All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
	Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@microchip.com>,
	Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
	Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@microchip.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] drivers: soc: atmel: Avoid calling at91_soc_init on non AT91 SoCs
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2020 13:58:46 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201211135846.1334322-1-sudeep.holla@arm.com> (raw)

Since at91_soc_init is called unconditionally from atmel_soc_device_init,
we get the following warning on all non AT91 SoCs:
	" AT91: Could not find identification node"

Fix the same by filtering with allowed AT91 SoC list.

Cc: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@microchip.com>
Cc: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
Cc: Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@microchip.com>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
---
 drivers/soc/atmel/soc.c | 12 ++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)

v1->v2:
	- Updated the allowed list as suggested by Alexandre

diff --git a/drivers/soc/atmel/soc.c b/drivers/soc/atmel/soc.c
index 55a1f57a4d8c..2dc86728b132 100644
--- a/drivers/soc/atmel/soc.c
+++ b/drivers/soc/atmel/soc.c
@@ -265,8 +265,20 @@ struct soc_device * __init at91_soc_init(const struct at91_soc *socs)
 	return soc_dev;
 }

+static const struct of_device_id at91_soc_allowed_list[] __initconst = {
+	{ .compatible = "atmel,at91rm9200", },
+	{ .compatible = "atmel,at91sam9", },
+	{ .compatible = "atmel,sama5", },
+	{ .compatible = "atmel,samv7", }
+};
+
 static int __init atmel_soc_device_init(void)
 {
+	struct device_node *np = of_find_node_by_path("/");
+
+	if (!of_match_node(at91_soc_allowed_list, np))
+		return 0;
+
 	at91_soc_init(socs);

 	return 0;
--
2.25.1


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
	Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@microchip.com>,
	Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] drivers: soc: atmel: Avoid calling at91_soc_init on non AT91 SoCs
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2020 13:58:46 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201211135846.1334322-1-sudeep.holla@arm.com> (raw)

Since at91_soc_init is called unconditionally from atmel_soc_device_init,
we get the following warning on all non AT91 SoCs:
	" AT91: Could not find identification node"

Fix the same by filtering with allowed AT91 SoC list.

Cc: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@microchip.com>
Cc: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
Cc: Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@microchip.com>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
---
 drivers/soc/atmel/soc.c | 12 ++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)

v1->v2:
	- Updated the allowed list as suggested by Alexandre

diff --git a/drivers/soc/atmel/soc.c b/drivers/soc/atmel/soc.c
index 55a1f57a4d8c..2dc86728b132 100644
--- a/drivers/soc/atmel/soc.c
+++ b/drivers/soc/atmel/soc.c
@@ -265,8 +265,20 @@ struct soc_device * __init at91_soc_init(const struct at91_soc *socs)
 	return soc_dev;
 }

+static const struct of_device_id at91_soc_allowed_list[] __initconst = {
+	{ .compatible = "atmel,at91rm9200", },
+	{ .compatible = "atmel,at91sam9", },
+	{ .compatible = "atmel,sama5", },
+	{ .compatible = "atmel,samv7", }
+};
+
 static int __init atmel_soc_device_init(void)
 {
+	struct device_node *np = of_find_node_by_path("/");
+
+	if (!of_match_node(at91_soc_allowed_list, np))
+		return 0;
+
 	at91_soc_init(socs);

 	return 0;
--
2.25.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

             reply	other threads:[~2020-12-11 14:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-12-11 13:58 Sudeep Holla [this message]
2020-12-11 13:58 ` [PATCH v2] drivers: soc: atmel: Avoid calling at91_soc_init on non AT91 SoCs Sudeep Holla
2020-12-28 16:58 ` Alexandre Belloni
2020-12-28 16:58   ` Alexandre Belloni

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201211135846.1334322-1-sudeep.holla@arm.com \
    --to=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
    --cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ludovic.desroches@microchip.com \
    --cc=nicolas.ferre@microchip.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.