All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 17/57] drm/i915: Extract request suspension from the execlists
Date: Mon,  1 Feb 2021 08:56:35 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210201085715.27435-17-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210201085715.27435-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>

Make the ability to suspend and resume a request and its dependents
generic.

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
---
 .../drm/i915/gt/intel_execlists_submission.c  | 167 +-----------------
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_execlists.c  |   8 +-
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler.c         | 153 ++++++++++++++++
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler.h         |  10 ++
 4 files changed, 169 insertions(+), 169 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_execlists_submission.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_execlists_submission.c
index b6dea80da533..853021314786 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_execlists_submission.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_execlists_submission.c
@@ -1921,169 +1921,6 @@ static void post_process_csb(struct i915_request **port,
 		execlists_schedule_out(*port++);
 }
 
-static void __execlists_hold(struct i915_request *rq)
-{
-	LIST_HEAD(list);
-
-	do {
-		struct i915_dependency *p;
-
-		if (i915_request_is_active(rq))
-			__i915_request_unsubmit(rq);
-
-		clear_bit(I915_FENCE_FLAG_PQUEUE, &rq->fence.flags);
-		list_move_tail(&rq->sched.link, &rq->engine->active.hold);
-		i915_request_set_hold(rq);
-		RQ_TRACE(rq, "on hold\n");
-
-		for_each_waiter(p, rq) {
-			struct i915_request *w =
-				container_of(p->waiter, typeof(*w), sched);
-
-			if (p->flags & I915_DEPENDENCY_WEAK)
-				continue;
-
-			/* Leave semaphores spinning on the other engines */
-			if (w->engine != rq->engine)
-				continue;
-
-			if (!i915_request_is_ready(w))
-				continue;
-
-			if (__i915_request_is_complete(w))
-				continue;
-
-			if (i915_request_on_hold(w))
-				continue;
-
-			list_move_tail(&w->sched.link, &list);
-		}
-
-		rq = list_first_entry_or_null(&list, typeof(*rq), sched.link);
-	} while (rq);
-}
-
-static bool execlists_hold(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
-			   struct i915_request *rq)
-{
-	if (i915_request_on_hold(rq))
-		return false;
-
-	spin_lock_irq(&engine->active.lock);
-
-	if (__i915_request_is_complete(rq)) { /* too late! */
-		rq = NULL;
-		goto unlock;
-	}
-
-	/*
-	 * Transfer this request onto the hold queue to prevent it
-	 * being resumbitted to HW (and potentially completed) before we have
-	 * released it. Since we may have already submitted following
-	 * requests, we need to remove those as well.
-	 */
-	GEM_BUG_ON(i915_request_on_hold(rq));
-	GEM_BUG_ON(rq->engine != engine);
-	__execlists_hold(rq);
-	GEM_BUG_ON(list_empty(&engine->active.hold));
-
-unlock:
-	spin_unlock_irq(&engine->active.lock);
-	return rq;
-}
-
-static bool hold_request(const struct i915_request *rq)
-{
-	struct i915_dependency *p;
-	bool result = false;
-
-	/*
-	 * If one of our ancestors is on hold, we must also be on hold,
-	 * otherwise we will bypass it and execute before it.
-	 */
-	rcu_read_lock();
-	for_each_signaler(p, rq) {
-		const struct i915_request *s =
-			container_of(p->signaler, typeof(*s), sched);
-
-		if (s->engine != rq->engine)
-			continue;
-
-		result = i915_request_on_hold(s);
-		if (result)
-			break;
-	}
-	rcu_read_unlock();
-
-	return result;
-}
-
-static void __execlists_unhold(struct i915_request *rq)
-{
-	LIST_HEAD(list);
-
-	do {
-		struct i915_dependency *p;
-
-		RQ_TRACE(rq, "hold release\n");
-
-		GEM_BUG_ON(!i915_request_on_hold(rq));
-		GEM_BUG_ON(!i915_sw_fence_signaled(&rq->submit));
-
-		i915_request_clear_hold(rq);
-		list_move_tail(&rq->sched.link,
-			       i915_sched_lookup_priolist(rq->engine,
-							  rq_prio(rq)));
-		set_bit(I915_FENCE_FLAG_PQUEUE, &rq->fence.flags);
-
-		/* Also release any children on this engine that are ready */
-		for_each_waiter(p, rq) {
-			struct i915_request *w =
-				container_of(p->waiter, typeof(*w), sched);
-
-			if (p->flags & I915_DEPENDENCY_WEAK)
-				continue;
-
-			/* Propagate any change in error status */
-			if (rq->fence.error)
-				i915_request_set_error_once(w, rq->fence.error);
-
-			if (w->engine != rq->engine)
-				continue;
-
-			if (!i915_request_on_hold(w))
-				continue;
-
-			/* Check that no other parents are also on hold */
-			if (hold_request(w))
-				continue;
-
-			list_move_tail(&w->sched.link, &list);
-		}
-
-		rq = list_first_entry_or_null(&list, typeof(*rq), sched.link);
-	} while (rq);
-}
-
-static void execlists_unhold(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
-			     struct i915_request *rq)
-{
-	spin_lock_irq(&engine->active.lock);
-
-	/*
-	 * Move this request back to the priority queue, and all of its
-	 * children and grandchildren that were suspended along with it.
-	 */
-	__execlists_unhold(rq);
-
-	if (rq_prio(rq) > engine->execlists.queue_priority_hint) {
-		engine->execlists.queue_priority_hint = rq_prio(rq);
-		tasklet_hi_schedule(&engine->execlists.tasklet);
-	}
-
-	spin_unlock_irq(&engine->active.lock);
-}
-
 struct execlists_capture {
 	struct work_struct work;
 	struct i915_request *rq;
@@ -2116,7 +1953,7 @@ static void execlists_capture_work(struct work_struct *work)
 	i915_gpu_coredump_put(cap->error);
 
 	/* Return this request and all that depend upon it for signaling */
-	execlists_unhold(engine, cap->rq);
+	i915_sched_resume_request(engine, cap->rq);
 	i915_request_put(cap->rq);
 
 	kfree(cap);
@@ -2250,7 +2087,7 @@ static void execlists_capture(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
 	 * simply hold that request accountable for being non-preemptible
 	 * long enough to force the reset.
 	 */
-	if (!execlists_hold(engine, cap->rq))
+	if (!i915_sched_suspend_request(engine, cap->rq))
 		goto err_rq;
 
 	INIT_WORK(&cap->work, execlists_capture_work);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_execlists.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_execlists.c
index 73340a96548f..64f6a49a5c22 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_execlists.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_execlists.c
@@ -608,7 +608,7 @@ static int live_hold_reset(void *arg)
 		GEM_BUG_ON(execlists_active(&engine->execlists) != rq);
 
 		i915_request_get(rq);
-		execlists_hold(engine, rq);
+		i915_sched_suspend_request(engine, rq);
 		GEM_BUG_ON(!i915_request_on_hold(rq));
 
 		__intel_engine_reset_bh(engine, NULL);
@@ -630,7 +630,7 @@ static int live_hold_reset(void *arg)
 		GEM_BUG_ON(!i915_request_on_hold(rq));
 
 		/* But is resubmitted on release */
-		execlists_unhold(engine, rq);
+		i915_sched_resume_request(engine, rq);
 		if (i915_request_wait(rq, 0, HZ / 5) < 0) {
 			pr_err("%s: held request did not complete!\n",
 			       engine->name);
@@ -4606,7 +4606,7 @@ static int reset_virtual_engine(struct intel_gt *gt,
 	GEM_BUG_ON(rq->engine != engine);
 
 	/* Reset the engine while keeping our active request on hold */
-	execlists_hold(engine, rq);
+	i915_sched_suspend_request(engine, rq);
 	GEM_BUG_ON(!i915_request_on_hold(rq));
 
 	__intel_engine_reset_bh(engine, NULL);
@@ -4629,7 +4629,7 @@ static int reset_virtual_engine(struct intel_gt *gt,
 	GEM_BUG_ON(!i915_request_on_hold(rq));
 
 	/* But is resubmitted on release */
-	execlists_unhold(engine, rq);
+	i915_sched_resume_request(engine, rq);
 	if (i915_request_wait(rq, 0, HZ / 5) < 0) {
 		pr_err("%s: held request did not complete!\n",
 		       engine->name);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler.c
index 9fcfbf303ce0..351c0c0055b5 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler.c
@@ -586,6 +586,159 @@ __i915_sched_rewind_requests(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
 	return active;
 }
 
+bool __i915_sched_suspend_request(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
+				  struct i915_request *rq)
+{
+	LIST_HEAD(list);
+
+	lockdep_assert_held(&engine->active.lock);
+	GEM_BUG_ON(rq->engine != engine);
+
+	if (__i915_request_is_complete(rq)) /* too late! */
+		return false;
+
+	if (i915_request_on_hold(rq))
+		return false;
+
+	ENGINE_TRACE(engine, "suspending request %llx:%lld\n",
+		     rq->fence.context, rq->fence.seqno);
+
+	/*
+	 * Transfer this request onto the hold queue to prevent it
+	 * being resumbitted to HW (and potentially completed) before we have
+	 * released it. Since we may have already submitted following
+	 * requests, we need to remove those as well.
+	 */
+	do {
+		struct i915_dependency *p;
+
+		if (i915_request_is_active(rq))
+			__i915_request_unsubmit(rq);
+
+		list_move_tail(&rq->sched.link, &engine->active.hold);
+		clear_bit(I915_FENCE_FLAG_PQUEUE, &rq->fence.flags);
+		i915_request_set_hold(rq);
+		RQ_TRACE(rq, "on hold\n");
+
+		for_each_waiter(p, rq) {
+			struct i915_request *w =
+				container_of(p->waiter, typeof(*w), sched);
+
+			if (p->flags & I915_DEPENDENCY_WEAK)
+				continue;
+
+			/* Leave semaphores spinning on the other engines */
+			if (w->engine != engine)
+				continue;
+
+			if (!i915_request_is_ready(w))
+				continue;
+
+			if (__i915_request_is_complete(w))
+				continue;
+
+			if (i915_request_on_hold(w)) /* acts as a visited bit */
+				continue;
+
+			list_move_tail(&w->sched.link, &list);
+		}
+
+		rq = list_first_entry_or_null(&list, typeof(*rq), sched.link);
+	} while (rq);
+
+	GEM_BUG_ON(list_empty(&engine->active.hold));
+
+	return true;
+}
+
+bool i915_sched_suspend_request(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
+				struct i915_request *rq)
+{
+	bool result;
+
+	if (i915_request_on_hold(rq))
+		return false;
+
+	spin_lock_irq(&engine->active.lock);
+	result = __i915_sched_suspend_request(engine, rq);
+	spin_unlock_irq(&engine->active.lock);
+
+	return result;
+}
+
+void __i915_sched_resume_request(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
+				 struct i915_request *rq)
+{
+	LIST_HEAD(list);
+
+	lockdep_assert_held(&engine->active.lock);
+
+	if (rq_prio(rq) > engine->execlists.queue_priority_hint) {
+		engine->execlists.queue_priority_hint = rq_prio(rq);
+		tasklet_hi_schedule(&engine->execlists.tasklet);
+	}
+
+	if (!i915_request_on_hold(rq))
+		return;
+
+	ENGINE_TRACE(engine, "resuming request %llx:%lld\n",
+		     rq->fence.context, rq->fence.seqno);
+
+	/*
+	 * Move this request back to the priority queue, and all of its
+	 * children and grandchildren that were suspended along with it.
+	 */
+	do {
+		struct i915_dependency *p;
+
+		RQ_TRACE(rq, "hold release\n");
+
+		GEM_BUG_ON(!i915_request_on_hold(rq));
+		GEM_BUG_ON(!i915_sw_fence_signaled(&rq->submit));
+
+		i915_request_clear_hold(rq);
+		list_del_init(&rq->sched.link);
+
+		queue_request(engine, rq);
+
+		/* Also release any children on this engine that are ready */
+		for_each_waiter(p, rq) {
+			struct i915_request *w =
+				container_of(p->waiter, typeof(*w), sched);
+
+			if (p->flags & I915_DEPENDENCY_WEAK)
+				continue;
+
+			/* Propagate any change in error status */
+			if (rq->fence.error)
+				i915_request_set_error_once(w, rq->fence.error);
+
+			if (w->engine != engine)
+				continue;
+
+			/* We also treat the on-hold status as a visited bit */
+			if (!i915_request_on_hold(w))
+				continue;
+
+			/* Check that no other parents are also on hold [BFS] */
+			if (hold_request(w))
+				continue;
+
+			list_move_tail(&w->sched.link, &list);
+		}
+
+		rq = list_first_entry_or_null(&list, typeof(*rq), sched.link);
+	} while (rq);
+}
+
+void i915_sched_resume_request(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
+			       struct i915_request *rq)
+{
+	spin_lock_irq(&engine->active.lock);
+	__i915_sched_resume_request(engine, rq);
+	spin_unlock_irq(&engine->active.lock);
+}
+
 void i915_sched_node_init(struct i915_sched_node *node)
 {
 	spin_lock_init(&node->lock);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler.h
index d3984f65b3a6..9860459fedb1 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler.h
@@ -45,6 +45,16 @@ void i915_request_enqueue(struct i915_request *request);
 struct i915_request *
 __i915_sched_rewind_requests(struct intel_engine_cs *engine);
 
+bool __i915_sched_suspend_request(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
+				  struct i915_request *rq);
+void __i915_sched_resume_request(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
+				 struct i915_request *request);
+
+bool i915_sched_suspend_request(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
+				struct i915_request *request);
+void i915_sched_resume_request(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
+			       struct i915_request *rq);
+
 struct list_head *
 i915_sched_lookup_priolist(struct intel_engine_cs *engine, int prio);
 
-- 
2.20.1

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-02-01  8:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 103+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-02-01  8:56 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/57] drm/i915/gt: Restrict the GT clock override to just Icelake Chris Wilson
2021-02-01  8:56 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 02/57] drm/i915/selftests: Exercise relative mmio paths to non-privileged registers Chris Wilson
2021-02-01 14:34   ` Mika Kuoppala
2021-02-01  8:56 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 03/57] drm/i915/selftests: Exercise cross-process context isolation Chris Wilson
2021-02-01 16:37   ` Mika Kuoppala
2021-02-01  8:56 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/57] drm/i915: Protect against request freeing during cancellation on wedging Chris Wilson
2021-02-02  9:55   ` Mika Kuoppala
2021-02-01  8:56 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 05/57] drm/i915: Take rcu_read_lock for querying fence's driver/timeline names Chris Wilson
2021-02-02 18:33   ` Mika Kuoppala
2021-02-01  8:56 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/57] drm/i915/gt: Always flush the submission queue on checking for idle Chris Wilson
2021-02-01  8:56 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 07/57] drm/i915/gt: Move engine setup out of set_default_submission Chris Wilson
2021-02-02 11:57   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-02-01  8:56 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 08/57] drm/i915/gt: Move submission_method into intel_gt Chris Wilson
2021-02-02 12:03   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-02-02 12:18     ` Chris Wilson
2021-02-01  8:56 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 09/57] drm/i915: Replace engine->schedule() with a known request operation Chris Wilson
2021-02-01  8:56 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 10/57] drm/i915: Restructure priority inheritance Chris Wilson
2021-02-01  8:56 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 11/57] drm/i915/selftests: Measure set-priority duration Chris Wilson
2021-02-01  8:56 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 12/57] drm/i915/selftests: Exercise priority inheritance around an engine loop Chris Wilson
2021-02-01  8:56 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 13/57] drm/i915/selftests: Force a rewind if at first we don't succeed Chris Wilson
2021-02-01  8:56 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 14/57] drm/i915: Improve DFS for priority inheritance Chris Wilson
2021-02-01  8:56 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 15/57] drm/i915: Extract request submission from execlists Chris Wilson
2021-02-01  8:56 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 16/57] drm/i915: Extract request rewinding " Chris Wilson
2021-02-02 13:08   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-02-01  8:56 ` Chris Wilson [this message]
2021-02-02 13:15   ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 17/57] drm/i915: Extract request suspension from the execlists Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-02-02 13:26     ` Chris Wilson
2021-02-02 13:32       ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-02-02 13:27     ` Chris Wilson
2021-02-01  8:56 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 18/57] drm/i915: Extract the ability to defer and rerun a request later Chris Wilson
2021-02-02 13:18   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-02-01  8:56 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 19/57] drm/i915: Fix the iterative dfs for defering requests Chris Wilson
2021-02-02 14:10   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-02-01  8:56 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 20/57] drm/i915: Wrap access to intel_engine.active Chris Wilson
2021-02-04 11:07   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-02-04 11:18     ` Chris Wilson
2021-02-04 11:56       ` Chris Wilson
2021-02-04 12:08         ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-02-01  8:56 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 21/57] drm/i915: Move common active lists from engine to i915_scheduler Chris Wilson
2021-02-04 11:12   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-02-01  8:56 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 22/57] drm/i915: Move scheduler queue Chris Wilson
2021-02-04 11:19   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-02-04 11:32     ` Chris Wilson
2021-02-04 11:40     ` Chris Wilson
2021-02-01  8:56 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 23/57] drm/i915: Move tasklet from execlists to sched Chris Wilson
2021-02-04 14:06   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-02-01  8:56 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 24/57] drm/i915/gt: Only kick the scheduler on timeslice/preemption change Chris Wilson
2021-02-04 14:09   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-02-04 14:43     ` Chris Wilson
2021-02-01  8:56 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 25/57] drm/i915: Move submit_request to i915_sched_engine Chris Wilson
2021-02-04 14:13   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-02-04 14:45     ` Chris Wilson
2021-02-01  8:56 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 26/57] drm/i915: Move finding the current active request to the scheduler Chris Wilson
2021-02-04 14:30   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-02-04 14:59     ` Chris Wilson
2021-02-01  8:56 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 27/57] drm/i915: Show execlists queues when dumping state Chris Wilson
2021-02-04 15:04   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-02-01  8:56 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 28/57] drm/i915: Wrap i915_request_use_semaphores() Chris Wilson
2021-02-04 15:05   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-02-01  8:56 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 29/57] drm/i915: Move scheduler flags Chris Wilson
2021-02-04 15:14   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-02-04 16:05     ` Chris Wilson
2021-02-01  8:56 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 30/57] drm/i915: Move timeslicing flag to scheduler Chris Wilson
2021-02-04 15:18   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-02-04 16:11     ` Chris Wilson
2021-02-05  9:48       ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-02-01  8:56 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 31/57] drm/i915/gt: Declare when we enabled timeslicing Chris Wilson
2021-02-04 15:26   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-02-01  8:56 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 32/57] drm/i915: Move needs-breadcrumb flags to scheduler Chris Wilson
2021-02-04 15:28   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-02-04 16:12     ` Chris Wilson
2021-02-01  8:56 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 33/57] drm/i915: Move busywaiting control to the scheduler Chris Wilson
2021-02-04 15:32   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-02-01  8:56 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 34/57] drm/i915: Move preempt-reset flag " Chris Wilson
2021-02-04 15:34   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-02-01  8:56 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 35/57] drm/i915: Replace priolist rbtree with a skiplist Chris Wilson
2021-02-01  8:56 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 36/57] drm/i915: Wrap cmpxchg64 with try_cmpxchg64() helper Chris Wilson
2021-02-01  8:56 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 37/57] drm/i915: Fair low-latency scheduling Chris Wilson
2021-02-01  8:56 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 38/57] drm/i915/gt: Specify a deadline for the heartbeat Chris Wilson
2021-02-01  8:56 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 39/57] drm/i915: Extend the priority boosting for the display with a deadline Chris Wilson
2021-02-01  8:56 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 40/57] drm/i915/gt: Support virtual engine queues Chris Wilson
2021-02-01  8:56 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 41/57] drm/i915: Move saturated workload detection back to the context Chris Wilson
2021-02-01  8:57 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 42/57] drm/i915: Bump default timeslicing quantum to 5ms Chris Wilson
2021-02-01  8:57 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 43/57] drm/i915/gt: Delay taking irqoff for execlists submission Chris Wilson
2021-02-01  8:57 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 44/57] drm/i915/gt: Wrap intel_timeline.has_initial_breadcrumb Chris Wilson
2021-02-01  8:57 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 45/57] drm/i915/gt: Track timeline GGTT offset separately from subpage offset Chris Wilson
2021-02-01  8:57 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 46/57] drm/i915/gt: Add timeline "mode" Chris Wilson
2021-02-01  8:57 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 47/57] drm/i915/gt: Use indices for writing into relative timelines Chris Wilson
2021-02-01  8:57 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 48/57] drm/i915/selftests: Exercise relative timeline modes Chris Wilson
2021-02-01  8:57 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 49/57] drm/i915/gt: Use ppHWSP for unshared non-semaphore related timelines Chris Wilson
2021-02-01  8:57 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 50/57] Restore "drm/i915: drop engine_pin/unpin_breadcrumbs_irq" Chris Wilson
2021-02-01  8:57 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 51/57] drm/i915/gt: Couple tasklet scheduling for all CS interrupts Chris Wilson
2021-02-01  8:57 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 52/57] drm/i915/gt: Support creation of 'internal' rings Chris Wilson
2021-02-01  8:57 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 53/57] drm/i915/gt: Use client timeline address for seqno writes Chris Wilson
2021-02-01  8:57 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 54/57] drm/i915/gt: Infrastructure for ring scheduling Chris Wilson
2021-02-01  8:57 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 55/57] drm/i915/gt: Implement ring scheduler for gen4-7 Chris Wilson
2021-02-01  8:57 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 56/57] drm/i915/gt: Enable ring scheduling for gen5-7 Chris Wilson
2021-02-01  8:57 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 57/57] drm/i915: Support secure dispatch on gen6/gen7 Chris Wilson
2021-02-01 14:13 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for series starting with [01/57] drm/i915/gt: Restrict the GT clock override to just Icelake Patchwork
2021-02-01 14:15 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2021-02-01 14:15 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/57] " Mika Kuoppala
2021-02-01 14:41 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for series starting with [01/57] " Patchwork
2021-02-01 19:33 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210201085715.27435-17-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
    --to=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.