All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>,
	Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>,
	Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] drm/i915/gt: Close race between enable_breadcrumbs and cancel_breadcrumbs
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2021 16:20:57 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210119162057.31097-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> (raw)

If we enable_breadcrumbs for a request while that request is being
removed from HW; we may see that the request is active as we take the
ce->signal_lock and proceed to attach the request to ce->signals.
However, during unsubmission after marking the request as inactive, we
see that the request has not yet been added to ce->signals and so skip
the removal. Pull the check during cancel_breadcrumbs under the same
spinlock as enabling so that we the two tests are consistent in
enable/cancel.

Otherwise, we may insert a request onto ce->signal that we expect should
not be there:

  intel_context_remove_breadcrumbs:488 GEM_BUG_ON(!__i915_request_is_complete(rq))

While updating, we can note that we are always called with
irqs-disabled, due to the engine->active.lock being held at the single
caller, and so remove the irqsave/restore.

Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/2931
Fixes: c18636f76344 ("drm/i915: Remove requirement for holding i915_request.lock for breadcrumbs")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v5.10+
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_breadcrumbs.c | 9 +++++----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_breadcrumbs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_breadcrumbs.c
index d098fc0c14ec..34a645d6babd 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_breadcrumbs.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_breadcrumbs.c
@@ -453,16 +453,17 @@ void i915_request_cancel_breadcrumb(struct i915_request *rq)
 {
 	struct intel_breadcrumbs *b = READ_ONCE(rq->engine)->breadcrumbs;
 	struct intel_context *ce = rq->context;
-	unsigned long flags;
 	bool release;
 
-	if (!test_and_clear_bit(I915_FENCE_FLAG_SIGNAL, &rq->fence.flags))
+	spin_lock(&ce->signal_lock);
+	if (!test_and_clear_bit(I915_FENCE_FLAG_SIGNAL, &rq->fence.flags)) {
+		spin_unlock(&ce->signal_lock);
 		return;
+	}
 
-	spin_lock_irqsave(&ce->signal_lock, flags);
 	list_del_rcu(&rq->signal_link);
 	release = remove_signaling_context(b, ce);
-	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ce->signal_lock, flags);
+	spin_unlock(&ce->signal_lock);
 	if (release)
 		intel_context_put(ce);
 
-- 
2.20.1


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/gt: Close race between enable_breadcrumbs and cancel_breadcrumbs
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2021 16:20:57 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210119162057.31097-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> (raw)

If we enable_breadcrumbs for a request while that request is being
removed from HW; we may see that the request is active as we take the
ce->signal_lock and proceed to attach the request to ce->signals.
However, during unsubmission after marking the request as inactive, we
see that the request has not yet been added to ce->signals and so skip
the removal. Pull the check during cancel_breadcrumbs under the same
spinlock as enabling so that we the two tests are consistent in
enable/cancel.

Otherwise, we may insert a request onto ce->signal that we expect should
not be there:

  intel_context_remove_breadcrumbs:488 GEM_BUG_ON(!__i915_request_is_complete(rq))

While updating, we can note that we are always called with
irqs-disabled, due to the engine->active.lock being held at the single
caller, and so remove the irqsave/restore.

Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/2931
Fixes: c18636f76344 ("drm/i915: Remove requirement for holding i915_request.lock for breadcrumbs")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v5.10+
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_breadcrumbs.c | 9 +++++----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_breadcrumbs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_breadcrumbs.c
index d098fc0c14ec..34a645d6babd 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_breadcrumbs.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_breadcrumbs.c
@@ -453,16 +453,17 @@ void i915_request_cancel_breadcrumb(struct i915_request *rq)
 {
 	struct intel_breadcrumbs *b = READ_ONCE(rq->engine)->breadcrumbs;
 	struct intel_context *ce = rq->context;
-	unsigned long flags;
 	bool release;
 
-	if (!test_and_clear_bit(I915_FENCE_FLAG_SIGNAL, &rq->fence.flags))
+	spin_lock(&ce->signal_lock);
+	if (!test_and_clear_bit(I915_FENCE_FLAG_SIGNAL, &rq->fence.flags)) {
+		spin_unlock(&ce->signal_lock);
 		return;
+	}
 
-	spin_lock_irqsave(&ce->signal_lock, flags);
 	list_del_rcu(&rq->signal_link);
 	release = remove_signaling_context(b, ce);
-	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ce->signal_lock, flags);
+	spin_unlock(&ce->signal_lock);
 	if (release)
 		intel_context_put(ce);
 
-- 
2.20.1

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

             reply	other threads:[~2021-01-19 18:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-01-19 16:20 Chris Wilson [this message]
2021-01-19 16:20 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/gt: Close race between enable_breadcrumbs and cancel_breadcrumbs Chris Wilson
2021-01-19 20:42 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for " Patchwork
2021-01-19 21:11 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2021-01-20  0:18 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2021-01-20  8:24 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-01-20  8:24   ` Tvrtko Ursulin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210119162057.31097-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
    --to=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
    --cc=andi.shyti@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.