From: Cristian Dumitrescu <cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com> To: intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, magnus.karlsson@intel.com, bjorn.topel@intel.com, maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com, edwin.verplanke@intel.com, cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com Subject: [PATCH net-next 3/4] i40e: remove the redundant buffer info updates Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2021 14:33:17 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20210114143318.2171-4-cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20210114143318.2171-1-cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com> For performace reasons, remove the redundant buffer info updates (*bi = NULL). The buffers ready to be cleaned can easily be tracked based on the ring next-to-clean variable, which is consistently updated. Signed-off-by: Cristian Dumitrescu <cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com> --- drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_xsk.c | 33 +++++++++------------- 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_xsk.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_xsk.c index 453ef30d9498..1167496a2e08 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_xsk.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_xsk.c @@ -280,7 +280,7 @@ int i40e_clean_rx_irq_zc(struct i40e_ring *rx_ring, int budget) while (likely(total_rx_packets < (unsigned int)budget)) { union i40e_rx_desc *rx_desc; - struct xdp_buff **bi; + struct xdp_buff *bi; unsigned int size; u64 qword; @@ -297,9 +297,8 @@ int i40e_clean_rx_irq_zc(struct i40e_ring *rx_ring, int budget) i40e_clean_programming_status(rx_ring, rx_desc->raw.qword[0], qword); - bi = i40e_rx_bi(rx_ring, next_to_clean); - xsk_buff_free(*bi); - *bi = NULL; + bi = *i40e_rx_bi(rx_ring, next_to_clean); + xsk_buff_free(bi); next_to_clean = (next_to_clean + 1) & count_mask; continue; } @@ -309,18 +308,17 @@ int i40e_clean_rx_irq_zc(struct i40e_ring *rx_ring, int budget) if (!size) break; - bi = i40e_rx_bi(rx_ring, next_to_clean); - (*bi)->data_end = (*bi)->data + size; - xsk_buff_dma_sync_for_cpu(*bi, rx_ring->xsk_pool); + bi = *i40e_rx_bi(rx_ring, next_to_clean); + bi->data_end = bi->data + size; + xsk_buff_dma_sync_for_cpu(bi, rx_ring->xsk_pool); - xdp_res = i40e_run_xdp_zc(rx_ring, *bi); + xdp_res = i40e_run_xdp_zc(rx_ring, bi); if (xdp_res) { if (xdp_res & (I40E_XDP_TX | I40E_XDP_REDIR)) xdp_xmit |= xdp_res; else - xsk_buff_free(*bi); + xsk_buff_free(bi); - *bi = NULL; total_rx_bytes += size; total_rx_packets++; @@ -335,8 +333,7 @@ int i40e_clean_rx_irq_zc(struct i40e_ring *rx_ring, int budget) * BIT(I40E_RXD_QW1_ERROR_SHIFT). This is due to that * SBP is *not* set in PRT_SBPVSI (default not set). */ - skb = i40e_construct_skb_zc(rx_ring, *bi); - *bi = NULL; + skb = i40e_construct_skb_zc(rx_ring, bi); if (!skb) { rx_ring->rx_stats.alloc_buff_failed++; break; @@ -594,16 +591,14 @@ int i40e_xsk_wakeup(struct net_device *dev, u32 queue_id, u32 flags) void i40e_xsk_clean_rx_ring(struct i40e_ring *rx_ring) { - u16 i; - - for (i = 0; i < rx_ring->count; i++) { - struct xdp_buff *rx_bi = *i40e_rx_bi(rx_ring, i); + u16 count_mask = rx_ring->count - 1; + u16 ntc = rx_ring->next_to_clean; + u16 ntu = rx_ring->next_to_use; - if (!rx_bi) - continue; + for ( ; ntc != ntu; ntc = (ntc + 1) & count_mask) { + struct xdp_buff *rx_bi = *i40e_rx_bi(rx_ring, ntc); xsk_buff_free(rx_bi); - rx_bi = NULL; } } -- 2.25.1
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Cristian Dumitrescu <cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com> To: intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next 3/4] i40e: remove the redundant buffer info updates Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2021 14:33:17 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20210114143318.2171-4-cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20210114143318.2171-1-cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com> For performace reasons, remove the redundant buffer info updates (*bi = NULL). The buffers ready to be cleaned can easily be tracked based on the ring next-to-clean variable, which is consistently updated. Signed-off-by: Cristian Dumitrescu <cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com> --- drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_xsk.c | 33 +++++++++------------- 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_xsk.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_xsk.c index 453ef30d9498..1167496a2e08 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_xsk.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_xsk.c @@ -280,7 +280,7 @@ int i40e_clean_rx_irq_zc(struct i40e_ring *rx_ring, int budget) while (likely(total_rx_packets < (unsigned int)budget)) { union i40e_rx_desc *rx_desc; - struct xdp_buff **bi; + struct xdp_buff *bi; unsigned int size; u64 qword; @@ -297,9 +297,8 @@ int i40e_clean_rx_irq_zc(struct i40e_ring *rx_ring, int budget) i40e_clean_programming_status(rx_ring, rx_desc->raw.qword[0], qword); - bi = i40e_rx_bi(rx_ring, next_to_clean); - xsk_buff_free(*bi); - *bi = NULL; + bi = *i40e_rx_bi(rx_ring, next_to_clean); + xsk_buff_free(bi); next_to_clean = (next_to_clean + 1) & count_mask; continue; } @@ -309,18 +308,17 @@ int i40e_clean_rx_irq_zc(struct i40e_ring *rx_ring, int budget) if (!size) break; - bi = i40e_rx_bi(rx_ring, next_to_clean); - (*bi)->data_end = (*bi)->data + size; - xsk_buff_dma_sync_for_cpu(*bi, rx_ring->xsk_pool); + bi = *i40e_rx_bi(rx_ring, next_to_clean); + bi->data_end = bi->data + size; + xsk_buff_dma_sync_for_cpu(bi, rx_ring->xsk_pool); - xdp_res = i40e_run_xdp_zc(rx_ring, *bi); + xdp_res = i40e_run_xdp_zc(rx_ring, bi); if (xdp_res) { if (xdp_res & (I40E_XDP_TX | I40E_XDP_REDIR)) xdp_xmit |= xdp_res; else - xsk_buff_free(*bi); + xsk_buff_free(bi); - *bi = NULL; total_rx_bytes += size; total_rx_packets++; @@ -335,8 +333,7 @@ int i40e_clean_rx_irq_zc(struct i40e_ring *rx_ring, int budget) * BIT(I40E_RXD_QW1_ERROR_SHIFT). This is due to that * SBP is *not* set in PRT_SBPVSI (default not set). */ - skb = i40e_construct_skb_zc(rx_ring, *bi); - *bi = NULL; + skb = i40e_construct_skb_zc(rx_ring, bi); if (!skb) { rx_ring->rx_stats.alloc_buff_failed++; break; @@ -594,16 +591,14 @@ int i40e_xsk_wakeup(struct net_device *dev, u32 queue_id, u32 flags) void i40e_xsk_clean_rx_ring(struct i40e_ring *rx_ring) { - u16 i; - - for (i = 0; i < rx_ring->count; i++) { - struct xdp_buff *rx_bi = *i40e_rx_bi(rx_ring, i); + u16 count_mask = rx_ring->count - 1; + u16 ntc = rx_ring->next_to_clean; + u16 ntu = rx_ring->next_to_use; - if (!rx_bi) - continue; + for ( ; ntc != ntu; ntc = (ntc + 1) & count_mask) { + struct xdp_buff *rx_bi = *i40e_rx_bi(rx_ring, ntc); xsk_buff_free(rx_bi); - rx_bi = NULL; } } -- 2.25.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-14 14:34 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2021-01-14 14:33 [PATCH net-next 0/4] i40e: small improvements on XDP path Cristian Dumitrescu 2021-01-14 14:33 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Cristian Dumitrescu 2021-01-14 14:33 ` [PATCH net-next 1/4] i40e: remove unnecessary memory writes of the next to clean pointer Cristian Dumitrescu 2021-01-14 14:33 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Cristian Dumitrescu 2021-01-14 14:33 ` [PATCH net-next 2/4] i40e: remove unnecessary cleaned_count updates Cristian Dumitrescu 2021-01-14 14:33 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Cristian Dumitrescu 2021-01-14 14:33 ` Cristian Dumitrescu [this message] 2021-01-14 14:33 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next 3/4] i40e: remove the redundant buffer info updates Cristian Dumitrescu 2021-01-14 14:33 ` [PATCH net-next 4/4] i40: consolidate handling of XDP program actions Cristian Dumitrescu 2021-01-14 14:33 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Cristian Dumitrescu 2021-01-14 22:59 ` [PATCH net-next 0/4] i40e: small improvements on XDP path Saeed Mahameed 2021-01-14 22:59 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Saeed Mahameed 2021-01-18 7:24 ` Magnus Karlsson 2021-01-18 7:31 ` Magnus Karlsson 2021-01-18 7:31 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Magnus Karlsson 2021-01-18 18:32 ` Jakub Kicinski 2021-01-18 18:32 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Jakub Kicinski 2021-05-07 22:11 ` Maciej Fijalkowski 2021-05-07 22:11 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Maciej Fijalkowski 2021-05-07 22:53 ` Nguyen, Anthony L 2021-05-07 22:53 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Nguyen, Anthony L
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20210114143318.2171-4-cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com \ --to=cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com \ --cc=bjorn.topel@intel.com \ --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=edwin.verplanke@intel.com \ --cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \ --cc=maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com \ --cc=magnus.karlsson@intel.com \ --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.