All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
To: DRI Development <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: "Intel Graphics Development" <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	"Daniel Vetter" <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
	"Daniel Vetter" <daniel.vetter@intel.com>,
	"Thomas Zimmermann" <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
	"Sumit Semwal" <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>,
	"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
	linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org
Subject: [PATCH 4/4] dma-buf: doc polish for pin/unpin
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2020 16:58:43 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201211155843.3348718-4-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201211155843.3348718-1-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Motivated by a discussion with Christian and Thomas: Try to untangle a
bit what's relevant for importers and what's relevant for exporters.

Also add an assert that really only dynamic importers use the api
function, anything else doesn't make sense.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>
Cc: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>
Cc: "Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org
---
 drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c | 19 ++++++++++++++++---
 include/linux/dma-buf.h   |  8 +++++---
 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
index 00d5afe904cc..1065545e9ca1 100644
--- a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
+++ b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
@@ -809,9 +809,15 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dma_buf_detach);
 
 /**
  * dma_buf_pin - Lock down the DMA-buf
- *
  * @attach:	[in]	attachment which should be pinned
  *
+ * Only dynamic importers (who set up @attach with dma_buf_dynamic_attach()) may
+ * call this, and only for limited use cases like scanout and not for temporary
+ * pin operations. It is not permitted to allow userspace to pin arbitrary
+ * amounts of buffers through this interface.
+ *
+ * Buffers must be unpinned by calling dma_buf_unpin().
+ *
  * Returns:
  * 0 on success, negative error code on failure.
  */
@@ -820,6 +826,8 @@ int dma_buf_pin(struct dma_buf_attachment *attach)
 	struct dma_buf *dmabuf = attach->dmabuf;
 	int ret = 0;
 
+	WARN_ON(!dma_buf_attachment_is_dynamic(attach));
+
 	dma_resv_assert_held(dmabuf->resv);
 
 	if (dmabuf->ops->pin)
@@ -830,14 +838,19 @@ int dma_buf_pin(struct dma_buf_attachment *attach)
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dma_buf_pin);
 
 /**
- * dma_buf_unpin - Remove lock from DMA-buf
- *
+ * dma_buf_unpin - Unpin a DMA-buf
  * @attach:	[in]	attachment which should be unpinned
+ *
+ * This unpins a buffer pinned by dma_buf_pin() and allows the exporter to move
+ * any mapping of @attach again and inform the importer through
+ * &dma_buf_attach_ops.move_notify.
  */
 void dma_buf_unpin(struct dma_buf_attachment *attach)
 {
 	struct dma_buf *dmabuf = attach->dmabuf;
 
+	WARN_ON(!dma_buf_attachment_is_dynamic(attach));
+
 	dma_resv_assert_held(dmabuf->resv);
 
 	if (dmabuf->ops->unpin)
diff --git a/include/linux/dma-buf.h b/include/linux/dma-buf.h
index 43802a31b25d..628681bf6c99 100644
--- a/include/linux/dma-buf.h
+++ b/include/linux/dma-buf.h
@@ -86,13 +86,15 @@ struct dma_buf_ops {
 	 * @pin:
 	 *
 	 * This is called by dma_buf_pin() and lets the exporter know that the
-	 * DMA-buf can't be moved any more.
+	 * DMA-buf can't be moved any more. The exporter should pin the buffer
+	 * into system memory to make sure it is generally accessible by other
+	 * devices.
 	 *
 	 * This is called with the &dmabuf.resv object locked and is mutual
 	 * exclusive with @cache_sgt_mapping.
 	 *
-	 * This callback is optional and should only be used in limited use
-	 * cases like scanout and not for temporary pin operations.
+	 * This is called automatically for non-dynamic importers from
+	 * dma_buf_attach().
 	 *
 	 * Returns:
 	 *
-- 
2.29.2


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
To: DRI Development <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: "Daniel Vetter" <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
	"Intel Graphics Development" <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org,
	"Thomas Zimmermann" <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
	"Daniel Vetter" <daniel.vetter@intel.com>,
	"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
	linux-media@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 4/4] dma-buf: doc polish for pin/unpin
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2020 16:58:43 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201211155843.3348718-4-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201211155843.3348718-1-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Motivated by a discussion with Christian and Thomas: Try to untangle a
bit what's relevant for importers and what's relevant for exporters.

Also add an assert that really only dynamic importers use the api
function, anything else doesn't make sense.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>
Cc: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>
Cc: "Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org
---
 drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c | 19 ++++++++++++++++---
 include/linux/dma-buf.h   |  8 +++++---
 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
index 00d5afe904cc..1065545e9ca1 100644
--- a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
+++ b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
@@ -809,9 +809,15 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dma_buf_detach);
 
 /**
  * dma_buf_pin - Lock down the DMA-buf
- *
  * @attach:	[in]	attachment which should be pinned
  *
+ * Only dynamic importers (who set up @attach with dma_buf_dynamic_attach()) may
+ * call this, and only for limited use cases like scanout and not for temporary
+ * pin operations. It is not permitted to allow userspace to pin arbitrary
+ * amounts of buffers through this interface.
+ *
+ * Buffers must be unpinned by calling dma_buf_unpin().
+ *
  * Returns:
  * 0 on success, negative error code on failure.
  */
@@ -820,6 +826,8 @@ int dma_buf_pin(struct dma_buf_attachment *attach)
 	struct dma_buf *dmabuf = attach->dmabuf;
 	int ret = 0;
 
+	WARN_ON(!dma_buf_attachment_is_dynamic(attach));
+
 	dma_resv_assert_held(dmabuf->resv);
 
 	if (dmabuf->ops->pin)
@@ -830,14 +838,19 @@ int dma_buf_pin(struct dma_buf_attachment *attach)
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dma_buf_pin);
 
 /**
- * dma_buf_unpin - Remove lock from DMA-buf
- *
+ * dma_buf_unpin - Unpin a DMA-buf
  * @attach:	[in]	attachment which should be unpinned
+ *
+ * This unpins a buffer pinned by dma_buf_pin() and allows the exporter to move
+ * any mapping of @attach again and inform the importer through
+ * &dma_buf_attach_ops.move_notify.
  */
 void dma_buf_unpin(struct dma_buf_attachment *attach)
 {
 	struct dma_buf *dmabuf = attach->dmabuf;
 
+	WARN_ON(!dma_buf_attachment_is_dynamic(attach));
+
 	dma_resv_assert_held(dmabuf->resv);
 
 	if (dmabuf->ops->unpin)
diff --git a/include/linux/dma-buf.h b/include/linux/dma-buf.h
index 43802a31b25d..628681bf6c99 100644
--- a/include/linux/dma-buf.h
+++ b/include/linux/dma-buf.h
@@ -86,13 +86,15 @@ struct dma_buf_ops {
 	 * @pin:
 	 *
 	 * This is called by dma_buf_pin() and lets the exporter know that the
-	 * DMA-buf can't be moved any more.
+	 * DMA-buf can't be moved any more. The exporter should pin the buffer
+	 * into system memory to make sure it is generally accessible by other
+	 * devices.
 	 *
 	 * This is called with the &dmabuf.resv object locked and is mutual
 	 * exclusive with @cache_sgt_mapping.
 	 *
-	 * This callback is optional and should only be used in limited use
-	 * cases like scanout and not for temporary pin operations.
+	 * This is called automatically for non-dynamic importers from
+	 * dma_buf_attach().
 	 *
 	 * Returns:
 	 *
-- 
2.29.2

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
To: DRI Development <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: "Daniel Vetter" <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
	"Intel Graphics Development" <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	"Sumit Semwal" <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>,
	linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org,
	"Thomas Zimmermann" <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
	"Daniel Vetter" <daniel.vetter@intel.com>,
	"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
	linux-media@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/4] dma-buf: doc polish for pin/unpin
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2020 16:58:43 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201211155843.3348718-4-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201211155843.3348718-1-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Motivated by a discussion with Christian and Thomas: Try to untangle a
bit what's relevant for importers and what's relevant for exporters.

Also add an assert that really only dynamic importers use the api
function, anything else doesn't make sense.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>
Cc: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>
Cc: "Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org
---
 drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c | 19 ++++++++++++++++---
 include/linux/dma-buf.h   |  8 +++++---
 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
index 00d5afe904cc..1065545e9ca1 100644
--- a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
+++ b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
@@ -809,9 +809,15 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dma_buf_detach);
 
 /**
  * dma_buf_pin - Lock down the DMA-buf
- *
  * @attach:	[in]	attachment which should be pinned
  *
+ * Only dynamic importers (who set up @attach with dma_buf_dynamic_attach()) may
+ * call this, and only for limited use cases like scanout and not for temporary
+ * pin operations. It is not permitted to allow userspace to pin arbitrary
+ * amounts of buffers through this interface.
+ *
+ * Buffers must be unpinned by calling dma_buf_unpin().
+ *
  * Returns:
  * 0 on success, negative error code on failure.
  */
@@ -820,6 +826,8 @@ int dma_buf_pin(struct dma_buf_attachment *attach)
 	struct dma_buf *dmabuf = attach->dmabuf;
 	int ret = 0;
 
+	WARN_ON(!dma_buf_attachment_is_dynamic(attach));
+
 	dma_resv_assert_held(dmabuf->resv);
 
 	if (dmabuf->ops->pin)
@@ -830,14 +838,19 @@ int dma_buf_pin(struct dma_buf_attachment *attach)
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dma_buf_pin);
 
 /**
- * dma_buf_unpin - Remove lock from DMA-buf
- *
+ * dma_buf_unpin - Unpin a DMA-buf
  * @attach:	[in]	attachment which should be unpinned
+ *
+ * This unpins a buffer pinned by dma_buf_pin() and allows the exporter to move
+ * any mapping of @attach again and inform the importer through
+ * &dma_buf_attach_ops.move_notify.
  */
 void dma_buf_unpin(struct dma_buf_attachment *attach)
 {
 	struct dma_buf *dmabuf = attach->dmabuf;
 
+	WARN_ON(!dma_buf_attachment_is_dynamic(attach));
+
 	dma_resv_assert_held(dmabuf->resv);
 
 	if (dmabuf->ops->unpin)
diff --git a/include/linux/dma-buf.h b/include/linux/dma-buf.h
index 43802a31b25d..628681bf6c99 100644
--- a/include/linux/dma-buf.h
+++ b/include/linux/dma-buf.h
@@ -86,13 +86,15 @@ struct dma_buf_ops {
 	 * @pin:
 	 *
 	 * This is called by dma_buf_pin() and lets the exporter know that the
-	 * DMA-buf can't be moved any more.
+	 * DMA-buf can't be moved any more. The exporter should pin the buffer
+	 * into system memory to make sure it is generally accessible by other
+	 * devices.
 	 *
 	 * This is called with the &dmabuf.resv object locked and is mutual
 	 * exclusive with @cache_sgt_mapping.
 	 *
-	 * This callback is optional and should only be used in limited use
-	 * cases like scanout and not for temporary pin operations.
+	 * This is called automatically for non-dynamic importers from
+	 * dma_buf_attach().
 	 *
 	 * Returns:
 	 *
-- 
2.29.2

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-12-11 17:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-12-11 15:58 [PATCH 1/4] dma-buf: Remove kmap kerneldoc vestiges Daniel Vetter
2020-12-11 15:58 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2020-12-11 15:58 ` Daniel Vetter
2020-12-11 15:58 ` [PATCH 2/4] dma-buf: some kerneldoc formatting fixes Daniel Vetter
2020-12-11 15:58   ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2020-12-11 15:58   ` Daniel Vetter
2020-12-11 15:58 ` [PATCH 3/4] dma-buf: begin/end_cpu might lock the dma_resv lock Daniel Vetter
2020-12-11 15:58   ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2020-12-11 15:58   ` Daniel Vetter
2020-12-11 22:31   ` kernel test robot
2020-12-11 22:31     ` kernel test robot
2020-12-11 22:31     ` [Intel-gfx] " kernel test robot
2020-12-11 22:31     ` kernel test robot
2020-12-14 10:33   ` Christian König
2020-12-14 10:33     ` [Intel-gfx] " Christian König
2020-12-14 10:33     ` Christian König
2020-12-14 17:16   ` [PATCH] " Daniel Vetter
2020-12-14 17:16     ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2020-12-14 17:16     ` Daniel Vetter
2020-12-15 14:16     ` Christian König
2020-12-15 14:16       ` [Intel-gfx] " Christian König
2020-12-15 14:16       ` Christian König
2020-12-11 15:58 ` Daniel Vetter [this message]
2020-12-11 15:58   ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/4] dma-buf: doc polish for pin/unpin Daniel Vetter
2020-12-11 15:58   ` Daniel Vetter
2020-12-11 16:21 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for series starting with [1/4] dma-buf: Remove kmap kerneldoc vestiges Patchwork
2020-12-14 10:33 ` [PATCH 1/4] " Christian König
2020-12-14 10:33   ` [Intel-gfx] " Christian König
2020-12-14 10:33   ` Christian König
2020-12-14 16:01   ` Daniel Vetter
2020-12-14 16:01     ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2020-12-14 16:01     ` Daniel Vetter
2020-12-15 14:18     ` Christian König
2020-12-15 14:18       ` [Intel-gfx] " Christian König
2020-12-15 14:18       ` Christian König
2020-12-16 10:29       ` Daniel Vetter
2020-12-16 10:29         ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2020-12-16 10:29         ` Daniel Vetter
2020-12-14 18:02 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for series starting with [1/4] dma-buf: Remove kmap kerneldoc vestiges (rev2) Patchwork
2020-12-14 18:06 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.DOCS: " Patchwork
2020-12-14 18:33 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2020-12-15 18:50 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for series starting with [1/4] dma-buf: Remove kmap kerneldoc vestiges (rev3) Patchwork
2020-12-15 19:20 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2020-12-16  0:09 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201211155843.3348718-4-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
    --to=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
    --cc=daniel.vetter@intel.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sumit.semwal@linaro.org \
    --cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.