All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
To: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>,
	Sean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org>,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
	Intel Graphics <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	DRI <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
	Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>,
	Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>,
	Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the drm-msm tree with the drm-misc tree
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2020 11:58:08 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201105115808.3aee29f1@canb.auug.org.au> (raw)

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1461 bytes --]

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the drm-msm tree got a conflict in:

  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_crtc.c

between commit:

  29b77ad7b9ca ("drm/atomic: Pass the full state to CRTC atomic_check")

from the drm-misc tree and commit:

  91693cbc13c2 ("drm/msm/dpu: Add newline to printks")

from the drm-msm tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

diff --cc drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_crtc.c
index e55be2922c2f,d4662e8184cc..000000000000
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_crtc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_crtc.c
@@@ -844,12 -838,12 +844,12 @@@ static int dpu_crtc_atomic_check(struc
  		goto end;
  	}
  
 -	mode = &state->adjusted_mode;
 +	mode = &crtc_state->adjusted_mode;
- 	DPU_DEBUG("%s: check", dpu_crtc->name);
+ 	DPU_DEBUG("%s: check\n", dpu_crtc->name);
  
  	/* force a full mode set if active state changed */
 -	if (state->active_changed)
 -		state->mode_changed = true;
 +	if (crtc_state->active_changed)
 +		crtc_state->mode_changed = true;
  
  	memset(pipe_staged, 0, sizeof(pipe_staged));
  

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
To: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>,
	Sean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org>,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
	Intel Graphics <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	DRI <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>,
	Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>,
	Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the drm-msm tree with the drm-misc tree
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2020 11:58:08 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201105115808.3aee29f1@canb.auug.org.au> (raw)


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1461 bytes --]

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the drm-msm tree got a conflict in:

  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_crtc.c

between commit:

  29b77ad7b9ca ("drm/atomic: Pass the full state to CRTC atomic_check")

from the drm-misc tree and commit:

  91693cbc13c2 ("drm/msm/dpu: Add newline to printks")

from the drm-msm tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

diff --cc drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_crtc.c
index e55be2922c2f,d4662e8184cc..000000000000
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_crtc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_crtc.c
@@@ -844,12 -838,12 +844,12 @@@ static int dpu_crtc_atomic_check(struc
  		goto end;
  	}
  
 -	mode = &state->adjusted_mode;
 +	mode = &crtc_state->adjusted_mode;
- 	DPU_DEBUG("%s: check", dpu_crtc->name);
+ 	DPU_DEBUG("%s: check\n", dpu_crtc->name);
  
  	/* force a full mode set if active state changed */
 -	if (state->active_changed)
 -		state->mode_changed = true;
 +	if (crtc_state->active_changed)
 +		crtc_state->mode_changed = true;
  
  	memset(pipe_staged, 0, sizeof(pipe_staged));
  

[-- Attachment #1.2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 160 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
To: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>,
	Sean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org>,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
	Intel Graphics <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	DRI <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>,
	Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>,
	Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Subject: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: manual merge of the drm-msm tree with the drm-misc tree
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2020 11:58:08 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201105115808.3aee29f1@canb.auug.org.au> (raw)


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1461 bytes --]

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the drm-msm tree got a conflict in:

  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_crtc.c

between commit:

  29b77ad7b9ca ("drm/atomic: Pass the full state to CRTC atomic_check")

from the drm-misc tree and commit:

  91693cbc13c2 ("drm/msm/dpu: Add newline to printks")

from the drm-msm tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

diff --cc drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_crtc.c
index e55be2922c2f,d4662e8184cc..000000000000
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_crtc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_crtc.c
@@@ -844,12 -838,12 +844,12 @@@ static int dpu_crtc_atomic_check(struc
  		goto end;
  	}
  
 -	mode = &state->adjusted_mode;
 +	mode = &crtc_state->adjusted_mode;
- 	DPU_DEBUG("%s: check", dpu_crtc->name);
+ 	DPU_DEBUG("%s: check\n", dpu_crtc->name);
  
  	/* force a full mode set if active state changed */
 -	if (state->active_changed)
 -		state->mode_changed = true;
 +	if (crtc_state->active_changed)
 +		crtc_state->mode_changed = true;
  
  	memset(pipe_staged, 0, sizeof(pipe_staged));
  

[-- Attachment #1.2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 160 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

             reply	other threads:[~2020-11-05  0:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-11-05  0:58 Stephen Rothwell [this message]
2020-11-05  0:58 ` [Intel-gfx] linux-next: manual merge of the drm-msm tree with the drm-misc tree Stephen Rothwell
2020-11-05  0:58 ` Stephen Rothwell
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2023-03-28 22:42 Stephen Rothwell
2023-03-28 22:42 ` Stephen Rothwell
2018-11-06  0:08 Stephen Rothwell
2018-11-06  0:08 ` Stephen Rothwell
2016-05-03  3:28 Stephen Rothwell
2016-05-03  3:28 ` Stephen Rothwell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201105115808.3aee29f1@canb.auug.org.au \
    --to=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maxime@cerno.tech \
    --cc=robdclark@chromium.org \
    --cc=robdclark@gmail.com \
    --cc=seanpaul@chromium.org \
    --cc=swboyd@chromium.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.