From: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com> To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>, Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com> Cc: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com>, linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com> Subject: [PATCH v2 1/3] clk: avoid devm_clk_release name clash Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2020 18:21:45 +0200 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20201021162147.563655-2-jbrunet@baylibre.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20201021162147.563655-1-jbrunet@baylibre.com> In clk-devres.c, devm_clk_release() is used to call clk_put() memory managed clock. In clk.c the same name, in a different scope is used to call clk_unregister(). As it stands, it is not really a problem but it does not readability, especially if we need to call clk_put() on managed clock in clk.c Signed-off-by: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com> --- drivers/clk/clk.c | 12 ++++++------ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk.c b/drivers/clk/clk.c index 0a9261a099bd..88e5797bb6b4 100644 --- a/drivers/clk/clk.c +++ b/drivers/clk/clk.c @@ -4068,12 +4068,12 @@ void clk_hw_unregister(struct clk_hw *hw) } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(clk_hw_unregister); -static void devm_clk_release(struct device *dev, void *res) +static void devm_clk_unregister_cb(struct device *dev, void *res) { clk_unregister(*(struct clk **)res); } -static void devm_clk_hw_release(struct device *dev, void *res) +static void devm_clk_hw_unregister_cb(struct device *dev, void *res) { clk_hw_unregister(*(struct clk_hw **)res); } @@ -4093,7 +4093,7 @@ struct clk *devm_clk_register(struct device *dev, struct clk_hw *hw) struct clk *clk; struct clk **clkp; - clkp = devres_alloc(devm_clk_release, sizeof(*clkp), GFP_KERNEL); + clkp = devres_alloc(devm_clk_unregister_cb, sizeof(*clkp), GFP_KERNEL); if (!clkp) return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM); @@ -4123,7 +4123,7 @@ int devm_clk_hw_register(struct device *dev, struct clk_hw *hw) struct clk_hw **hwp; int ret; - hwp = devres_alloc(devm_clk_hw_release, sizeof(*hwp), GFP_KERNEL); + hwp = devres_alloc(devm_clk_hw_unregister_cb, sizeof(*hwp), GFP_KERNEL); if (!hwp) return -ENOMEM; @@ -4167,7 +4167,7 @@ static int devm_clk_hw_match(struct device *dev, void *res, void *data) */ void devm_clk_unregister(struct device *dev, struct clk *clk) { - WARN_ON(devres_release(dev, devm_clk_release, devm_clk_match, clk)); + WARN_ON(devres_release(dev, devm_clk_unregister_cb, devm_clk_match, clk)); } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(devm_clk_unregister); @@ -4182,7 +4182,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(devm_clk_unregister); */ void devm_clk_hw_unregister(struct device *dev, struct clk_hw *hw) { - WARN_ON(devres_release(dev, devm_clk_hw_release, devm_clk_hw_match, + WARN_ON(devres_release(dev, devm_clk_hw_unregister_cb, devm_clk_hw_match, hw)); } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(devm_clk_hw_unregister); -- 2.25.4
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com> To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>, Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com> Cc: linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org, Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com>, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com> Subject: [PATCH v2 1/3] clk: avoid devm_clk_release name clash Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2020 18:21:45 +0200 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20201021162147.563655-2-jbrunet@baylibre.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20201021162147.563655-1-jbrunet@baylibre.com> In clk-devres.c, devm_clk_release() is used to call clk_put() memory managed clock. In clk.c the same name, in a different scope is used to call clk_unregister(). As it stands, it is not really a problem but it does not readability, especially if we need to call clk_put() on managed clock in clk.c Signed-off-by: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com> --- drivers/clk/clk.c | 12 ++++++------ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk.c b/drivers/clk/clk.c index 0a9261a099bd..88e5797bb6b4 100644 --- a/drivers/clk/clk.c +++ b/drivers/clk/clk.c @@ -4068,12 +4068,12 @@ void clk_hw_unregister(struct clk_hw *hw) } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(clk_hw_unregister); -static void devm_clk_release(struct device *dev, void *res) +static void devm_clk_unregister_cb(struct device *dev, void *res) { clk_unregister(*(struct clk **)res); } -static void devm_clk_hw_release(struct device *dev, void *res) +static void devm_clk_hw_unregister_cb(struct device *dev, void *res) { clk_hw_unregister(*(struct clk_hw **)res); } @@ -4093,7 +4093,7 @@ struct clk *devm_clk_register(struct device *dev, struct clk_hw *hw) struct clk *clk; struct clk **clkp; - clkp = devres_alloc(devm_clk_release, sizeof(*clkp), GFP_KERNEL); + clkp = devres_alloc(devm_clk_unregister_cb, sizeof(*clkp), GFP_KERNEL); if (!clkp) return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM); @@ -4123,7 +4123,7 @@ int devm_clk_hw_register(struct device *dev, struct clk_hw *hw) struct clk_hw **hwp; int ret; - hwp = devres_alloc(devm_clk_hw_release, sizeof(*hwp), GFP_KERNEL); + hwp = devres_alloc(devm_clk_hw_unregister_cb, sizeof(*hwp), GFP_KERNEL); if (!hwp) return -ENOMEM; @@ -4167,7 +4167,7 @@ static int devm_clk_hw_match(struct device *dev, void *res, void *data) */ void devm_clk_unregister(struct device *dev, struct clk *clk) { - WARN_ON(devres_release(dev, devm_clk_release, devm_clk_match, clk)); + WARN_ON(devres_release(dev, devm_clk_unregister_cb, devm_clk_match, clk)); } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(devm_clk_unregister); @@ -4182,7 +4182,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(devm_clk_unregister); */ void devm_clk_hw_unregister(struct device *dev, struct clk_hw *hw) { - WARN_ON(devres_release(dev, devm_clk_hw_release, devm_clk_hw_match, + WARN_ON(devres_release(dev, devm_clk_hw_unregister_cb, devm_clk_hw_match, hw)); } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(devm_clk_hw_unregister); -- 2.25.4 _______________________________________________ linux-amlogic mailing list linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-amlogic
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-10-21 16:22 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2020-10-21 16:21 [PATCH v2 0/3] clk: add api to get clk consumer from clk_hw Jerome Brunet 2020-10-21 16:21 ` Jerome Brunet 2020-10-21 16:21 ` Jerome Brunet [this message] 2020-10-21 16:21 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] clk: avoid devm_clk_release name clash Jerome Brunet 2020-11-14 20:54 ` Stephen Boyd 2020-11-14 20:54 ` Stephen Boyd 2020-10-21 16:21 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] clk: add api to get clk consumer from clk_hw Jerome Brunet 2020-10-21 16:21 ` Jerome Brunet 2020-11-14 20:54 ` Stephen Boyd 2020-11-14 20:54 ` Stephen Boyd 2020-10-21 16:21 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] clk: meson: g12: drop use of __clk_lookup() Jerome Brunet 2020-10-21 16:21 ` Jerome Brunet 2020-11-14 20:54 ` Stephen Boyd 2020-11-14 20:54 ` Stephen Boyd 2020-10-26 16:11 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] clk: add api to get clk consumer from clk_hw Kevin Hilman 2020-10-26 16:11 ` Kevin Hilman
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20201021162147.563655-2-jbrunet@baylibre.com \ --to=jbrunet@baylibre.com \ --cc=khilman@baylibre.com \ --cc=linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com \ --cc=sboyd@kernel.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.