All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Martin Willi <martin@strongswan.org>
To: David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org>,
	Shrijeet Mukherjee <shrijeet@gmail.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH net] vrf: Fix fast path output packet handling with async Netfilter rules
Date: Fri,  6 Nov 2020 08:30:30 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201106073030.3974927-1-martin@strongswan.org> (raw)

VRF devices use an optimized direct path on output if a default qdisc
is involved, calling Netfilter hooks directly. This path, however, does
not consider Netfilter rules completing asynchronously, such as with
NFQUEUE. The Netfilter okfn() is called for asynchronously accepted
packets, but the VRF never passes that packet down the stack to send
it out over the slave device. Using the slower redirect path for this
seems not feasible, as we do not know beforehand if a Netfilter hook
has asynchronously completing rules.

Fix the use of asynchronously completing Netfilter rules in OUTPUT and
POSTROUTING by using a special completion function that additionally
calls dst_output() to pass the packet down the stack. Also, slightly
adjust the use of nf_reset_ct() so that is called in the asynchronous
case, too.

Fixes: dcdd43c41e60 ("net: vrf: performance improvements for IPv4")
Fixes: a9ec54d1b0cd ("net: vrf: performance improvements for IPv6")
Signed-off-by: Martin Willi <martin@strongswan.org>
---
 drivers/net/vrf.c | 92 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 69 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/vrf.c b/drivers/net/vrf.c
index 60c1aadece89..f2793ffde191 100644
--- a/drivers/net/vrf.c
+++ b/drivers/net/vrf.c
@@ -608,8 +608,7 @@ static netdev_tx_t vrf_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
 	return ret;
 }
 
-static int vrf_finish_direct(struct net *net, struct sock *sk,
-			     struct sk_buff *skb)
+static void vrf_finish_direct(struct sk_buff *skb)
 {
 	struct net_device *vrf_dev = skb->dev;
 
@@ -628,7 +627,8 @@ static int vrf_finish_direct(struct net *net, struct sock *sk,
 		skb_pull(skb, ETH_HLEN);
 	}
 
-	return 1;
+	/* reset skb device */
+	nf_reset_ct(skb);
 }
 
 #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6)
@@ -707,15 +707,41 @@ static struct sk_buff *vrf_ip6_out_redirect(struct net_device *vrf_dev,
 	return skb;
 }
 
+static int vrf_output6_direct_finish(struct net *net, struct sock *sk,
+				     struct sk_buff *skb)
+{
+	vrf_finish_direct(skb);
+
+	return vrf_ip6_local_out(net, sk, skb);
+}
+
 static int vrf_output6_direct(struct net *net, struct sock *sk,
 			      struct sk_buff *skb)
 {
+	int err = 1;
+
 	skb->protocol = htons(ETH_P_IPV6);
 
-	return NF_HOOK_COND(NFPROTO_IPV6, NF_INET_POST_ROUTING,
-			    net, sk, skb, NULL, skb->dev,
-			    vrf_finish_direct,
-			    !(IPCB(skb)->flags & IPSKB_REROUTED));
+	if (!(IPCB(skb)->flags & IPSKB_REROUTED))
+		err = nf_hook(NFPROTO_IPV6, NF_INET_POST_ROUTING, net, sk, skb,
+			      NULL, skb->dev, vrf_output6_direct_finish);
+
+	if (likely(err == 1))
+		vrf_finish_direct(skb);
+
+	return err;
+}
+
+static int vrf_ip6_out_direct_finish(struct net *net, struct sock *sk,
+				     struct sk_buff *skb)
+{
+	int err;
+
+	err = vrf_output6_direct(net, sk, skb);
+	if (likely(err == 1))
+		err = vrf_ip6_local_out(net, sk, skb);
+
+	return err;
 }
 
 static struct sk_buff *vrf_ip6_out_direct(struct net_device *vrf_dev,
@@ -728,18 +754,15 @@ static struct sk_buff *vrf_ip6_out_direct(struct net_device *vrf_dev,
 	skb->dev = vrf_dev;
 
 	err = nf_hook(NFPROTO_IPV6, NF_INET_LOCAL_OUT, net, sk,
-		      skb, NULL, vrf_dev, vrf_output6_direct);
+		      skb, NULL, vrf_dev, vrf_ip6_out_direct_finish);
 
 	if (likely(err == 1))
 		err = vrf_output6_direct(net, sk, skb);
 
-	/* reset skb device */
 	if (likely(err == 1))
-		nf_reset_ct(skb);
-	else
-		skb = NULL;
+		return skb;
 
-	return skb;
+	return NULL;
 }
 
 static struct sk_buff *vrf_ip6_out(struct net_device *vrf_dev,
@@ -919,15 +942,41 @@ static struct sk_buff *vrf_ip_out_redirect(struct net_device *vrf_dev,
 	return skb;
 }
 
+static int vrf_output_direct_finish(struct net *net, struct sock *sk,
+				    struct sk_buff *skb)
+{
+	vrf_finish_direct(skb);
+
+	return vrf_ip_local_out(net, sk, skb);
+}
+
 static int vrf_output_direct(struct net *net, struct sock *sk,
 			     struct sk_buff *skb)
 {
+	int err = 1;
+
 	skb->protocol = htons(ETH_P_IP);
 
-	return NF_HOOK_COND(NFPROTO_IPV4, NF_INET_POST_ROUTING,
-			    net, sk, skb, NULL, skb->dev,
-			    vrf_finish_direct,
-			    !(IPCB(skb)->flags & IPSKB_REROUTED));
+	if (!(IPCB(skb)->flags & IPSKB_REROUTED))
+		err = nf_hook(NFPROTO_IPV4, NF_INET_POST_ROUTING, net, sk, skb,
+			      NULL, skb->dev, vrf_output_direct_finish);
+
+	if (likely(err == 1))
+		vrf_finish_direct(skb);
+
+	return err;
+}
+
+static int vrf_ip_out_direct_finish(struct net *net, struct sock *sk,
+				    struct sk_buff *skb)
+{
+	int err;
+
+	err = vrf_output_direct(net, sk, skb);
+	if (likely(err == 1))
+		err = vrf_ip_local_out(net, sk, skb);
+
+	return err;
 }
 
 static struct sk_buff *vrf_ip_out_direct(struct net_device *vrf_dev,
@@ -940,18 +989,15 @@ static struct sk_buff *vrf_ip_out_direct(struct net_device *vrf_dev,
 	skb->dev = vrf_dev;
 
 	err = nf_hook(NFPROTO_IPV4, NF_INET_LOCAL_OUT, net, sk,
-		      skb, NULL, vrf_dev, vrf_output_direct);
+		      skb, NULL, vrf_dev, vrf_ip_out_direct_finish);
 
 	if (likely(err == 1))
 		err = vrf_output_direct(net, sk, skb);
 
-	/* reset skb device */
 	if (likely(err == 1))
-		nf_reset_ct(skb);
-	else
-		skb = NULL;
+		return skb;
 
-	return skb;
+	return NULL;
 }
 
 static struct sk_buff *vrf_ip_out(struct net_device *vrf_dev,
-- 
2.25.1


             reply	other threads:[~2020-11-06  7:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-11-06  7:30 Martin Willi [this message]
2020-11-09 23:44 ` [PATCH net] vrf: Fix fast path output packet handling with async Netfilter rules Jakub Kicinski
2020-11-10  4:04   ` David Ahern
2020-11-10 13:35 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2020-11-10 15:02   ` Martin Willi
2020-11-11 23:43     ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2020-11-12 15:49       ` Jakub Kicinski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201106073030.3974927-1-martin@strongswan.org \
    --to=martin@strongswan.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=shrijeet@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.