All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
To: casey.schaufler@intel.com, jmorris@namei.org,
	linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, selinux@vger.kernel.org
Cc: casey@schaufler-ca.com, linux-audit@redhat.com,
	keescook@chromium.org, john.johansen@canonical.com,
	penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp, paul@paul-moore.com,
	sds@tycho.nsa.gov, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v23 05/23] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_secctx_to_secid
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2020 12:14:49 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201120201507.11993-6-casey@schaufler-ca.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201120201507.11993-1-casey@schaufler-ca.com>

Change the security_secctx_to_secid interface to use a lsmblob
structure in place of the single u32 secid in support of
module stacking. Change its callers to do the same.

The security module hook is unchanged, still passing back a secid.
The infrastructure passes the correct entry from the lsmblob.

Signed-off-by: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
To: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
---
 include/linux/security.h          | 26 ++++++++++++++++++--
 kernel/cred.c                     |  4 +---
 net/netfilter/nft_meta.c          | 10 ++++----
 net/netfilter/xt_SECMARK.c        |  7 +++++-
 net/netlabel/netlabel_unlabeled.c | 23 +++++++++++-------
 security/security.c               | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
 6 files changed, 85 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/security.h b/include/linux/security.h
index 948d12a5eb25..0766725a6b21 100644
--- a/include/linux/security.h
+++ b/include/linux/security.h
@@ -191,6 +191,27 @@ static inline bool lsmblob_equal(struct lsmblob *bloba, struct lsmblob *blobb)
 	return !memcmp(bloba, blobb, sizeof(*bloba));
 }
 
+/**
+ * lsmblob_value - find the first non-zero value in an lsmblob structure.
+ * @blob: Pointer to the data
+ *
+ * This needs to be used with extreme caution, as the cases where
+ * it is appropriate are rare.
+ *
+ * Return the first secid value set in the lsmblob.
+ * There should only be one.
+ */
+static inline u32 lsmblob_value(const struct lsmblob *blob)
+{
+	int i;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < LSMBLOB_ENTRIES; i++)
+		if (blob->secid[i])
+			return blob->secid[i];
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 /* These functions are in security/commoncap.c */
 extern int cap_capable(const struct cred *cred, struct user_namespace *ns,
 		       int cap, unsigned int opts);
@@ -508,7 +529,8 @@ int security_setprocattr(const char *lsm, const char *name, void *value,
 int security_netlink_send(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb);
 int security_ismaclabel(const char *name);
 int security_secid_to_secctx(u32 secid, char **secdata, u32 *seclen);
-int security_secctx_to_secid(const char *secdata, u32 seclen, u32 *secid);
+int security_secctx_to_secid(const char *secdata, u32 seclen,
+			     struct lsmblob *blob);
 void security_release_secctx(char *secdata, u32 seclen);
 void security_inode_invalidate_secctx(struct inode *inode);
 int security_inode_notifysecctx(struct inode *inode, void *ctx, u32 ctxlen);
@@ -1335,7 +1357,7 @@ static inline int security_secid_to_secctx(u32 secid, char **secdata, u32 *secle
 
 static inline int security_secctx_to_secid(const char *secdata,
 					   u32 seclen,
-					   u32 *secid)
+					   struct lsmblob *blob)
 {
 	return -EOPNOTSUPP;
 }
diff --git a/kernel/cred.c b/kernel/cred.c
index 22e0e7cbefde..848306c7d823 100644
--- a/kernel/cred.c
+++ b/kernel/cred.c
@@ -757,14 +757,12 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(set_security_override);
 int set_security_override_from_ctx(struct cred *new, const char *secctx)
 {
 	struct lsmblob blob;
-	u32 secid;
 	int ret;
 
-	ret = security_secctx_to_secid(secctx, strlen(secctx), &secid);
+	ret = security_secctx_to_secid(secctx, strlen(secctx), &blob);
 	if (ret < 0)
 		return ret;
 
-	lsmblob_init(&blob, secid);
 	return set_security_override(new, &blob);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(set_security_override_from_ctx);
diff --git a/net/netfilter/nft_meta.c b/net/netfilter/nft_meta.c
index b37bd02448d8..f1b9b0021414 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/nft_meta.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nft_meta.c
@@ -811,21 +811,21 @@ static const struct nla_policy nft_secmark_policy[NFTA_SECMARK_MAX + 1] = {
 
 static int nft_secmark_compute_secid(struct nft_secmark *priv)
 {
-	u32 tmp_secid = 0;
+	struct lsmblob blob;
 	int err;
 
-	err = security_secctx_to_secid(priv->ctx, strlen(priv->ctx), &tmp_secid);
+	err = security_secctx_to_secid(priv->ctx, strlen(priv->ctx), &blob);
 	if (err)
 		return err;
 
-	if (!tmp_secid)
+	if (!lsmblob_is_set(&blob))
 		return -ENOENT;
 
-	err = security_secmark_relabel_packet(tmp_secid);
+	err = security_secmark_relabel_packet(lsmblob_value(&blob));
 	if (err)
 		return err;
 
-	priv->secid = tmp_secid;
+	priv->secid = lsmblob_value(&blob);
 	return 0;
 }
 
diff --git a/net/netfilter/xt_SECMARK.c b/net/netfilter/xt_SECMARK.c
index 75625d13e976..9845d98e6b77 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/xt_SECMARK.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/xt_SECMARK.c
@@ -43,13 +43,14 @@ secmark_tg(struct sk_buff *skb, const struct xt_action_param *par)
 
 static int checkentry_lsm(struct xt_secmark_target_info *info)
 {
+	struct lsmblob blob;
 	int err;
 
 	info->secctx[SECMARK_SECCTX_MAX - 1] = '\0';
 	info->secid = 0;
 
 	err = security_secctx_to_secid(info->secctx, strlen(info->secctx),
-				       &info->secid);
+				       &blob);
 	if (err) {
 		if (err == -EINVAL)
 			pr_info_ratelimited("invalid security context \'%s\'\n",
@@ -57,6 +58,10 @@ static int checkentry_lsm(struct xt_secmark_target_info *info)
 		return err;
 	}
 
+	/* xt_secmark_target_info can't be changed to use lsmblobs because
+	 * it is exposed as an API. Use lsmblob_value() to get the one
+	 * value that got set by security_secctx_to_secid(). */
+	info->secid = lsmblob_value(&blob);
 	if (!info->secid) {
 		pr_info_ratelimited("unable to map security context \'%s\'\n",
 				    info->secctx);
diff --git a/net/netlabel/netlabel_unlabeled.c b/net/netlabel/netlabel_unlabeled.c
index fc55c9116da0..3b7a3e0ae8af 100644
--- a/net/netlabel/netlabel_unlabeled.c
+++ b/net/netlabel/netlabel_unlabeled.c
@@ -882,7 +882,7 @@ static int netlbl_unlabel_staticadd(struct sk_buff *skb,
 	void *addr;
 	void *mask;
 	u32 addr_len;
-	u32 secid;
+	struct lsmblob blob;
 	struct netlbl_audit audit_info;
 
 	/* Don't allow users to add both IPv4 and IPv6 addresses for a
@@ -906,13 +906,18 @@ static int netlbl_unlabel_staticadd(struct sk_buff *skb,
 	ret_val = security_secctx_to_secid(
 		                  nla_data(info->attrs[NLBL_UNLABEL_A_SECCTX]),
 				  nla_len(info->attrs[NLBL_UNLABEL_A_SECCTX]),
-				  &secid);
+				  &blob);
 	if (ret_val != 0)
 		return ret_val;
 
+	/* netlbl_unlhsh_add will be changed to pass a struct lsmblob *
+	 * instead of a u32 later in this patch set. security_secctx_to_secid()
+	 * will only be setting one entry in the lsmblob struct, so it is
+	 * safe to use lsmblob_value() to get that one value. */
+
 	return netlbl_unlhsh_add(&init_net,
-				 dev_name, addr, mask, addr_len, secid,
-				 &audit_info);
+				 dev_name, addr, mask, addr_len,
+				 lsmblob_value(&blob), &audit_info);
 }
 
 /**
@@ -933,7 +938,7 @@ static int netlbl_unlabel_staticadddef(struct sk_buff *skb,
 	void *addr;
 	void *mask;
 	u32 addr_len;
-	u32 secid;
+	struct lsmblob blob;
 	struct netlbl_audit audit_info;
 
 	/* Don't allow users to add both IPv4 and IPv6 addresses for a
@@ -955,13 +960,15 @@ static int netlbl_unlabel_staticadddef(struct sk_buff *skb,
 	ret_val = security_secctx_to_secid(
 		                  nla_data(info->attrs[NLBL_UNLABEL_A_SECCTX]),
 				  nla_len(info->attrs[NLBL_UNLABEL_A_SECCTX]),
-				  &secid);
+				  &blob);
 	if (ret_val != 0)
 		return ret_val;
 
+	/* security_secctx_to_secid() will only put one secid into the lsmblob
+	 * so it's safe to use lsmblob_value() to get the secid. */
 	return netlbl_unlhsh_add(&init_net,
-				 NULL, addr, mask, addr_len, secid,
-				 &audit_info);
+				 NULL, addr, mask, addr_len,
+				 lsmblob_value(&blob), &audit_info);
 }
 
 /**
diff --git a/security/security.c b/security/security.c
index 3a88a90ddba6..eac7c10b8cfa 100644
--- a/security/security.c
+++ b/security/security.c
@@ -2081,10 +2081,22 @@ int security_secid_to_secctx(u32 secid, char **secdata, u32 *seclen)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(security_secid_to_secctx);
 
-int security_secctx_to_secid(const char *secdata, u32 seclen, u32 *secid)
+int security_secctx_to_secid(const char *secdata, u32 seclen,
+			     struct lsmblob *blob)
 {
-	*secid = 0;
-	return call_int_hook(secctx_to_secid, 0, secdata, seclen, secid);
+	struct security_hook_list *hp;
+	int rc;
+
+	lsmblob_init(blob, 0);
+	hlist_for_each_entry(hp, &security_hook_heads.secctx_to_secid, list) {
+		if (WARN_ON(hp->lsmid->slot < 0 || hp->lsmid->slot >= lsm_slot))
+			continue;
+		rc = hp->hook.secctx_to_secid(secdata, seclen,
+					      &blob->secid[hp->lsmid->slot]);
+		if (rc != 0)
+			return rc;
+	}
+	return 0;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(security_secctx_to_secid);
 
@@ -2235,10 +2247,26 @@ int security_socket_getpeersec_stream(struct socket *sock, char __user *optval,
 				optval, optlen, len);
 }
 
-int security_socket_getpeersec_dgram(struct socket *sock, struct sk_buff *skb, u32 *secid)
+int security_socket_getpeersec_dgram(struct socket *sock, struct sk_buff *skb,
+				     u32 *secid)
 {
-	return call_int_hook(socket_getpeersec_dgram, -ENOPROTOOPT, sock,
-			     skb, secid);
+	struct security_hook_list *hp;
+	int rc = -ENOPROTOOPT;
+
+	/*
+	 * Only one security module should provide a real hook for
+	 * this. A stub or bypass like is used in BPF should either
+	 * (somehow) leave rc unaltered or return -ENOPROTOOPT.
+	 */
+	hlist_for_each_entry(hp, &security_hook_heads.socket_getpeersec_dgram,
+			     list) {
+		if (WARN_ON(hp->lsmid->slot < 0 || hp->lsmid->slot >= lsm_slot))
+			continue;
+		rc = hp->hook.socket_getpeersec_dgram(sock, skb, secid);
+		if (rc != -ENOPROTOOPT)
+			break;
+	}
+	return rc;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(security_socket_getpeersec_dgram);
 
-- 
2.24.1


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
To: casey.schaufler@intel.com, jmorris@namei.org,
	linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, selinux@vger.kernel.org
Cc: john.johansen@canonical.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-audit@redhat.com,
	netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, sds@tycho.nsa.gov
Subject: [PATCH v23 05/23] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_secctx_to_secid
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2020 12:14:49 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201120201507.11993-6-casey@schaufler-ca.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201120201507.11993-1-casey@schaufler-ca.com>

Change the security_secctx_to_secid interface to use a lsmblob
structure in place of the single u32 secid in support of
module stacking. Change its callers to do the same.

The security module hook is unchanged, still passing back a secid.
The infrastructure passes the correct entry from the lsmblob.

Signed-off-by: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
To: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
---
 include/linux/security.h          | 26 ++++++++++++++++++--
 kernel/cred.c                     |  4 +---
 net/netfilter/nft_meta.c          | 10 ++++----
 net/netfilter/xt_SECMARK.c        |  7 +++++-
 net/netlabel/netlabel_unlabeled.c | 23 +++++++++++-------
 security/security.c               | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
 6 files changed, 85 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/security.h b/include/linux/security.h
index 948d12a5eb25..0766725a6b21 100644
--- a/include/linux/security.h
+++ b/include/linux/security.h
@@ -191,6 +191,27 @@ static inline bool lsmblob_equal(struct lsmblob *bloba, struct lsmblob *blobb)
 	return !memcmp(bloba, blobb, sizeof(*bloba));
 }
 
+/**
+ * lsmblob_value - find the first non-zero value in an lsmblob structure.
+ * @blob: Pointer to the data
+ *
+ * This needs to be used with extreme caution, as the cases where
+ * it is appropriate are rare.
+ *
+ * Return the first secid value set in the lsmblob.
+ * There should only be one.
+ */
+static inline u32 lsmblob_value(const struct lsmblob *blob)
+{
+	int i;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < LSMBLOB_ENTRIES; i++)
+		if (blob->secid[i])
+			return blob->secid[i];
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 /* These functions are in security/commoncap.c */
 extern int cap_capable(const struct cred *cred, struct user_namespace *ns,
 		       int cap, unsigned int opts);
@@ -508,7 +529,8 @@ int security_setprocattr(const char *lsm, const char *name, void *value,
 int security_netlink_send(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb);
 int security_ismaclabel(const char *name);
 int security_secid_to_secctx(u32 secid, char **secdata, u32 *seclen);
-int security_secctx_to_secid(const char *secdata, u32 seclen, u32 *secid);
+int security_secctx_to_secid(const char *secdata, u32 seclen,
+			     struct lsmblob *blob);
 void security_release_secctx(char *secdata, u32 seclen);
 void security_inode_invalidate_secctx(struct inode *inode);
 int security_inode_notifysecctx(struct inode *inode, void *ctx, u32 ctxlen);
@@ -1335,7 +1357,7 @@ static inline int security_secid_to_secctx(u32 secid, char **secdata, u32 *secle
 
 static inline int security_secctx_to_secid(const char *secdata,
 					   u32 seclen,
-					   u32 *secid)
+					   struct lsmblob *blob)
 {
 	return -EOPNOTSUPP;
 }
diff --git a/kernel/cred.c b/kernel/cred.c
index 22e0e7cbefde..848306c7d823 100644
--- a/kernel/cred.c
+++ b/kernel/cred.c
@@ -757,14 +757,12 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(set_security_override);
 int set_security_override_from_ctx(struct cred *new, const char *secctx)
 {
 	struct lsmblob blob;
-	u32 secid;
 	int ret;
 
-	ret = security_secctx_to_secid(secctx, strlen(secctx), &secid);
+	ret = security_secctx_to_secid(secctx, strlen(secctx), &blob);
 	if (ret < 0)
 		return ret;
 
-	lsmblob_init(&blob, secid);
 	return set_security_override(new, &blob);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(set_security_override_from_ctx);
diff --git a/net/netfilter/nft_meta.c b/net/netfilter/nft_meta.c
index b37bd02448d8..f1b9b0021414 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/nft_meta.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nft_meta.c
@@ -811,21 +811,21 @@ static const struct nla_policy nft_secmark_policy[NFTA_SECMARK_MAX + 1] = {
 
 static int nft_secmark_compute_secid(struct nft_secmark *priv)
 {
-	u32 tmp_secid = 0;
+	struct lsmblob blob;
 	int err;
 
-	err = security_secctx_to_secid(priv->ctx, strlen(priv->ctx), &tmp_secid);
+	err = security_secctx_to_secid(priv->ctx, strlen(priv->ctx), &blob);
 	if (err)
 		return err;
 
-	if (!tmp_secid)
+	if (!lsmblob_is_set(&blob))
 		return -ENOENT;
 
-	err = security_secmark_relabel_packet(tmp_secid);
+	err = security_secmark_relabel_packet(lsmblob_value(&blob));
 	if (err)
 		return err;
 
-	priv->secid = tmp_secid;
+	priv->secid = lsmblob_value(&blob);
 	return 0;
 }
 
diff --git a/net/netfilter/xt_SECMARK.c b/net/netfilter/xt_SECMARK.c
index 75625d13e976..9845d98e6b77 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/xt_SECMARK.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/xt_SECMARK.c
@@ -43,13 +43,14 @@ secmark_tg(struct sk_buff *skb, const struct xt_action_param *par)
 
 static int checkentry_lsm(struct xt_secmark_target_info *info)
 {
+	struct lsmblob blob;
 	int err;
 
 	info->secctx[SECMARK_SECCTX_MAX - 1] = '\0';
 	info->secid = 0;
 
 	err = security_secctx_to_secid(info->secctx, strlen(info->secctx),
-				       &info->secid);
+				       &blob);
 	if (err) {
 		if (err == -EINVAL)
 			pr_info_ratelimited("invalid security context \'%s\'\n",
@@ -57,6 +58,10 @@ static int checkentry_lsm(struct xt_secmark_target_info *info)
 		return err;
 	}
 
+	/* xt_secmark_target_info can't be changed to use lsmblobs because
+	 * it is exposed as an API. Use lsmblob_value() to get the one
+	 * value that got set by security_secctx_to_secid(). */
+	info->secid = lsmblob_value(&blob);
 	if (!info->secid) {
 		pr_info_ratelimited("unable to map security context \'%s\'\n",
 				    info->secctx);
diff --git a/net/netlabel/netlabel_unlabeled.c b/net/netlabel/netlabel_unlabeled.c
index fc55c9116da0..3b7a3e0ae8af 100644
--- a/net/netlabel/netlabel_unlabeled.c
+++ b/net/netlabel/netlabel_unlabeled.c
@@ -882,7 +882,7 @@ static int netlbl_unlabel_staticadd(struct sk_buff *skb,
 	void *addr;
 	void *mask;
 	u32 addr_len;
-	u32 secid;
+	struct lsmblob blob;
 	struct netlbl_audit audit_info;
 
 	/* Don't allow users to add both IPv4 and IPv6 addresses for a
@@ -906,13 +906,18 @@ static int netlbl_unlabel_staticadd(struct sk_buff *skb,
 	ret_val = security_secctx_to_secid(
 		                  nla_data(info->attrs[NLBL_UNLABEL_A_SECCTX]),
 				  nla_len(info->attrs[NLBL_UNLABEL_A_SECCTX]),
-				  &secid);
+				  &blob);
 	if (ret_val != 0)
 		return ret_val;
 
+	/* netlbl_unlhsh_add will be changed to pass a struct lsmblob *
+	 * instead of a u32 later in this patch set. security_secctx_to_secid()
+	 * will only be setting one entry in the lsmblob struct, so it is
+	 * safe to use lsmblob_value() to get that one value. */
+
 	return netlbl_unlhsh_add(&init_net,
-				 dev_name, addr, mask, addr_len, secid,
-				 &audit_info);
+				 dev_name, addr, mask, addr_len,
+				 lsmblob_value(&blob), &audit_info);
 }
 
 /**
@@ -933,7 +938,7 @@ static int netlbl_unlabel_staticadddef(struct sk_buff *skb,
 	void *addr;
 	void *mask;
 	u32 addr_len;
-	u32 secid;
+	struct lsmblob blob;
 	struct netlbl_audit audit_info;
 
 	/* Don't allow users to add both IPv4 and IPv6 addresses for a
@@ -955,13 +960,15 @@ static int netlbl_unlabel_staticadddef(struct sk_buff *skb,
 	ret_val = security_secctx_to_secid(
 		                  nla_data(info->attrs[NLBL_UNLABEL_A_SECCTX]),
 				  nla_len(info->attrs[NLBL_UNLABEL_A_SECCTX]),
-				  &secid);
+				  &blob);
 	if (ret_val != 0)
 		return ret_val;
 
+	/* security_secctx_to_secid() will only put one secid into the lsmblob
+	 * so it's safe to use lsmblob_value() to get the secid. */
 	return netlbl_unlhsh_add(&init_net,
-				 NULL, addr, mask, addr_len, secid,
-				 &audit_info);
+				 NULL, addr, mask, addr_len,
+				 lsmblob_value(&blob), &audit_info);
 }
 
 /**
diff --git a/security/security.c b/security/security.c
index 3a88a90ddba6..eac7c10b8cfa 100644
--- a/security/security.c
+++ b/security/security.c
@@ -2081,10 +2081,22 @@ int security_secid_to_secctx(u32 secid, char **secdata, u32 *seclen)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(security_secid_to_secctx);
 
-int security_secctx_to_secid(const char *secdata, u32 seclen, u32 *secid)
+int security_secctx_to_secid(const char *secdata, u32 seclen,
+			     struct lsmblob *blob)
 {
-	*secid = 0;
-	return call_int_hook(secctx_to_secid, 0, secdata, seclen, secid);
+	struct security_hook_list *hp;
+	int rc;
+
+	lsmblob_init(blob, 0);
+	hlist_for_each_entry(hp, &security_hook_heads.secctx_to_secid, list) {
+		if (WARN_ON(hp->lsmid->slot < 0 || hp->lsmid->slot >= lsm_slot))
+			continue;
+		rc = hp->hook.secctx_to_secid(secdata, seclen,
+					      &blob->secid[hp->lsmid->slot]);
+		if (rc != 0)
+			return rc;
+	}
+	return 0;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(security_secctx_to_secid);
 
@@ -2235,10 +2247,26 @@ int security_socket_getpeersec_stream(struct socket *sock, char __user *optval,
 				optval, optlen, len);
 }
 
-int security_socket_getpeersec_dgram(struct socket *sock, struct sk_buff *skb, u32 *secid)
+int security_socket_getpeersec_dgram(struct socket *sock, struct sk_buff *skb,
+				     u32 *secid)
 {
-	return call_int_hook(socket_getpeersec_dgram, -ENOPROTOOPT, sock,
-			     skb, secid);
+	struct security_hook_list *hp;
+	int rc = -ENOPROTOOPT;
+
+	/*
+	 * Only one security module should provide a real hook for
+	 * this. A stub or bypass like is used in BPF should either
+	 * (somehow) leave rc unaltered or return -ENOPROTOOPT.
+	 */
+	hlist_for_each_entry(hp, &security_hook_heads.socket_getpeersec_dgram,
+			     list) {
+		if (WARN_ON(hp->lsmid->slot < 0 || hp->lsmid->slot >= lsm_slot))
+			continue;
+		rc = hp->hook.socket_getpeersec_dgram(sock, skb, secid);
+		if (rc != -ENOPROTOOPT)
+			break;
+	}
+	return rc;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(security_socket_getpeersec_dgram);
 
-- 
2.24.1

--
Linux-audit mailing list
Linux-audit@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit


  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-11-20 20:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 84+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20201120201507.11993-1-casey.ref@schaufler-ca.com>
2020-11-20 20:14 ` [PATCH v22 00/23] LSM: Module stacking for AppArmor Casey Schaufler
2020-11-20 20:14   ` Casey Schaufler
2020-11-20 20:14   ` [PATCH v23 01/23] LSM: Infrastructure management of the sock security Casey Schaufler
2020-11-20 20:14     ` Casey Schaufler
2020-11-20 20:14   ` [PATCH v23 02/23] LSM: Create and manage the lsmblob data structure Casey Schaufler
2020-11-20 20:14     ` Casey Schaufler
2020-12-28 17:54     ` Mimi Zohar
2020-12-28 17:54       ` Mimi Zohar
2020-12-28 19:22       ` Casey Schaufler
2020-12-28 19:22         ` Casey Schaufler
2020-12-28 19:43         ` Mimi Zohar
2020-12-28 19:43           ` Mimi Zohar
2020-12-28 19:24     ` Mimi Zohar
2020-12-28 19:24       ` Mimi Zohar
2020-12-28 20:06       ` Casey Schaufler
2020-12-28 20:06         ` Casey Schaufler
2020-12-28 22:14         ` Mimi Zohar
2020-12-28 22:14           ` Mimi Zohar
2020-12-28 23:20           ` Casey Schaufler
2020-12-28 23:20             ` Casey Schaufler
2020-12-29  1:53             ` Mimi Zohar
2020-12-29  1:53               ` Mimi Zohar
2020-12-29 13:53               ` Mimi Zohar
2020-12-29 13:53                 ` Mimi Zohar
2020-12-29 18:46               ` Casey Schaufler
2020-12-29 18:46                 ` Casey Schaufler
2020-12-29 19:16                 ` Mimi Zohar
2020-12-29 19:16                   ` Mimi Zohar
2020-11-20 20:14   ` [PATCH v23 03/23] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_audit_rule_match Casey Schaufler
2020-11-20 20:14     ` Casey Schaufler
2020-11-20 20:14   ` [PATCH v23 04/23] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_kernel_act_as Casey Schaufler
2020-11-20 20:14     ` Casey Schaufler
2020-11-20 20:14   ` Casey Schaufler [this message]
2020-11-20 20:14     ` [PATCH v23 05/23] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_secctx_to_secid Casey Schaufler
2020-11-20 20:14   ` [PATCH v23 06/23] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_secid_to_secctx Casey Schaufler
2020-11-20 20:14     ` Casey Schaufler
2020-11-20 20:14   ` [PATCH v23 07/23] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_ipc_getsecid Casey Schaufler
2020-11-20 20:14     ` Casey Schaufler
2020-11-20 20:14   ` [PATCH v23 08/23] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_task_getsecid Casey Schaufler
2020-11-20 20:14     ` Casey Schaufler
2020-11-20 20:14   ` [PATCH v23 09/23] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_inode_getsecid Casey Schaufler
2020-11-20 20:14     ` Casey Schaufler
2020-11-20 20:14   ` [PATCH v23 10/23] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_cred_getsecid Casey Schaufler
2020-11-20 20:14     ` Casey Schaufler
2020-11-20 20:14   ` [PATCH v23 11/23] IMA: Change internal interfaces to use lsmblobs Casey Schaufler
2020-11-20 20:14     ` Casey Schaufler
2020-11-20 20:14   ` [PATCH v23 12/23] LSM: Specify which LSM to display Casey Schaufler
2020-11-20 20:14     ` Casey Schaufler
2020-11-20 20:14   ` [PATCH v23 13/23] LSM: Ensure the correct LSM context releaser Casey Schaufler
2020-11-20 20:14     ` Casey Schaufler
2020-11-20 20:14   ` [PATCH v23 14/23] LSM: Use lsmcontext in security_secid_to_secctx Casey Schaufler
2020-11-20 20:14     ` Casey Schaufler
2020-11-20 20:14   ` [PATCH v23 15/23] LSM: Use lsmcontext in security_inode_getsecctx Casey Schaufler
2020-11-20 20:14     ` Casey Schaufler
2020-11-20 20:15   ` [PATCH v23 16/23] LSM: security_secid_to_secctx in netlink netfilter Casey Schaufler
2020-11-20 20:15     ` Casey Schaufler
2020-11-20 20:15   ` [PATCH v23 17/23] NET: Store LSM netlabel data in a lsmblob Casey Schaufler
2020-11-20 20:15     ` Casey Schaufler
2020-11-20 20:15   ` [PATCH v23 18/23] LSM: Verify LSM display sanity in binder Casey Schaufler
2020-11-20 20:15     ` Casey Schaufler
2020-11-20 20:15   ` [PATCH v23 19/23] audit: add support for non-syscall auxiliary records Casey Schaufler
2020-11-20 20:15     ` Casey Schaufler
2020-11-20 23:06     ` kernel test robot
2020-11-20 23:06       ` kernel test robot
2020-11-20 23:06       ` kernel test robot
2020-11-21  0:36     ` kernel test robot
2020-11-21  0:36       ` kernel test robot
2020-11-21  7:36     ` kernel test robot
2020-11-21  7:36       ` kernel test robot
2020-11-21  7:36       ` kernel test robot
2020-11-20 20:15   ` [PATCH v23 20/23] Audit: Add new record for multiple process LSM attributes Casey Schaufler
2020-11-20 20:15     ` Casey Schaufler
2020-11-20 22:51     ` kernel test robot
2020-11-20 22:51       ` kernel test robot
2020-11-20 22:51       ` kernel test robot
2020-11-21  0:02     ` kernel test robot
2020-11-21  0:02       ` kernel test robot
2020-11-21  0:02       ` kernel test robot
2020-11-20 20:15   ` [PATCH v23 21/23] Audit: Add a new record for multiple object " Casey Schaufler
2020-11-20 20:15     ` Casey Schaufler
2020-11-20 20:15   ` [PATCH v23 22/23] LSM: Add /proc attr entry for full LSM context Casey Schaufler
2020-11-20 20:15     ` Casey Schaufler
2020-11-20 20:15   ` [PATCH v23 23/23] AppArmor: Remove the exclusive flag Casey Schaufler
2020-11-20 20:15     ` Casey Schaufler

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201120201507.11993-6-casey@schaufler-ca.com \
    --to=casey@schaufler-ca.com \
    --cc=casey.schaufler@intel.com \
    --cc=jmorris@namei.org \
    --cc=john.johansen@canonical.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-audit@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
    --cc=penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp \
    --cc=sds@tycho.nsa.gov \
    --cc=selinux@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.