From: Taehee Yoo <ap420073@gmail.com>
To: davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: ap420073@gmail.com, gnault@redhat.com
Subject: [PATCH net v2 1/2] bareudp: set NETIF_F_LLTX flag
Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2020 15:21:36 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201228152136.24215-1-ap420073@gmail.com> (raw)
Like other tunneling interfaces, the bareudp doesn't need TXLOCK.
So, It is good to set the NETIF_F_LLTX flag to improve performance and
to avoid lockdep's false-positive warning.
Test commands:
ip netns add A
ip netns add B
ip link add veth0 netns A type veth peer name veth1 netns B
ip netns exec A ip link set veth0 up
ip netns exec A ip a a 10.0.0.1/24 dev veth0
ip netns exec B ip link set veth1 up
ip netns exec B ip a a 10.0.0.2/24 dev veth1
for i in {2..1}
do
let A=$i-1
ip netns exec A ip link add bareudp$i type bareudp \
dstport $i ethertype ip
ip netns exec A ip link set bareudp$i up
ip netns exec A ip a a 10.0.$i.1/24 dev bareudp$i
ip netns exec A ip r a 10.0.$i.2 encap ip src 10.0.$A.1 \
dst 10.0.$A.2 via 10.0.$i.2 dev bareudp$i
ip netns exec B ip link add bareudp$i type bareudp \
dstport $i ethertype ip
ip netns exec B ip link set bareudp$i up
ip netns exec B ip a a 10.0.$i.2/24 dev bareudp$i
ip netns exec B ip r a 10.0.$i.1 encap ip src 10.0.$A.2 \
dst 10.0.$A.1 via 10.0.$i.1 dev bareudp$i
done
ip netns exec A ping 10.0.2.2
Splat looks like:
[ 96.992803][ T822] ============================================
[ 96.993954][ T822] WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
[ 96.995102][ T822] 5.10.0+ #819 Not tainted
[ 96.995927][ T822] --------------------------------------------
[ 96.997091][ T822] ping/822 is trying to acquire lock:
[ 96.998083][ T822] ffff88810f753898 (_xmit_NONE#2){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: __dev_queue_xmit+0x1f52/0x2960
[ 96.999813][ T822]
[ 96.999813][ T822] but task is already holding lock:
[ 97.001192][ T822] ffff88810c385498 (_xmit_NONE#2){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: __dev_queue_xmit+0x1f52/0x2960
[ 97.002908][ T822]
[ 97.002908][ T822] other info that might help us debug this:
[ 97.004401][ T822] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
[ 97.004401][ T822]
[ 97.005784][ T822] CPU0
[ 97.006407][ T822] ----
[ 97.007010][ T822] lock(_xmit_NONE#2);
[ 97.007779][ T822] lock(_xmit_NONE#2);
[ 97.008550][ T822]
[ 97.008550][ T822] *** DEADLOCK ***
[ 97.008550][ T822]
[ 97.010057][ T822] May be due to missing lock nesting notation
[ 97.010057][ T822]
[ 97.011594][ T822] 7 locks held by ping/822:
[ 97.012426][ T822] #0: ffff888109a144f0 (sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: raw_sendmsg+0x12f7/0x2b00
[ 97.014191][ T822] #1: ffffffffbce2f5a0 (rcu_read_lock_bh){....}-{1:2}, at: ip_finish_output2+0x249/0x2020
[ 97.016045][ T822] #2: ffffffffbce2f5a0 (rcu_read_lock_bh){....}-{1:2}, at: __dev_queue_xmit+0x1fd/0x2960
[ 97.017897][ T822] #3: ffff88810c385498 (_xmit_NONE#2){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: __dev_queue_xmit+0x1f52/0x2960
[ 97.019684][ T822] #4: ffffffffbce2f600 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: bareudp_xmit+0x31b/0x3690 [bareudp]
[ 97.021573][ T822] #5: ffffffffbce2f5a0 (rcu_read_lock_bh){....}-{1:2}, at: ip_finish_output2+0x249/0x2020
[ 97.023424][ T822] #6: ffffffffbce2f5a0 (rcu_read_lock_bh){....}-{1:2}, at: __dev_queue_xmit+0x1fd/0x2960
[ 97.025259][ T822]
[ 97.025259][ T822] stack backtrace:
[ 97.026349][ T822] CPU: 3 PID: 822 Comm: ping Not tainted 5.10.0+ #819
[ 97.027609][ T822] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.10.2-1ubuntu1 04/01/2014
[ 97.029407][ T822] Call Trace:
[ 97.030015][ T822] dump_stack+0x99/0xcb
[ 97.030783][ T822] __lock_acquire.cold.77+0x149/0x3a9
[ 97.031773][ T822] ? stack_trace_save+0x81/0xa0
[ 97.032661][ T822] ? register_lock_class+0x1910/0x1910
[ 97.033673][ T822] ? register_lock_class+0x1910/0x1910
[ 97.034679][ T822] ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x91/0xc0
[ 97.035697][ T822] ? rcu_read_lock_bh_held+0xa0/0xa0
[ 97.036690][ T822] lock_acquire+0x1b2/0x730
[ 97.037515][ T822] ? __dev_queue_xmit+0x1f52/0x2960
[ 97.038466][ T822] ? check_flags+0x50/0x50
[ 97.039277][ T822] ? netif_skb_features+0x296/0x9c0
[ 97.040226][ T822] ? validate_xmit_skb+0x29/0xb10
[ 97.041151][ T822] _raw_spin_lock+0x30/0x70
[ 97.041977][ T822] ? __dev_queue_xmit+0x1f52/0x2960
[ 97.042927][ T822] __dev_queue_xmit+0x1f52/0x2960
[ 97.043852][ T822] ? netdev_core_pick_tx+0x290/0x290
[ 97.044824][ T822] ? mark_held_locks+0xb7/0x120
[ 97.045712][ T822] ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0x12c/0x3e0
[ 97.046824][ T822] ? __local_bh_enable_ip+0xa5/0xf0
[ 97.047771][ T822] ? ___neigh_create+0x12a8/0x1eb0
[ 97.048710][ T822] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0x41/0x120
[ 97.049626][ T822] ? ___neigh_create+0x12a8/0x1eb0
[ 97.050556][ T822] ? __local_bh_enable_ip+0xa5/0xf0
[ 97.051509][ T822] ? ___neigh_create+0x12a8/0x1eb0
[ 97.052443][ T822] ? check_chain_key+0x244/0x5f0
[ 97.053352][ T822] ? rcu_read_lock_bh_held+0x56/0xa0
[ 97.054317][ T822] ? ip_finish_output2+0x6ea/0x2020
[ 97.055263][ T822] ? pneigh_lookup+0x410/0x410
[ 97.056135][ T822] ip_finish_output2+0x6ea/0x2020
[ ... ]
Acked-by: Guillaume Nault <gnault@redhat.com>
Fixes: 571912c69f0e ("net: UDP tunnel encapsulation module for tunnelling different protocols like MPLS, IP, NSH etc.")
Signed-off-by: Taehee Yoo <ap420073@gmail.com>
---
v1 -> v2:
- Change reproducer script
drivers/net/bareudp.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/drivers/net/bareudp.c b/drivers/net/bareudp.c
index 85ebd2b7e446..aea10196c222 100644
--- a/drivers/net/bareudp.c
+++ b/drivers/net/bareudp.c
@@ -534,6 +534,7 @@ static void bareudp_setup(struct net_device *dev)
SET_NETDEV_DEVTYPE(dev, &bareudp_type);
dev->features |= NETIF_F_SG | NETIF_F_HW_CSUM;
dev->features |= NETIF_F_RXCSUM;
+ dev->features |= NETIF_F_LLTX;
dev->features |= NETIF_F_GSO_SOFTWARE;
dev->hw_features |= NETIF_F_SG | NETIF_F_HW_CSUM | NETIF_F_RXCSUM;
dev->hw_features |= NETIF_F_GSO_SOFTWARE;
--
2.17.1
reply other threads:[~2020-12-28 15:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201228152136.24215-1-ap420073@gmail.com \
--to=ap420073@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=gnault@redhat.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.