All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 10/10] drm/i915/gt: ce->inflight updates are now serialised
Date: Tue,  1 Dec 2020 10:06:26 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201201100626.16073-10-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201201100626.16073-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>

Since schedule-in and schedule-out are now both always under the tasklet
bitlock, we can reduce the individual atomic operations to simple
instructions and worry less.

This notably eliminates the race observed with intel_context_inflight in
__engine_unpark().

Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/2583
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c | 52 ++++++++++++++---------------
 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c
index c195e33f3c58..fd2c18da71a9 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c
@@ -1331,11 +1331,11 @@ __execlists_schedule_in(struct i915_request *rq)
 		ce->lrc.ccid = ce->tag;
 	} else {
 		/* We don't need a strict matching tag, just different values */
-		unsigned int tag = ffs(READ_ONCE(engine->context_tag));
+		unsigned int tag = __ffs(engine->context_tag);
 
-		GEM_BUG_ON(tag == 0 || tag >= BITS_PER_LONG);
-		clear_bit(tag - 1, &engine->context_tag);
-		ce->lrc.ccid = tag << (GEN11_SW_CTX_ID_SHIFT - 32);
+		GEM_BUG_ON(tag >= BITS_PER_LONG);
+		__clear_bit(tag, &engine->context_tag);
+		ce->lrc.ccid = (1 + tag) << (GEN11_SW_CTX_ID_SHIFT - 32);
 
 		BUILD_BUG_ON(BITS_PER_LONG > GEN12_MAX_CONTEXT_HW_ID);
 	}
@@ -1348,6 +1348,8 @@ __execlists_schedule_in(struct i915_request *rq)
 	execlists_context_status_change(rq, INTEL_CONTEXT_SCHEDULE_IN);
 	intel_engine_context_in(engine);
 
+	CE_TRACE(ce, "schedule-in, ccid:%x\n", ce->lrc.ccid);
+
 	return engine;
 }
 
@@ -1359,13 +1361,10 @@ static inline void execlists_schedule_in(struct i915_request *rq, int idx)
 	GEM_BUG_ON(!intel_engine_pm_is_awake(rq->engine));
 	trace_i915_request_in(rq, idx);
 
-	old = READ_ONCE(ce->inflight);
-	do {
-		if (!old) {
-			WRITE_ONCE(ce->inflight, __execlists_schedule_in(rq));
-			break;
-		}
-	} while (!try_cmpxchg(&ce->inflight, &old, ptr_inc(old)));
+	old = ce->inflight;
+	if (!old)
+		old = __execlists_schedule_in(rq);
+	WRITE_ONCE(ce->inflight, ptr_inc(old));
 
 	GEM_BUG_ON(intel_context_inflight(ce) != rq->engine);
 }
@@ -1418,12 +1417,11 @@ static void kick_siblings(struct i915_request *rq, struct intel_context *ce)
 		tasklet_hi_schedule(&ve->base.execlists.tasklet);
 }
 
-static inline void
-__execlists_schedule_out(struct i915_request *rq,
-			 struct intel_engine_cs * const engine,
-			 unsigned int ccid)
+static inline void __execlists_schedule_out(struct i915_request *rq)
 {
 	struct intel_context * const ce = rq->context;
+	struct intel_engine_cs * const engine = rq->engine;
+	unsigned int ccid;
 
 	/*
 	 * NB process_csb() is not under the engine->active.lock and hence
@@ -1431,6 +1429,8 @@ __execlists_schedule_out(struct i915_request *rq,
 	 * refrain from doing non-trivial work here.
 	 */
 
+	CE_TRACE(ce, "schedule-out, ccid:%x\n", ce->lrc.ccid);
+
 	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DRM_I915_DEBUG_GEM))
 		execlists_check_context(ce, engine, "after");
 
@@ -1442,12 +1442,13 @@ __execlists_schedule_out(struct i915_request *rq,
 	    i915_request_completed(rq))
 		intel_engine_add_retire(engine, ce->timeline);
 
+	ccid = ce->lrc.ccid;
 	ccid >>= GEN11_SW_CTX_ID_SHIFT - 32;
 	ccid &= GEN12_MAX_CONTEXT_HW_ID;
 	if (ccid < BITS_PER_LONG) {
 		GEM_BUG_ON(ccid == 0);
 		GEM_BUG_ON(test_bit(ccid - 1, &engine->context_tag));
-		set_bit(ccid - 1, &engine->context_tag);
+		__set_bit(ccid - 1, &engine->context_tag);
 	}
 
 	intel_context_update_runtime(ce);
@@ -1468,26 +1469,23 @@ __execlists_schedule_out(struct i915_request *rq,
 	 */
 	if (ce->engine != engine)
 		kick_siblings(rq, ce);
-
-	intel_context_put(ce);
 }
 
 static inline void
 execlists_schedule_out(struct i915_request *rq)
 {
 	struct intel_context * const ce = rq->context;
-	struct intel_engine_cs *cur, *old;
-	u32 ccid;
 
 	trace_i915_request_out(rq);
 
-	ccid = rq->context->lrc.ccid;
-	old = READ_ONCE(ce->inflight);
-	do
-		cur = ptr_unmask_bits(old, 2) ? ptr_dec(old) : NULL;
-	while (!try_cmpxchg(&ce->inflight, &old, cur));
-	if (!cur)
-		__execlists_schedule_out(rq, old, ccid);
+	GEM_BUG_ON(!ce->inflight);
+	ce->inflight = ptr_dec(ce->inflight);
+	if (!intel_context_inflight_count(ce)) {
+		GEM_BUG_ON(ce->inflight != rq->engine);
+		__execlists_schedule_out(rq);
+		WRITE_ONCE(ce->inflight, NULL);
+		intel_context_put(ce);
+	}
 
 	i915_request_put(rq);
 }
-- 
2.20.1

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-12-01 10:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-12-01 10:06 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/10] drm/i915/gt: Replace direct submit with direct call to tasklet Chris Wilson
2020-12-01 10:06 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 02/10] drm/i915: Disable outputs during unregister Chris Wilson
2020-12-01 10:06 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 03/10] drm/i915/gt: Use virtual_engine during execlists_dequeue Chris Wilson
2020-12-01 10:06 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/10] drm/i915/gt: Decouple inflight virtual engines Chris Wilson
2020-12-01 10:06 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 05/10] drm/i915/gt: Defer schedule_out until after the next dequeue Chris Wilson
2020-12-01 10:06 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/10] drm/i915/gt: Remove virtual breadcrumb before transfer Chris Wilson
2020-12-01 10:06 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 07/10] drm/i915/gt: Shrink the critical section for irq signaling Chris Wilson
2020-12-01 10:06 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 08/10] drm/i915/gt: Resubmit the virtual engine on schedule-out Chris Wilson
2020-12-01 10:06 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 09/10] drm/i915/gt: Simplify virtual engine handling for execlists_hold() Chris Wilson
2020-12-01 10:06 ` Chris Wilson [this message]
2020-12-01 10:44 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: warning for series starting with [01/10] drm/i915/gt: Replace direct submit with direct call to tasklet Patchwork
2020-12-01 11:13 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2020-12-01 17:37 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201201100626.16073-10-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
    --to=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.