From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org> Cc: Aubrey Li <aubrey.li@linux.intel.com>, Barry Song <song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Peter Ziljstra <peterz@infradead.org>, Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>, Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>, Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>, Linux-ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> Subject: [PATCH 06/10] sched/fair: Clear the target CPU from the cpumask of CPUs searched Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2020 14:11:20 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20201203141124.7391-7-mgorman@techsingularity.net> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20201203141124.7391-1-mgorman@techsingularity.net> The target CPU is definitely not idle in both select_idle_core and select_idle_cpu. For select_idle_core(), the SMT is potentially checked unnecessarily as the core is definitely not idle if the target is busy. For select_idle_cpu(), the first CPU checked is simply a waste. Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> --- kernel/sched/fair.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c index 68dd9cd62fbd..1d8f5c4b4936 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c @@ -6077,6 +6077,7 @@ static int select_idle_core(struct task_struct *p, struct sched_domain *sd, int return -1; cpumask_and(cpus, sched_domain_span(sd), p->cpus_ptr); + __cpumask_clear_cpu(target, cpus); for_each_cpu_wrap(core, cpus, target) { bool idle = true; @@ -6181,6 +6182,7 @@ static int select_idle_cpu(struct task_struct *p, struct sched_domain *sd, int t time = cpu_clock(this); cpumask_and(cpus, sched_domain_span(sd), p->cpus_ptr); + __cpumask_clear_cpu(target, cpus); for_each_cpu_wrap(cpu, cpus, target) { schedstat_inc(this_rq()->sis_scanned); -- 2.26.2
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org> Cc: Barry Song <song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com>, Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>, Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>, Peter Ziljstra <peterz@infradead.org>, Aubrey Li <aubrey.li@linux.intel.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>, Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>, Linux-ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org> Subject: [PATCH 06/10] sched/fair: Clear the target CPU from the cpumask of CPUs searched Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2020 14:11:20 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20201203141124.7391-7-mgorman@techsingularity.net> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20201203141124.7391-1-mgorman@techsingularity.net> The target CPU is definitely not idle in both select_idle_core and select_idle_cpu. For select_idle_core(), the SMT is potentially checked unnecessarily as the core is definitely not idle if the target is busy. For select_idle_cpu(), the first CPU checked is simply a waste. Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> --- kernel/sched/fair.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c index 68dd9cd62fbd..1d8f5c4b4936 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c @@ -6077,6 +6077,7 @@ static int select_idle_core(struct task_struct *p, struct sched_domain *sd, int return -1; cpumask_and(cpus, sched_domain_span(sd), p->cpus_ptr); + __cpumask_clear_cpu(target, cpus); for_each_cpu_wrap(core, cpus, target) { bool idle = true; @@ -6181,6 +6182,7 @@ static int select_idle_cpu(struct task_struct *p, struct sched_domain *sd, int t time = cpu_clock(this); cpumask_and(cpus, sched_domain_span(sd), p->cpus_ptr); + __cpumask_clear_cpu(target, cpus); for_each_cpu_wrap(cpu, cpus, target) { schedstat_inc(this_rq()->sis_scanned); -- 2.26.2 _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-12-03 14:12 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2020-12-03 14:11 [RFC PATCH 00/10] Reduce time complexity of select_idle_sibling Mel Gorman 2020-12-03 14:11 ` Mel Gorman 2020-12-03 14:11 ` [PATCH 01/10] sched/fair: Track efficiency " Mel Gorman 2020-12-03 14:11 ` Mel Gorman 2020-12-03 14:11 ` [PATCH 02/10] sched/fair: Track efficiency of task recent_used_cpu Mel Gorman 2020-12-03 14:11 ` Mel Gorman 2020-12-03 14:11 ` [PATCH 03/10] sched/fair: Remove SIS_AVG_CPU Mel Gorman 2020-12-03 14:11 ` Mel Gorman 2020-12-03 14:11 ` [PATCH 04/10] sched/fair: Return an idle cpu if one is found after a failed search for an idle core Mel Gorman 2020-12-03 14:11 ` Mel Gorman 2020-12-03 16:35 ` Vincent Guittot 2020-12-03 16:35 ` Vincent Guittot 2020-12-03 17:50 ` Mel Gorman 2020-12-03 17:50 ` Mel Gorman 2020-12-03 14:11 ` [PATCH 05/10] sched/fair: Do not replace recent_used_cpu with the new target Mel Gorman 2020-12-03 14:11 ` Mel Gorman 2020-12-03 14:11 ` Mel Gorman [this message] 2020-12-03 14:11 ` [PATCH 06/10] sched/fair: Clear the target CPU from the cpumask of CPUs searched Mel Gorman 2020-12-03 16:38 ` Vincent Guittot 2020-12-03 16:38 ` Vincent Guittot 2020-12-03 17:52 ` Mel Gorman 2020-12-03 17:52 ` Mel Gorman 2020-12-04 10:56 ` Vincent Guittot 2020-12-04 10:56 ` Vincent Guittot 2020-12-04 11:30 ` Mel Gorman 2020-12-04 11:30 ` Mel Gorman 2020-12-04 13:13 ` Vincent Guittot 2020-12-04 13:13 ` Vincent Guittot 2020-12-04 13:17 ` Vincent Guittot 2020-12-04 13:17 ` Vincent Guittot 2020-12-04 13:40 ` Li, Aubrey 2020-12-04 13:40 ` Li, Aubrey 2020-12-04 13:47 ` Li, Aubrey 2020-12-04 13:47 ` Li, Aubrey 2020-12-04 13:47 ` Vincent Guittot 2020-12-04 13:47 ` Vincent Guittot 2020-12-04 14:07 ` Li, Aubrey 2020-12-04 14:07 ` Li, Aubrey 2020-12-04 14:31 ` Mel Gorman 2020-12-04 14:31 ` Mel Gorman 2020-12-04 15:23 ` Vincent Guittot 2020-12-04 15:23 ` Vincent Guittot 2020-12-04 15:40 ` Mel Gorman 2020-12-04 15:40 ` Mel Gorman 2020-12-04 15:43 ` Vincent Guittot 2020-12-04 15:43 ` Vincent Guittot 2020-12-04 18:41 ` Mel Gorman 2020-12-04 18:41 ` Mel Gorman 2020-12-04 14:27 ` Mel Gorman 2020-12-04 14:27 ` Mel Gorman 2020-12-03 14:11 ` [PATCH 07/10] sched/fair: Account for the idle cpu/smt search cost Mel Gorman 2020-12-03 14:11 ` Mel Gorman 2020-12-03 14:11 ` [PATCH 08/10] sched/fair: Reintroduce SIS_AVG_CPU but in the context of SIS_PROP to reduce search depth Mel Gorman 2020-12-03 14:11 ` Mel Gorman 2020-12-03 14:11 ` [PATCH 09/10] sched/fair: Limit the search for an idle core Mel Gorman 2020-12-03 14:11 ` Mel Gorman 2020-12-03 14:19 ` Mel Gorman 2020-12-03 14:19 ` Mel Gorman 2020-12-03 14:20 ` [PATCH 10/10] sched/fair: Avoid revisiting CPUs multiple times during select_idle_sibling Mel Gorman 2020-12-03 14:20 ` Mel Gorman
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20201203141124.7391-7-mgorman@techsingularity.net \ --to=mgorman@techsingularity.net \ --cc=aubrey.li@linux.intel.com \ --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \ --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=mingo@redhat.com \ --cc=peterz@infradead.org \ --cc=song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com \ --cc=valentin.schneider@arm.com \ --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.