All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Jeffery <andrew@aj.id.au>
To: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linus.walleij@linaro.org, joel@jms.id.au,
	billy_tsai@aspeedtech.com, sashal@kernel.org,
	linux-aspeed@lists.ozlabs.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: [PATCH] pinctrl: aspeed: Fix GPIO requests on pass-through banks
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2020 17:03:37 +1030	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201126063337.489927-1-andrew@aj.id.au> (raw)

Commit 6726fbff19bf ("pinctrl: aspeed: Fix GPI only function problem.")
fixes access to GPIO banks T and U on the AST2600. Both banks contain
input-only pins and the GPIO pin function is named GPITx and GPIUx
respectively. Unfortunately the fix had a negative impact on GPIO banks
D and E for the AST2400 and AST2500 where the GPIO pass-through
functions take similar "GPI"-style names. The net effect on the older
SoCs was that when the GPIO subsystem requested a pin in banks D or E be
muxed for GPIO, they were instead muxed for pass-through mode.
Mistakenly muxing pass-through mode e.g. breaks booting the host on
IBM's Witherspoon (AC922) platform where GPIOE0 is used for FSI.

Further exploit the names in the provided expression structure to
differentiate pass-through from pin-specific GPIO modes.

This follow-up fix gives the expected behaviour for the following tests:

Witherspoon BMC (AST2500):

1. Power-on the Witherspoon host
2. Request GPIOD1 be muxed via /sys/class/gpio/export
3. Request GPIOE1 be muxed via /sys/class/gpio/export
4. Request the balls for GPIOs E2 and E3 be muxed as GPIO pass-through
   ("GPIE2" mode) via a pinctrl hog in the devicetree

Rainier BMC (AST2600):

5. Request GPIT0 be muxed via /sys/class/gpio/export
6. Request GPIU0 be muxed via /sys/class/gpio/export

Together the tests demonstrate that all three pieces of functionality
(general GPIOs via 1, 2 and 3, input-only GPIOs via 5 and 6, pass-through
mode via 4) operate as desired across old and new SoCs.

Fixes: 6726fbff19bf ("pinctrl: aspeed: Fix GPI only function problem.")
Cc: Billy Tsai <billy_tsai@aspeedtech.com>
Cc: Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Jeffery <andrew@aj.id.au>
---
 drivers/pinctrl/aspeed/pinctrl-aspeed.c | 74 +++++++++++++++++++++++--
 drivers/pinctrl/aspeed/pinmux-aspeed.h  |  7 ++-
 2 files changed, 72 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/aspeed/pinctrl-aspeed.c b/drivers/pinctrl/aspeed/pinctrl-aspeed.c
index 1d603732903f..9c44ef11b567 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/aspeed/pinctrl-aspeed.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/aspeed/pinctrl-aspeed.c
@@ -286,14 +286,76 @@ int aspeed_pinmux_set_mux(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, unsigned int function,
 static bool aspeed_expr_is_gpio(const struct aspeed_sig_expr *expr)
 {
 	/*
-	 * The signal type is GPIO if the signal name has "GPI" as a prefix.
-	 * strncmp (rather than strcmp) is used to implement the prefix
-	 * requirement.
+	 * We need to differentiate between GPIO and non-GPIO signals to
+	 * implement the gpio_request_enable() interface. For better or worse
+	 * the ASPEED pinctrl driver uses the expression names to determine
+	 * whether an expression will mux a pin for GPIO.
 	 *
-	 * expr->signal might look like "GPIOB1" in the GPIO case.
-	 * expr->signal might look like "GPIT0" in the GPI case.
+	 * Generally we have the following - A GPIO such as B1 has:
+	 *
+	 *    - expr->signal set to "GPIOB1"
+	 *    - expr->function set to "GPIOB1"
+	 *
+	 * Using this fact we can determine whether the provided expression is
+	 * a GPIO expression by testing the signal name for the string prefix
+	 * "GPIO".
+	 *
+	 * However, some GPIOs are input-only, and the ASPEED datasheets name
+	 * them differently. An input-only GPIO such as T0 has:
+	 *
+	 *    - expr->signal set to "GPIT0"
+	 *    - expr->function set to "GPIT0"
+	 *
+	 * It's tempting to generalise the prefix test from "GPIO" to "GPI" to
+	 * account for both GPIOs and GPIs, but in doing so we run aground on
+	 * another feature:
+	 *
+	 * Some pins in the ASPEED BMC SoCs have a "pass-through" GPIO
+	 * function where the input state of one pin is replicated as the
+	 * output state of another (as if they were shorted together - a mux
+	 * configuration that is typically enabled by hardware strapping).
+	 * This feature allows the BMC to pass e.g. power button state through
+	 * to the host while the BMC is yet to boot, but take control of the
+	 * button state once the BMC has booted by muxing each pin as a
+	 * separate, pin-specific GPIO.
+	 *
+	 * Conceptually this pass-through mode is a form of GPIO and is named
+	 * as such in the datasheets, e.g. "GPID0". This naming similarity
+	 * trips us up with the simple GPI-prefixed-signal-name scheme
+	 * discussed above, as the pass-through configuration is not what we
+	 * want when muxing a pin as GPIO for the GPIO subsystem.
+	 *
+	 * On e.g. the AST2400, a pass-through function "GPID0" is grouped on
+	 * balls A18 and D16, where we have:
+	 *
+	 *    For ball A18:
+	 *    - expr->signal set to "GPID0IN"
+	 *    - expr->function set to "GPID0"
+	 *
+	 *    For ball D16:
+	 *    - expr->signal set to "GPID0OUT"
+	 *    - expr->function set to "GPID0"
+	 *
+	 * By contrast, the pin-specific GPIO expressions for the same pins are
+	 * as follows:
+	 *
+	 *    For ball A18:
+	 *    - expr->signal looks like "GPIOD0"
+	 *    - expr->function looks like "GPIOD0"
+	 *
+	 *    For ball D16:
+	 *    - expr->signal looks like "GPIOD1"
+	 *    - expr->function looks like "GPIOD1"
+	 *
+	 * Testing both the signal _and_ function names gives us the means
+	 * differentiate the pass-through GPIO pinmux configuration from the
+	 * pin-specific configuration that the GPIO subsystem is after: An
+	 * expression is a pin-specific (non-pass-through) GPIO configuration
+	 * if the signal prefix is "GPI" and the signal name matches the
+	 * function name.
 	 */
-	return strncmp(expr->signal, "GPI", 3) == 0;
+	return !strncmp(expr->signal, "GPI", 3) &&
+			!strcmp(expr->signal, expr->function);
 }
 
 static bool aspeed_gpio_in_exprs(const struct aspeed_sig_expr **exprs)
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/aspeed/pinmux-aspeed.h b/drivers/pinctrl/aspeed/pinmux-aspeed.h
index f86739e800c3..dba5875ff276 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/aspeed/pinmux-aspeed.h
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/aspeed/pinmux-aspeed.h
@@ -452,10 +452,11 @@ struct aspeed_sig_desc {
  * evaluation of the descriptors.
  *
  * @signal: The signal name for the priority level on the pin. If the signal
- *          type is GPIO, then the signal name must begin with the string
- *          "GPIO", e.g. GPIOA0, GPIOT4 etc.
+ *          type is GPIO, then the signal name must begin with the
+ *          prefix "GPI", e.g. GPIOA0, GPIT0 etc.
  * @function: The name of the function the signal participates in for the
- *            associated expression
+ *            associated expression. For pin-specific GPIO, the function
+ *            name must match the signal name.
  * @ndescs: The number of signal descriptors in the expression
  * @descs: Pointer to an array of signal descriptors that comprise the
  *         function expression
-- 
2.27.0


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Andrew Jeffery <andrew@aj.id.au>
To: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org
Cc: sashal@kernel.org, linux-aspeed@lists.ozlabs.org,
	linus.walleij@linaro.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	billy_tsai@aspeedtech.com, openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] pinctrl: aspeed: Fix GPIO requests on pass-through banks
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2020 17:03:37 +1030	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201126063337.489927-1-andrew@aj.id.au> (raw)

Commit 6726fbff19bf ("pinctrl: aspeed: Fix GPI only function problem.")
fixes access to GPIO banks T and U on the AST2600. Both banks contain
input-only pins and the GPIO pin function is named GPITx and GPIUx
respectively. Unfortunately the fix had a negative impact on GPIO banks
D and E for the AST2400 and AST2500 where the GPIO pass-through
functions take similar "GPI"-style names. The net effect on the older
SoCs was that when the GPIO subsystem requested a pin in banks D or E be
muxed for GPIO, they were instead muxed for pass-through mode.
Mistakenly muxing pass-through mode e.g. breaks booting the host on
IBM's Witherspoon (AC922) platform where GPIOE0 is used for FSI.

Further exploit the names in the provided expression structure to
differentiate pass-through from pin-specific GPIO modes.

This follow-up fix gives the expected behaviour for the following tests:

Witherspoon BMC (AST2500):

1. Power-on the Witherspoon host
2. Request GPIOD1 be muxed via /sys/class/gpio/export
3. Request GPIOE1 be muxed via /sys/class/gpio/export
4. Request the balls for GPIOs E2 and E3 be muxed as GPIO pass-through
   ("GPIE2" mode) via a pinctrl hog in the devicetree

Rainier BMC (AST2600):

5. Request GPIT0 be muxed via /sys/class/gpio/export
6. Request GPIU0 be muxed via /sys/class/gpio/export

Together the tests demonstrate that all three pieces of functionality
(general GPIOs via 1, 2 and 3, input-only GPIOs via 5 and 6, pass-through
mode via 4) operate as desired across old and new SoCs.

Fixes: 6726fbff19bf ("pinctrl: aspeed: Fix GPI only function problem.")
Cc: Billy Tsai <billy_tsai@aspeedtech.com>
Cc: Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Jeffery <andrew@aj.id.au>
---
 drivers/pinctrl/aspeed/pinctrl-aspeed.c | 74 +++++++++++++++++++++++--
 drivers/pinctrl/aspeed/pinmux-aspeed.h  |  7 ++-
 2 files changed, 72 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/aspeed/pinctrl-aspeed.c b/drivers/pinctrl/aspeed/pinctrl-aspeed.c
index 1d603732903f..9c44ef11b567 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/aspeed/pinctrl-aspeed.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/aspeed/pinctrl-aspeed.c
@@ -286,14 +286,76 @@ int aspeed_pinmux_set_mux(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, unsigned int function,
 static bool aspeed_expr_is_gpio(const struct aspeed_sig_expr *expr)
 {
 	/*
-	 * The signal type is GPIO if the signal name has "GPI" as a prefix.
-	 * strncmp (rather than strcmp) is used to implement the prefix
-	 * requirement.
+	 * We need to differentiate between GPIO and non-GPIO signals to
+	 * implement the gpio_request_enable() interface. For better or worse
+	 * the ASPEED pinctrl driver uses the expression names to determine
+	 * whether an expression will mux a pin for GPIO.
 	 *
-	 * expr->signal might look like "GPIOB1" in the GPIO case.
-	 * expr->signal might look like "GPIT0" in the GPI case.
+	 * Generally we have the following - A GPIO such as B1 has:
+	 *
+	 *    - expr->signal set to "GPIOB1"
+	 *    - expr->function set to "GPIOB1"
+	 *
+	 * Using this fact we can determine whether the provided expression is
+	 * a GPIO expression by testing the signal name for the string prefix
+	 * "GPIO".
+	 *
+	 * However, some GPIOs are input-only, and the ASPEED datasheets name
+	 * them differently. An input-only GPIO such as T0 has:
+	 *
+	 *    - expr->signal set to "GPIT0"
+	 *    - expr->function set to "GPIT0"
+	 *
+	 * It's tempting to generalise the prefix test from "GPIO" to "GPI" to
+	 * account for both GPIOs and GPIs, but in doing so we run aground on
+	 * another feature:
+	 *
+	 * Some pins in the ASPEED BMC SoCs have a "pass-through" GPIO
+	 * function where the input state of one pin is replicated as the
+	 * output state of another (as if they were shorted together - a mux
+	 * configuration that is typically enabled by hardware strapping).
+	 * This feature allows the BMC to pass e.g. power button state through
+	 * to the host while the BMC is yet to boot, but take control of the
+	 * button state once the BMC has booted by muxing each pin as a
+	 * separate, pin-specific GPIO.
+	 *
+	 * Conceptually this pass-through mode is a form of GPIO and is named
+	 * as such in the datasheets, e.g. "GPID0". This naming similarity
+	 * trips us up with the simple GPI-prefixed-signal-name scheme
+	 * discussed above, as the pass-through configuration is not what we
+	 * want when muxing a pin as GPIO for the GPIO subsystem.
+	 *
+	 * On e.g. the AST2400, a pass-through function "GPID0" is grouped on
+	 * balls A18 and D16, where we have:
+	 *
+	 *    For ball A18:
+	 *    - expr->signal set to "GPID0IN"
+	 *    - expr->function set to "GPID0"
+	 *
+	 *    For ball D16:
+	 *    - expr->signal set to "GPID0OUT"
+	 *    - expr->function set to "GPID0"
+	 *
+	 * By contrast, the pin-specific GPIO expressions for the same pins are
+	 * as follows:
+	 *
+	 *    For ball A18:
+	 *    - expr->signal looks like "GPIOD0"
+	 *    - expr->function looks like "GPIOD0"
+	 *
+	 *    For ball D16:
+	 *    - expr->signal looks like "GPIOD1"
+	 *    - expr->function looks like "GPIOD1"
+	 *
+	 * Testing both the signal _and_ function names gives us the means
+	 * differentiate the pass-through GPIO pinmux configuration from the
+	 * pin-specific configuration that the GPIO subsystem is after: An
+	 * expression is a pin-specific (non-pass-through) GPIO configuration
+	 * if the signal prefix is "GPI" and the signal name matches the
+	 * function name.
 	 */
-	return strncmp(expr->signal, "GPI", 3) == 0;
+	return !strncmp(expr->signal, "GPI", 3) &&
+			!strcmp(expr->signal, expr->function);
 }
 
 static bool aspeed_gpio_in_exprs(const struct aspeed_sig_expr **exprs)
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/aspeed/pinmux-aspeed.h b/drivers/pinctrl/aspeed/pinmux-aspeed.h
index f86739e800c3..dba5875ff276 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/aspeed/pinmux-aspeed.h
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/aspeed/pinmux-aspeed.h
@@ -452,10 +452,11 @@ struct aspeed_sig_desc {
  * evaluation of the descriptors.
  *
  * @signal: The signal name for the priority level on the pin. If the signal
- *          type is GPIO, then the signal name must begin with the string
- *          "GPIO", e.g. GPIOA0, GPIOT4 etc.
+ *          type is GPIO, then the signal name must begin with the
+ *          prefix "GPI", e.g. GPIOA0, GPIT0 etc.
  * @function: The name of the function the signal participates in for the
- *            associated expression
+ *            associated expression. For pin-specific GPIO, the function
+ *            name must match the signal name.
  * @ndescs: The number of signal descriptors in the expression
  * @descs: Pointer to an array of signal descriptors that comprise the
  *         function expression
-- 
2.27.0


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Andrew Jeffery <andrew@aj.id.au>
To: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org
Cc: sashal@kernel.org, linux-aspeed@lists.ozlabs.org,
	linus.walleij@linaro.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	billy_tsai@aspeedtech.com, joel@jms.id.au,
	openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] pinctrl: aspeed: Fix GPIO requests on pass-through banks
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2020 17:03:37 +1030	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201126063337.489927-1-andrew@aj.id.au> (raw)

Commit 6726fbff19bf ("pinctrl: aspeed: Fix GPI only function problem.")
fixes access to GPIO banks T and U on the AST2600. Both banks contain
input-only pins and the GPIO pin function is named GPITx and GPIUx
respectively. Unfortunately the fix had a negative impact on GPIO banks
D and E for the AST2400 and AST2500 where the GPIO pass-through
functions take similar "GPI"-style names. The net effect on the older
SoCs was that when the GPIO subsystem requested a pin in banks D or E be
muxed for GPIO, they were instead muxed for pass-through mode.
Mistakenly muxing pass-through mode e.g. breaks booting the host on
IBM's Witherspoon (AC922) platform where GPIOE0 is used for FSI.

Further exploit the names in the provided expression structure to
differentiate pass-through from pin-specific GPIO modes.

This follow-up fix gives the expected behaviour for the following tests:

Witherspoon BMC (AST2500):

1. Power-on the Witherspoon host
2. Request GPIOD1 be muxed via /sys/class/gpio/export
3. Request GPIOE1 be muxed via /sys/class/gpio/export
4. Request the balls for GPIOs E2 and E3 be muxed as GPIO pass-through
   ("GPIE2" mode) via a pinctrl hog in the devicetree

Rainier BMC (AST2600):

5. Request GPIT0 be muxed via /sys/class/gpio/export
6. Request GPIU0 be muxed via /sys/class/gpio/export

Together the tests demonstrate that all three pieces of functionality
(general GPIOs via 1, 2 and 3, input-only GPIOs via 5 and 6, pass-through
mode via 4) operate as desired across old and new SoCs.

Fixes: 6726fbff19bf ("pinctrl: aspeed: Fix GPI only function problem.")
Cc: Billy Tsai <billy_tsai@aspeedtech.com>
Cc: Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Jeffery <andrew@aj.id.au>
---
 drivers/pinctrl/aspeed/pinctrl-aspeed.c | 74 +++++++++++++++++++++++--
 drivers/pinctrl/aspeed/pinmux-aspeed.h  |  7 ++-
 2 files changed, 72 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/aspeed/pinctrl-aspeed.c b/drivers/pinctrl/aspeed/pinctrl-aspeed.c
index 1d603732903f..9c44ef11b567 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/aspeed/pinctrl-aspeed.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/aspeed/pinctrl-aspeed.c
@@ -286,14 +286,76 @@ int aspeed_pinmux_set_mux(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, unsigned int function,
 static bool aspeed_expr_is_gpio(const struct aspeed_sig_expr *expr)
 {
 	/*
-	 * The signal type is GPIO if the signal name has "GPI" as a prefix.
-	 * strncmp (rather than strcmp) is used to implement the prefix
-	 * requirement.
+	 * We need to differentiate between GPIO and non-GPIO signals to
+	 * implement the gpio_request_enable() interface. For better or worse
+	 * the ASPEED pinctrl driver uses the expression names to determine
+	 * whether an expression will mux a pin for GPIO.
 	 *
-	 * expr->signal might look like "GPIOB1" in the GPIO case.
-	 * expr->signal might look like "GPIT0" in the GPI case.
+	 * Generally we have the following - A GPIO such as B1 has:
+	 *
+	 *    - expr->signal set to "GPIOB1"
+	 *    - expr->function set to "GPIOB1"
+	 *
+	 * Using this fact we can determine whether the provided expression is
+	 * a GPIO expression by testing the signal name for the string prefix
+	 * "GPIO".
+	 *
+	 * However, some GPIOs are input-only, and the ASPEED datasheets name
+	 * them differently. An input-only GPIO such as T0 has:
+	 *
+	 *    - expr->signal set to "GPIT0"
+	 *    - expr->function set to "GPIT0"
+	 *
+	 * It's tempting to generalise the prefix test from "GPIO" to "GPI" to
+	 * account for both GPIOs and GPIs, but in doing so we run aground on
+	 * another feature:
+	 *
+	 * Some pins in the ASPEED BMC SoCs have a "pass-through" GPIO
+	 * function where the input state of one pin is replicated as the
+	 * output state of another (as if they were shorted together - a mux
+	 * configuration that is typically enabled by hardware strapping).
+	 * This feature allows the BMC to pass e.g. power button state through
+	 * to the host while the BMC is yet to boot, but take control of the
+	 * button state once the BMC has booted by muxing each pin as a
+	 * separate, pin-specific GPIO.
+	 *
+	 * Conceptually this pass-through mode is a form of GPIO and is named
+	 * as such in the datasheets, e.g. "GPID0". This naming similarity
+	 * trips us up with the simple GPI-prefixed-signal-name scheme
+	 * discussed above, as the pass-through configuration is not what we
+	 * want when muxing a pin as GPIO for the GPIO subsystem.
+	 *
+	 * On e.g. the AST2400, a pass-through function "GPID0" is grouped on
+	 * balls A18 and D16, where we have:
+	 *
+	 *    For ball A18:
+	 *    - expr->signal set to "GPID0IN"
+	 *    - expr->function set to "GPID0"
+	 *
+	 *    For ball D16:
+	 *    - expr->signal set to "GPID0OUT"
+	 *    - expr->function set to "GPID0"
+	 *
+	 * By contrast, the pin-specific GPIO expressions for the same pins are
+	 * as follows:
+	 *
+	 *    For ball A18:
+	 *    - expr->signal looks like "GPIOD0"
+	 *    - expr->function looks like "GPIOD0"
+	 *
+	 *    For ball D16:
+	 *    - expr->signal looks like "GPIOD1"
+	 *    - expr->function looks like "GPIOD1"
+	 *
+	 * Testing both the signal _and_ function names gives us the means
+	 * differentiate the pass-through GPIO pinmux configuration from the
+	 * pin-specific configuration that the GPIO subsystem is after: An
+	 * expression is a pin-specific (non-pass-through) GPIO configuration
+	 * if the signal prefix is "GPI" and the signal name matches the
+	 * function name.
 	 */
-	return strncmp(expr->signal, "GPI", 3) == 0;
+	return !strncmp(expr->signal, "GPI", 3) &&
+			!strcmp(expr->signal, expr->function);
 }
 
 static bool aspeed_gpio_in_exprs(const struct aspeed_sig_expr **exprs)
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/aspeed/pinmux-aspeed.h b/drivers/pinctrl/aspeed/pinmux-aspeed.h
index f86739e800c3..dba5875ff276 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/aspeed/pinmux-aspeed.h
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/aspeed/pinmux-aspeed.h
@@ -452,10 +452,11 @@ struct aspeed_sig_desc {
  * evaluation of the descriptors.
  *
  * @signal: The signal name for the priority level on the pin. If the signal
- *          type is GPIO, then the signal name must begin with the string
- *          "GPIO", e.g. GPIOA0, GPIOT4 etc.
+ *          type is GPIO, then the signal name must begin with the
+ *          prefix "GPI", e.g. GPIOA0, GPIT0 etc.
  * @function: The name of the function the signal participates in for the
- *            associated expression
+ *            associated expression. For pin-specific GPIO, the function
+ *            name must match the signal name.
  * @ndescs: The number of signal descriptors in the expression
  * @descs: Pointer to an array of signal descriptors that comprise the
  *         function expression
-- 
2.27.0


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

             reply	other threads:[~2020-11-26  6:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-11-26  6:33 Andrew Jeffery [this message]
2020-11-26  6:33 ` [PATCH] pinctrl: aspeed: Fix GPIO requests on pass-through banks Andrew Jeffery
2020-11-26  6:33 ` Andrew Jeffery
2020-11-26  9:52 ` Joel Stanley
2020-11-26  9:52   ` Joel Stanley
2020-11-26  9:52   ` Joel Stanley
2020-12-04  9:19 ` Linus Walleij
2020-12-04  9:19   ` Linus Walleij
2020-12-04  9:19   ` Linus Walleij

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201126063337.489927-1-andrew@aj.id.au \
    --to=andrew@aj.id.au \
    --cc=billy_tsai@aspeedtech.com \
    --cc=joel@jms.id.au \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-aspeed@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=sashal@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.