All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
To: Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Cc: Maor Gottlieb <maorg@nvidia.com>,
	Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
	linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org,
	"Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@risingtidesystems.com>,
	target-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH rdma-next v2] IB/srpt: Fix memory leak in srpt_add_one
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2020 08:50:51 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201028065051.112430-1-leon@kernel.org> (raw)

From: Maor Gottlieb <maorg@nvidia.com>

Failure in srpt_refresh_port() for the second port will leave MAD
registered for the first one, however, the srpt_add_one() will be
marked as "failed" and SRPT will leak resources for that registered
but not used and released first port.

Unregister the MAD agent for all ports in case of failure.

Fixes: a42d985bd5b2 ("ib_srpt: Initial SRP Target merge for v3.3-rc1")
Signed-off-by: Maor Gottlieb <maorg@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>
---
Changelog:
v2:
 * Added an extra parameter to srpt_unregister_mad_agent() to eliminate
   an extra obfuscation call.
v1:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-rdma/20201027055920.1760663-1-leon@kernel.org
 * Fixed and updated commit message.
 * Remove port_cnt check from __srpt_unregister_mad_agent().
v0:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-rdma/20201026132737.1338171-1-leon@kernel.org
---
 drivers/infiniband/ulp/srpt/ib_srpt.c | 13 ++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/ulp/srpt/ib_srpt.c b/drivers/infiniband/ulp/srpt/ib_srpt.c
index 0065eb17ae36..1b096305de1a 100644
--- a/drivers/infiniband/ulp/srpt/ib_srpt.c
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/ulp/srpt/ib_srpt.c
@@ -622,10 +622,11 @@ static int srpt_refresh_port(struct srpt_port *sport)
 /**
  * srpt_unregister_mad_agent - unregister MAD callback functions
  * @sdev: SRPT HCA pointer.
+ * #port_cnt: number of ports with registered MAD
  *
  * Note: It is safe to call this function more than once for the same device.
  */
-static void srpt_unregister_mad_agent(struct srpt_device *sdev)
+static void srpt_unregister_mad_agent(struct srpt_device *sdev, int port_cnt)
 {
 	struct ib_port_modify port_modify = {
 		.clr_port_cap_mask = IB_PORT_DEVICE_MGMT_SUP,
@@ -633,7 +634,7 @@ static void srpt_unregister_mad_agent(struct srpt_device *sdev)
 	struct srpt_port *sport;
 	int i;

-	for (i = 1; i <= sdev->device->phys_port_cnt; i++) {
+	for (i = 1; i <= port_cnt; i++) {
 		sport = &sdev->port[i - 1];
 		WARN_ON(sport->port != i);
 		if (sport->mad_agent) {
@@ -3185,7 +3186,8 @@ static int srpt_add_one(struct ib_device *device)
 		if (ret) {
 			pr_err("MAD registration failed for %s-%d.\n",
 			       dev_name(&sdev->device->dev), i);
-			goto err_event;
+			i--;
+			goto err_port;
 		}
 	}

@@ -3197,7 +3199,8 @@ static int srpt_add_one(struct ib_device *device)
 	pr_debug("added %s.\n", dev_name(&device->dev));
 	return 0;

-err_event:
+err_port:
+	srpt_unregister_mad_agent(sdev, i);
 	ib_unregister_event_handler(&sdev->event_handler);
 err_cm:
 	if (sdev->cm_id)
@@ -3221,7 +3224,7 @@ static void srpt_remove_one(struct ib_device *device, void *client_data)
 	struct srpt_device *sdev = client_data;
 	int i;

-	srpt_unregister_mad_agent(sdev);
+	srpt_unregister_mad_agent(sdev, sdev->device->phys_port_cnt);

 	ib_unregister_event_handler(&sdev->event_handler);

--
2.28.0


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
To: Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Cc: Maor Gottlieb <maorg@nvidia.com>,
	Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
	linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org,
	"Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@risingtidesystems.com>,
	target-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH rdma-next v2] IB/srpt: Fix memory leak in srpt_add_one
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2020 06:50:51 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201028065051.112430-1-leon@kernel.org> (raw)

From: Maor Gottlieb <maorg@nvidia.com>

Failure in srpt_refresh_port() for the second port will leave MAD
registered for the first one, however, the srpt_add_one() will be
marked as "failed" and SRPT will leak resources for that registered
but not used and released first port.

Unregister the MAD agent for all ports in case of failure.

Fixes: a42d985bd5b2 ("ib_srpt: Initial SRP Target merge for v3.3-rc1")
Signed-off-by: Maor Gottlieb <maorg@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>
---
Changelog:
v2:
 * Added an extra parameter to srpt_unregister_mad_agent() to eliminate
   an extra obfuscation call.
v1:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-rdma/20201027055920.1760663-1-leon@kernel.org
 * Fixed and updated commit message.
 * Remove port_cnt check from __srpt_unregister_mad_agent().
v0:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-rdma/20201026132737.1338171-1-leon@kernel.org
---
 drivers/infiniband/ulp/srpt/ib_srpt.c | 13 ++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/ulp/srpt/ib_srpt.c b/drivers/infiniband/ulp/srpt/ib_srpt.c
index 0065eb17ae36..1b096305de1a 100644
--- a/drivers/infiniband/ulp/srpt/ib_srpt.c
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/ulp/srpt/ib_srpt.c
@@ -622,10 +622,11 @@ static int srpt_refresh_port(struct srpt_port *sport)
 /**
  * srpt_unregister_mad_agent - unregister MAD callback functions
  * @sdev: SRPT HCA pointer.
+ * #port_cnt: number of ports with registered MAD
  *
  * Note: It is safe to call this function more than once for the same device.
  */
-static void srpt_unregister_mad_agent(struct srpt_device *sdev)
+static void srpt_unregister_mad_agent(struct srpt_device *sdev, int port_cnt)
 {
 	struct ib_port_modify port_modify = {
 		.clr_port_cap_mask = IB_PORT_DEVICE_MGMT_SUP,
@@ -633,7 +634,7 @@ static void srpt_unregister_mad_agent(struct srpt_device *sdev)
 	struct srpt_port *sport;
 	int i;

-	for (i = 1; i <= sdev->device->phys_port_cnt; i++) {
+	for (i = 1; i <= port_cnt; i++) {
 		sport = &sdev->port[i - 1];
 		WARN_ON(sport->port != i);
 		if (sport->mad_agent) {
@@ -3185,7 +3186,8 @@ static int srpt_add_one(struct ib_device *device)
 		if (ret) {
 			pr_err("MAD registration failed for %s-%d.\n",
 			       dev_name(&sdev->device->dev), i);
-			goto err_event;
+			i--;
+			goto err_port;
 		}
 	}

@@ -3197,7 +3199,8 @@ static int srpt_add_one(struct ib_device *device)
 	pr_debug("added %s.\n", dev_name(&device->dev));
 	return 0;

-err_event:
+err_port:
+	srpt_unregister_mad_agent(sdev, i);
 	ib_unregister_event_handler(&sdev->event_handler);
 err_cm:
 	if (sdev->cm_id)
@@ -3221,7 +3224,7 @@ static void srpt_remove_one(struct ib_device *device, void *client_data)
 	struct srpt_device *sdev = client_data;
 	int i;

-	srpt_unregister_mad_agent(sdev);
+	srpt_unregister_mad_agent(sdev, sdev->device->phys_port_cnt);

 	ib_unregister_event_handler(&sdev->event_handler);

--
2.28.0

             reply	other threads:[~2020-10-28 22:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-10-28  6:50 Leon Romanovsky [this message]
2020-10-28  6:50 ` [PATCH rdma-next v2] IB/srpt: Fix memory leak in srpt_add_one Leon Romanovsky
2020-10-29  3:31 ` Bart Van Assche
2020-10-29  3:31   ` Bart Van Assche
2020-11-02 19:25 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-11-02 19:25   ` Jason Gunthorpe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201028065051.112430-1-leon@kernel.org \
    --to=leon@kernel.org \
    --cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=dledford@redhat.com \
    --cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maorg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=nab@risingtidesystems.com \
    --cc=target-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.