All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
To: "Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Cc: "James E . J . Bottomley" <jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>, Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>,
	linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
	Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
	Can Guo <cang@codeaurora.org>,
	Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@mediatek.com>,
	Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
	Martin Kepplinger <martin.kepplinger@puri.sm>
Subject: [PATCH v5 6/8] scsi: Only process PM requests if rpm_status != RPM_ACTIVE
Date: Tue,  8 Dec 2020 21:29:49 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201209052951.16136-7-bvanassche@acm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201209052951.16136-1-bvanassche@acm.org>

Instead of submitting all SCSI commands submitted with scsi_execute() to a
SCSI device if rpm_status != RPM_ACTIVE, only submit RQF_PM (power
management requests) if rpm_status != RPM_ACTIVE. This patch makes the
SCSI core handle the runtime power management status (rpm_status) as it
should be handled.

Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Can Guo <cang@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@mediatek.com>
Cc: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Cc: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Cc: Martin Kepplinger <martin.kepplinger@puri.sm>
Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
---
 drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c | 27 ++++++++++++++-------------
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
index b7ac14571415..91bc39a4c3c3 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
@@ -249,7 +249,8 @@ int __scsi_execute(struct scsi_device *sdev, const unsigned char *cmd,
 
 	req = blk_get_request(sdev->request_queue,
 			data_direction == DMA_TO_DEVICE ?
-			REQ_OP_SCSI_OUT : REQ_OP_SCSI_IN, BLK_MQ_REQ_PREEMPT);
+			REQ_OP_SCSI_OUT : REQ_OP_SCSI_IN,
+			rq_flags & RQF_PM ? BLK_MQ_REQ_PM : 0);
 	if (IS_ERR(req))
 		return ret;
 	rq = scsi_req(req);
@@ -1206,6 +1207,8 @@ static blk_status_t
 scsi_device_state_check(struct scsi_device *sdev, struct request *req)
 {
 	switch (sdev->sdev_state) {
+	case SDEV_CREATED:
+		return BLK_STS_OK;
 	case SDEV_OFFLINE:
 	case SDEV_TRANSPORT_OFFLINE:
 		/*
@@ -1232,18 +1235,18 @@ scsi_device_state_check(struct scsi_device *sdev, struct request *req)
 		return BLK_STS_RESOURCE;
 	case SDEV_QUIESCE:
 		/*
-		 * If the devices is blocked we defer normal commands.
+		 * If the device is blocked we only accept power management
+		 * commands.
 		 */
-		if (req && !(req->rq_flags & RQF_PREEMPT))
+		if (req && WARN_ON_ONCE(!(req->rq_flags & RQF_PM)))
 			return BLK_STS_RESOURCE;
 		return BLK_STS_OK;
 	default:
 		/*
 		 * For any other not fully online state we only allow
-		 * special commands.  In particular any user initiated
-		 * command is not allowed.
+		 * power management commands.
 		 */
-		if (req && !(req->rq_flags & RQF_PREEMPT))
+		if (req && !(req->rq_flags & RQF_PM))
 			return BLK_STS_IOERR;
 		return BLK_STS_OK;
 	}
@@ -2517,15 +2520,13 @@ void sdev_evt_send_simple(struct scsi_device *sdev,
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(sdev_evt_send_simple);
 
 /**
- *	scsi_device_quiesce - Block user issued commands.
+ *	scsi_device_quiesce - Block all commands except power management.
  *	@sdev:	scsi device to quiesce.
  *
  *	This works by trying to transition to the SDEV_QUIESCE state
  *	(which must be a legal transition).  When the device is in this
- *	state, only special requests will be accepted, all others will
- *	be deferred.  Since special requests may also be requeued requests,
- *	a successful return doesn't guarantee the device will be
- *	totally quiescent.
+ *	state, only power management requests will be accepted, all others will
+ *	be deferred.
  *
  *	Must be called with user context, may sleep.
  *
@@ -2587,12 +2588,12 @@ void scsi_device_resume(struct scsi_device *sdev)
 	 * device deleted during suspend)
 	 */
 	mutex_lock(&sdev->state_mutex);
+	if (sdev->sdev_state == SDEV_QUIESCE)
+		scsi_device_set_state(sdev, SDEV_RUNNING);
 	if (sdev->quiesced_by) {
 		sdev->quiesced_by = NULL;
 		blk_clear_pm_only(sdev->request_queue);
 	}
-	if (sdev->sdev_state == SDEV_QUIESCE)
-		scsi_device_set_state(sdev, SDEV_RUNNING);
 	mutex_unlock(&sdev->state_mutex);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(scsi_device_resume);

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-12-09  5:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-12-09  5:29 [PATCH v5 0/8] Rework runtime suspend and SPI domain validation Bart Van Assche
2020-12-09  5:29 ` [PATCH v5 1/8] block: Fix a race in the runtime power management code Bart Van Assche
2020-12-09  5:29 ` [PATCH v5 2/8] block: Introduce BLK_MQ_REQ_PM Bart Van Assche
2020-12-09  6:06   ` Can Guo
2020-12-09  5:29 ` [PATCH v5 3/8] ide: Do not set the RQF_PREEMPT flag for sense requests Bart Van Assche
2020-12-09  5:29 ` [PATCH v5 4/8] ide: Mark power management requests with RQF_PM instead of RQF_PREEMPT Bart Van Assche
2020-12-09  5:29 ` [PATCH v5 5/8] scsi_transport_spi: Set RQF_PM for domain validation commands Bart Van Assche
2020-12-09  7:34   ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-12-09  5:29 ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
2020-12-09  6:06   ` [PATCH v5 6/8] scsi: Only process PM requests if rpm_status != RPM_ACTIVE Can Guo
2020-12-09  5:29 ` [PATCH v5 7/8] block: Remove RQF_PREEMPT and BLK_MQ_REQ_PREEMPT Bart Van Assche
2020-12-09  6:05   ` Can Guo
2020-12-09  5:29 ` [PATCH v5 8/8] block: Do not accept any requests while suspended Bart Van Assche
2020-12-09  6:04   ` Can Guo
2020-12-09  7:36   ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-12-09 16:44 ` [PATCH v5 0/8] Rework runtime suspend and SPI domain validation Martin K. Petersen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201209052951.16136-7-bvanassche@acm.org \
    --to=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=cang@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=hare@suse.de \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.kepplinger@puri.sm \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
    --cc=stanley.chu@mediatek.com \
    --cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.