All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
	Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>,
	Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] drm/vblank: Do not store a new vblank timestamp in drm_vblank_restore()
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2021 18:03:05 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210218160305.16711-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210204020400.29628-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>

From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>

drm_vblank_restore() exists because certain power saving states
can clobber the hardware frame counter. The way it does this is
by guesstimating how many frames were missed purely based on
the difference between the last stored timestamp vs. a newly
sampled timestamp.

If we should call this function before a full frame has
elapsed since we sampled the last timestamp we would end up
with a possibly slightly different timestamp value for the
same frame. Currently we will happily overwrite the already
stored timestamp for the frame with the new value. This
could cause userspace to observe two different timestamps
for the same frame (and the timestamp could even go
backwards depending on how much error we introduce when
correcting the timestamp based on the scanout position).

To avoid that let's not update the stored timestamp at all,
and instead we just fix up the last recorded hw vblank counter
value such that the already stored timestamp/seq number will
match. Thus the next time a vblank irq happens it will calculate
the correct diff between the current and stored hw vblank counter
values.

Sidenote: Another possible idea that came to mind would be to
do this correction only if the power really was removed since
the last time we sampled the hw frame counter. But to do that
we would need a robust way to detect when it has occurred. Some
possibilities could involve some kind of hardare power well
transition counter, or potentially we could store a magic value
in a scratch register that lives in the same power well. But
I'm not sure either of those exist, so would need an actual
investigation to find out. All of that is very hardware specific
of course, so would have to be done in the driver code.

Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/drm_vblank.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_vblank.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_vblank.c
index 2bd989688eae..3417e1ac7918 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_vblank.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_vblank.c
@@ -1478,6 +1478,7 @@ static void drm_vblank_restore(struct drm_device *dev, unsigned int pipe)
 	u64 diff_ns;
 	u32 cur_vblank, diff = 1;
 	int count = DRM_TIMESTAMP_MAXRETRIES;
+	u32 max_vblank_count = drm_max_vblank_count(dev, pipe);
 
 	if (drm_WARN_ON(dev, pipe >= dev->num_crtcs))
 		return;
@@ -1504,7 +1505,7 @@ static void drm_vblank_restore(struct drm_device *dev, unsigned int pipe)
 	drm_dbg_vbl(dev,
 		    "missed %d vblanks in %lld ns, frame duration=%d ns, hw_diff=%d\n",
 		    diff, diff_ns, framedur_ns, cur_vblank - vblank->last);
-	store_vblank(dev, pipe, diff, t_vblank, cur_vblank);
+	vblank->last = (cur_vblank - diff) & max_vblank_count;
 }
 
 /**
-- 
2.26.2

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
	Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] drm/vblank: Do not store a new vblank timestamp in drm_vblank_restore()
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2021 18:03:05 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210218160305.16711-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210204020400.29628-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>

From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>

drm_vblank_restore() exists because certain power saving states
can clobber the hardware frame counter. The way it does this is
by guesstimating how many frames were missed purely based on
the difference between the last stored timestamp vs. a newly
sampled timestamp.

If we should call this function before a full frame has
elapsed since we sampled the last timestamp we would end up
with a possibly slightly different timestamp value for the
same frame. Currently we will happily overwrite the already
stored timestamp for the frame with the new value. This
could cause userspace to observe two different timestamps
for the same frame (and the timestamp could even go
backwards depending on how much error we introduce when
correcting the timestamp based on the scanout position).

To avoid that let's not update the stored timestamp at all,
and instead we just fix up the last recorded hw vblank counter
value such that the already stored timestamp/seq number will
match. Thus the next time a vblank irq happens it will calculate
the correct diff between the current and stored hw vblank counter
values.

Sidenote: Another possible idea that came to mind would be to
do this correction only if the power really was removed since
the last time we sampled the hw frame counter. But to do that
we would need a robust way to detect when it has occurred. Some
possibilities could involve some kind of hardare power well
transition counter, or potentially we could store a magic value
in a scratch register that lives in the same power well. But
I'm not sure either of those exist, so would need an actual
investigation to find out. All of that is very hardware specific
of course, so would have to be done in the driver code.

Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/drm_vblank.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_vblank.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_vblank.c
index 2bd989688eae..3417e1ac7918 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_vblank.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_vblank.c
@@ -1478,6 +1478,7 @@ static void drm_vblank_restore(struct drm_device *dev, unsigned int pipe)
 	u64 diff_ns;
 	u32 cur_vblank, diff = 1;
 	int count = DRM_TIMESTAMP_MAXRETRIES;
+	u32 max_vblank_count = drm_max_vblank_count(dev, pipe);
 
 	if (drm_WARN_ON(dev, pipe >= dev->num_crtcs))
 		return;
@@ -1504,7 +1505,7 @@ static void drm_vblank_restore(struct drm_device *dev, unsigned int pipe)
 	drm_dbg_vbl(dev,
 		    "missed %d vblanks in %lld ns, frame duration=%d ns, hw_diff=%d\n",
 		    diff, diff_ns, framedur_ns, cur_vblank - vblank->last);
-	store_vblank(dev, pipe, diff, t_vblank, cur_vblank);
+	vblank->last = (cur_vblank - diff) & max_vblank_count;
 }
 
 /**
-- 
2.26.2

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-02-18 16:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-02-04  2:04 [PATCH] drm/vblank: Avoid storing a timestamp for the same frame twice Ville Syrjala
2021-02-04  2:04 ` [Intel-gfx] " Ville Syrjala
2021-02-04  3:12 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
2021-02-04  5:44 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2021-02-04 15:32 ` [PATCH] " Daniel Vetter
2021-02-04 15:32   ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2021-02-04 15:55   ` Ville Syrjälä
2021-02-04 15:55     ` [Intel-gfx] " Ville Syrjälä
2021-02-05 15:46     ` Daniel Vetter
2021-02-05 15:46       ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2021-02-05 16:24       ` Ville Syrjälä
2021-02-05 16:24         ` [Intel-gfx] " Ville Syrjälä
2021-02-05 21:19         ` Ville Syrjälä
2021-02-05 21:19           ` [Intel-gfx] " Ville Syrjälä
2021-02-08  9:56           ` Daniel Vetter
2021-02-08  9:56             ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2021-02-08 16:58             ` Ville Syrjälä
2021-02-08 16:58               ` [Intel-gfx] " Ville Syrjälä
2021-02-08 17:43               ` Daniel Vetter
2021-02-08 17:43                 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2021-02-08 18:05                 ` Ville Syrjälä
2021-02-08 18:05                   ` [Intel-gfx] " Ville Syrjälä
2021-02-09 10:07 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-02-09 10:07   ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2021-02-09 15:40   ` Ville Syrjälä
2021-02-09 15:40     ` [Intel-gfx] " Ville Syrjälä
2021-02-09 16:44     ` Daniel Vetter
2021-02-09 16:44       ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2021-02-18 16:03 ` Ville Syrjala [this message]
2021-02-18 16:03   ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] drm/vblank: Do not store a new vblank timestamp in drm_vblank_restore() Ville Syrjala
2021-02-18 16:10   ` Ville Syrjälä
2021-02-18 16:10     ` [Intel-gfx] " Ville Syrjälä
2021-02-19 15:08   ` Daniel Vetter
2021-02-19 15:08     ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2021-02-19 15:47     ` Ville Syrjälä
2021-02-19 15:47       ` [Intel-gfx] " Ville Syrjälä
2021-02-18 19:08 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/vblank: Avoid storing a timestamp for the same frame twice (rev2) Patchwork
2021-02-18 19:22   ` Ville Syrjälä
2021-02-18 19:51     ` Vudum, Lakshminarayana
2021-02-18 19:29 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2021-02-18 20:58 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2021-02-21  4:18 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/vblank: Avoid storing a timestamp for the same frame twice (rev3) Patchwork
2021-02-21  5:41 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210218160305.16711-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    --to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.