All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>,
	Vijayendra Suman <vijayendra.suman@oracle.com>,
	dm-devel@redhat.com, linux-block@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 1/6] dm: fix bio splitting and its bio completion order for regular IO
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2020 22:32:46 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200922023251.47712-2-snitzer@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200922023251.47712-1-snitzer@redhat.com>

dm_queue_split() is removed because __split_and_process_bio() _must_
handle splitting bios to ensure proper bio submission and completion
ordering as a bio is split.

Otherwise, multiple recursive calls to ->submit_bio will cause multiple
split bios to be allocated from the same ->bio_split mempool at the same
time. This would result in deadlock in low memory conditions because no
progress could be made (only one bio is available in ->bio_split
mempool).

This fix has been verified to still fix the loss of performance, due
to excess splitting, that commit 120c9257f5f1 provided.

Fixes: 120c9257f5f1 ("Revert "dm: always call blk_queue_split() in dm_process_bio()"")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.0+, requires custom backport due to 5.9 changes
Reported-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
---
 drivers/md/dm.c | 23 ++---------------------
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/md/dm.c b/drivers/md/dm.c
index 4a40df8af7d3..d948cd522431 100644
--- a/drivers/md/dm.c
+++ b/drivers/md/dm.c
@@ -1724,23 +1724,6 @@ static blk_qc_t __process_bio(struct mapped_device *md, struct dm_table *map,
 	return ret;
 }
 
-static void dm_queue_split(struct mapped_device *md, struct dm_target *ti, struct bio **bio)
-{
-	unsigned len, sector_count;
-
-	sector_count = bio_sectors(*bio);
-	len = min_t(sector_t, max_io_len((*bio)->bi_iter.bi_sector, ti), sector_count);
-
-	if (sector_count > len) {
-		struct bio *split = bio_split(*bio, len, GFP_NOIO, &md->queue->bio_split);
-
-		bio_chain(split, *bio);
-		trace_block_split(md->queue, split, (*bio)->bi_iter.bi_sector);
-		submit_bio_noacct(*bio);
-		*bio = split;
-	}
-}
-
 static blk_qc_t dm_process_bio(struct mapped_device *md,
 			       struct dm_table *map, struct bio *bio)
 {
@@ -1768,14 +1751,12 @@ static blk_qc_t dm_process_bio(struct mapped_device *md,
 	if (current->bio_list) {
 		if (is_abnormal_io(bio))
 			blk_queue_split(&bio);
-		else
-			dm_queue_split(md, ti, &bio);
+		/* regular IO is split by __split_and_process_bio */
 	}
 
 	if (dm_get_md_type(md) == DM_TYPE_NVME_BIO_BASED)
 		return __process_bio(md, map, bio, ti);
-	else
-		return __split_and_process_bio(md, map, bio);
+	return __split_and_process_bio(md, map, bio);
 }
 
 static blk_qc_t dm_submit_bio(struct bio *bio)
-- 
2.15.0


  reply	other threads:[~2020-09-22  2:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-09-22  2:32 [PATCH v3 0/6] dm: fix then improve bio splitting Mike Snitzer
2020-09-22  2:32 ` Mike Snitzer [this message]
2020-09-22  2:32 ` [PATCH v3 2/6] dm: fix comment in dm_process_bio() Mike Snitzer
2020-09-22  2:32 ` [PATCH v3 3/6] block: use lcm_not_zero() when stacking chunk_sectors Mike Snitzer
2020-09-22 19:28   ` Martin K. Petersen
2020-09-22  2:32 ` [PATCH v3 4/6] block: allow 'chunk_sectors' to be non-power-of-2 Mike Snitzer
2020-09-22 19:30   ` Martin K. Petersen
2020-09-22  2:32 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] dm table: stack 'chunk_sectors' limit to account for target-specific splitting Mike Snitzer
2020-09-22  2:32 ` [PATCH v3 6/6] dm: change max_io_len() to use blk_max_size_offset() Mike Snitzer
2020-09-23 16:38 ` [PATCH v3 0/6] dm: fix then improve bio splitting Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200922023251.47712-2-snitzer@redhat.com \
    --to=snitzer@redhat.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=vijayendra.suman@oracle.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.