From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> To: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>, Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Cc: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>, David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH] btrfs: clean up NULL checks in qgroup_unreserve_range() Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2020 14:26:33 +0300 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20201023112633.GE282278@mwanda> (raw) Smatch complains that this code dereferences "entry" before checking whether it's NULL on the next line. Fortunately, rb_entry() will never return NULL so it doesn't cause a problem. We can clean up the NULL checking a bit to silence the warning and make the code more clear. Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> --- My patch does not change run-time, but it's possible that the original code was buggy and I missed it. fs/btrfs/qgroup.c | 12 ++++-------- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/btrfs/qgroup.c b/fs/btrfs/qgroup.c index 580899bdb991..a7ae2f18f486 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/qgroup.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/qgroup.c @@ -3417,24 +3417,20 @@ static int qgroup_unreserve_range(struct btrfs_inode *inode, { struct rb_node *node; struct rb_node *next; - struct ulist_node *entry = NULL; + struct ulist_node *entry; int ret = 0; node = reserved->range_changed.root.rb_node; + if (!node) + return 0; while (node) { entry = rb_entry(node, struct ulist_node, rb_node); if (entry->val < start) node = node->rb_right; - else if (entry) - node = node->rb_left; else - break; + node = node->rb_left; } - /* Empty changeset */ - if (!entry) - return 0; - if (entry->val > start && rb_prev(&entry->rb_node)) entry = rb_entry(rb_prev(&entry->rb_node), struct ulist_node, rb_node); -- 2.28.0
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> To: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>, Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Cc: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>, David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH] btrfs: clean up NULL checks in qgroup_unreserve_range() Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2020 11:26:33 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20201023112633.GE282278@mwanda> (raw) Smatch complains that this code dereferences "entry" before checking whether it's NULL on the next line. Fortunately, rb_entry() will never return NULL so it doesn't cause a problem. We can clean up the NULL checking a bit to silence the warning and make the code more clear. Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> --- My patch does not change run-time, but it's possible that the original code was buggy and I missed it. fs/btrfs/qgroup.c | 12 ++++-------- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/btrfs/qgroup.c b/fs/btrfs/qgroup.c index 580899bdb991..a7ae2f18f486 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/qgroup.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/qgroup.c @@ -3417,24 +3417,20 @@ static int qgroup_unreserve_range(struct btrfs_inode *inode, { struct rb_node *node; struct rb_node *next; - struct ulist_node *entry = NULL; + struct ulist_node *entry; int ret = 0; node = reserved->range_changed.root.rb_node; + if (!node) + return 0; while (node) { entry = rb_entry(node, struct ulist_node, rb_node); if (entry->val < start) node = node->rb_right; - else if (entry) - node = node->rb_left; else - break; + node = node->rb_left; } - /* Empty changeset */ - if (!entry) - return 0; - if (entry->val > start && rb_prev(&entry->rb_node)) entry = rb_entry(rb_prev(&entry->rb_node), struct ulist_node, rb_node); -- 2.28.0
next reply other threads:[~2020-10-23 11:26 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2020-10-23 11:26 Dan Carpenter [this message] 2020-10-23 11:26 ` [PATCH] btrfs: clean up NULL checks in qgroup_unreserve_range() Dan Carpenter 2020-10-23 11:39 ` Qu Wenruo 2020-10-23 11:39 ` Qu Wenruo 2020-10-29 20:51 ` David Sterba 2020-10-29 20:51 ` David Sterba
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20201023112633.GE282278@mwanda \ --to=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \ --cc=clm@fb.com \ --cc=dsterba@suse.com \ --cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \ --cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=wqu@suse.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.