All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Liam Beguin <liambeguin@gmail.com>
To: liambeguin@gmail.com, ysato@users.sourceforge.jp, dalias@libc.org
Cc: linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/1] sh: add support for cmpxchg on u8 and u16 pointers
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2020 03:05:11 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200819030511.1114-1-liambeguin@gmail.com> (raw)

The kernel test bot reported[1] that using set_mask_bits on a u8 causes
the following issue on SuperH:

    >> ERROR: modpost: "__cmpxchg_called_with_bad_pointer" [drivers/phy/ti/phy-tusb1210.ko] undefined!

Add support for cmpxchg on u8 and u16 pointers.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1288894/#1485536

Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Beguin <liambeguin@gmail.com>
---

Hi,

This was reported by the kernel test bot on an architecture I can't
really test on. I was only able to make sure the build succeeds, but
nothing more.
This patch is based on the __cmpxchg_u32 impletmentation and seems
incomplete based on the different cmpxchg headers I can find.

Do these function need to be impletmented in each header
simulataneously?

Thanks,
Liam

 arch/sh/include/asm/cmpxchg-irq.h | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 arch/sh/include/asm/cmpxchg.h     |  5 +++--
 2 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/sh/include/asm/cmpxchg-irq.h b/arch/sh/include/asm/cmpxchg-irq.h
index 07d3e7f08389..918c4153a930 100644
--- a/arch/sh/include/asm/cmpxchg-irq.h
+++ b/arch/sh/include/asm/cmpxchg-irq.h
@@ -51,4 +51,31 @@ static inline unsigned long __cmpxchg_u32(volatile int *m, unsigned long old,
 	return retval;
 }
 
+static inline unsigned long __cmpxchg_u16(volatile u16 *m, unsigned long old,
+	unsigned long new)
+{
+	u16 retval;
+	unsigned long flags;
+
+	local_irq_save(flags);
+	retval = *m;
+	if (retval = old)
+		*m = new;
+	local_irq_restore(flags);
+	return (unsigned long)retval;
+}
+
+static inline unsigned long __cmpxchg_u8(volatile u8 *m, unsigned long old,
+	unsigned long new)
+{
+	u8 retval;
+	unsigned long flags;
+
+	local_irq_save(flags);
+	retval = *m;
+	if (retval = old)
+		*m = new;
+	local_irq_restore(flags);
+	return (unsigned long)retval;
+}
 #endif /* __ASM_SH_CMPXCHG_IRQ_H */
diff --git a/arch/sh/include/asm/cmpxchg.h b/arch/sh/include/asm/cmpxchg.h
index e9501d85c278..7d65d0fd1665 100644
--- a/arch/sh/include/asm/cmpxchg.h
+++ b/arch/sh/include/asm/cmpxchg.h
@@ -56,8 +56,9 @@ static inline unsigned long __cmpxchg(volatile void * ptr, unsigned long old,
 		unsigned long new, int size)
 {
 	switch (size) {
-	case 4:
-		return __cmpxchg_u32(ptr, old, new);
+	case 4: return __cmpxchg_u32((int *)ptr, old, new);
+	case 2: return __cmpxchg_u16((u16 *)ptr, old, new);
+	case 1: return __cmpxchg_u8((u8 *)ptr, old, new);
 	}
 	__cmpxchg_called_with_bad_pointer();
 	return old;
-- 
2.27.0

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Liam Beguin <liambeguin@gmail.com>
To: liambeguin@gmail.com, ysato@users.sourceforge.jp, dalias@libc.org
Cc: linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/1] sh: add support for cmpxchg on u8 and u16 pointers
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2020 23:05:11 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200819030511.1114-1-liambeguin@gmail.com> (raw)

The kernel test bot reported[1] that using set_mask_bits on a u8 causes
the following issue on SuperH:

    >> ERROR: modpost: "__cmpxchg_called_with_bad_pointer" [drivers/phy/ti/phy-tusb1210.ko] undefined!

Add support for cmpxchg on u8 and u16 pointers.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1288894/#1485536

Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Beguin <liambeguin@gmail.com>
---

Hi,

This was reported by the kernel test bot on an architecture I can't
really test on. I was only able to make sure the build succeeds, but
nothing more.
This patch is based on the __cmpxchg_u32 impletmentation and seems
incomplete based on the different cmpxchg headers I can find.

Do these function need to be impletmented in each header
simulataneously?

Thanks,
Liam

 arch/sh/include/asm/cmpxchg-irq.h | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 arch/sh/include/asm/cmpxchg.h     |  5 +++--
 2 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/sh/include/asm/cmpxchg-irq.h b/arch/sh/include/asm/cmpxchg-irq.h
index 07d3e7f08389..918c4153a930 100644
--- a/arch/sh/include/asm/cmpxchg-irq.h
+++ b/arch/sh/include/asm/cmpxchg-irq.h
@@ -51,4 +51,31 @@ static inline unsigned long __cmpxchg_u32(volatile int *m, unsigned long old,
 	return retval;
 }
 
+static inline unsigned long __cmpxchg_u16(volatile u16 *m, unsigned long old,
+	unsigned long new)
+{
+	u16 retval;
+	unsigned long flags;
+
+	local_irq_save(flags);
+	retval = *m;
+	if (retval == old)
+		*m = new;
+	local_irq_restore(flags);
+	return (unsigned long)retval;
+}
+
+static inline unsigned long __cmpxchg_u8(volatile u8 *m, unsigned long old,
+	unsigned long new)
+{
+	u8 retval;
+	unsigned long flags;
+
+	local_irq_save(flags);
+	retval = *m;
+	if (retval == old)
+		*m = new;
+	local_irq_restore(flags);
+	return (unsigned long)retval;
+}
 #endif /* __ASM_SH_CMPXCHG_IRQ_H */
diff --git a/arch/sh/include/asm/cmpxchg.h b/arch/sh/include/asm/cmpxchg.h
index e9501d85c278..7d65d0fd1665 100644
--- a/arch/sh/include/asm/cmpxchg.h
+++ b/arch/sh/include/asm/cmpxchg.h
@@ -56,8 +56,9 @@ static inline unsigned long __cmpxchg(volatile void * ptr, unsigned long old,
 		unsigned long new, int size)
 {
 	switch (size) {
-	case 4:
-		return __cmpxchg_u32(ptr, old, new);
+	case 4: return __cmpxchg_u32((int *)ptr, old, new);
+	case 2: return __cmpxchg_u16((u16 *)ptr, old, new);
+	case 1: return __cmpxchg_u8((u8 *)ptr, old, new);
 	}
 	__cmpxchg_called_with_bad_pointer();
 	return old;
-- 
2.27.0


             reply	other threads:[~2020-08-19  3:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-08-19  3:05 Liam Beguin [this message]
2020-08-19  3:05 ` [PATCH 1/1] sh: add support for cmpxchg on u8 and u16 pointers Liam Beguin
2020-08-19  9:09 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2020-08-19  9:09   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2020-08-19 13:23   ` Liam Beguin
2020-08-19 13:23     ` Liam Beguin
2020-08-19 13:50     ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2020-08-19 13:50       ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2020-08-21 20:46 ` Rob Landley
2020-08-23  8:47 ` Geert Uytterhoeven

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200819030511.1114-1-liambeguin@gmail.com \
    --to=liambeguin@gmail.com \
    --cc=dalias@libc.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=ysato@users.sourceforge.jp \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.