All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com>
To: guro@fb.com, ktkhai@virtuozzo.com, shakeelb@google.com,
	david@fromorbit.com, hannes@cmpxchg.org, mhocko@suse.com,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: shy828301@gmail.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [v2 PATCH 9/9] mm: vmscan: shrink deferred objects proportional to priority
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2020 14:37:22 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201214223722.232537-10-shy828301@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201214223722.232537-1-shy828301@gmail.com>

The number of deferred objects might get windup to an absurd number, and it results in
clamp of slab objects.  It is undesirable for sustaining workingset.

So shrink deferred objects proportional to priority and cap nr_deferred to twice of
cache items.

Signed-off-by: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com>
---
 mm/vmscan.c | 40 +++++-----------------------------------
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index 693a41e89969..58f4a383f0df 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -525,7 +525,6 @@ static unsigned long do_shrink_slab(struct shrink_control *shrinkctl,
 	 */
 	nr = count_nr_deferred(shrinker, shrinkctl);
 
-	total_scan = nr;
 	if (shrinker->seeks) {
 		delta = freeable >> priority;
 		delta *= 4;
@@ -539,37 +538,9 @@ static unsigned long do_shrink_slab(struct shrink_control *shrinkctl,
 		delta = freeable / 2;
 	}
 
+	total_scan = nr >> priority;
 	total_scan += delta;
-	if (total_scan < 0) {
-		pr_err("shrink_slab: %pS negative objects to delete nr=%ld\n",
-		       shrinker->scan_objects, total_scan);
-		total_scan = freeable;
-		next_deferred = nr;
-	} else
-		next_deferred = total_scan;
-
-	/*
-	 * We need to avoid excessive windup on filesystem shrinkers
-	 * due to large numbers of GFP_NOFS allocations causing the
-	 * shrinkers to return -1 all the time. This results in a large
-	 * nr being built up so when a shrink that can do some work
-	 * comes along it empties the entire cache due to nr >>>
-	 * freeable. This is bad for sustaining a working set in
-	 * memory.
-	 *
-	 * Hence only allow the shrinker to scan the entire cache when
-	 * a large delta change is calculated directly.
-	 */
-	if (delta < freeable / 4)
-		total_scan = min(total_scan, freeable / 2);
-
-	/*
-	 * Avoid risking looping forever due to too large nr value:
-	 * never try to free more than twice the estimate number of
-	 * freeable entries.
-	 */
-	if (total_scan > freeable * 2)
-		total_scan = freeable * 2;
+	total_scan = min(total_scan, (2 * freeable));
 
 	trace_mm_shrink_slab_start(shrinker, shrinkctl, nr,
 				   freeable, delta, total_scan, priority);
@@ -608,10 +579,9 @@ static unsigned long do_shrink_slab(struct shrink_control *shrinkctl,
 		cond_resched();
 	}
 
-	if (next_deferred >= scanned)
-		next_deferred -= scanned;
-	else
-		next_deferred = 0;
+	next_deferred = max_t(long, (nr - scanned), 0) + total_scan;
+	next_deferred = min(next_deferred, (2 * freeable));
+
 	/*
 	 * move the unused scan count back into the shrinker in a
 	 * manner that handles concurrent updates.
-- 
2.26.2


  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-12-14 22:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-12-14 22:37 [RFC v2 PATCH 0/9] Make shrinker's nr_deferred memcg aware Yang Shi
2020-12-14 22:37 ` [v2 PATCH 1/9] mm: vmscan: use nid from shrink_control for tracepoint Yang Shi
2020-12-14 22:37 ` [v2 PATCH 2/9] mm: memcontrol: use shrinker_rwsem to protect shrinker_maps allocation Yang Shi
2020-12-15  2:09   ` Dave Chinner
2020-12-15 13:53     ` Johannes Weiner
2020-12-15 21:59       ` Dave Chinner
2020-12-16 13:17         ` Kirill Tkhai
2020-12-16 19:12         ` Johannes Weiner
2020-12-16 21:56           ` Yang Shi
2020-12-16 21:56             ` Yang Shi
2020-12-16 19:39         ` Roman Gushchin
2020-12-15 14:07   ` Johannes Weiner
2020-12-15 20:32     ` Yang Shi
2020-12-15 20:32       ` Yang Shi
2020-12-14 22:37 ` [v2 PATCH 3/9] mm: vmscan: guarantee shrinker_slab_memcg() sees valid shrinker_maps for online memcg Yang Shi
2020-12-15  2:04   ` Dave Chinner
2020-12-15 12:38   ` Johannes Weiner
2020-12-15 12:58     ` Kirill Tkhai
2020-12-15 16:45       ` Johannes Weiner
2020-12-15 17:14   ` Johannes Weiner
2020-12-15 20:31     ` Yang Shi
2020-12-28 20:03       ` Yang Shi
2020-12-28 20:03         ` Yang Shi
2020-12-14 22:37 ` [v2 PATCH 4/9] mm: vmscan: use a new flag to indicate shrinker is registered Yang Shi
2020-12-14 22:37 ` [v2 PATCH 5/9] mm: memcontrol: add per memcg shrinker nr_deferred Yang Shi
2020-12-15  2:22   ` Dave Chinner
2020-12-15 14:45     ` Johannes Weiner
2020-12-15 21:57       ` Yang Shi
2020-12-15 21:57         ` Yang Shi
2020-12-14 22:37 ` [v2 PATCH 6/9] mm: vmscan: use per memcg nr_deferred of shrinker Yang Shi
2020-12-15  2:46   ` Dave Chinner
2020-12-15 22:27     ` Yang Shi
2020-12-15 22:27       ` Yang Shi
2020-12-15 23:48       ` Dave Chinner
2020-12-14 22:37 ` [v2 PATCH 7/9] mm: vmscan: don't need allocate shrinker->nr_deferred for memcg aware shrinkers Yang Shi
2020-12-15  3:05   ` Dave Chinner
2020-12-15 23:07     ` Yang Shi
2020-12-15 23:07       ` Yang Shi
2020-12-18  0:56       ` Yang Shi
2020-12-18  0:56         ` Yang Shi
2020-12-18  1:09         ` Dave Chinner
2020-12-14 22:37 ` [v2 PATCH 8/9] mm: memcontrol: reparent nr_deferred when memcg offline Yang Shi
2020-12-15  3:07   ` Dave Chinner
2020-12-15 23:10     ` Yang Shi
2020-12-15 23:10       ` Yang Shi
2020-12-14 22:37 ` Yang Shi [this message]
2020-12-15  3:23   ` [v2 PATCH 9/9] mm: vmscan: shrink deferred objects proportional to priority Dave Chinner
2020-12-15 23:59     ` Yang Shi
2020-12-15 23:59       ` Yang Shi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201214223722.232537-10-shy828301@gmail.com \
    --to=shy828301@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=guro@fb.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=ktkhai@virtuozzo.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=shakeelb@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.