All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
To: <bpf@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
	Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>, <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <kernel-team@fb.com>,
	Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v5 03/34] mm: introduce page memcg flags
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2020 14:15:12 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201112221543.3621014-4-guro@fb.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201112221543.3621014-1-guro@fb.com>

The lowest bit in page->memcg_data is used to distinguish between struct
memory_cgroup pointer and a pointer to a objcgs array.  All checks and
modifications of this bit are open-coded.

Let's formalize it using page memcg flags, defined in enum
page_memcg_data_flags.

Additional flags might be added later.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201027001657.3398190-4-guro@fb.com
Signed-off-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
---
 include/linux/memcontrol.h | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/memcontrol.h b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
index c7ac0a5b8989..99a4841d658b 100644
--- a/include/linux/memcontrol.h
+++ b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
@@ -343,6 +343,15 @@ struct mem_cgroup {
 
 extern struct mem_cgroup *root_mem_cgroup;
 
+enum page_memcg_data_flags {
+	/* page->memcg_data is a pointer to an objcgs vector */
+	MEMCG_DATA_OBJCGS = (1UL << 0),
+	/* the next bit after the last actual flag */
+	__NR_MEMCG_DATA_FLAGS  = (1UL << 1),
+};
+
+#define MEMCG_DATA_FLAGS_MASK (__NR_MEMCG_DATA_FLAGS - 1)
+
 /*
  * page_memcg - get the memory cgroup associated with a page
  * @page: a pointer to the page struct
@@ -404,13 +413,7 @@ static inline struct mem_cgroup *page_memcg_check(struct page *page)
 	 */
 	unsigned long memcg_data = READ_ONCE(page->memcg_data);
 
-	/*
-	 * The lowest bit set means that memcg isn't a valid
-	 * memcg pointer, but a obj_cgroups pointer.
-	 * In this case the page is shared and doesn't belong
-	 * to any specific memory cgroup.
-	 */
-	if (memcg_data & 0x1UL)
+	if (memcg_data & MEMCG_DATA_OBJCGS)
 		return NULL;
 
 	return (struct mem_cgroup *)memcg_data;
@@ -429,7 +432,11 @@ static inline struct mem_cgroup *page_memcg_check(struct page *page)
  */
 static inline struct obj_cgroup **page_objcgs(struct page *page)
 {
-	return (struct obj_cgroup **)(READ_ONCE(page->memcg_data) & ~0x1UL);
+	unsigned long memcg_data = READ_ONCE(page->memcg_data);
+
+	VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(memcg_data && !(memcg_data & MEMCG_DATA_OBJCGS), page);
+
+	return (struct obj_cgroup **)(memcg_data & ~MEMCG_DATA_FLAGS_MASK);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -444,10 +451,10 @@ static inline struct obj_cgroup **page_objcgs_check(struct page *page)
 {
 	unsigned long memcg_data = READ_ONCE(page->memcg_data);
 
-	if (memcg_data && (memcg_data & 0x1UL))
-		return (struct obj_cgroup **)(memcg_data & ~0x1UL);
+	if (!memcg_data || !(memcg_data & MEMCG_DATA_OBJCGS))
+		return NULL;
 
-	return NULL;
+	return (struct obj_cgroup **)(memcg_data & ~MEMCG_DATA_FLAGS_MASK);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -460,7 +467,8 @@ static inline struct obj_cgroup **page_objcgs_check(struct page *page)
 static inline bool set_page_objcgs(struct page *page,
 					struct obj_cgroup **objcgs)
 {
-	return !cmpxchg(&page->memcg_data, 0, (unsigned long)objcgs | 0x1UL);
+	return !cmpxchg(&page->memcg_data, 0, (unsigned long)objcgs |
+			MEMCG_DATA_OBJCGS);
 }
 #else
 static inline struct obj_cgroup **page_objcgs(struct page *page)
-- 
2.26.2



  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-11-12 22:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-11-12 22:15 [PATCH bpf-next v5 00/34] bpf: switch to memcg-based memory accounting Roman Gushchin
2020-11-12 22:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 01/34] mm: memcontrol: use helpers to read page's memcg data Roman Gushchin
2020-11-12 22:56   ` Stephen Rothwell
2020-11-13  0:26     ` Roman Gushchin
2020-11-13  3:04       ` Alexei Starovoitov
2020-11-13  3:18         ` Andrew Morton
2020-11-13  3:25           ` Alexei Starovoitov
2020-11-13  3:25             ` Alexei Starovoitov
2020-11-13  3:40             ` Andrew Morton
2020-11-13  4:08               ` Alexei Starovoitov
2020-11-13  4:08                 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2020-11-13  4:01             ` Roman Gushchin
2020-11-13 14:25               ` Shakeel Butt
2020-11-13 14:25                 ` Shakeel Butt
2020-11-13 17:18                 ` Roman Gushchin
2020-11-12 22:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 02/34] mm: memcontrol/slab: use helpers to access slab page's memcg_data Roman Gushchin
2020-11-12 22:15 ` Roman Gushchin [this message]
2020-11-12 22:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 04/34] mm: convert page kmemcg type to a page memcg flag Roman Gushchin
2020-11-12 22:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 05/34] bpf: memcg-based memory accounting for bpf progs Roman Gushchin
2020-11-13 17:31   ` Song Liu
2020-11-12 22:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 06/34] bpf: prepare for memcg-based memory accounting for bpf maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-13 17:46   ` Song Liu
2020-11-13 19:40     ` Roman Gushchin
2020-11-13 20:48       ` Song Liu
2020-11-12 22:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 07/34] bpf: " Roman Gushchin
2020-11-13 18:04   ` Song Liu
2020-11-12 22:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 08/34] bpf: refine memcg-based memory accounting for arraymap maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-12 22:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 09/34] bpf: refine memcg-based memory accounting for cpumap maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-12 22:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 10/34] bpf: memcg-based memory accounting for cgroup storage maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-12 22:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 11/34] bpf: refine memcg-based memory accounting for devmap maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-12 22:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 12/34] bpf: refine memcg-based memory accounting for hashtab maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-12 22:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 13/34] bpf: memcg-based memory accounting for lpm_trie maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-12 22:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 14/34] bpf: memcg-based memory accounting for bpf ringbuffer Roman Gushchin
2020-11-12 22:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 15/34] bpf: memcg-based memory accounting for bpf local storage maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-13 18:07   ` Song Liu
2020-11-12 22:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 16/34] bpf: refine memcg-based memory accounting for sockmap and sockhash maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-12 22:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 17/34] bpf: refine memcg-based memory accounting for xskmap maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-12 22:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 18/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for arraymap maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-12 22:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 19/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for bpf_struct_ops maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-12 22:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 20/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for cpumap maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-12 22:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 21/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for cgroup storage maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-12 22:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 22/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for devmap maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-12 22:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 23/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for hashtab maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-12 22:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 24/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for lpm_trie maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-12 22:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 25/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for queue_stack_maps maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-12 22:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 26/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for reuseport_array maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-12 22:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 27/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for bpf ringbuffer Roman Gushchin
2020-11-12 22:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 28/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for sockmap and sockhash maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-12 22:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 29/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for stackmap maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-12 22:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 30/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for xskmap maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-12 22:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 31/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for bpf local storage maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-13 18:14   ` Song Liu
2020-11-13 19:33     ` Roman Gushchin
2020-11-13 20:53       ` Song Liu
2020-11-12 22:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 32/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting infra for bpf maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-13 18:17   ` Song Liu
2020-11-12 22:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 33/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for bpf progs Roman Gushchin
2020-11-12 22:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 34/34] bpf: samples: do not touch RLIMIT_MEMLOCK Roman Gushchin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201112221543.3621014-4-guro@fb.com \
    --to=guro@fb.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --cc=shakeelb@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.