All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>
To: Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@gmail.com>,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>,
	"Dave Jiang" <dave.jiang@intel.com>,
	Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>,
	Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@web.de>,
	linux-nvdimm <linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>,
	Libin <huawei.libin@huawei.com>,
	Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/2] libnvdimm/badrange: eliminate a meaningless spinlock operation
Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2020 18:45:46 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200919104546.3848-3-thunder.leizhen@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200919104546.3848-1-thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>

badrange_add() take the lock "badrange->lock", but it's released
immediately in add_badrange(), protect nothing.

The pseudo code is as follows:
In badrange_add():
	spin_lock(&badrange->lock);	<---------------
	rc = add_badrange(badrange, addr, length);	|
In add_badrange():					|
	//do nothing					|
	spin_unlock(&badrange->lock);	<---------------
	bre_new = kzalloc(sizeof(*bre_new), GFP_KERNEL);
	spin_lock(&badrange->lock);	<--- lock again

This lock/unlock operation is meaningless.

Because the static function add_badrange() is only called by
badrange_add(), so move its content into badrange_add() then delete it.
By the way, move "kfree(bre_new)" out of the lock protection, it really
doesn't need.

Fixes: b3b454f694db ("libnvdimm: fix clear poison locking with spinlock ...")
Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>
---
 drivers/nvdimm/badrange.c | 22 ++++++++--------------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/nvdimm/badrange.c b/drivers/nvdimm/badrange.c
index 9fdba8c43e8605e..7f78b659057902d 100644
--- a/drivers/nvdimm/badrange.c
+++ b/drivers/nvdimm/badrange.c
@@ -45,12 +45,12 @@ static int alloc_and_append_badrange_entry(struct badrange *badrange,
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static int add_badrange(struct badrange *badrange, u64 addr, u64 length)
+int badrange_add(struct badrange *badrange, u64 addr, u64 length)
 {
 	struct badrange_entry *bre, *bre_new;
 
-	spin_unlock(&badrange->lock);
 	bre_new = kzalloc(sizeof(*bre_new), GFP_KERNEL);
+
 	spin_lock(&badrange->lock);
 
 	/*
@@ -63,6 +63,7 @@ static int add_badrange(struct badrange *badrange, u64 addr, u64 length)
 			/* If length has changed, update this list entry */
 			if (bre->length != length)
 				bre->length = length;
+			spin_unlock(&badrange->lock);
 			kfree(bre_new);
 			return 0;
 		}
@@ -72,22 +73,15 @@ static int add_badrange(struct badrange *badrange, u64 addr, u64 length)
 	 * as any overlapping ranges will get resolved when the list is consumed
 	 * and converted to badblocks
 	 */
-	if (!bre_new)
+	if (!bre_new) {
+		spin_unlock(&badrange->lock);
 		return -ENOMEM;
-	append_badrange_entry(badrange, bre_new, addr, length);
-
-	return 0;
-}
-
-int badrange_add(struct badrange *badrange, u64 addr, u64 length)
-{
-	int rc;
+	}
 
-	spin_lock(&badrange->lock);
-	rc = add_badrange(badrange, addr, length);
+	append_badrange_entry(badrange, bre_new, addr, length);
 	spin_unlock(&badrange->lock);
 
-	return rc;
+	return 0;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(badrange_add);
 
-- 
1.8.3

_______________________________________________
Linux-nvdimm mailing list -- linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org
To unsubscribe send an email to linux-nvdimm-leave@lists.01.org

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>
To: Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@gmail.com>,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>,
	"Dave Jiang" <dave.jiang@intel.com>,
	Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>,
	Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@web.de>,
	linux-nvdimm <linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>,
	Libin <huawei.libin@huawei.com>,
	Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/2] libnvdimm/badrange: eliminate a meaningless spinlock operation
Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2020 18:45:46 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200919104546.3848-3-thunder.leizhen@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200919104546.3848-1-thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>

badrange_add() take the lock "badrange->lock", but it's released
immediately in add_badrange(), protect nothing.

The pseudo code is as follows:
In badrange_add():
	spin_lock(&badrange->lock);	<---------------
	rc = add_badrange(badrange, addr, length);	|
In add_badrange():					|
	//do nothing					|
	spin_unlock(&badrange->lock);	<---------------
	bre_new = kzalloc(sizeof(*bre_new), GFP_KERNEL);
	spin_lock(&badrange->lock);	<--- lock again

This lock/unlock operation is meaningless.

Because the static function add_badrange() is only called by
badrange_add(), so move its content into badrange_add() then delete it.
By the way, move "kfree(bre_new)" out of the lock protection, it really
doesn't need.

Fixes: b3b454f694db ("libnvdimm: fix clear poison locking with spinlock ...")
Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>
---
 drivers/nvdimm/badrange.c | 22 ++++++++--------------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/nvdimm/badrange.c b/drivers/nvdimm/badrange.c
index 9fdba8c43e8605e..7f78b659057902d 100644
--- a/drivers/nvdimm/badrange.c
+++ b/drivers/nvdimm/badrange.c
@@ -45,12 +45,12 @@ static int alloc_and_append_badrange_entry(struct badrange *badrange,
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static int add_badrange(struct badrange *badrange, u64 addr, u64 length)
+int badrange_add(struct badrange *badrange, u64 addr, u64 length)
 {
 	struct badrange_entry *bre, *bre_new;
 
-	spin_unlock(&badrange->lock);
 	bre_new = kzalloc(sizeof(*bre_new), GFP_KERNEL);
+
 	spin_lock(&badrange->lock);
 
 	/*
@@ -63,6 +63,7 @@ static int add_badrange(struct badrange *badrange, u64 addr, u64 length)
 			/* If length has changed, update this list entry */
 			if (bre->length != length)
 				bre->length = length;
+			spin_unlock(&badrange->lock);
 			kfree(bre_new);
 			return 0;
 		}
@@ -72,22 +73,15 @@ static int add_badrange(struct badrange *badrange, u64 addr, u64 length)
 	 * as any overlapping ranges will get resolved when the list is consumed
 	 * and converted to badblocks
 	 */
-	if (!bre_new)
+	if (!bre_new) {
+		spin_unlock(&badrange->lock);
 		return -ENOMEM;
-	append_badrange_entry(badrange, bre_new, addr, length);
-
-	return 0;
-}
-
-int badrange_add(struct badrange *badrange, u64 addr, u64 length)
-{
-	int rc;
+	}
 
-	spin_lock(&badrange->lock);
-	rc = add_badrange(badrange, addr, length);
+	append_badrange_entry(badrange, bre_new, addr, length);
 	spin_unlock(&badrange->lock);
 
-	return rc;
+	return 0;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(badrange_add);
 
-- 
1.8.3



  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-09-19 10:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-09-19 10:45 [PATCH v2 0/2] libnvdimm/badrange: simplify code Zhen Lei
2020-09-19 10:45 ` Zhen Lei
2020-09-19 10:45 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] libnvdimm/badrange: remove two redundant list_empty() branches Zhen Lei
2020-09-19 10:45   ` Zhen Lei
2020-09-19 10:45 ` Zhen Lei [this message]
2020-09-19 10:45   ` [PATCH v2 2/2] libnvdimm/badrange: eliminate a meaningless spinlock operation Zhen Lei

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200919104546.3848-3-thunder.leizhen@huawei.com \
    --to=thunder.leizhen@huawei.com \
    --cc=Markus.Elfring@web.de \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
    --cc=huawei.libin@huawei.com \
    --cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org \
    --cc=oohall@gmail.com \
    --cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
    --cc=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.