All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ido Schimmel <idosch@idosch.org>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org, dsahern@gmail.com,
	nikolay@nvidia.com, mlxsw@nvidia.com,
	Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>
Subject: [PATCH net] nexthop: Fix performance regression in nexthop deletion
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2020 20:29:14 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201016172914.643282-1-idosch@idosch.org> (raw)

From: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>

While insertion of 16k nexthops all using the same netdev ('dummy10')
takes less than a second, deletion takes about 130 seconds:

# time -p ip -b nexthop.batch
real 0.29
user 0.01
sys 0.15

# time -p ip link set dev dummy10 down
real 131.03
user 0.06
sys 0.52

This is because of repeated calls to synchronize_rcu() whenever a
nexthop is removed from a nexthop group:

# /usr/share/bcc/tools/offcputime -p `pgrep -nx ip` -K
...
    b'finish_task_switch'
    b'schedule'
    b'schedule_timeout'
    b'wait_for_completion'
    b'__wait_rcu_gp'
    b'synchronize_rcu.part.0'
    b'synchronize_rcu'
    b'__remove_nexthop'
    b'remove_nexthop'
    b'nexthop_flush_dev'
    b'nh_netdev_event'
    b'raw_notifier_call_chain'
    b'call_netdevice_notifiers_info'
    b'__dev_notify_flags'
    b'dev_change_flags'
    b'do_setlink'
    b'__rtnl_newlink'
    b'rtnl_newlink'
    b'rtnetlink_rcv_msg'
    b'netlink_rcv_skb'
    b'rtnetlink_rcv'
    b'netlink_unicast'
    b'netlink_sendmsg'
    b'____sys_sendmsg'
    b'___sys_sendmsg'
    b'__sys_sendmsg'
    b'__x64_sys_sendmsg'
    b'do_syscall_64'
    b'entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe'
    -                ip (277)
        126554955

Since nexthops are always deleted under RTNL, synchronize_net() can be
used instead. It will call synchronize_rcu_expedited() which only blocks
for several microseconds as opposed to multiple milliseconds like
synchronize_rcu().

With this patch deletion of 16k nexthops takes less than a second:

# time -p ip link set dev dummy10 down
real 0.12
user 0.00
sys 0.04

Tested with fib_nexthops.sh which includes torture tests that prompted
the initial change:

# ./fib_nexthops.sh
...
Tests passed: 134
Tests failed:   0

Fixes: 90f33bffa382 ("nexthops: don't modify published nexthop groups")
Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>
---
 net/ipv4/nexthop.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/net/ipv4/nexthop.c b/net/ipv4/nexthop.c
index 8c0f17c6863c..0dc43ad28eb9 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/nexthop.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/nexthop.c
@@ -845,7 +845,7 @@ static void remove_nexthop_from_groups(struct net *net, struct nexthop *nh,
 		remove_nh_grp_entry(net, nhge, nlinfo);
 
 	/* make sure all see the newly published array before releasing rtnl */
-	synchronize_rcu();
+	synchronize_net();
 }
 
 static void remove_nexthop_group(struct nexthop *nh, struct nl_info *nlinfo)
-- 
2.26.2


             reply	other threads:[~2020-10-16 17:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-10-16 17:29 Ido Schimmel [this message]
2020-10-16 21:46 ` [PATCH net] nexthop: Fix performance regression in nexthop deletion Jesse Brandeburg
2020-10-17  4:37 ` David Ahern
2020-10-17  9:16 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2020-10-20  3:10 ` Jakub Kicinski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201016172914.643282-1-idosch@idosch.org \
    --to=idosch@idosch.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dsahern@gmail.com \
    --cc=idosch@nvidia.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=mlxsw@nvidia.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nikolay@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.