All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
	Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
	Anton Blanchard <anton@ozlabs.org>,
	"Oliver O'Halloran" <oohall@gmail.com>,
	Nathan Lynch <nathanl@linux.ibm.com>,
	Michael Neuling <mikey@neuling.org>,
	Gautham R Shenoy <ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>,
	Jordan Niethe <jniethe5@gmail.com>,
	Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH v5 01/10] powerpc/smp: Fix a warning under !NEED_MULTIPLE_NODES
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2020 12:48:25 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200810071834.92514-2-srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200810071834.92514-1-srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

Fix a build warning in a non CONFIG_NEED_MULTIPLE_NODES
"error: _numa_cpu_lookup_table_ undeclared"

Cc: linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Cc: Anton Blanchard <anton@ozlabs.org>
Cc: Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@gmail.com>
Cc: Nathan Lynch <nathanl@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Michael Neuling <mikey@neuling.org>
Cc: Gautham R Shenoy <ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
Cc: Jordan Niethe <jniethe5@gmail.com>
Cc: Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Gautham R. Shenoy <ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
Changelog v2 -> v3:
	Removed node caching part. Rewrote the Commit msg (Michael Ellerman)
	Renamed to powerpc/smp: Fix a warning under !NEED_MULTIPLE_NODES

 arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c
index 73199470c265..edf94ca64eea 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c
@@ -860,6 +860,7 @@ void __init smp_prepare_cpus(unsigned int max_cpus)
 					GFP_KERNEL, cpu_to_node(cpu));
 		zalloc_cpumask_var_node(&per_cpu(cpu_core_map, cpu),
 					GFP_KERNEL, cpu_to_node(cpu));
+#ifdef CONFIG_NEED_MULTIPLE_NODES
 		/*
 		 * numa_node_id() works after this.
 		 */
@@ -868,6 +869,7 @@ void __init smp_prepare_cpus(unsigned int max_cpus)
 			set_cpu_numa_mem(cpu,
 				local_memory_node(numa_cpu_lookup_table[cpu]));
 		}
+#endif
 	}
 
 	/* Init the cpumasks so the boot CPU is related to itself */
-- 
2.18.2


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Nathan Lynch <nathanl@linux.ibm.com>,
	Gautham R Shenoy <ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Michael Neuling <mikey@neuling.org>,
	Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Jordan Niethe <jniethe5@gmail.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
	Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>,
	Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@gmail.com>,
	linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v5 01/10] powerpc/smp: Fix a warning under !NEED_MULTIPLE_NODES
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2020 12:48:25 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200810071834.92514-2-srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200810071834.92514-1-srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

Fix a build warning in a non CONFIG_NEED_MULTIPLE_NODES
"error: _numa_cpu_lookup_table_ undeclared"

Cc: linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Cc: Anton Blanchard <anton@ozlabs.org>
Cc: Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@gmail.com>
Cc: Nathan Lynch <nathanl@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Michael Neuling <mikey@neuling.org>
Cc: Gautham R Shenoy <ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
Cc: Jordan Niethe <jniethe5@gmail.com>
Cc: Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Gautham R. Shenoy <ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
Changelog v2 -> v3:
	Removed node caching part. Rewrote the Commit msg (Michael Ellerman)
	Renamed to powerpc/smp: Fix a warning under !NEED_MULTIPLE_NODES

 arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c
index 73199470c265..edf94ca64eea 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c
@@ -860,6 +860,7 @@ void __init smp_prepare_cpus(unsigned int max_cpus)
 					GFP_KERNEL, cpu_to_node(cpu));
 		zalloc_cpumask_var_node(&per_cpu(cpu_core_map, cpu),
 					GFP_KERNEL, cpu_to_node(cpu));
+#ifdef CONFIG_NEED_MULTIPLE_NODES
 		/*
 		 * numa_node_id() works after this.
 		 */
@@ -868,6 +869,7 @@ void __init smp_prepare_cpus(unsigned int max_cpus)
 			set_cpu_numa_mem(cpu,
 				local_memory_node(numa_cpu_lookup_table[cpu]));
 		}
+#endif
 	}
 
 	/* Init the cpumasks so the boot CPU is related to itself */
-- 
2.18.2


  reply	other threads:[~2020-08-10  7:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-08-10  7:18 [PATCH v5 00/10] Coregroup support on Powerpc Srikar Dronamraju
2020-08-10  7:18 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2020-08-10  7:18 ` Srikar Dronamraju [this message]
2020-08-10  7:18   ` [PATCH v5 01/10] powerpc/smp: Fix a warning under !NEED_MULTIPLE_NODES Srikar Dronamraju
2020-08-10  7:18 ` [PATCH v5 02/10] powerpc/smp: Merge Power9 topology with Power topology Srikar Dronamraju
2020-08-10  7:18   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2020-08-10  7:18 ` [PATCH v5 03/10] powerpc/smp: Move powerpc_topology above Srikar Dronamraju
2020-08-10  7:18   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2020-08-10  7:18 ` [PATCH v5 04/10] powerpc/smp: Move topology fixups into a new function Srikar Dronamraju
2020-08-10  7:18   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2020-08-10  7:18 ` [PATCH v5 05/10] powerpc/smp: Dont assume l2-cache to be superset of sibling Srikar Dronamraju
2020-08-10  7:18   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2020-09-11 11:55   ` Michael Ellerman
2020-09-11 11:55     ` Michael Ellerman
2020-09-12  4:46     ` Srikar Dronamraju
2020-09-12  4:46       ` Srikar Dronamraju
2020-09-13  1:46       ` Michael Ellerman
2020-09-13  1:46         ` Michael Ellerman
2020-09-13 16:53         ` Srikar Dronamraju
2020-09-13 16:53           ` Srikar Dronamraju
2020-09-13 17:10         ` Srikar Dronamraju
2020-09-13 17:10           ` Srikar Dronamraju
2020-09-13 17:42     ` Satheesh Rajendran
2020-09-13 17:42       ` Satheesh Rajendran
2020-08-10  7:18 ` [PATCH v5 06/10] powerpc/smp: Optimize start_secondary Srikar Dronamraju
2020-08-10  7:18   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2020-08-12  5:37   ` Gautham R Shenoy
2020-08-12  5:37     ` Gautham R Shenoy
2020-08-10  7:18 ` [PATCH v5 07/10] powerpc/numa: Detect support for coregroup Srikar Dronamraju
2020-08-10  7:18   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2020-08-10  7:18 ` [PATCH v5 08/10] powerpc/smp: Allocate cpumask only after searching thread group Srikar Dronamraju
2020-08-10  7:18   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2020-08-10  7:18 ` [PATCH v5 09/10] powerpc/smp: Create coregroup domain Srikar Dronamraju
2020-08-10  7:18   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2020-08-10  7:18 ` [PATCH v5 10/10] powerpc/smp: Implement cpu_to_coregroup_id Srikar Dronamraju
2020-08-10  7:18   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2020-09-17 11:27 ` [PATCH v5 00/10] Coregroup support on Powerpc Michael Ellerman
2020-09-17 11:27   ` Michael Ellerman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200810071834.92514-2-srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=anton@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=jniethe5@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mikey@neuling.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=nathanl@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=oohall@gmail.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=svaidy@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=valentin.schneider@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.