All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
To: <bpf@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
	Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>, <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <kernel-team@fb.com>,
	Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v5 15/34] bpf: memcg-based memory accounting for bpf local storage maps
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2020 14:15:24 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201112221543.3621014-16-guro@fb.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201112221543.3621014-1-guro@fb.com>

Account memory used by bpf local storage maps:
per-socket and per-inode storages.

Signed-off-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
---
 kernel/bpf/bpf_local_storage.c | 7 ++++---
 net/core/bpf_sk_storage.c      | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/bpf_local_storage.c b/kernel/bpf/bpf_local_storage.c
index 5d3a7af9ba9b..fd4f9ac1d042 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/bpf_local_storage.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/bpf_local_storage.c
@@ -67,7 +67,8 @@ bpf_selem_alloc(struct bpf_local_storage_map *smap, void *owner,
 	if (charge_mem && mem_charge(smap, owner, smap->elem_size))
 		return NULL;
 
-	selem = kzalloc(smap->elem_size, GFP_ATOMIC | __GFP_NOWARN);
+	selem = kzalloc(smap->elem_size, GFP_ATOMIC | __GFP_NOWARN |
+			__GFP_ACCOUNT);
 	if (selem) {
 		if (value)
 			memcpy(SDATA(selem)->data, value, smap->map.value_size);
@@ -546,7 +547,7 @@ struct bpf_local_storage_map *bpf_local_storage_map_alloc(union bpf_attr *attr)
 	u64 cost;
 	int ret;
 
-	smap = kzalloc(sizeof(*smap), GFP_USER | __GFP_NOWARN);
+	smap = kzalloc(sizeof(*smap), GFP_USER | __GFP_NOWARN | __GFP_ACCOUNT);
 	if (!smap)
 		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
 	bpf_map_init_from_attr(&smap->map, attr);
@@ -564,7 +565,7 @@ struct bpf_local_storage_map *bpf_local_storage_map_alloc(union bpf_attr *attr)
 	}
 
 	smap->buckets = kvcalloc(sizeof(*smap->buckets), nbuckets,
-				 GFP_USER | __GFP_NOWARN);
+				 GFP_USER | __GFP_NOWARN | __GFP_ACCOUNT);
 	if (!smap->buckets) {
 		bpf_map_charge_finish(&smap->map.memory);
 		kfree(smap);
diff --git a/net/core/bpf_sk_storage.c b/net/core/bpf_sk_storage.c
index c907f0dc7f87..1d9704bb2eca 100644
--- a/net/core/bpf_sk_storage.c
+++ b/net/core/bpf_sk_storage.c
@@ -453,7 +453,7 @@ bpf_sk_storage_diag_alloc(const struct nlattr *nla_stgs)
 	}
 
 	diag = kzalloc(sizeof(*diag) + sizeof(diag->maps[0]) * nr_maps,
-		       GFP_KERNEL);
+		       GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT);
 	if (!diag)
 		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
 
-- 
2.26.2


  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-11-12 22:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-11-12 22:15 [PATCH bpf-next v5 00/34] bpf: switch to memcg-based memory accounting Roman Gushchin
2020-11-12 22:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 01/34] mm: memcontrol: use helpers to read page's memcg data Roman Gushchin
2020-11-12 22:56   ` Stephen Rothwell
2020-11-13  0:26     ` Roman Gushchin
2020-11-13  3:04       ` Alexei Starovoitov
2020-11-13  3:18         ` Andrew Morton
2020-11-13  3:25           ` Alexei Starovoitov
2020-11-13  3:25             ` Alexei Starovoitov
2020-11-13  3:40             ` Andrew Morton
2020-11-13  4:08               ` Alexei Starovoitov
2020-11-13  4:08                 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2020-11-13  4:01             ` Roman Gushchin
2020-11-13 14:25               ` Shakeel Butt
2020-11-13 14:25                 ` Shakeel Butt
2020-11-13 17:18                 ` Roman Gushchin
2020-11-12 22:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 02/34] mm: memcontrol/slab: use helpers to access slab page's memcg_data Roman Gushchin
2020-11-12 22:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 03/34] mm: introduce page memcg flags Roman Gushchin
2020-11-12 22:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 04/34] mm: convert page kmemcg type to a page memcg flag Roman Gushchin
2020-11-12 22:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 05/34] bpf: memcg-based memory accounting for bpf progs Roman Gushchin
2020-11-13 17:31   ` Song Liu
2020-11-12 22:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 06/34] bpf: prepare for memcg-based memory accounting for bpf maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-13 17:46   ` Song Liu
2020-11-13 19:40     ` Roman Gushchin
2020-11-13 20:48       ` Song Liu
2020-11-12 22:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 07/34] bpf: " Roman Gushchin
2020-11-13 18:04   ` Song Liu
2020-11-12 22:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 08/34] bpf: refine memcg-based memory accounting for arraymap maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-12 22:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 09/34] bpf: refine memcg-based memory accounting for cpumap maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-12 22:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 10/34] bpf: memcg-based memory accounting for cgroup storage maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-12 22:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 11/34] bpf: refine memcg-based memory accounting for devmap maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-12 22:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 12/34] bpf: refine memcg-based memory accounting for hashtab maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-12 22:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 13/34] bpf: memcg-based memory accounting for lpm_trie maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-12 22:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 14/34] bpf: memcg-based memory accounting for bpf ringbuffer Roman Gushchin
2020-11-12 22:15 ` Roman Gushchin [this message]
2020-11-13 18:07   ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 15/34] bpf: memcg-based memory accounting for bpf local storage maps Song Liu
2020-11-12 22:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 16/34] bpf: refine memcg-based memory accounting for sockmap and sockhash maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-12 22:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 17/34] bpf: refine memcg-based memory accounting for xskmap maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-12 22:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 18/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for arraymap maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-12 22:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 19/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for bpf_struct_ops maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-12 22:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 20/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for cpumap maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-12 22:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 21/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for cgroup storage maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-12 22:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 22/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for devmap maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-12 22:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 23/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for hashtab maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-12 22:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 24/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for lpm_trie maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-12 22:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 25/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for queue_stack_maps maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-12 22:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 26/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for reuseport_array maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-12 22:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 27/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for bpf ringbuffer Roman Gushchin
2020-11-12 22:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 28/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for sockmap and sockhash maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-12 22:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 29/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for stackmap maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-12 22:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 30/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for xskmap maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-12 22:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 31/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for bpf local storage maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-13 18:14   ` Song Liu
2020-11-13 19:33     ` Roman Gushchin
2020-11-13 20:53       ` Song Liu
2020-11-12 22:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 32/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting infra for bpf maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-13 18:17   ` Song Liu
2020-11-12 22:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 33/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for bpf progs Roman Gushchin
2020-11-12 22:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 34/34] bpf: samples: do not touch RLIMIT_MEMLOCK Roman Gushchin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201112221543.3621014-16-guro@fb.com \
    --to=guro@fb.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=shakeelb@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.