All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Colin King <colin.king@canonical.com>
To: "Harry Wentland" <harry.wentland@amd.com>,
	"Leo Li" <sunpeng.li@amd.com>,
	"Alex Deucher" <alexander.deucher@amd.com>,
	"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
	"David Airlie" <airlied@linux.ie>,
	"Daniel Vetter" <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
	"Anthony Koo" <Anthony.Koo@amd.com>,
	"Aurabindo Pillai" <aurabindo.pillai@amd.com>,
	amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH][next] drm/amd/display: fix potential integer overflow when shifting 32 bit variable bl_pwm
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2020 13:09:14 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200818120914.20280-1-colin.king@canonical.com> (raw)

From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>

The 32 bit unsigned integer bl_pwm is being shifted using 32 bit arithmetic
and then being assigned to a 64 bit unsigned integer.  There is a potential
for a 32 bit overflow so cast bl_pwm to enforce a 64 bit shift operation
to avoid this.

Addresses-Coverity: ("unintentional integer overflow")
Fixes: 3ba01817365c ("drm/amd/display: Move panel_cntl specific register from abm to panel_cntl.")
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dce/dce_panel_cntl.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dce/dce_panel_cntl.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dce/dce_panel_cntl.c
index a6d73d30837c..df7f826eebd8 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dce/dce_panel_cntl.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dce/dce_panel_cntl.c
@@ -76,7 +76,7 @@ static unsigned int dce_get_16_bit_backlight_from_pwm(struct panel_cntl *panel_c
 	else
 		bl_pwm &= 0xFFFF;
 
-	current_backlight = bl_pwm << (1 + bl_int_count);
+	current_backlight = (uint64_t)bl_pwm << (1 + bl_int_count);
 
 	if (bl_period == 0)
 		bl_period = 0xFFFF;
-- 
2.27.0


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Colin King <colin.king@canonical.com>
To: "Harry Wentland" <harry.wentland@amd.com>,
	"Leo Li" <sunpeng.li@amd.com>,
	"Alex Deucher" <alexander.deucher@amd.com>,
	"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
	"David Airlie" <airlied@linux.ie>,
	"Daniel Vetter" <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
	"Anthony Koo" <Anthony.Koo@amd.com>,
	"Aurabindo Pillai" <aurabindo.pillai@amd.com>,
	amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH][next] drm/amd/display: fix potential integer overflow when shifting 32 bit variable bl_pwm
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2020 12:09:14 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200818120914.20280-1-colin.king@canonical.com> (raw)

From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>

The 32 bit unsigned integer bl_pwm is being shifted using 32 bit arithmetic
and then being assigned to a 64 bit unsigned integer.  There is a potential
for a 32 bit overflow so cast bl_pwm to enforce a 64 bit shift operation
to avoid this.

Addresses-Coverity: ("unintentional integer overflow")
Fixes: 3ba01817365c ("drm/amd/display: Move panel_cntl specific register from abm to panel_cntl.")
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dce/dce_panel_cntl.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dce/dce_panel_cntl.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dce/dce_panel_cntl.c
index a6d73d30837c..df7f826eebd8 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dce/dce_panel_cntl.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dce/dce_panel_cntl.c
@@ -76,7 +76,7 @@ static unsigned int dce_get_16_bit_backlight_from_pwm(struct panel_cntl *panel_c
 	else
 		bl_pwm &= 0xFFFF;
 
-	current_backlight = bl_pwm << (1 + bl_int_count);
+	current_backlight = (uint64_t)bl_pwm << (1 + bl_int_count);
 
 	if (bl_period = 0)
 		bl_period = 0xFFFF;
-- 
2.27.0

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Colin King <colin.king@canonical.com>
To: "Harry Wentland" <harry.wentland@amd.com>,
	"Leo Li" <sunpeng.li@amd.com>,
	"Alex Deucher" <alexander.deucher@amd.com>,
	"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
	"David Airlie" <airlied@linux.ie>,
	"Daniel Vetter" <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
	"Anthony Koo" <Anthony.Koo@amd.com>,
	"Aurabindo Pillai" <aurabindo.pillai@amd.com>,
	amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH][next] drm/amd/display: fix potential integer overflow when shifting 32 bit variable bl_pwm
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2020 13:09:14 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200818120914.20280-1-colin.king@canonical.com> (raw)

From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>

The 32 bit unsigned integer bl_pwm is being shifted using 32 bit arithmetic
and then being assigned to a 64 bit unsigned integer.  There is a potential
for a 32 bit overflow so cast bl_pwm to enforce a 64 bit shift operation
to avoid this.

Addresses-Coverity: ("unintentional integer overflow")
Fixes: 3ba01817365c ("drm/amd/display: Move panel_cntl specific register from abm to panel_cntl.")
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dce/dce_panel_cntl.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dce/dce_panel_cntl.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dce/dce_panel_cntl.c
index a6d73d30837c..df7f826eebd8 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dce/dce_panel_cntl.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dce/dce_panel_cntl.c
@@ -76,7 +76,7 @@ static unsigned int dce_get_16_bit_backlight_from_pwm(struct panel_cntl *panel_c
 	else
 		bl_pwm &= 0xFFFF;
 
-	current_backlight = bl_pwm << (1 + bl_int_count);
+	current_backlight = (uint64_t)bl_pwm << (1 + bl_int_count);
 
 	if (bl_period == 0)
 		bl_period = 0xFFFF;
-- 
2.27.0

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Colin King <colin.king@canonical.com>
To: "Harry Wentland" <harry.wentland@amd.com>,
	"Leo Li" <sunpeng.li@amd.com>,
	"Alex Deucher" <alexander.deucher@amd.com>,
	"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
	"David Airlie" <airlied@linux.ie>,
	"Daniel Vetter" <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
	"Anthony Koo" <Anthony.Koo@amd.com>,
	"Aurabindo Pillai" <aurabindo.pillai@amd.com>,
	amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH][next] drm/amd/display: fix potential integer overflow when shifting 32 bit variable bl_pwm
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2020 13:09:14 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200818120914.20280-1-colin.king@canonical.com> (raw)

From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>

The 32 bit unsigned integer bl_pwm is being shifted using 32 bit arithmetic
and then being assigned to a 64 bit unsigned integer.  There is a potential
for a 32 bit overflow so cast bl_pwm to enforce a 64 bit shift operation
to avoid this.

Addresses-Coverity: ("unintentional integer overflow")
Fixes: 3ba01817365c ("drm/amd/display: Move panel_cntl specific register from abm to panel_cntl.")
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dce/dce_panel_cntl.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dce/dce_panel_cntl.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dce/dce_panel_cntl.c
index a6d73d30837c..df7f826eebd8 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dce/dce_panel_cntl.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dce/dce_panel_cntl.c
@@ -76,7 +76,7 @@ static unsigned int dce_get_16_bit_backlight_from_pwm(struct panel_cntl *panel_c
 	else
 		bl_pwm &= 0xFFFF;
 
-	current_backlight = bl_pwm << (1 + bl_int_count);
+	current_backlight = (uint64_t)bl_pwm << (1 + bl_int_count);
 
 	if (bl_period == 0)
 		bl_period = 0xFFFF;
-- 
2.27.0

_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx

             reply	other threads:[~2020-08-18 12:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-08-18 12:09 Colin King [this message]
2020-08-18 12:09 ` [PATCH][next] drm/amd/display: fix potential integer overflow when shifting 32 bit variable bl_pwm Colin King
2020-08-18 12:09 ` Colin King
2020-08-18 12:09 ` Colin King
2020-08-18 14:43 ` Alex Deucher
2020-08-18 14:43   ` Alex Deucher
2020-08-18 14:43   ` Alex Deucher
2020-08-18 14:43   ` [PATCH][next] drm/amd/display: fix potential integer overflow when shifting 32 bit variable bl_p Alex Deucher

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200818120914.20280-1-colin.king@canonical.com \
    --to=colin.king@canonical.com \
    --cc=Anthony.Koo@amd.com \
    --cc=airlied@linux.ie \
    --cc=alexander.deucher@amd.com \
    --cc=amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=aurabindo.pillai@amd.com \
    --cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
    --cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=harry.wentland@amd.com \
    --cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sunpeng.li@amd.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.