From: Jisheng Zhang <Jisheng.Zhang@synaptics.com> To: Richard Zhu <hongxing.zhu@nxp.com>, Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de>, Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>, Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>, Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>, Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@pengutronix.de>, Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>, Jonathan Chocron <jonnyc@amazon.com>, Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@gmail.com>, Gustavo Pimentel <gustavo.pimentel@synopsys.com> Cc: NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@nxp.com>, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH dwc-next 0/3] PCI: dwc: remove useless dw_pcie_ops Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2020 16:56:57 +0800 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20201005165657.0fd31b10@xhacker.debian> (raw) Some designware based device driver especially host only driver may work well with the default read_dbi/write_dbi/link_up implementation in pcie-designware.c, thus remove the assumption to simplify those drivers. Jisheng Zhang (3): PCI: dwc: Don't assume the ops in dw_pcie always exists PCI: dwc: al: Remove useless dw_pcie_ops PCI: dwc: imx6: Remove useless dw_pcie_ops drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c | 5 ----- drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-al.c | 4 ---- drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c | 8 +++----- drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c | 14 +++++++------- 4 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-) -- 2.28.0
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jisheng Zhang <Jisheng.Zhang@synaptics.com> To: Richard Zhu <hongxing.zhu@nxp.com>, Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de>, Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>, Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>, Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>, Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@pengutronix.de>, Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>, Jonathan Chocron <jonnyc@amazon.com>, Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@gmail.com>, Gustavo Pimentel <gustavo.pimentel@synopsys.com> Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@nxp.com>, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH dwc-next 0/3] PCI: dwc: remove useless dw_pcie_ops Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2020 16:56:57 +0800 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20201005165657.0fd31b10@xhacker.debian> (raw) Some designware based device driver especially host only driver may work well with the default read_dbi/write_dbi/link_up implementation in pcie-designware.c, thus remove the assumption to simplify those drivers. Jisheng Zhang (3): PCI: dwc: Don't assume the ops in dw_pcie always exists PCI: dwc: al: Remove useless dw_pcie_ops PCI: dwc: imx6: Remove useless dw_pcie_ops drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c | 5 ----- drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-al.c | 4 ---- drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c | 8 +++----- drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c | 14 +++++++------- 4 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-) -- 2.28.0 _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next reply other threads:[~2020-10-05 9:16 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2020-10-05 8:56 Jisheng Zhang [this message] 2020-10-05 8:56 ` [PATCH dwc-next 0/3] PCI: dwc: remove useless dw_pcie_ops Jisheng Zhang 2020-10-05 8:57 ` [PATCH dwc-next 1/3] PCI: dwc: Don't assume the ops in dw_pcie always exists Jisheng Zhang 2020-10-05 8:57 ` Jisheng Zhang 2020-10-05 8:57 ` [PATCH dwc-next 2/3] PCI: dwc: al: Remove useless dw_pcie_ops Jisheng Zhang 2020-10-05 8:57 ` Jisheng Zhang 2020-10-05 9:03 ` [PATCH dwc-next 3/3] PCI: dwc: imx6: " Jisheng Zhang 2020-10-05 9:03 ` Jisheng Zhang
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20201005165657.0fd31b10@xhacker.debian \ --to=jisheng.zhang@synaptics.com \ --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \ --cc=festevam@gmail.com \ --cc=gustavo.pimentel@synopsys.com \ --cc=hongxing.zhu@nxp.com \ --cc=jingoohan1@gmail.com \ --cc=jonnyc@amazon.com \ --cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \ --cc=l.stach@pengutronix.de \ --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=linux-imx@nxp.com \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \ --cc=robh@kernel.org \ --cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \ --cc=shawnguo@kernel.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.