All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
	Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Michael Neuling <mikey@neuling.org>,
	Gautham R Shenoy <ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>,
	Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/2] sched/topology: Allow archs to override cpu_smt_mask
Date: Fri,  7 Aug 2020 13:15:16 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200807074517.27957-1-srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)

cpu_smt_mask tracks topology_sibling_cpumask. This would be good for
most architectures. One of the users of cpu_smt_mask(), would be to
identify idle-cores. On Power9, a pair of SMT4 cores can be presented by
the firmware as a SMT8 core for backward compatibility reasons.

Powerpc allows LPARs to be live migrated from Power8 to Power9. Do note
Power8 had only SMT8 cores. Existing software which has been
developed/configured for Power8 would expect to see SMT8 core.
Maintaining the illusion of SMT8 core is a requirement to make that
work.

In order to maintain above userspace backward compatibility with
previous versions of processor, Power9 onwards there is option to the
firmware to advertise a pair of SMT4 cores as a fused cores aka SMT8
core. On Power9 this pair shares the L2 cache as well. However, from the
scheduler's point of view, a core should be determined by SMT4, since
its a completely independent unit of compute. Hence allow PowerPc
architecture to override the default cpu_smt_mask() to point to the SMT4
cores in a SMT8 mode.

This will ensure the scheduler is always given the right information.

Cc: linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Michael Neuling <mikey@neuling.org>
Cc: Gautham R Shenoy <ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
Cc: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Cc: Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@linux.ibm.com>
Acked-by; Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
Changelog v1->v2:
	Update the commit msg based on the discussion in community esp
	with Peter Zijlstra and Michael Ellerman.

 include/linux/topology.h | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/topology.h b/include/linux/topology.h
index 608fa4aadf0e..ad03df1cc266 100644
--- a/include/linux/topology.h
+++ b/include/linux/topology.h
@@ -198,7 +198,7 @@ static inline int cpu_to_mem(int cpu)
 #define topology_die_cpumask(cpu)		cpumask_of(cpu)
 #endif
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_SMT
+#if defined(CONFIG_SCHED_SMT) && !defined(cpu_smt_mask)
 static inline const struct cpumask *cpu_smt_mask(int cpu)
 {
 	return topology_sibling_cpumask(cpu);
-- 
2.18.2


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Gautham R Shenoy <ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Michael Neuling <mikey@neuling.org>,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>,
	linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/2] sched/topology: Allow archs to override cpu_smt_mask
Date: Fri,  7 Aug 2020 13:15:16 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200807074517.27957-1-srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)

cpu_smt_mask tracks topology_sibling_cpumask. This would be good for
most architectures. One of the users of cpu_smt_mask(), would be to
identify idle-cores. On Power9, a pair of SMT4 cores can be presented by
the firmware as a SMT8 core for backward compatibility reasons.

Powerpc allows LPARs to be live migrated from Power8 to Power9. Do note
Power8 had only SMT8 cores. Existing software which has been
developed/configured for Power8 would expect to see SMT8 core.
Maintaining the illusion of SMT8 core is a requirement to make that
work.

In order to maintain above userspace backward compatibility with
previous versions of processor, Power9 onwards there is option to the
firmware to advertise a pair of SMT4 cores as a fused cores aka SMT8
core. On Power9 this pair shares the L2 cache as well. However, from the
scheduler's point of view, a core should be determined by SMT4, since
its a completely independent unit of compute. Hence allow PowerPc
architecture to override the default cpu_smt_mask() to point to the SMT4
cores in a SMT8 mode.

This will ensure the scheduler is always given the right information.

Cc: linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Michael Neuling <mikey@neuling.org>
Cc: Gautham R Shenoy <ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
Cc: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Cc: Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@linux.ibm.com>
Acked-by; Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
Changelog v1->v2:
	Update the commit msg based on the discussion in community esp
	with Peter Zijlstra and Michael Ellerman.

 include/linux/topology.h | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/topology.h b/include/linux/topology.h
index 608fa4aadf0e..ad03df1cc266 100644
--- a/include/linux/topology.h
+++ b/include/linux/topology.h
@@ -198,7 +198,7 @@ static inline int cpu_to_mem(int cpu)
 #define topology_die_cpumask(cpu)		cpumask_of(cpu)
 #endif
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_SMT
+#if defined(CONFIG_SCHED_SMT) && !defined(cpu_smt_mask)
 static inline const struct cpumask *cpu_smt_mask(int cpu)
 {
 	return topology_sibling_cpumask(cpu);
-- 
2.18.2


             reply	other threads:[~2020-08-07  7:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-08-07  7:45 Srikar Dronamraju [this message]
2020-08-07  7:45 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] sched/topology: Allow archs to override cpu_smt_mask Srikar Dronamraju
2020-08-07  7:45 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] powerpc/topology: Override cpu_smt_mask Srikar Dronamraju
2020-08-07  7:45   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2020-09-17 11:27 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] sched/topology: Allow archs to override cpu_smt_mask Michael Ellerman
2020-09-17 11:27   ` Michael Ellerman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200807074517.27957-1-srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
    --cc=mikey@neuling.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=svaidy@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=valentin.schneider@arm.com \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.