All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: trondmy@kernel.org
To: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v5 21/22] NFS: Reduce number of RPC calls when doing uncached readdir
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2020 16:37:40 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201110213741.860745-22-trondmy@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201110213741.860745-21-trondmy@kernel.org>

From: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>

If we're doing uncached readdir, allocate multiple pages in order to
try to avoid duplicate RPC calls for the same getdents() call.

Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
Reviewed-by: Benjamin Coddington <bcodding@redhat.com>
---
 fs/nfs/dir.c | 105 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
 1 file changed, 69 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/nfs/dir.c b/fs/nfs/dir.c
index b6c3501e8f61..93c6f22cdc62 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/dir.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/dir.c
@@ -199,6 +199,23 @@ void nfs_readdir_clear_array(struct page *page)
 	kunmap_atomic(array);
 }
 
+static struct page *
+nfs_readdir_page_array_alloc(u64 last_cookie, gfp_t gfp_flags)
+{
+	struct page *page = alloc_page(gfp_flags);
+	if (page)
+		nfs_readdir_page_init_array(page, last_cookie);
+	return page;
+}
+
+static void nfs_readdir_page_array_free(struct page *page)
+{
+	if (page) {
+		nfs_readdir_clear_array(page);
+		put_page(page);
+	}
+}
+
 static void nfs_readdir_array_set_eof(struct nfs_cache_array *array)
 {
 	array->page_is_eof = 1;
@@ -694,12 +711,14 @@ void nfs_prime_dcache(struct dentry *parent, struct nfs_entry *entry,
 static int nfs_readdir_page_filler(struct nfs_readdir_descriptor *desc,
 				   struct nfs_entry *entry,
 				   struct page **xdr_pages,
-				   struct page *fillme, unsigned int buflen)
+				   unsigned int buflen,
+				   struct page **arrays,
+				   size_t narrays)
 {
 	struct address_space *mapping = desc->file->f_mapping;
 	struct xdr_stream stream;
 	struct xdr_buf buf;
-	struct page *scratch, *new, *page = fillme;
+	struct page *scratch, *new, *page = *arrays;
 	int status;
 
 	scratch = alloc_page(GFP_KERNEL);
@@ -725,15 +744,25 @@ static int nfs_readdir_page_filler(struct nfs_readdir_descriptor *desc,
 		if (status != -ENOSPC)
 			continue;
 
-		if (page->mapping != mapping)
-			break;
-		new = nfs_readdir_page_get_next(mapping, page->index + 1,
-						entry->prev_cookie);
-		if (!new)
-			break;
-		if (page != fillme)
-			nfs_readdir_page_unlock_and_put(page);
-		page = new;
+		if (page->mapping != mapping) {
+			if (!--narrays)
+				break;
+			new = nfs_readdir_page_array_alloc(entry->prev_cookie,
+							   GFP_KERNEL);
+			if (!new)
+				break;
+			arrays++;
+			*arrays = page = new;
+		} else {
+			new = nfs_readdir_page_get_next(mapping,
+							page->index + 1,
+							entry->prev_cookie);
+			if (!new)
+				break;
+			if (page != *arrays)
+				nfs_readdir_page_unlock_and_put(page);
+			page = new;
+		}
 		status = nfs_readdir_add_to_array(entry, page);
 	} while (!status && !entry->eof);
 
@@ -750,7 +779,7 @@ static int nfs_readdir_page_filler(struct nfs_readdir_descriptor *desc,
 		break;
 	}
 
-	if (page != fillme)
+	if (page != *arrays)
 		nfs_readdir_page_unlock_and_put(page);
 
 	put_page(scratch);
@@ -790,10 +819,11 @@ static struct page **nfs_readdir_alloc_pages(size_t npages)
 }
 
 static int nfs_readdir_xdr_to_array(struct nfs_readdir_descriptor *desc,
-				    struct page *page, __be32 *verf_arg,
-				    __be32 *verf_res)
+				    __be32 *verf_arg, __be32 *verf_res,
+				    struct page **arrays, size_t narrays)
 {
 	struct page **pages;
+	struct page *page = *arrays;
 	struct nfs_entry *entry;
 	size_t array_size;
 	struct inode *inode = file_inode(desc->file);
@@ -835,7 +865,8 @@ static int nfs_readdir_xdr_to_array(struct nfs_readdir_descriptor *desc,
 			break;
 		}
 
-		status = nfs_readdir_page_filler(desc, entry, pages, page, pglen);
+		status = nfs_readdir_page_filler(desc, entry, pages, pglen,
+						 arrays, narrays);
 	} while (!status && nfs_readdir_page_needs_filling(page));
 
 	nfs_readdir_free_pages(pages, array_size);
@@ -884,8 +915,8 @@ static int find_and_lock_cache_page(struct nfs_readdir_descriptor *desc)
 	if (!desc->page)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 	if (nfs_readdir_page_needs_filling(desc->page)) {
-		res = nfs_readdir_xdr_to_array(desc, desc->page,
-					       nfsi->cookieverf, verf);
+		res = nfs_readdir_xdr_to_array(desc, nfsi->cookieverf, verf,
+					       &desc->page, 1);
 		if (res < 0) {
 			nfs_readdir_page_unlock_and_put_cached(desc);
 			if (res == -EBADCOOKIE || res == -ENOTSYNC) {
@@ -976,37 +1007,39 @@ static void nfs_do_filldir(struct nfs_readdir_descriptor *desc)
  */
 static int uncached_readdir(struct nfs_readdir_descriptor *desc)
 {
-	struct page	*page = NULL;
+	struct page	**arrays;
+	size_t		i, sz = 512;
 	__be32		verf[NFS_DIR_VERIFIER_SIZE];
-	int		status;
+	int		status = -ENOMEM;
 
-	dfprintk(DIRCACHE, "NFS: uncached_readdir() searching for cookie %Lu\n",
+	dfprintk(DIRCACHE, "NFS: uncached_readdir() searching for cookie %llu\n",
 			(unsigned long long)desc->dir_cookie);
 
-	page = alloc_page(GFP_HIGHUSER);
-	if (!page) {
-		status = -ENOMEM;
+	arrays = kcalloc(sz, sizeof(*arrays), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!arrays)
+		goto out;
+	arrays[0] = nfs_readdir_page_array_alloc(desc->dir_cookie, GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!arrays[0])
 		goto out;
-	}
 
 	desc->page_index = 0;
 	desc->last_cookie = desc->dir_cookie;
-	desc->page = page;
 	desc->duped = 0;
 
-	nfs_readdir_page_init_array(page, desc->dir_cookie);
-	status = nfs_readdir_xdr_to_array(desc, page, desc->verf, verf);
-	if (status < 0)
-		goto out_release;
+	status = nfs_readdir_xdr_to_array(desc, desc->verf, verf, arrays, sz);
 
-	nfs_do_filldir(desc);
+	for (i = 0; !desc->eof && i < sz && arrays[i]; i++) {
+		desc->page = arrays[i];
+		nfs_do_filldir(desc);
+	}
+	desc->page = NULL;
 
- out_release:
-	nfs_readdir_clear_array(desc->page);
-	nfs_readdir_page_put(desc);
- out:
-	dfprintk(DIRCACHE, "NFS: %s: returns %d\n",
-			__func__, status);
+
+	for (i = 0; i < sz && arrays[i]; i++)
+		nfs_readdir_page_array_free(arrays[i]);
+out:
+	kfree(arrays);
+	dfprintk(DIRCACHE, "NFS: %s: returns %d\n", __func__, status);
 	return status;
 }
 
-- 
2.28.0


  reply	other threads:[~2020-11-10 21:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-11-10 21:37 [PATCH v5 00/22] Readdir enhancements trondmy
2020-11-10 21:37 ` [PATCH v5 01/22] NFS: Remove unnecessary inode locking in nfs_llseek_dir() trondmy
2020-11-10 21:37   ` [PATCH v5 02/22] NFS: Remove unnecessary inode lock in nfs_fsync_dir() trondmy
2020-11-10 21:37     ` [PATCH v5 03/22] NFSv4.2: condition READDIR's mask for security label based on LSM state trondmy
2020-11-10 21:37       ` [PATCH v5 04/22] NFS: Ensure contents of struct nfs_open_dir_context are consistent trondmy
2020-11-10 21:37         ` [PATCH v5 05/22] NFS: Clean up readdir struct nfs_cache_array trondmy
2020-11-10 21:37           ` [PATCH v5 06/22] NFS: Clean up nfs_readdir_page_filler() trondmy
2020-11-10 21:37             ` [PATCH v5 07/22] NFS: Clean up directory array handling trondmy
2020-11-10 21:37               ` [PATCH v5 08/22] NFS: Don't discard readdir results trondmy
2020-11-10 21:37                 ` [PATCH v5 09/22] NFS: Remove unnecessary kmap in nfs_readdir_xdr_to_array() trondmy
2020-11-10 21:37                   ` [PATCH v5 10/22] NFS: Replace kmap() with kmap_atomic() in nfs_readdir_search_array() trondmy
2020-11-10 21:37                     ` [PATCH v5 11/22] NFS: Simplify struct nfs_cache_array_entry trondmy
2020-11-10 21:37                       ` [PATCH v5 12/22] NFS: Support larger readdir buffers trondmy
2020-11-10 21:37                         ` [PATCH v5 13/22] NFS: More readdir cleanups trondmy
2020-11-10 21:37                           ` [PATCH v5 14/22] NFS: nfs_do_filldir() does not return a value trondmy
2020-11-10 21:37                             ` [PATCH v5 15/22] NFS: Reduce readdir stack usage trondmy
2020-11-10 21:37                               ` [PATCH v5 16/22] NFS: Cleanup to remove nfs_readdir_descriptor_t typedef trondmy
2020-11-10 21:37                                 ` [PATCH v5 17/22] NFS: Allow the NFS generic code to pass in a verifier to readdir trondmy
2020-11-10 21:37                                   ` [PATCH v5 18/22] NFS: Handle NFS4ERR_NOT_SAME and NFSERR_BADCOOKIE from readdir calls trondmy
2020-11-10 21:37                                     ` [PATCH v5 19/22] NFS: Improve handling of directory verifiers trondmy
2020-11-10 21:37                                       ` [PATCH v5 20/22] NFS: Optimisations for monotonically increasing readdir cookies trondmy
2020-11-10 21:37                                         ` trondmy [this message]
2020-11-10 21:37                                           ` [PATCH v5 22/22] NFS: Do uncached readdir when we're seeking a cookie in an empty page cache trondmy
2020-11-11 22:15 ` [PATCH v5 00/22] Readdir enhancements David Wysochanski
2020-11-12 11:41   ` David Wysochanski
2020-11-12 15:34     ` Guy Keren
2020-11-12 16:54       ` Trond Myklebust
2020-11-12 16:51     ` Trond Myklebust
2020-11-12 18:26       ` Trond Myklebust
2020-11-12 18:39         ` Benjamin Coddington
2020-11-12 18:49           ` Benjamin Coddington
2020-11-12 19:04           ` Trond Myklebust
2020-11-12 19:09             ` Benjamin Coddington
2020-11-12 20:23               ` Benjamin Coddington
2020-11-13 11:09                 ` Mkrtchyan, Tigran
2020-11-14 13:32         ` David Wysochanski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201110213741.860745-22-trondmy@kernel.org \
    --to=trondmy@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.