From: Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc> To: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>, Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>, Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>, Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@microchip.com>, Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>, Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc> Subject: [PATCH v8 6/7] mtd: spi-nor: atmel: fix unlock_all() for AT25FS010/040 Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2020 17:29:58 +0100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20201203162959.29589-7-michael@walle.cc> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20201203162959.29589-1-michael@walle.cc> These flashes have some weird BP bits mapping which aren't supported in the current locking code. Just add a simple unlock op to unprotect the entire flash array which is needed for legacy behavior. Fixes: 3e0930f109e7 ("mtd: spi-nor: Rework the disabling of block write protection") Signed-off-by: Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc> Reviewed-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@microchip.com> --- changes since v7: - added fixes tag changes since v6: - use spi_nor_write_sr_and_check() and log a debug message if writing fails changes since v5: - new patch drivers/mtd/spi-nor/atmel.c | 53 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c | 2 +- drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.h | 1 + 3 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/atmel.c b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/atmel.c index 49d392c6c8bc..deacf87a68a0 100644 --- a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/atmel.c +++ b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/atmel.c @@ -8,10 +8,59 @@ #include "core.h" +/* + * The Atmel AT25FS010/AT25FS040 parts have some weird configuration for the + * block protection bits. We don't support them. But legacy behavior in linux + * is to unlock the whole flash array on startup. Therefore, we have to support + * exactly this operation. + */ +static int atmel_at25fs_lock(struct spi_nor *nor, loff_t ofs, uint64_t len) +{ + return -EOPNOTSUPP; +} + +static int atmel_at25fs_unlock(struct spi_nor *nor, loff_t ofs, uint64_t len) +{ + int ret; + + /* We only support unlocking the whole flash array */ + if (ofs || len != nor->params->size) + return -EINVAL; + + /* Write 0x00 to the status register to disable write protection */ + ret = spi_nor_write_sr_and_check(nor, 0); + if (ret) + dev_dbg(nor->dev, "unable to clear BP bits, WP# asserted?\n"); + + return ret; +} + +static int atmel_at25fs_is_locked(struct spi_nor *nor, loff_t ofs, uint64_t len) +{ + return -EOPNOTSUPP; +} + +static const struct spi_nor_locking_ops atmel_at25fs_locking_ops = { + .lock = atmel_at25fs_lock, + .unlock = atmel_at25fs_unlock, + .is_locked = atmel_at25fs_is_locked, +}; + +static void atmel_at25fs_default_init(struct spi_nor *nor) +{ + nor->params->locking_ops = &atmel_at25fs_locking_ops; +} + +static const struct spi_nor_fixups atmel_at25fs_fixups = { + .default_init = atmel_at25fs_default_init, +}; + static const struct flash_info atmel_parts[] = { /* Atmel -- some are (confusingly) marketed as "DataFlash" */ - { "at25fs010", INFO(0x1f6601, 0, 32 * 1024, 4, SECT_4K | SPI_NOR_HAS_LOCK) }, - { "at25fs040", INFO(0x1f6604, 0, 64 * 1024, 8, SECT_4K | SPI_NOR_HAS_LOCK) }, + { "at25fs010", INFO(0x1f6601, 0, 32 * 1024, 4, SECT_4K | SPI_NOR_HAS_LOCK) + .fixups = &atmel_at25fs_fixups }, + { "at25fs040", INFO(0x1f6604, 0, 64 * 1024, 8, SECT_4K | SPI_NOR_HAS_LOCK) + .fixups = &atmel_at25fs_fixups }, { "at25df041a", INFO(0x1f4401, 0, 64 * 1024, 8, SECT_4K | SPI_NOR_HAS_LOCK) }, { "at25df321", INFO(0x1f4700, 0, 64 * 1024, 64, SECT_4K | SPI_NOR_HAS_LOCK) }, diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c index 013198abe929..6afcb99e9741 100644 --- a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c +++ b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c @@ -1049,7 +1049,7 @@ static int spi_nor_write_16bit_cr_and_check(struct spi_nor *nor, u8 cr) * * Return: 0 on success, -errno otherwise. */ -static int spi_nor_write_sr_and_check(struct spi_nor *nor, u8 sr1) +int spi_nor_write_sr_and_check(struct spi_nor *nor, u8 sr1) { if (nor->flags & SNOR_F_HAS_16BIT_SR) return spi_nor_write_16bit_sr_and_check(nor, sr1); diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.h b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.h index 0a775a7b5606..7780169d485b 100644 --- a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.h +++ b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.h @@ -430,6 +430,7 @@ void spi_nor_unlock_and_unprep(struct spi_nor *nor); int spi_nor_sr1_bit6_quad_enable(struct spi_nor *nor); int spi_nor_sr2_bit1_quad_enable(struct spi_nor *nor); int spi_nor_sr2_bit7_quad_enable(struct spi_nor *nor); +int spi_nor_write_sr_and_check(struct spi_nor *nor, u8 sr1); int spi_nor_xread_sr(struct spi_nor *nor, u8 *sr); ssize_t spi_nor_read_data(struct spi_nor *nor, loff_t from, size_t len, -- 2.20.1
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc> To: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>, Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@microchip.com>, Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>, Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc>, Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>, Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com> Subject: [PATCH v8 6/7] mtd: spi-nor: atmel: fix unlock_all() for AT25FS010/040 Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2020 17:29:58 +0100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20201203162959.29589-7-michael@walle.cc> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20201203162959.29589-1-michael@walle.cc> These flashes have some weird BP bits mapping which aren't supported in the current locking code. Just add a simple unlock op to unprotect the entire flash array which is needed for legacy behavior. Fixes: 3e0930f109e7 ("mtd: spi-nor: Rework the disabling of block write protection") Signed-off-by: Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc> Reviewed-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@microchip.com> --- changes since v7: - added fixes tag changes since v6: - use spi_nor_write_sr_and_check() and log a debug message if writing fails changes since v5: - new patch drivers/mtd/spi-nor/atmel.c | 53 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c | 2 +- drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.h | 1 + 3 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/atmel.c b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/atmel.c index 49d392c6c8bc..deacf87a68a0 100644 --- a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/atmel.c +++ b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/atmel.c @@ -8,10 +8,59 @@ #include "core.h" +/* + * The Atmel AT25FS010/AT25FS040 parts have some weird configuration for the + * block protection bits. We don't support them. But legacy behavior in linux + * is to unlock the whole flash array on startup. Therefore, we have to support + * exactly this operation. + */ +static int atmel_at25fs_lock(struct spi_nor *nor, loff_t ofs, uint64_t len) +{ + return -EOPNOTSUPP; +} + +static int atmel_at25fs_unlock(struct spi_nor *nor, loff_t ofs, uint64_t len) +{ + int ret; + + /* We only support unlocking the whole flash array */ + if (ofs || len != nor->params->size) + return -EINVAL; + + /* Write 0x00 to the status register to disable write protection */ + ret = spi_nor_write_sr_and_check(nor, 0); + if (ret) + dev_dbg(nor->dev, "unable to clear BP bits, WP# asserted?\n"); + + return ret; +} + +static int atmel_at25fs_is_locked(struct spi_nor *nor, loff_t ofs, uint64_t len) +{ + return -EOPNOTSUPP; +} + +static const struct spi_nor_locking_ops atmel_at25fs_locking_ops = { + .lock = atmel_at25fs_lock, + .unlock = atmel_at25fs_unlock, + .is_locked = atmel_at25fs_is_locked, +}; + +static void atmel_at25fs_default_init(struct spi_nor *nor) +{ + nor->params->locking_ops = &atmel_at25fs_locking_ops; +} + +static const struct spi_nor_fixups atmel_at25fs_fixups = { + .default_init = atmel_at25fs_default_init, +}; + static const struct flash_info atmel_parts[] = { /* Atmel -- some are (confusingly) marketed as "DataFlash" */ - { "at25fs010", INFO(0x1f6601, 0, 32 * 1024, 4, SECT_4K | SPI_NOR_HAS_LOCK) }, - { "at25fs040", INFO(0x1f6604, 0, 64 * 1024, 8, SECT_4K | SPI_NOR_HAS_LOCK) }, + { "at25fs010", INFO(0x1f6601, 0, 32 * 1024, 4, SECT_4K | SPI_NOR_HAS_LOCK) + .fixups = &atmel_at25fs_fixups }, + { "at25fs040", INFO(0x1f6604, 0, 64 * 1024, 8, SECT_4K | SPI_NOR_HAS_LOCK) + .fixups = &atmel_at25fs_fixups }, { "at25df041a", INFO(0x1f4401, 0, 64 * 1024, 8, SECT_4K | SPI_NOR_HAS_LOCK) }, { "at25df321", INFO(0x1f4700, 0, 64 * 1024, 64, SECT_4K | SPI_NOR_HAS_LOCK) }, diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c index 013198abe929..6afcb99e9741 100644 --- a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c +++ b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c @@ -1049,7 +1049,7 @@ static int spi_nor_write_16bit_cr_and_check(struct spi_nor *nor, u8 cr) * * Return: 0 on success, -errno otherwise. */ -static int spi_nor_write_sr_and_check(struct spi_nor *nor, u8 sr1) +int spi_nor_write_sr_and_check(struct spi_nor *nor, u8 sr1) { if (nor->flags & SNOR_F_HAS_16BIT_SR) return spi_nor_write_16bit_sr_and_check(nor, sr1); diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.h b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.h index 0a775a7b5606..7780169d485b 100644 --- a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.h +++ b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.h @@ -430,6 +430,7 @@ void spi_nor_unlock_and_unprep(struct spi_nor *nor); int spi_nor_sr1_bit6_quad_enable(struct spi_nor *nor); int spi_nor_sr2_bit1_quad_enable(struct spi_nor *nor); int spi_nor_sr2_bit7_quad_enable(struct spi_nor *nor); +int spi_nor_write_sr_and_check(struct spi_nor *nor, u8 sr1); int spi_nor_xread_sr(struct spi_nor *nor, u8 *sr); ssize_t spi_nor_read_data(struct spi_nor *nor, loff_t from, size_t len, -- 2.20.1 ______________________________________________________ Linux MTD discussion mailing list http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-12-03 16:31 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2020-12-03 16:29 [PATCH v8 0/7] mtd: spi-nor: keep lock bits if they are non-volatile Michael Walle 2020-12-03 16:29 ` Michael Walle 2020-12-03 16:29 ` [PATCH v8 1/7] mtd: spi-nor: sst: fix BPn bits for the SST25VF064C Michael Walle 2020-12-03 16:29 ` Michael Walle 2020-12-03 16:29 ` [PATCH v8 2/7] mtd: spi-nor: ignore errors in spi_nor_unlock_all() Michael Walle 2020-12-03 16:29 ` Michael Walle 2020-12-03 16:29 ` [PATCH v8 3/7] mtd: spi-nor: atmel: remove global protection flag Michael Walle 2020-12-03 16:29 ` Michael Walle 2020-12-03 16:29 ` [PATCH v8 4/7] mtd: spi-nor: sst: " Michael Walle 2020-12-03 16:29 ` Michael Walle 2020-12-03 16:29 ` [PATCH v8 5/7] mtd: spi-nor: intel: " Michael Walle 2020-12-03 16:29 ` Michael Walle 2020-12-03 16:29 ` Michael Walle [this message] 2020-12-03 16:29 ` [PATCH v8 6/7] mtd: spi-nor: atmel: fix unlock_all() for AT25FS010/040 Michael Walle 2020-12-03 16:29 ` [PATCH v8 7/7] mtd: spi-nor: keep lock bits if they are non-volatile Michael Walle 2020-12-03 16:29 ` Michael Walle 2020-12-09 14:36 ` [PATCH v8 0/7] " Vignesh Raghavendra 2020-12-09 14:36 ` Vignesh Raghavendra
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20201203162959.29589-7-michael@walle.cc \ --to=michael@walle.cc \ --cc=boris.brezillon@collabora.com \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \ --cc=richard@nod.at \ --cc=tudor.ambarus@microchip.com \ --cc=vigneshr@ti.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.