All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Adalbert Lazăr" <alazar@bitdefender.com>
To: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	"Mihai Donțu" <mdontu@bitdefender.com>,
	"Adalbert Lazăr" <alazar@bitdefender.com>
Subject: [PATCH v10 61/81] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VCPU_CONTROL_CR and KVMI_VCPU_EVENT_CR
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2020 11:35:40 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201125093600.2766-62-alazar@bitdefender.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201125093600.2766-1-alazar@bitdefender.com>

From: Mihai Donțu <mdontu@bitdefender.com>

Using the KVMI_VCPU_CONTROL_CR command, the introspection tool subscribes
to KVMI_VCPU_EVENT_CR events that will be sent when a control register
(CR0, CR3 or CR4) is going to be changed.

Signed-off-by: Mihai Donțu <mdontu@bitdefender.com>
Co-developed-by: Adalbert Lazăr <alazar@bitdefender.com>
Signed-off-by: Adalbert Lazăr <alazar@bitdefender.com>
---
 Documentation/virt/kvm/kvmi.rst               |  73 +++++++++++++
 arch/x86/include/asm/kvmi_host.h              |  12 +++
 arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/kvmi.h              |  18 ++++
 arch/x86/kvm/kvmi.c                           |  78 ++++++++++++++
 arch/x86/kvm/kvmi.h                           |   4 +
 arch/x86/kvm/kvmi_msg.c                       |  44 ++++++++
 arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c                        |   6 +-
 arch/x86/kvm/x86.c                            |  12 ++-
 include/uapi/linux/kvmi.h                     |   2 +
 .../testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/kvmi_test.c  | 100 ++++++++++++++++++
 virt/kvm/introspection/kvmi_int.h             |   2 +
 11 files changed, 348 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/virt/kvm/kvmi.rst b/Documentation/virt/kvm/kvmi.rst
index f9c10d27ce14..85e14b82aa2f 100644
--- a/Documentation/virt/kvm/kvmi.rst
+++ b/Documentation/virt/kvm/kvmi.rst
@@ -539,6 +539,7 @@ Enables/disables vCPU introspection events. This command can be used with
 the following events::
 
 	KVMI_VCPU_EVENT_BREAKPOINT
+	KVMI_VCPU_EVENT_CR
 	KVMI_VCPU_EVENT_HYPERCALL
 
 When an event is enabled, the introspection tool is notified and
@@ -701,6 +702,40 @@ interceptions). By default it is enabled.
 * -KVM_EINVAL - the padding is not zero
 * -KVM_EINVAL - ``enable`` is not 1 or 0
 
+15. KVMI_VCPU_CONTROL_CR
+------------------------
+
+:Architectures: x86
+:Versions: >= 1
+:Parameters:
+
+::
+
+	struct kvmi_vcpu_hdr;
+	struct kvmi_vcpu_control_cr {
+		__u8 cr;
+		__u8 enable;
+		__u16 padding1;
+		__u32 padding2;
+	};
+
+:Returns:
+
+::
+
+	struct kvmi_error_code
+
+Enables/disables introspection for a specific control register and must
+be used in addition to *KVMI_VCPU_CONTROL_EVENTS* with the *KVMI_VCPU_EVENT_CR*
+ID set.
+
+:Errors:
+
+* -KVM_EINVAL - the selected vCPU is invalid
+* -KVM_EINVAL - the specified control register is not CR0, CR3 or CR4
+* -KVM_EINVAL - the padding is not zero
+* -KVM_EAGAIN - the selected vCPU can't be introspected yet
+
 Events
 ======
 
@@ -893,3 +928,41 @@ before returning this action.
 
 The *CONTINUE* action will cause the breakpoint exception to be reinjected
 (the OS will handle it).
+
+5. KVMI_VCPU_EVENT_CR
+---------------------
+
+:Architectures: x86
+:Versions: >= 1
+:Actions: CONTINUE, CRASH
+:Parameters:
+
+::
+
+	struct kvmi_event_hdr;
+	struct kvmi_vcpu_event;
+	struct kvmi_vcpu_event_cr {
+		__u8 cr;
+		__u8 padding[7];
+		__u64 old_value;
+		__u64 new_value;
+	};
+
+:Returns:
+
+::
+
+	struct kvmi_vcpu_hdr;
+	struct kvmi_vcpu_event_reply;
+	struct kvmi_vcpu_event_cr_reply {
+		__u64 new_val;
+	};
+
+This event is sent when a control register is going to be changed and the
+introspection has been enabled for this event and for this specific
+register (see **KVMI_VCPU_CONTROL_EVENTS**).
+
+``kvmi_vcpu_event`` (with the vCPU state), the control register number
+(``cr``), the old value (``old_value``) and the new value (``new_value``)
+are sent to the introspection tool. The *CONTINUE* action will set the
+``new_val``.
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvmi_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvmi_host.h
index 161d1ae5a7cf..7613088d0ae2 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvmi_host.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvmi_host.h
@@ -4,6 +4,8 @@
 
 #include <asm/kvmi.h>
 
+#define KVMI_NUM_CR 5
+
 struct kvmi_monitor_interception {
 	bool kvmi_intercepted;
 	bool kvm_intercepted;
@@ -19,6 +21,8 @@ struct kvmi_interception {
 struct kvm_vcpu_arch_introspection {
 	struct kvm_regs delayed_regs;
 	bool have_delayed_regs;
+
+	DECLARE_BITMAP(cr_mask, KVMI_NUM_CR);
 };
 
 struct kvm_arch_introspection {
@@ -27,11 +31,19 @@ struct kvm_arch_introspection {
 #ifdef CONFIG_KVM_INTROSPECTION
 
 bool kvmi_monitor_bp_intercept(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 dbg);
+bool kvmi_cr_event(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned int cr,
+		   unsigned long old_value, unsigned long *new_value);
+bool kvmi_cr3_intercepted(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
 
 #else /* CONFIG_KVM_INTROSPECTION */
 
 static inline bool kvmi_monitor_bp_intercept(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 dbg)
 	{ return false; }
+static inline bool kvmi_cr_event(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned int cr,
+				 unsigned long old_value,
+				 unsigned long *new_value)
+			{ return true; }
+static inline bool kvmi_cr3_intercepted(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) { return false; }
 
 #endif /* CONFIG_KVM_INTROSPECTION */
 
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/kvmi.h b/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/kvmi.h
index a442ba4d2190..32cd17488058 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/kvmi.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/kvmi.h
@@ -61,4 +61,22 @@ struct kvmi_vcpu_get_cpuid_reply {
 	__u32 edx;
 };
 
+struct kvmi_vcpu_control_cr {
+	__u8 cr;
+	__u8 enable;
+	__u16 padding1;
+	__u32 padding2;
+};
+
+struct kvmi_vcpu_event_cr {
+	__u8 cr;
+	__u8 padding[7];
+	__u64 old_value;
+	__u64 new_value;
+};
+
+struct kvmi_vcpu_event_cr_reply {
+	__u64 new_val;
+};
+
 #endif /* _UAPI_ASM_X86_KVMI_H */
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/kvmi.c b/arch/x86/kvm/kvmi.c
index e7a4ef48ed61..2bb6b4bb932b 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/kvmi.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/kvmi.c
@@ -8,10 +8,12 @@
 #include "linux/kvm_host.h"
 #include "x86.h"
 #include "../../../virt/kvm/introspection/kvmi_int.h"
+#include "kvmi.h"
 
 void kvmi_arch_init_vcpu_events_mask(unsigned long *supported)
 {
 	set_bit(KVMI_VCPU_EVENT_BREAKPOINT, supported);
+	set_bit(KVMI_VCPU_EVENT_CR, supported);
 	set_bit(KVMI_VCPU_EVENT_HYPERCALL, supported);
 }
 
@@ -320,3 +322,79 @@ void kvmi_arch_request_interception_cleanup(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 		arch_vcpui->cleanup = true;
 	}
 }
+
+int kvmi_arch_cmd_vcpu_control_cr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int cr, bool enable)
+{
+	if (cr == 3)
+		kvm_x86_ops.control_cr3_intercept(vcpu, CR_TYPE_W, enable);
+
+	if (enable)
+		set_bit(cr, VCPUI(vcpu)->arch.cr_mask);
+	else
+		clear_bit(cr, VCPUI(vcpu)->arch.cr_mask);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static bool __kvmi_cr_event(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned int cr,
+			    u64 old_value, unsigned long *new_value)
+{
+	u64 reply_value;
+	u32 action;
+	bool ret;
+
+	if (!test_bit(cr, VCPUI(vcpu)->arch.cr_mask))
+		return true;
+
+	action = kvmi_msg_send_cr(vcpu, cr, old_value, *new_value,
+				  &reply_value);
+	switch (action) {
+	case KVMI_EVENT_ACTION_CONTINUE:
+		*new_value = reply_value;
+		ret = true;
+		break;
+	default:
+		kvmi_handle_common_event_actions(vcpu, action);
+		ret = false;
+	}
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
+bool kvmi_cr_event(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned int cr,
+		   unsigned long old_value, unsigned long *new_value)
+{
+	struct kvm_introspection *kvmi;
+	bool ret = true;
+
+	if (old_value == *new_value)
+		return true;
+
+	kvmi = kvmi_get(vcpu->kvm);
+	if (!kvmi)
+		return true;
+
+	if (is_vcpu_event_enabled(vcpu, KVMI_VCPU_EVENT_CR))
+		ret = __kvmi_cr_event(vcpu, cr, old_value, new_value);
+
+	kvmi_put(vcpu->kvm);
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
+bool kvmi_cr3_intercepted(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+	struct kvm_introspection *kvmi;
+	bool ret;
+
+	kvmi = kvmi_get(vcpu->kvm);
+	if (!kvmi)
+		return false;
+
+	ret = test_bit(3, VCPUI(vcpu)->arch.cr_mask);
+
+	kvmi_put(vcpu->kvm);
+
+	return ret;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(kvmi_cr3_intercepted);
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/kvmi.h b/arch/x86/kvm/kvmi.h
index 4eeb0c900083..6f4aaebb67f9 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/kvmi.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/kvmi.h
@@ -7,5 +7,9 @@ int kvmi_arch_cmd_vcpu_get_registers(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 				struct kvmi_vcpu_get_registers_reply *rpl);
 void kvmi_arch_cmd_vcpu_set_registers(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 				      const struct kvm_regs *regs);
+int kvmi_arch_cmd_vcpu_control_cr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int cr, bool enable);
+
+u32 kvmi_msg_send_cr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 cr, u64 old_value,
+		     u64 new_value, u64 *ret_value);
 
 #endif
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/kvmi_msg.c b/arch/x86/kvm/kvmi_msg.c
index 1651ef877e3e..1682bb27105f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/kvmi_msg.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/kvmi_msg.c
@@ -132,7 +132,26 @@ static int handle_vcpu_get_cpuid(const struct kvmi_vcpu_msg_job *job,
 	return kvmi_msg_vcpu_reply(job, msg, ec, &rpl, sizeof(rpl));
 }
 
+static int handle_vcpu_control_cr(const struct kvmi_vcpu_msg_job *job,
+				  const struct kvmi_msg_hdr *msg,
+				  const void *_req)
+{
+	const struct kvmi_vcpu_control_cr *req = _req;
+	int ec;
+
+	if (req->padding1 || req->padding2 || req->enable > 1)
+		ec = -KVM_EINVAL;
+	else if (req->cr != 0 && req->cr != 3 && req->cr != 4)
+		ec = -KVM_EINVAL;
+	else
+		ec = kvmi_arch_cmd_vcpu_control_cr(job->vcpu, req->cr,
+						   req->enable == 1);
+
+	return kvmi_msg_vcpu_reply(job, msg, ec, NULL, 0);
+}
+
 static kvmi_vcpu_msg_job_fct const msg_vcpu[] = {
+	[KVMI_VCPU_CONTROL_CR]    = handle_vcpu_control_cr,
 	[KVMI_VCPU_GET_CPUID]     = handle_vcpu_get_cpuid,
 	[KVMI_VCPU_GET_INFO]      = handle_vcpu_get_info,
 	[KVMI_VCPU_GET_REGISTERS] = handle_vcpu_get_registers,
@@ -143,3 +162,28 @@ kvmi_vcpu_msg_job_fct kvmi_arch_vcpu_msg_handler(u16 id)
 {
 	return id < ARRAY_SIZE(msg_vcpu) ? msg_vcpu[id] : NULL;
 }
+
+u32 kvmi_msg_send_cr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 cr, u64 old_value,
+		     u64 new_value, u64 *ret_value)
+{
+	struct kvmi_vcpu_event_cr e;
+	struct kvmi_vcpu_event_cr_reply r;
+	u32 action;
+	int err;
+
+	memset(&e, 0, sizeof(e));
+	e.cr = cr;
+	e.old_value = old_value;
+	e.new_value = new_value;
+
+	err = kvmi_send_vcpu_event(vcpu, KVMI_VCPU_EVENT_CR, &e, sizeof(e),
+				   &r, sizeof(r), &action);
+	if (err) {
+		action = KVMI_EVENT_ACTION_CONTINUE;
+		*ret_value = new_value;
+	} else {
+		*ret_value = r.new_val;
+	}
+
+	return action;
+}
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
index 9bfa2e9f8161..723e78529146 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
@@ -5062,7 +5062,8 @@ static int handle_cr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 			err = handle_set_cr0(vcpu, val);
 			return kvm_complete_insn_gp(vcpu, err);
 		case 3:
-			WARN_ON_ONCE(enable_unrestricted_guest);
+			WARN_ON_ONCE(enable_unrestricted_guest &&
+				     !kvmi_cr3_intercepted(vcpu));
 			err = kvm_set_cr3(vcpu, val);
 			return kvm_complete_insn_gp(vcpu, err);
 		case 4:
@@ -5095,7 +5096,8 @@ static int handle_cr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	case 1: /*mov from cr*/
 		switch (cr) {
 		case 3:
-			WARN_ON_ONCE(enable_unrestricted_guest);
+			WARN_ON_ONCE(enable_unrestricted_guest &&
+				     !kvmi_cr3_intercepted(vcpu));
 			val = kvm_read_cr3(vcpu);
 			kvm_register_write(vcpu, reg, val);
 			trace_kvm_cr_read(cr, val);
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
index 824d9d20a6ea..9a4ec0b4714c 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -849,6 +849,9 @@ int kvm_set_cr0(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long cr0)
 	if (!(cr0 & X86_CR0_PG) && kvm_read_cr4_bits(vcpu, X86_CR4_PCIDE))
 		return 1;
 
+	if (!kvmi_cr_event(vcpu, 0, old_cr0, &cr0))
+		return 1;
+
 	kvm_x86_ops.set_cr0(vcpu, cr0);
 
 	if ((cr0 ^ old_cr0) & X86_CR0_PG) {
@@ -1010,6 +1013,9 @@ int kvm_set_cr4(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long cr4)
 			return 1;
 	}
 
+	if (!kvmi_cr_event(vcpu, 4, old_cr4, &cr4))
+		return 1;
+
 	kvm_x86_ops.set_cr4(vcpu, cr4);
 
 	if (((cr4 ^ old_cr4) & mmu_role_bits) ||
@@ -1022,6 +1028,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_set_cr4);
 
 int kvm_set_cr3(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long cr3)
 {
+	unsigned long old_cr3 = kvm_read_cr3(vcpu);
 	bool skip_tlb_flush = false;
 #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
 	bool pcid_enabled = kvm_read_cr4_bits(vcpu, X86_CR4_PCIDE);
@@ -1032,7 +1039,7 @@ int kvm_set_cr3(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long cr3)
 	}
 #endif
 
-	if (cr3 == kvm_read_cr3(vcpu) && !pdptrs_changed(vcpu)) {
+	if (cr3 == old_cr3 && !pdptrs_changed(vcpu)) {
 		if (!skip_tlb_flush) {
 			kvm_mmu_sync_roots(vcpu);
 			kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_TLB_FLUSH_CURRENT, vcpu);
@@ -1047,6 +1054,9 @@ int kvm_set_cr3(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long cr3)
 		 !load_pdptrs(vcpu, vcpu->arch.walk_mmu, cr3))
 		return 1;
 
+	if (!kvmi_cr_event(vcpu, 3, old_cr3, &cr3))
+		return 1;
+
 	kvm_mmu_new_pgd(vcpu, cr3, skip_tlb_flush, skip_tlb_flush);
 	vcpu->arch.cr3 = cr3;
 	kvm_register_mark_available(vcpu, VCPU_EXREG_CR3);
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/kvmi.h b/include/uapi/linux/kvmi.h
index 9e28961a8387..c1d8cf02018b 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/kvmi.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/kvmi.h
@@ -41,6 +41,7 @@ enum {
 	KVMI_VCPU_GET_REGISTERS  = KVMI_VCPU_MESSAGE_ID(3),
 	KVMI_VCPU_SET_REGISTERS  = KVMI_VCPU_MESSAGE_ID(4),
 	KVMI_VCPU_GET_CPUID      = KVMI_VCPU_MESSAGE_ID(5),
+	KVMI_VCPU_CONTROL_CR     = KVMI_VCPU_MESSAGE_ID(6),
 
 	KVMI_NEXT_VCPU_MESSAGE
 };
@@ -58,6 +59,7 @@ enum {
 	KVMI_VCPU_EVENT_PAUSE      = KVMI_VCPU_EVENT_ID(0),
 	KVMI_VCPU_EVENT_HYPERCALL  = KVMI_VCPU_EVENT_ID(1),
 	KVMI_VCPU_EVENT_BREAKPOINT = KVMI_VCPU_EVENT_ID(2),
+	KVMI_VCPU_EVENT_CR         = KVMI_VCPU_EVENT_ID(3),
 
 	KVMI_NEXT_VCPU_EVENT
 };
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/kvmi_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/kvmi_test.c
index f95f2771a123..6a1103eab77a 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/kvmi_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/kvmi_test.c
@@ -54,6 +54,7 @@ struct vcpu_worker_data {
 enum {
 	GUEST_TEST_NOOP = 0,
 	GUEST_TEST_BP,
+	GUEST_TEST_CR,
 	GUEST_TEST_HYPERCALL,
 };
 
@@ -77,6 +78,11 @@ static void guest_bp_test(void)
 	asm volatile("int3");
 }
 
+static void guest_cr_test(void)
+{
+	set_cr4(get_cr4() | X86_CR4_OSXSAVE);
+}
+
 static void guest_hypercall_test(void)
 {
 	asm volatile("mov $34, %rax");
@@ -94,6 +100,9 @@ static void guest_code(void)
 		case GUEST_TEST_BP:
 			guest_bp_test();
 			break;
+		case GUEST_TEST_CR:
+			guest_cr_test();
+			break;
 		case GUEST_TEST_HYPERCALL:
 			guest_hypercall_test();
 			break;
@@ -1100,6 +1109,96 @@ static void test_cmd_vm_control_cleanup(struct kvm_vm *vm)
 	cmd_vm_control_cleanup(disable, 0);
 }
 
+static void cmd_vcpu_control_cr(struct kvm_vm *vm, __u8 cr, __u8 enable,
+				int expected_err)
+{
+	struct {
+		struct kvmi_msg_hdr hdr;
+		struct kvmi_vcpu_hdr vcpu_hdr;
+		struct kvmi_vcpu_control_cr cmd;
+	} req = {};
+
+	req.cmd.cr = cr;
+	req.cmd.enable = enable;
+
+	test_vcpu0_command(vm, KVMI_VCPU_CONTROL_CR, &req.hdr, sizeof(req),
+			   NULL, 0, expected_err);
+}
+
+static void enable_cr_events(struct kvm_vm *vm, __u8 cr)
+{
+	enable_vcpu_event(vm, KVMI_VCPU_EVENT_CR);
+
+	cmd_vcpu_control_cr(vm, cr, 1, 0);
+}
+
+static void disable_cr_events(struct kvm_vm *vm, __u8 cr)
+{
+	cmd_vcpu_control_cr(vm, cr, 0, 0);
+
+	disable_vcpu_event(vm, KVMI_VCPU_EVENT_CR);
+}
+
+static void test_invalid_vcpu_control_cr(struct kvm_vm *vm)
+{
+	__u8 enable = 1, enable_inval = 2;
+	__u8 cr_inval = 99, cr = 0;
+
+	cmd_vcpu_control_cr(vm, cr,       enable_inval, -KVM_EINVAL);
+	cmd_vcpu_control_cr(vm, cr_inval, enable,       -KVM_EINVAL);
+}
+
+static void test_cmd_vcpu_control_cr(struct kvm_vm *vm)
+{
+	struct vcpu_worker_data data = {
+		.vm = vm,
+		.vcpu_id = VCPU_ID,
+		.test_id = GUEST_TEST_CR,
+	};
+	struct kvmi_msg_hdr hdr;
+	struct {
+		struct vcpu_event vcpu_ev;
+		struct kvmi_vcpu_event_cr cr;
+	} ev;
+	struct {
+		struct vcpu_reply common;
+		struct kvmi_vcpu_event_cr_reply cr;
+	} rpl = {};
+	__u16 event_id = KVMI_VCPU_EVENT_CR;
+	__u8 cr_no = 4;
+	struct kvm_sregs sregs;
+	pthread_t vcpu_thread;
+
+	enable_cr_events(vm, cr_no);
+
+	vcpu_thread = start_vcpu_worker(&data);
+
+	receive_vcpu_event(&hdr, &ev.vcpu_ev, sizeof(ev), event_id);
+
+	pr_debug("CR%u, old 0x%llx, new 0x%llx\n",
+		 ev.cr.cr, ev.cr.old_value, ev.cr.new_value);
+
+	TEST_ASSERT(ev.cr.cr == cr_no,
+		"Unexpected CR event, received CR%u, expected CR%u",
+		ev.cr.cr, cr_no);
+
+	rpl.cr.new_val = ev.cr.old_value;
+
+	reply_to_event(&hdr, &ev.vcpu_ev, KVMI_EVENT_ACTION_CONTINUE,
+		       &rpl.common, sizeof(rpl));
+
+	wait_vcpu_worker(vcpu_thread);
+
+	disable_cr_events(vm, cr_no);
+
+	vcpu_sregs_get(vm, VCPU_ID, &sregs);
+	TEST_ASSERT(sregs.cr4 == ev.cr.old_value,
+		"Failed to block CR4 update, CR4 0x%llx, expected 0x%llx",
+		sregs.cr4, ev.cr.old_value);
+
+	test_invalid_vcpu_control_cr(vm);
+}
+
 static void test_introspection(struct kvm_vm *vm)
 {
 	srandom(time(0));
@@ -1123,6 +1222,7 @@ static void test_introspection(struct kvm_vm *vm)
 	test_event_hypercall(vm);
 	test_event_breakpoint(vm);
 	test_cmd_vm_control_cleanup(vm);
+	test_cmd_vcpu_control_cr(vm);
 
 	unhook_introspection(vm);
 }
diff --git a/virt/kvm/introspection/kvmi_int.h b/virt/kvm/introspection/kvmi_int.h
index 8a266b058155..b1877a770fcb 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/introspection/kvmi_int.h
+++ b/virt/kvm/introspection/kvmi_int.h
@@ -69,6 +69,8 @@ int kvmi_add_job(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 void kvmi_run_jobs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
 void kvmi_handle_common_event_actions(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 action);
 void kvmi_cmd_vm_control_cleanup(struct kvm_introspection *kvmi, bool enable);
+struct kvm_introspection * __must_check kvmi_get(struct kvm *kvm);
+void kvmi_put(struct kvm *kvm);
 int kvmi_cmd_vm_control_events(struct kvm_introspection *kvmi,
 			       u16 event_id, bool enable);
 int kvmi_cmd_vcpu_control_events(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Adalbert Lazăr" <alazar@bitdefender.com>
To: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Adalbert Lazăr" <alazar@bitdefender.com>,
	"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	"Mihai Donțu" <mdontu@bitdefender.com>,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: [PATCH v10 61/81] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VCPU_CONTROL_CR and KVMI_VCPU_EVENT_CR
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2020 11:35:40 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201125093600.2766-62-alazar@bitdefender.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201125093600.2766-1-alazar@bitdefender.com>

From: Mihai Donțu <mdontu@bitdefender.com>

Using the KVMI_VCPU_CONTROL_CR command, the introspection tool subscribes
to KVMI_VCPU_EVENT_CR events that will be sent when a control register
(CR0, CR3 or CR4) is going to be changed.

Signed-off-by: Mihai Donțu <mdontu@bitdefender.com>
Co-developed-by: Adalbert Lazăr <alazar@bitdefender.com>
Signed-off-by: Adalbert Lazăr <alazar@bitdefender.com>
---
 Documentation/virt/kvm/kvmi.rst               |  73 +++++++++++++
 arch/x86/include/asm/kvmi_host.h              |  12 +++
 arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/kvmi.h              |  18 ++++
 arch/x86/kvm/kvmi.c                           |  78 ++++++++++++++
 arch/x86/kvm/kvmi.h                           |   4 +
 arch/x86/kvm/kvmi_msg.c                       |  44 ++++++++
 arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c                        |   6 +-
 arch/x86/kvm/x86.c                            |  12 ++-
 include/uapi/linux/kvmi.h                     |   2 +
 .../testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/kvmi_test.c  | 100 ++++++++++++++++++
 virt/kvm/introspection/kvmi_int.h             |   2 +
 11 files changed, 348 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/virt/kvm/kvmi.rst b/Documentation/virt/kvm/kvmi.rst
index f9c10d27ce14..85e14b82aa2f 100644
--- a/Documentation/virt/kvm/kvmi.rst
+++ b/Documentation/virt/kvm/kvmi.rst
@@ -539,6 +539,7 @@ Enables/disables vCPU introspection events. This command can be used with
 the following events::
 
 	KVMI_VCPU_EVENT_BREAKPOINT
+	KVMI_VCPU_EVENT_CR
 	KVMI_VCPU_EVENT_HYPERCALL
 
 When an event is enabled, the introspection tool is notified and
@@ -701,6 +702,40 @@ interceptions). By default it is enabled.
 * -KVM_EINVAL - the padding is not zero
 * -KVM_EINVAL - ``enable`` is not 1 or 0
 
+15. KVMI_VCPU_CONTROL_CR
+------------------------
+
+:Architectures: x86
+:Versions: >= 1
+:Parameters:
+
+::
+
+	struct kvmi_vcpu_hdr;
+	struct kvmi_vcpu_control_cr {
+		__u8 cr;
+		__u8 enable;
+		__u16 padding1;
+		__u32 padding2;
+	};
+
+:Returns:
+
+::
+
+	struct kvmi_error_code
+
+Enables/disables introspection for a specific control register and must
+be used in addition to *KVMI_VCPU_CONTROL_EVENTS* with the *KVMI_VCPU_EVENT_CR*
+ID set.
+
+:Errors:
+
+* -KVM_EINVAL - the selected vCPU is invalid
+* -KVM_EINVAL - the specified control register is not CR0, CR3 or CR4
+* -KVM_EINVAL - the padding is not zero
+* -KVM_EAGAIN - the selected vCPU can't be introspected yet
+
 Events
 ======
 
@@ -893,3 +928,41 @@ before returning this action.
 
 The *CONTINUE* action will cause the breakpoint exception to be reinjected
 (the OS will handle it).
+
+5. KVMI_VCPU_EVENT_CR
+---------------------
+
+:Architectures: x86
+:Versions: >= 1
+:Actions: CONTINUE, CRASH
+:Parameters:
+
+::
+
+	struct kvmi_event_hdr;
+	struct kvmi_vcpu_event;
+	struct kvmi_vcpu_event_cr {
+		__u8 cr;
+		__u8 padding[7];
+		__u64 old_value;
+		__u64 new_value;
+	};
+
+:Returns:
+
+::
+
+	struct kvmi_vcpu_hdr;
+	struct kvmi_vcpu_event_reply;
+	struct kvmi_vcpu_event_cr_reply {
+		__u64 new_val;
+	};
+
+This event is sent when a control register is going to be changed and the
+introspection has been enabled for this event and for this specific
+register (see **KVMI_VCPU_CONTROL_EVENTS**).
+
+``kvmi_vcpu_event`` (with the vCPU state), the control register number
+(``cr``), the old value (``old_value``) and the new value (``new_value``)
+are sent to the introspection tool. The *CONTINUE* action will set the
+``new_val``.
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvmi_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvmi_host.h
index 161d1ae5a7cf..7613088d0ae2 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvmi_host.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvmi_host.h
@@ -4,6 +4,8 @@
 
 #include <asm/kvmi.h>
 
+#define KVMI_NUM_CR 5
+
 struct kvmi_monitor_interception {
 	bool kvmi_intercepted;
 	bool kvm_intercepted;
@@ -19,6 +21,8 @@ struct kvmi_interception {
 struct kvm_vcpu_arch_introspection {
 	struct kvm_regs delayed_regs;
 	bool have_delayed_regs;
+
+	DECLARE_BITMAP(cr_mask, KVMI_NUM_CR);
 };
 
 struct kvm_arch_introspection {
@@ -27,11 +31,19 @@ struct kvm_arch_introspection {
 #ifdef CONFIG_KVM_INTROSPECTION
 
 bool kvmi_monitor_bp_intercept(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 dbg);
+bool kvmi_cr_event(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned int cr,
+		   unsigned long old_value, unsigned long *new_value);
+bool kvmi_cr3_intercepted(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
 
 #else /* CONFIG_KVM_INTROSPECTION */
 
 static inline bool kvmi_monitor_bp_intercept(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 dbg)
 	{ return false; }
+static inline bool kvmi_cr_event(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned int cr,
+				 unsigned long old_value,
+				 unsigned long *new_value)
+			{ return true; }
+static inline bool kvmi_cr3_intercepted(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) { return false; }
 
 #endif /* CONFIG_KVM_INTROSPECTION */
 
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/kvmi.h b/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/kvmi.h
index a442ba4d2190..32cd17488058 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/kvmi.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/kvmi.h
@@ -61,4 +61,22 @@ struct kvmi_vcpu_get_cpuid_reply {
 	__u32 edx;
 };
 
+struct kvmi_vcpu_control_cr {
+	__u8 cr;
+	__u8 enable;
+	__u16 padding1;
+	__u32 padding2;
+};
+
+struct kvmi_vcpu_event_cr {
+	__u8 cr;
+	__u8 padding[7];
+	__u64 old_value;
+	__u64 new_value;
+};
+
+struct kvmi_vcpu_event_cr_reply {
+	__u64 new_val;
+};
+
 #endif /* _UAPI_ASM_X86_KVMI_H */
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/kvmi.c b/arch/x86/kvm/kvmi.c
index e7a4ef48ed61..2bb6b4bb932b 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/kvmi.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/kvmi.c
@@ -8,10 +8,12 @@
 #include "linux/kvm_host.h"
 #include "x86.h"
 #include "../../../virt/kvm/introspection/kvmi_int.h"
+#include "kvmi.h"
 
 void kvmi_arch_init_vcpu_events_mask(unsigned long *supported)
 {
 	set_bit(KVMI_VCPU_EVENT_BREAKPOINT, supported);
+	set_bit(KVMI_VCPU_EVENT_CR, supported);
 	set_bit(KVMI_VCPU_EVENT_HYPERCALL, supported);
 }
 
@@ -320,3 +322,79 @@ void kvmi_arch_request_interception_cleanup(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 		arch_vcpui->cleanup = true;
 	}
 }
+
+int kvmi_arch_cmd_vcpu_control_cr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int cr, bool enable)
+{
+	if (cr == 3)
+		kvm_x86_ops.control_cr3_intercept(vcpu, CR_TYPE_W, enable);
+
+	if (enable)
+		set_bit(cr, VCPUI(vcpu)->arch.cr_mask);
+	else
+		clear_bit(cr, VCPUI(vcpu)->arch.cr_mask);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static bool __kvmi_cr_event(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned int cr,
+			    u64 old_value, unsigned long *new_value)
+{
+	u64 reply_value;
+	u32 action;
+	bool ret;
+
+	if (!test_bit(cr, VCPUI(vcpu)->arch.cr_mask))
+		return true;
+
+	action = kvmi_msg_send_cr(vcpu, cr, old_value, *new_value,
+				  &reply_value);
+	switch (action) {
+	case KVMI_EVENT_ACTION_CONTINUE:
+		*new_value = reply_value;
+		ret = true;
+		break;
+	default:
+		kvmi_handle_common_event_actions(vcpu, action);
+		ret = false;
+	}
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
+bool kvmi_cr_event(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned int cr,
+		   unsigned long old_value, unsigned long *new_value)
+{
+	struct kvm_introspection *kvmi;
+	bool ret = true;
+
+	if (old_value == *new_value)
+		return true;
+
+	kvmi = kvmi_get(vcpu->kvm);
+	if (!kvmi)
+		return true;
+
+	if (is_vcpu_event_enabled(vcpu, KVMI_VCPU_EVENT_CR))
+		ret = __kvmi_cr_event(vcpu, cr, old_value, new_value);
+
+	kvmi_put(vcpu->kvm);
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
+bool kvmi_cr3_intercepted(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+	struct kvm_introspection *kvmi;
+	bool ret;
+
+	kvmi = kvmi_get(vcpu->kvm);
+	if (!kvmi)
+		return false;
+
+	ret = test_bit(3, VCPUI(vcpu)->arch.cr_mask);
+
+	kvmi_put(vcpu->kvm);
+
+	return ret;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(kvmi_cr3_intercepted);
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/kvmi.h b/arch/x86/kvm/kvmi.h
index 4eeb0c900083..6f4aaebb67f9 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/kvmi.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/kvmi.h
@@ -7,5 +7,9 @@ int kvmi_arch_cmd_vcpu_get_registers(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 				struct kvmi_vcpu_get_registers_reply *rpl);
 void kvmi_arch_cmd_vcpu_set_registers(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 				      const struct kvm_regs *regs);
+int kvmi_arch_cmd_vcpu_control_cr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int cr, bool enable);
+
+u32 kvmi_msg_send_cr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 cr, u64 old_value,
+		     u64 new_value, u64 *ret_value);
 
 #endif
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/kvmi_msg.c b/arch/x86/kvm/kvmi_msg.c
index 1651ef877e3e..1682bb27105f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/kvmi_msg.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/kvmi_msg.c
@@ -132,7 +132,26 @@ static int handle_vcpu_get_cpuid(const struct kvmi_vcpu_msg_job *job,
 	return kvmi_msg_vcpu_reply(job, msg, ec, &rpl, sizeof(rpl));
 }
 
+static int handle_vcpu_control_cr(const struct kvmi_vcpu_msg_job *job,
+				  const struct kvmi_msg_hdr *msg,
+				  const void *_req)
+{
+	const struct kvmi_vcpu_control_cr *req = _req;
+	int ec;
+
+	if (req->padding1 || req->padding2 || req->enable > 1)
+		ec = -KVM_EINVAL;
+	else if (req->cr != 0 && req->cr != 3 && req->cr != 4)
+		ec = -KVM_EINVAL;
+	else
+		ec = kvmi_arch_cmd_vcpu_control_cr(job->vcpu, req->cr,
+						   req->enable == 1);
+
+	return kvmi_msg_vcpu_reply(job, msg, ec, NULL, 0);
+}
+
 static kvmi_vcpu_msg_job_fct const msg_vcpu[] = {
+	[KVMI_VCPU_CONTROL_CR]    = handle_vcpu_control_cr,
 	[KVMI_VCPU_GET_CPUID]     = handle_vcpu_get_cpuid,
 	[KVMI_VCPU_GET_INFO]      = handle_vcpu_get_info,
 	[KVMI_VCPU_GET_REGISTERS] = handle_vcpu_get_registers,
@@ -143,3 +162,28 @@ kvmi_vcpu_msg_job_fct kvmi_arch_vcpu_msg_handler(u16 id)
 {
 	return id < ARRAY_SIZE(msg_vcpu) ? msg_vcpu[id] : NULL;
 }
+
+u32 kvmi_msg_send_cr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 cr, u64 old_value,
+		     u64 new_value, u64 *ret_value)
+{
+	struct kvmi_vcpu_event_cr e;
+	struct kvmi_vcpu_event_cr_reply r;
+	u32 action;
+	int err;
+
+	memset(&e, 0, sizeof(e));
+	e.cr = cr;
+	e.old_value = old_value;
+	e.new_value = new_value;
+
+	err = kvmi_send_vcpu_event(vcpu, KVMI_VCPU_EVENT_CR, &e, sizeof(e),
+				   &r, sizeof(r), &action);
+	if (err) {
+		action = KVMI_EVENT_ACTION_CONTINUE;
+		*ret_value = new_value;
+	} else {
+		*ret_value = r.new_val;
+	}
+
+	return action;
+}
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
index 9bfa2e9f8161..723e78529146 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
@@ -5062,7 +5062,8 @@ static int handle_cr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 			err = handle_set_cr0(vcpu, val);
 			return kvm_complete_insn_gp(vcpu, err);
 		case 3:
-			WARN_ON_ONCE(enable_unrestricted_guest);
+			WARN_ON_ONCE(enable_unrestricted_guest &&
+				     !kvmi_cr3_intercepted(vcpu));
 			err = kvm_set_cr3(vcpu, val);
 			return kvm_complete_insn_gp(vcpu, err);
 		case 4:
@@ -5095,7 +5096,8 @@ static int handle_cr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	case 1: /*mov from cr*/
 		switch (cr) {
 		case 3:
-			WARN_ON_ONCE(enable_unrestricted_guest);
+			WARN_ON_ONCE(enable_unrestricted_guest &&
+				     !kvmi_cr3_intercepted(vcpu));
 			val = kvm_read_cr3(vcpu);
 			kvm_register_write(vcpu, reg, val);
 			trace_kvm_cr_read(cr, val);
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
index 824d9d20a6ea..9a4ec0b4714c 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -849,6 +849,9 @@ int kvm_set_cr0(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long cr0)
 	if (!(cr0 & X86_CR0_PG) && kvm_read_cr4_bits(vcpu, X86_CR4_PCIDE))
 		return 1;
 
+	if (!kvmi_cr_event(vcpu, 0, old_cr0, &cr0))
+		return 1;
+
 	kvm_x86_ops.set_cr0(vcpu, cr0);
 
 	if ((cr0 ^ old_cr0) & X86_CR0_PG) {
@@ -1010,6 +1013,9 @@ int kvm_set_cr4(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long cr4)
 			return 1;
 	}
 
+	if (!kvmi_cr_event(vcpu, 4, old_cr4, &cr4))
+		return 1;
+
 	kvm_x86_ops.set_cr4(vcpu, cr4);
 
 	if (((cr4 ^ old_cr4) & mmu_role_bits) ||
@@ -1022,6 +1028,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_set_cr4);
 
 int kvm_set_cr3(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long cr3)
 {
+	unsigned long old_cr3 = kvm_read_cr3(vcpu);
 	bool skip_tlb_flush = false;
 #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
 	bool pcid_enabled = kvm_read_cr4_bits(vcpu, X86_CR4_PCIDE);
@@ -1032,7 +1039,7 @@ int kvm_set_cr3(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long cr3)
 	}
 #endif
 
-	if (cr3 == kvm_read_cr3(vcpu) && !pdptrs_changed(vcpu)) {
+	if (cr3 == old_cr3 && !pdptrs_changed(vcpu)) {
 		if (!skip_tlb_flush) {
 			kvm_mmu_sync_roots(vcpu);
 			kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_TLB_FLUSH_CURRENT, vcpu);
@@ -1047,6 +1054,9 @@ int kvm_set_cr3(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long cr3)
 		 !load_pdptrs(vcpu, vcpu->arch.walk_mmu, cr3))
 		return 1;
 
+	if (!kvmi_cr_event(vcpu, 3, old_cr3, &cr3))
+		return 1;
+
 	kvm_mmu_new_pgd(vcpu, cr3, skip_tlb_flush, skip_tlb_flush);
 	vcpu->arch.cr3 = cr3;
 	kvm_register_mark_available(vcpu, VCPU_EXREG_CR3);
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/kvmi.h b/include/uapi/linux/kvmi.h
index 9e28961a8387..c1d8cf02018b 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/kvmi.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/kvmi.h
@@ -41,6 +41,7 @@ enum {
 	KVMI_VCPU_GET_REGISTERS  = KVMI_VCPU_MESSAGE_ID(3),
 	KVMI_VCPU_SET_REGISTERS  = KVMI_VCPU_MESSAGE_ID(4),
 	KVMI_VCPU_GET_CPUID      = KVMI_VCPU_MESSAGE_ID(5),
+	KVMI_VCPU_CONTROL_CR     = KVMI_VCPU_MESSAGE_ID(6),
 
 	KVMI_NEXT_VCPU_MESSAGE
 };
@@ -58,6 +59,7 @@ enum {
 	KVMI_VCPU_EVENT_PAUSE      = KVMI_VCPU_EVENT_ID(0),
 	KVMI_VCPU_EVENT_HYPERCALL  = KVMI_VCPU_EVENT_ID(1),
 	KVMI_VCPU_EVENT_BREAKPOINT = KVMI_VCPU_EVENT_ID(2),
+	KVMI_VCPU_EVENT_CR         = KVMI_VCPU_EVENT_ID(3),
 
 	KVMI_NEXT_VCPU_EVENT
 };
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/kvmi_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/kvmi_test.c
index f95f2771a123..6a1103eab77a 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/kvmi_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/kvmi_test.c
@@ -54,6 +54,7 @@ struct vcpu_worker_data {
 enum {
 	GUEST_TEST_NOOP = 0,
 	GUEST_TEST_BP,
+	GUEST_TEST_CR,
 	GUEST_TEST_HYPERCALL,
 };
 
@@ -77,6 +78,11 @@ static void guest_bp_test(void)
 	asm volatile("int3");
 }
 
+static void guest_cr_test(void)
+{
+	set_cr4(get_cr4() | X86_CR4_OSXSAVE);
+}
+
 static void guest_hypercall_test(void)
 {
 	asm volatile("mov $34, %rax");
@@ -94,6 +100,9 @@ static void guest_code(void)
 		case GUEST_TEST_BP:
 			guest_bp_test();
 			break;
+		case GUEST_TEST_CR:
+			guest_cr_test();
+			break;
 		case GUEST_TEST_HYPERCALL:
 			guest_hypercall_test();
 			break;
@@ -1100,6 +1109,96 @@ static void test_cmd_vm_control_cleanup(struct kvm_vm *vm)
 	cmd_vm_control_cleanup(disable, 0);
 }
 
+static void cmd_vcpu_control_cr(struct kvm_vm *vm, __u8 cr, __u8 enable,
+				int expected_err)
+{
+	struct {
+		struct kvmi_msg_hdr hdr;
+		struct kvmi_vcpu_hdr vcpu_hdr;
+		struct kvmi_vcpu_control_cr cmd;
+	} req = {};
+
+	req.cmd.cr = cr;
+	req.cmd.enable = enable;
+
+	test_vcpu0_command(vm, KVMI_VCPU_CONTROL_CR, &req.hdr, sizeof(req),
+			   NULL, 0, expected_err);
+}
+
+static void enable_cr_events(struct kvm_vm *vm, __u8 cr)
+{
+	enable_vcpu_event(vm, KVMI_VCPU_EVENT_CR);
+
+	cmd_vcpu_control_cr(vm, cr, 1, 0);
+}
+
+static void disable_cr_events(struct kvm_vm *vm, __u8 cr)
+{
+	cmd_vcpu_control_cr(vm, cr, 0, 0);
+
+	disable_vcpu_event(vm, KVMI_VCPU_EVENT_CR);
+}
+
+static void test_invalid_vcpu_control_cr(struct kvm_vm *vm)
+{
+	__u8 enable = 1, enable_inval = 2;
+	__u8 cr_inval = 99, cr = 0;
+
+	cmd_vcpu_control_cr(vm, cr,       enable_inval, -KVM_EINVAL);
+	cmd_vcpu_control_cr(vm, cr_inval, enable,       -KVM_EINVAL);
+}
+
+static void test_cmd_vcpu_control_cr(struct kvm_vm *vm)
+{
+	struct vcpu_worker_data data = {
+		.vm = vm,
+		.vcpu_id = VCPU_ID,
+		.test_id = GUEST_TEST_CR,
+	};
+	struct kvmi_msg_hdr hdr;
+	struct {
+		struct vcpu_event vcpu_ev;
+		struct kvmi_vcpu_event_cr cr;
+	} ev;
+	struct {
+		struct vcpu_reply common;
+		struct kvmi_vcpu_event_cr_reply cr;
+	} rpl = {};
+	__u16 event_id = KVMI_VCPU_EVENT_CR;
+	__u8 cr_no = 4;
+	struct kvm_sregs sregs;
+	pthread_t vcpu_thread;
+
+	enable_cr_events(vm, cr_no);
+
+	vcpu_thread = start_vcpu_worker(&data);
+
+	receive_vcpu_event(&hdr, &ev.vcpu_ev, sizeof(ev), event_id);
+
+	pr_debug("CR%u, old 0x%llx, new 0x%llx\n",
+		 ev.cr.cr, ev.cr.old_value, ev.cr.new_value);
+
+	TEST_ASSERT(ev.cr.cr == cr_no,
+		"Unexpected CR event, received CR%u, expected CR%u",
+		ev.cr.cr, cr_no);
+
+	rpl.cr.new_val = ev.cr.old_value;
+
+	reply_to_event(&hdr, &ev.vcpu_ev, KVMI_EVENT_ACTION_CONTINUE,
+		       &rpl.common, sizeof(rpl));
+
+	wait_vcpu_worker(vcpu_thread);
+
+	disable_cr_events(vm, cr_no);
+
+	vcpu_sregs_get(vm, VCPU_ID, &sregs);
+	TEST_ASSERT(sregs.cr4 == ev.cr.old_value,
+		"Failed to block CR4 update, CR4 0x%llx, expected 0x%llx",
+		sregs.cr4, ev.cr.old_value);
+
+	test_invalid_vcpu_control_cr(vm);
+}
+
 static void test_introspection(struct kvm_vm *vm)
 {
 	srandom(time(0));
@@ -1123,6 +1222,7 @@ static void test_introspection(struct kvm_vm *vm)
 	test_event_hypercall(vm);
 	test_event_breakpoint(vm);
 	test_cmd_vm_control_cleanup(vm);
+	test_cmd_vcpu_control_cr(vm);
 
 	unhook_introspection(vm);
 }
diff --git a/virt/kvm/introspection/kvmi_int.h b/virt/kvm/introspection/kvmi_int.h
index 8a266b058155..b1877a770fcb 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/introspection/kvmi_int.h
+++ b/virt/kvm/introspection/kvmi_int.h
@@ -69,6 +69,8 @@ int kvmi_add_job(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 void kvmi_run_jobs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
 void kvmi_handle_common_event_actions(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 action);
 void kvmi_cmd_vm_control_cleanup(struct kvm_introspection *kvmi, bool enable);
+struct kvm_introspection * __must_check kvmi_get(struct kvm *kvm);
+void kvmi_put(struct kvm *kvm);
 int kvmi_cmd_vm_control_events(struct kvm_introspection *kvmi,
 			       u16 event_id, bool enable);
 int kvmi_cmd_vcpu_control_events(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-11-25  9:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 192+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-11-25  9:34 [PATCH v10 00/81] VM introspection Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:34 ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:34 ` [PATCH v10 01/81] KVM: UAPI: add error codes used by the VM introspection code Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:34   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:34 ` [PATCH v10 02/81] KVM: add kvm_vcpu_kick_and_wait() Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:34   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:34 ` [PATCH v10 03/81] KVM: add kvm_get_max_gfn() Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:34   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:34 ` [PATCH v10 04/81] KVM: doc: fix the hypercalls numbering Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:34   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:34 ` [PATCH v10 05/81] KVM: x86: add kvm_arch_vcpu_get_regs() and kvm_arch_vcpu_get_sregs() Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:34   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:34 ` [PATCH v10 06/81] KVM: x86: add kvm_arch_vcpu_set_regs() Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:34   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:34 ` [PATCH v10 07/81] KVM: x86: avoid injecting #PF when emulate the VMCALL instruction Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:34   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:34 ` [PATCH v10 08/81] KVM: x86: add kvm_x86_ops.bp_intercepted() Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:34   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:34 ` [PATCH v10 09/81] KVM: x86: add kvm_x86_ops.control_cr3_intercept() Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:34   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:34 ` [PATCH v10 10/81] KVM: x86: add kvm_x86_ops.cr3_write_intercepted() Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:34   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:34 ` [PATCH v10 11/81] KVM: x86: add kvm_x86_ops.desc_ctrl_supported() Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:34   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:34 ` [PATCH v10 12/81] KVM: svm: add support for descriptor-table VM-exits Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:34   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:34 ` [PATCH v10 13/81] KVM: x86: add kvm_x86_ops.control_desc_intercept() Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:34   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:34 ` [PATCH v10 14/81] KVM: x86: add kvm_x86_ops.desc_intercepted() Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:34   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:34 ` [PATCH v10 15/81] KVM: x86: add kvm_x86_ops.msr_write_intercepted() Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:34   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:34 ` [PATCH v10 16/81] KVM: x86: svm: use the vmx convention to control the MSR interception Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:34   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:34 ` [PATCH v10 17/81] KVM: x86: add kvm_x86_ops.control_msr_intercept() Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:34   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:34 ` [PATCH v10 18/81] KVM: x86: vmx: use a symbolic constant when checking the exit qualifications Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:34   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:34 ` [PATCH v10 19/81] KVM: x86: save the error code during EPT/NPF exits handling Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:34   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:34 ` [PATCH v10 20/81] KVM: x86: add kvm_x86_ops.fault_gla() Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:34   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35 ` [PATCH v10 21/81] KVM: x86: add kvm_x86_ops.control_singlestep() Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35 ` [PATCH v10 22/81] KVM: x86: export kvm_arch_vcpu_set_guest_debug() Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35 ` [PATCH v10 23/81] KVM: x86: extend kvm_mmu_gva_to_gpa_system() with the 'access' parameter Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35 ` [PATCH v10 24/81] KVM: x86: export kvm_inject_pending_exception() Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35 ` [PATCH v10 25/81] KVM: x86: export kvm_vcpu_ioctl_x86_get_xsave() Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25 12:19   ` kernel test robot
2020-11-25 12:19     ` kernel test robot
2020-11-25 12:19     ` kernel test robot
2020-11-25 12:24   ` kernel test robot
2020-11-25 12:24     ` kernel test robot
2020-11-25 12:24     ` kernel test robot
2020-11-25  9:35 ` [PATCH v10 26/81] KVM: x86: export kvm_vcpu_ioctl_x86_set_xsave() Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35 ` [PATCH v10 27/81] KVM: x86: page track: provide all callbacks with the guest virtual address Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35 ` [PATCH v10 28/81] KVM: x86: page track: add track_create_slot() callback Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35 ` [PATCH v10 29/81] KVM: x86: page_track: add support for preread, prewrite and preexec Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35 ` [PATCH v10 30/81] KVM: x86: wire in the preread/prewrite/preexec page trackers Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35 ` [PATCH v10 31/81] KVM: x86: disable gpa_available optimization for fetch and page-walk SPT violations Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35 ` [PATCH v10 32/81] KVM: introduce VM introspection Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25 12:45   ` kernel test robot
2020-11-25 12:45     ` kernel test robot
2020-11-25 12:45     ` kernel test robot
2020-11-25 13:41   ` kernel test robot
2020-11-25 13:41     ` kernel test robot
2020-11-25 13:41     ` kernel test robot
2020-11-25 16:24   ` kernel test robot
2020-11-25 16:24     ` kernel test robot
2020-11-25 16:24     ` kernel test robot
2020-11-25  9:35 ` [PATCH v10 33/81] KVM: introspection: add hook/unhook ioctls Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25 11:49   ` kernel test robot
2020-11-25 11:49     ` kernel test robot
2020-11-25  9:35 ` [PATCH v10 34/81] KVM: introspection: add permission access ioctls Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35 ` [PATCH v10 35/81] KVM: introspection: add the read/dispatch message function Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35 ` [PATCH v10 36/81] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_GET_VERSION Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35 ` [PATCH v10 37/81] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VM_CHECK_COMMAND and KVMI_VM_CHECK_EVENT Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35 ` [PATCH v10 38/81] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VM_GET_INFO Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35 ` [PATCH v10 39/81] KVM: introspection: add KVM_INTROSPECTION_PREUNHOOK Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35 ` [PATCH v10 40/81] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VM_EVENT_UNHOOK Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35 ` [PATCH v10 41/81] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VM_CONTROL_EVENTS Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35 ` [PATCH v10 42/81] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VM_READ_PHYSICAL/KVMI_VM_WRITE_PHYSICAL Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35 ` [PATCH v10 43/81] KVM: introspection: add vCPU related data Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35 ` [PATCH v10 44/81] KVM: introspection: add a jobs list to every introspected vCPU Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35 ` [PATCH v10 45/81] KVM: introspection: handle vCPU introspection requests Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35 ` [PATCH v10 46/81] KVM: introspection: handle vCPU commands Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35 ` [PATCH v10 47/81] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VCPU_GET_INFO Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35 ` [PATCH v10 48/81] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VM_PAUSE_VCPU Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35 ` [PATCH v10 49/81] KVM: introspection: add support for vCPU events Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35 ` [PATCH v10 50/81] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VCPU_EVENT_PAUSE Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35 ` [PATCH v10 51/81] KVM: introspection: add the crash action handling on the event reply Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35 ` [PATCH v10 52/81] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VCPU_CONTROL_EVENTS Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35 ` [PATCH v10 53/81] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VCPU_GET_REGISTERS Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35 ` [PATCH v10 54/81] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VCPU_SET_REGISTERS Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35 ` [PATCH v10 55/81] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VCPU_GET_CPUID Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35 ` [PATCH v10 56/81] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VCPU_EVENT_HYPERCALL Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35 ` [PATCH v10 57/81] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VCPU_EVENT_BREAKPOINT Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35 ` [PATCH v10 58/81] KVM: introspection: add cleanup support for vCPUs Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35 ` [PATCH v10 59/81] KVM: introspection: restore the state of #BP interception on unhook Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35 ` [PATCH v10 60/81] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VM_CONTROL_CLEANUP Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35 ` Adalbert Lazăr [this message]
2020-11-25  9:35   ` [PATCH v10 61/81] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VCPU_CONTROL_CR and KVMI_VCPU_EVENT_CR Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35 ` [PATCH v10 62/81] KVM: introspection: restore the state of CR3 interception on unhook Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35 ` [PATCH v10 63/81] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VCPU_INJECT_EXCEPTION + KVMI_VCPU_EVENT_TRAP Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25 12:57   ` kernel test robot
2020-11-25 12:57     ` kernel test robot
2020-11-25  9:35 ` [PATCH v10 64/81] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VM_GET_MAX_GFN Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35 ` [PATCH v10 65/81] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VCPU_EVENT_XSETBV Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35 ` [PATCH v10 66/81] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VCPU_GET_XCR Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25 15:22   ` kernel test robot
2020-11-25 15:22     ` kernel test robot
2020-11-25 15:22     ` kernel test robot
2020-11-25  9:35 ` [PATCH v10 67/81] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VCPU_GET_XSAVE Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25 13:50   ` kernel test robot
2020-11-25 13:50     ` kernel test robot
2020-11-25  9:35 ` [PATCH v10 68/81] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VCPU_SET_XSAVE Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35 ` [PATCH v10 69/81] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VCPU_GET_MTRR_TYPE Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35 ` [PATCH v10 70/81] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VCPU_EVENT_DESCRIPTOR Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35 ` [PATCH v10 71/81] KVM: introspection: restore the state of descriptor-table register interception on unhook Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35 ` [PATCH v10 72/81] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VCPU_CONTROL_MSR and KVMI_VCPU_EVENT_MSR Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35 ` [PATCH v10 73/81] KVM: introspection: restore the state of MSR interception on unhook Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35 ` [PATCH v10 74/81] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VM_SET_PAGE_ACCESS Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35 ` [PATCH v10 75/81] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VCPU_EVENT_PF Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25 14:44   ` kernel test robot
2020-11-25 14:44     ` kernel test robot
2020-11-25  9:35 ` [PATCH v10 76/81] KVM: introspection: extend KVMI_GET_VERSION with struct kvmi_features Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35 ` [PATCH v10 77/81] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VCPU_CONTROL_SINGLESTEP Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35 ` [PATCH v10 78/81] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VCPU_EVENT_SINGLESTEP Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35 ` [PATCH v10 79/81] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VCPU_TRANSLATE_GVA Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25 15:46   ` kernel test robot
2020-11-25 15:46     ` kernel test robot
2020-11-25  9:35 ` [PATCH v10 80/81] KVM: introspection: emulate a guest page table walk on SPT violations due to A/D bit updates Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:35   ` Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:36 ` [PATCH v10 81/81] KVM: x86: call the page tracking code on emulation failure Adalbert Lazăr
2020-11-25  9:36   ` Adalbert Lazăr

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201125093600.2766-62-alazar@bitdefender.com \
    --to=alazar@bitdefender.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mdontu@bitdefender.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.