg_ns.ns_frac); -- 2.19.1
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jingyi Wang <wangjingyi11@huawei.com> To: <drjones@redhat.com>, <kvm@vger.kernel.org>, <kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu> Cc: maz@kernel.org, prime.zeng@hisilicon.com Subject: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 06/10] arm64: microbench: Allow each test to specify its running times Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2020 15:42:40 +0800 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20200731074244.20432-7-wangjingyi11@huawei.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20200731074244.20432-1-wangjingyi11@huawei.com> For some test in micro-bench can be time consuming, we add a micro-bench test parameter to allow each individual test to specify its running times. Signed-off-by: Jingyi Wang <wangjingyi11@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com> --- arm/micro-bench.c | 27 ++++++++++++++------------- 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) diff --git a/arm/micro-bench.c b/arm/micro-bench.c index 82f3c07..93bd855 100644 --- a/arm/micro-bench.c +++ b/arm/micro-bench.c @@ -22,8 +22,6 @@ #include <asm/gic.h> #include <asm/gic-v3-its.h> -#define NTIMES (1U << 16) - static u32 cntfrq; static volatile bool irq_ready, irq_received; @@ -234,17 +232,18 @@ struct exit_test { const char *name; bool (*prep)(void); void (*exec)(void); + u32 times; bool run; }; static struct exit_test tests[] = { - {"hvc", NULL, hvc_exec, true}, - {"mmio_read_user", NULL, mmio_read_user_exec, true}, - {"mmio_read_vgic", NULL, mmio_read_vgic_exec, true}, - {"eoi", NULL, eoi_exec, true}, - {"ipi", ipi_prep, ipi_exec, true}, - {"ipi_hw", ipi_hw_prep, ipi_exec, true}, - {"lpi", lpi_prep, lpi_exec, true}, + {"hvc", NULL, hvc_exec, 65536, true}, + {"mmio_read_user", NULL, mmio_read_user_exec, 65536, true}, + {"mmio_read_vgic", NULL, mmio_read_vgic_exec, 65536, true}, + {"eoi", NULL, eoi_exec, 65536, true}, + {"ipi", ipi_prep, ipi_exec, 65536, true}, + {"ipi_hw", ipi_hw_prep, ipi_exec, 65536, true}, + {"lpi", lpi_prep, lpi_exec, 65536, true}, }; struct ns_time { @@ -265,7 +264,7 @@ static void ticks_to_ns_time(uint64_t ticks, struct ns_time *ns_time) static void loop_test(struct exit_test *test) { - uint64_t start, end, total_ticks, ntimes = NTIMES; + uint64_t start, end, total_ticks, ntimes = 0; struct ns_time total_ns, avg_ns; if (test->prep) { @@ -276,15 +275,17 @@ static void loop_test(struct exit_test *test) } isb(); start = read_sysreg(cntpct_el0); - while (ntimes--) + while (ntimes < test->times) { test->exec(); + ntimes++; + } isb(); end = read_sysreg(cntpct_el0); total_ticks = end - start; ticks_to_ns_time(total_ticks, &total_ns); - avg_ns.ns = total_ns.ns / NTIMES; - avg_ns.ns_frac = total_ns.ns_frac / NTIMES; + avg_ns.ns = total_ns.ns / ntimes; + avg_ns.ns_frac = total_ns.ns_frac / ntimes; printf("%-30s%15" PRId64 ".%-15" PRId64 "%15" PRId64 ".%-15" PRId64 "\n", test->name, total_ns.ns, total_ns.ns_frac, avg_ns.ns, avg_ns.ns_frac); -- 2.19.1 _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-31 7:43 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2020-07-31 7:42 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 00/10] arm/arm64: Add IPI/LPI/vtimer latency test Jingyi Wang 2020-07-31 7:42 ` Jingyi Wang 2020-07-31 7:42 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 01/10] arm64: microbench: get correct ipi received num Jingyi Wang 2020-07-31 7:42 ` Jingyi Wang 2020-07-31 7:42 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 02/10] arm64: microbench: Generalize ipi test names Jingyi Wang 2020-07-31 7:42 ` Jingyi Wang 2020-07-31 7:42 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 03/10] arm64: microbench: gic: Add ipi latency test for gicv4.1 support kvm Jingyi Wang 2020-07-31 7:42 ` Jingyi Wang 2020-07-31 7:42 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 04/10] arm64: its: Handle its command queue wrapping Jingyi Wang 2020-07-31 7:42 ` Jingyi Wang 2020-07-31 7:42 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 05/10] arm64: microbench: its: Add LPI latency test Jingyi Wang 2020-07-31 7:42 ` Jingyi Wang 2020-07-31 7:42 ` Jingyi Wang [this message] 2020-07-31 7:42 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 06/10] arm64: microbench: Allow each test to specify its running times Jingyi Wang 2020-07-31 7:42 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 07/10] arm64: microbench: Add time limit for each individual test Jingyi Wang 2020-07-31 7:42 ` Jingyi Wang 2020-08-01 16:13 ` Andrew Jones 2020-08-01 16:13 ` Andrew Jones 2020-07-31 7:42 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 08/10] arm64: microbench: Add vtimer latency test Jingyi Wang 2020-07-31 7:42 ` Jingyi Wang 2020-08-01 16:22 ` Andrew Jones 2020-08-01 16:22 ` Andrew Jones 2020-07-31 7:42 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 09/10] arm64: microbench: Add test->post() to further process test results Jingyi Wang 2020-07-31 7:42 ` Jingyi Wang 2020-08-01 17:03 ` Andrew Jones 2020-08-01 17:03 ` Andrew Jones 2020-07-31 7:42 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 10/10] arm64: microbench: Add timer_post() to get actual PPI latency Jingyi Wang 2020-07-31 7:42 ` Jingyi Wang 2020-07-31 12:01 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 00/10] arm/arm64: Add IPI/LPI/vtimer latency test Andrew Jones 2020-07-31 12:01 ` Andrew Jones 2020-08-03 2:15 ` Jingyi Wang 2020-08-03 2:15 ` Jingyi Wang 2020-08-01 17:40 ` Andrew Jones 2020-08-01 17:40 ` Andrew Jones 2020-08-05 11:54 ` Jingyi Wang 2020-08-05 11:54 ` Jingyi Wang 2020-08-05 12:13 ` Marc Zyngier 2020-08-05 12:13 ` Marc Zyngier 2020-08-11 1:48 ` Jingyi Wang 2020-08-11 1:48 ` Jingyi Wang 2020-08-11 7:49 ` Marc Zyngier 2020-08-11 7:49 ` Marc Zyngier 2020-08-17 1:46 ` Jingyi Wang 2020-08-17 1:46 ` Jingyi Wang 2020-08-17 8:26 ` Marc Zyngier 2020-08-17 8:26 ` Marc Zyngier
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20200731074244.20432-7-wangjingyi11@huawei.com \ --to=wangjingyi11@huawei.com \ --cc=drjones@redhat.com \ --cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \ --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \ --cc=maz@kernel.org \ --cc=prime.zeng@hisilicon.com \ --cc=wanghaibin.wang@huawei.com \ --cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.