From: Shijie Luo <luoshijie1@huawei.com>
To: <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>, <lihaotian9@huawei.com>,
<lutianxiong@huawei.com>, <jack@suse.cz>, <linfeilong@huawei.com>
Subject: [PATCH] fs: fix race condition oops between destroy_inode and writeback_sb_inodes
Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2020 04:38:18 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200919083818.10968-1-luoshijie1@huawei.com> (raw)
We tested an oops problem in Linux 4.18. The Call Trace message is
followed below.
[255946.665989] Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI
[255946.674811] Workqueue: writeback wb_workfn (flush-253:6)
[255946.676443] RIP: 0010:locked_inode_to_wb_and_lock_list+0x20/0x120
[255946.683916] RSP: 0018:ffffbb0e44727c00 EFLAGS: 00010286
[255946.685518] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 0000000000000000
[255946.687699] RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ffff9ef282be5398
[255946.689866] RBP: ffff9ef282be5398 R08: ffffbb0e44727cd8 R09: ffff9ef3064f306e
[255946.692037] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000010 R12: ffff9ef282be5420
[255946.694208] R13: ffff9ef3351cc800 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: ffff9ef3352e2058
[255946.696378] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff9ef33ad80000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
[255946.698835] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[255946.700604] CR2: 0000000000000000 CR3: 000000000760a005 CR4: 00000000003606e0
[255946.702787] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
[255946.704955] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
[255946.707123] Call Trace:
[255946.707918] writeback_sb_inodes+0x1fe/0x460
[255946.709244] __writeback_inodes_wb+0x5d/0xb0
[255946.710575] wb_writeback+0x265/0x2f0
[255946.711728] ? wb_workfn+0x3cf/0x4d0
[255946.712850] wb_workfn+0x3cf/0x4d0
[255946.713923] process_one_work+0x195/0x390
[255946.715173] worker_thread+0x30/0x390
[255946.716319] ? process_one_work+0x390/0x390
[255946.717625] kthread+0x10d/0x130
[255946.718789] ? kthread_flush_work_fn+0x10/0x10
[255946.720170] ret_from_fork+0x35/0x40
There is a race condition between destroy_inode and writeback_sb_inodes,
thread-1 thread-2
wb_workfn
writeback_inodes_wb
__writeback_inodes_wb
writeback_sb_inodes
wbc_attach_and_unlock_inode
iget_locked
destroy_inode
inode_detach_wb
inode->i_wb = NULL;
inode_to_wb_and_lock_list
locked_inode_to_wb_and_lock_list
wb_get
oops
so destroy inode after adding I_FREEING to inode state and the I_SYNC state
being cleared.
Reported-by: Tianxiong Lu <lutianxiong@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Shijie Luo <luoshijie1@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Haotian Li <lihaotian9@huawei.com>
---
fs/inode.c | 14 +++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/inode.c b/fs/inode.c
index 72c4c347afb7..571e2ecd5f03 100644
--- a/fs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/inode.c
@@ -1148,10 +1148,17 @@ struct inode *iget5_locked(struct super_block *sb, unsigned long hashval,
struct inode *new = alloc_inode(sb);
if (new) {
+ spin_lock(&new->i_lock);
new->i_state = 0;
+ spin_unlock(&new->i_lock);
inode = inode_insert5(new, hashval, test, set, data);
- if (unlikely(inode != new))
+ if (unlikely(inode != new)) {
+ spin_lock(&new->i_lock);
+ new->i_state |= I_FREEING;
+ spin_unlock(&new->i_lock);
+ inode_wait_for_writeback(inode);
destroy_inode(new);
+ }
}
}
return inode;
@@ -1218,6 +1225,11 @@ struct inode *iget_locked(struct super_block *sb, unsigned long ino)
* allocated.
*/
spin_unlock(&inode_hash_lock);
+
+ spin_lock(&inode->i_lock);
+ inode->i_state |= I_FREEING;
+ spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
+ inode_wait_for_writeback(inode);
destroy_inode(inode);
if (IS_ERR(old))
return NULL;
--
2.19.1
reply other threads:[~2020-09-19 8:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200919083818.10968-1-luoshijie1@huawei.com \
--to=luoshijie1@huawei.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=lihaotian9@huawei.com \
--cc=linfeilong@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lutianxiong@huawei.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.