From: trondmy@kernel.org
To: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/4] pNFS: We want return-on-close to complete when evicting the inode
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2021 10:26:18 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210105152620.754453-2-trondmy@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210105152620.754453-1-trondmy@kernel.org>
From: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
If the inode is being evicted, it should be safe to run return-on-close,
so we should do it to ensure we don't inadvertently leak layout segments.
Fixes: 1c5bd76d17cc ("pNFS: Enable layoutreturn operation for return-on-close")
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
---
fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c | 26 ++++++++++----------------
fs/nfs/pnfs.c | 8 +++-----
fs/nfs/pnfs.h | 6 ++----
3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
index 0ce04e0e5d82..bbca5c46e400 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
@@ -3536,10 +3536,8 @@ static void nfs4_close_done(struct rpc_task *task, void *data)
trace_nfs4_close(state, &calldata->arg, &calldata->res, task->tk_status);
/* Handle Layoutreturn errors */
- if (pnfs_roc_done(task, calldata->inode,
- &calldata->arg.lr_args,
- &calldata->res.lr_res,
- &calldata->res.lr_ret) == -EAGAIN)
+ if (pnfs_roc_done(task, &calldata->arg.lr_args, &calldata->res.lr_res,
+ &calldata->res.lr_ret) == -EAGAIN)
goto out_restart;
/* hmm. we are done with the inode, and in the process of freeing
@@ -6384,10 +6382,8 @@ static void nfs4_delegreturn_done(struct rpc_task *task, void *calldata)
trace_nfs4_delegreturn_exit(&data->args, &data->res, task->tk_status);
/* Handle Layoutreturn errors */
- if (pnfs_roc_done(task, data->inode,
- &data->args.lr_args,
- &data->res.lr_res,
- &data->res.lr_ret) == -EAGAIN)
+ if (pnfs_roc_done(task, &data->args.lr_args, &data->res.lr_res,
+ &data->res.lr_ret) == -EAGAIN)
goto out_restart;
switch (task->tk_status) {
@@ -6441,10 +6437,10 @@ static void nfs4_delegreturn_release(void *calldata)
struct nfs4_delegreturndata *data = calldata;
struct inode *inode = data->inode;
+ if (data->lr.roc)
+ pnfs_roc_release(&data->lr.arg, &data->lr.res,
+ data->res.lr_ret);
if (inode) {
- if (data->lr.roc)
- pnfs_roc_release(&data->lr.arg, &data->lr.res,
- data->res.lr_ret);
nfs_post_op_update_inode_force_wcc(inode, &data->fattr);
nfs_iput_and_deactive(inode);
}
@@ -6520,16 +6516,14 @@ static int _nfs4_proc_delegreturn(struct inode *inode, const struct cred *cred,
nfs_fattr_init(data->res.fattr);
data->timestamp = jiffies;
data->rpc_status = 0;
- data->lr.roc = pnfs_roc(inode, &data->lr.arg, &data->lr.res, cred);
data->inode = nfs_igrab_and_active(inode);
- if (data->inode) {
+ if (data->inode || issync) {
+ data->lr.roc = pnfs_roc(inode, &data->lr.arg, &data->lr.res,
+ cred);
if (data->lr.roc) {
data->args.lr_args = &data->lr.arg;
data->res.lr_res = &data->lr.res;
}
- } else if (data->lr.roc) {
- pnfs_roc_release(&data->lr.arg, &data->lr.res, 0);
- data->lr.roc = false;
}
task_setup_data.callback_data = data;
diff --git a/fs/nfs/pnfs.c b/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
index ccc89fab1802..a18b1992b2fb 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
@@ -1509,10 +1509,8 @@ bool pnfs_roc(struct inode *ino,
return false;
}
-int pnfs_roc_done(struct rpc_task *task, struct inode *inode,
- struct nfs4_layoutreturn_args **argpp,
- struct nfs4_layoutreturn_res **respp,
- int *ret)
+int pnfs_roc_done(struct rpc_task *task, struct nfs4_layoutreturn_args **argpp,
+ struct nfs4_layoutreturn_res **respp, int *ret)
{
struct nfs4_layoutreturn_args *arg = *argpp;
int retval = -EAGAIN;
@@ -1545,7 +1543,7 @@ int pnfs_roc_done(struct rpc_task *task, struct inode *inode,
return 0;
case -NFS4ERR_OLD_STATEID:
if (!nfs4_layout_refresh_old_stateid(&arg->stateid,
- &arg->range, inode))
+ &arg->range, arg->inode))
break;
*ret = -NFS4ERR_NOMATCHING_LAYOUT;
return -EAGAIN;
diff --git a/fs/nfs/pnfs.h b/fs/nfs/pnfs.h
index bbd3de1025f2..4d5ee568411d 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/pnfs.h
+++ b/fs/nfs/pnfs.h
@@ -297,10 +297,8 @@ bool pnfs_roc(struct inode *ino,
struct nfs4_layoutreturn_args *args,
struct nfs4_layoutreturn_res *res,
const struct cred *cred);
-int pnfs_roc_done(struct rpc_task *task, struct inode *inode,
- struct nfs4_layoutreturn_args **argpp,
- struct nfs4_layoutreturn_res **respp,
- int *ret);
+int pnfs_roc_done(struct rpc_task *task, struct nfs4_layoutreturn_args **argpp,
+ struct nfs4_layoutreturn_res **respp, int *ret);
void pnfs_roc_release(struct nfs4_layoutreturn_args *args,
struct nfs4_layoutreturn_res *res,
int ret);
--
2.29.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-05 15:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-05 15:26 [PATCH 1/4] pNFS: Mark layout for return if return-on-close was not sent trondmy
2021-01-05 15:26 ` trondmy [this message]
2021-01-05 15:26 ` [PATCH 3/4] pNFS: Clean up pnfs_layoutreturn_free_lsegs() trondmy
2021-01-05 15:26 ` [PATCH 4/4] pNFS: Stricter ordering of layoutget and layoutreturn trondmy
2021-01-06 15:25 ` [PATCH 2/4] pNFS: We want return-on-close to complete when evicting the inode Anna Schumaker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210105152620.754453-2-trondmy@kernel.org \
--to=trondmy@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.