All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com>
To: <linux-mm@kvack.org>, <nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	<bskeggs@redhat.com>, <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org>, <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	<jhubbard@nvidia.com>, <rcampbell@nvidia.com>,
	<jglisse@redhat.com>, "Alistair Popple" <apopple@nvidia.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 7/8] nouveau/svm: Refactor nouveau_range_fault
Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2021 17:16:44 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210304061645.29747-8-apopple@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210304061645.29747-1-apopple@nvidia.com>

Call mmu_interval_notifier_insert() as part of nouveau_range_fault().
This doesn't introduce any functional change but makes it easier for a
subsequent patch to alter the behaviour of nouveau_range_fault() to
support GPU atomic operations.

Signed-off-by: Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_svm.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_svm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_svm.c
index f18bd53da052..cd7b47c946cf 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_svm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_svm.c
@@ -567,18 +567,27 @@ static int nouveau_range_fault(struct nouveau_svmm *svmm,
 	unsigned long hmm_pfns[1];
 	struct hmm_range range = {
 		.notifier = &notifier->notifier,
-		.start = notifier->notifier.interval_tree.start,
-		.end = notifier->notifier.interval_tree.last + 1,
 		.default_flags = hmm_flags,
 		.hmm_pfns = hmm_pfns,
 		.dev_private_owner = drm->dev,
 	};
-	struct mm_struct *mm = notifier->notifier.mm;
+	struct mm_struct *mm = svmm->notifier.mm;
 	int ret;
 
+	ret = mmu_interval_notifier_insert(&notifier->notifier, mm,
+					args->p.addr, args->p.size,
+					&nouveau_svm_mni_ops);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	range.start = notifier->notifier.interval_tree.start;
+	range.end = notifier->notifier.interval_tree.last + 1;
+
 	while (true) {
-		if (time_after(jiffies, timeout))
-			return -EBUSY;
+		if (time_after(jiffies, timeout)) {
+			ret = -EBUSY;
+			goto out;
+		}
 
 		range.notifier_seq = mmu_interval_read_begin(range.notifier);
 		mmap_read_lock(mm);
@@ -587,7 +596,7 @@ static int nouveau_range_fault(struct nouveau_svmm *svmm,
 		if (ret) {
 			if (ret == -EBUSY)
 				continue;
-			return ret;
+			goto out;
 		}
 
 		mutex_lock(&svmm->mutex);
@@ -606,6 +615,9 @@ static int nouveau_range_fault(struct nouveau_svmm *svmm,
 	svmm->vmm->vmm.object.client->super = false;
 	mutex_unlock(&svmm->mutex);
 
+out:
+	mmu_interval_notifier_remove(&notifier->notifier);
+
 	return ret;
 }
 
@@ -727,14 +739,8 @@ nouveau_svm_fault(struct nvif_notify *notify)
 		}
 
 		notifier.svmm = svmm;
-		ret = mmu_interval_notifier_insert(&notifier.notifier, mm,
-						   args.i.p.addr, args.i.p.size,
-						   &nouveau_svm_mni_ops);
-		if (!ret) {
-			ret = nouveau_range_fault(svmm, svm->drm, &args.i,
-				sizeof(args), hmm_flags, &notifier);
-			mmu_interval_notifier_remove(&notifier.notifier);
-		}
+		ret = nouveau_range_fault(svmm, svm->drm, &args.i,
+					sizeof(args), hmm_flags, &notifier);
 		mmput(mm);
 
 		limit = args.i.p.addr + args.i.p.size;
-- 
2.20.1


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com>
To: <linux-mm@kvack.org>, <nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	<bskeggs@redhat.com>, <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: rcampbell@nvidia.com, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
	Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [Nouveau] [PATCH v4 7/8] nouveau/svm: Refactor nouveau_range_fault
Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2021 17:16:44 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210304061645.29747-8-apopple@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210304061645.29747-1-apopple@nvidia.com>

Call mmu_interval_notifier_insert() as part of nouveau_range_fault().
This doesn't introduce any functional change but makes it easier for a
subsequent patch to alter the behaviour of nouveau_range_fault() to
support GPU atomic operations.

Signed-off-by: Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_svm.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_svm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_svm.c
index f18bd53da052..cd7b47c946cf 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_svm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_svm.c
@@ -567,18 +567,27 @@ static int nouveau_range_fault(struct nouveau_svmm *svmm,
 	unsigned long hmm_pfns[1];
 	struct hmm_range range = {
 		.notifier = &notifier->notifier,
-		.start = notifier->notifier.interval_tree.start,
-		.end = notifier->notifier.interval_tree.last + 1,
 		.default_flags = hmm_flags,
 		.hmm_pfns = hmm_pfns,
 		.dev_private_owner = drm->dev,
 	};
-	struct mm_struct *mm = notifier->notifier.mm;
+	struct mm_struct *mm = svmm->notifier.mm;
 	int ret;
 
+	ret = mmu_interval_notifier_insert(&notifier->notifier, mm,
+					args->p.addr, args->p.size,
+					&nouveau_svm_mni_ops);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	range.start = notifier->notifier.interval_tree.start;
+	range.end = notifier->notifier.interval_tree.last + 1;
+
 	while (true) {
-		if (time_after(jiffies, timeout))
-			return -EBUSY;
+		if (time_after(jiffies, timeout)) {
+			ret = -EBUSY;
+			goto out;
+		}
 
 		range.notifier_seq = mmu_interval_read_begin(range.notifier);
 		mmap_read_lock(mm);
@@ -587,7 +596,7 @@ static int nouveau_range_fault(struct nouveau_svmm *svmm,
 		if (ret) {
 			if (ret == -EBUSY)
 				continue;
-			return ret;
+			goto out;
 		}
 
 		mutex_lock(&svmm->mutex);
@@ -606,6 +615,9 @@ static int nouveau_range_fault(struct nouveau_svmm *svmm,
 	svmm->vmm->vmm.object.client->super = false;
 	mutex_unlock(&svmm->mutex);
 
+out:
+	mmu_interval_notifier_remove(&notifier->notifier);
+
 	return ret;
 }
 
@@ -727,14 +739,8 @@ nouveau_svm_fault(struct nvif_notify *notify)
 		}
 
 		notifier.svmm = svmm;
-		ret = mmu_interval_notifier_insert(&notifier.notifier, mm,
-						   args.i.p.addr, args.i.p.size,
-						   &nouveau_svm_mni_ops);
-		if (!ret) {
-			ret = nouveau_range_fault(svmm, svm->drm, &args.i,
-				sizeof(args), hmm_flags, &notifier);
-			mmu_interval_notifier_remove(&notifier.notifier);
-		}
+		ret = nouveau_range_fault(svmm, svm->drm, &args.i,
+					sizeof(args), hmm_flags, &notifier);
 		mmput(mm);
 
 		limit = args.i.p.addr + args.i.p.size;
-- 
2.20.1

_______________________________________________
Nouveau mailing list
Nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com>
To: <linux-mm@kvack.org>, <nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	<bskeggs@redhat.com>, <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: rcampbell@nvidia.com, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
	jhubbard@nvidia.com, Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	jglisse@redhat.com, kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 7/8] nouveau/svm: Refactor nouveau_range_fault
Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2021 17:16:44 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210304061645.29747-8-apopple@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210304061645.29747-1-apopple@nvidia.com>

Call mmu_interval_notifier_insert() as part of nouveau_range_fault().
This doesn't introduce any functional change but makes it easier for a
subsequent patch to alter the behaviour of nouveau_range_fault() to
support GPU atomic operations.

Signed-off-by: Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_svm.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_svm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_svm.c
index f18bd53da052..cd7b47c946cf 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_svm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_svm.c
@@ -567,18 +567,27 @@ static int nouveau_range_fault(struct nouveau_svmm *svmm,
 	unsigned long hmm_pfns[1];
 	struct hmm_range range = {
 		.notifier = &notifier->notifier,
-		.start = notifier->notifier.interval_tree.start,
-		.end = notifier->notifier.interval_tree.last + 1,
 		.default_flags = hmm_flags,
 		.hmm_pfns = hmm_pfns,
 		.dev_private_owner = drm->dev,
 	};
-	struct mm_struct *mm = notifier->notifier.mm;
+	struct mm_struct *mm = svmm->notifier.mm;
 	int ret;
 
+	ret = mmu_interval_notifier_insert(&notifier->notifier, mm,
+					args->p.addr, args->p.size,
+					&nouveau_svm_mni_ops);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	range.start = notifier->notifier.interval_tree.start;
+	range.end = notifier->notifier.interval_tree.last + 1;
+
 	while (true) {
-		if (time_after(jiffies, timeout))
-			return -EBUSY;
+		if (time_after(jiffies, timeout)) {
+			ret = -EBUSY;
+			goto out;
+		}
 
 		range.notifier_seq = mmu_interval_read_begin(range.notifier);
 		mmap_read_lock(mm);
@@ -587,7 +596,7 @@ static int nouveau_range_fault(struct nouveau_svmm *svmm,
 		if (ret) {
 			if (ret == -EBUSY)
 				continue;
-			return ret;
+			goto out;
 		}
 
 		mutex_lock(&svmm->mutex);
@@ -606,6 +615,9 @@ static int nouveau_range_fault(struct nouveau_svmm *svmm,
 	svmm->vmm->vmm.object.client->super = false;
 	mutex_unlock(&svmm->mutex);
 
+out:
+	mmu_interval_notifier_remove(&notifier->notifier);
+
 	return ret;
 }
 
@@ -727,14 +739,8 @@ nouveau_svm_fault(struct nvif_notify *notify)
 		}
 
 		notifier.svmm = svmm;
-		ret = mmu_interval_notifier_insert(&notifier.notifier, mm,
-						   args.i.p.addr, args.i.p.size,
-						   &nouveau_svm_mni_ops);
-		if (!ret) {
-			ret = nouveau_range_fault(svmm, svm->drm, &args.i,
-				sizeof(args), hmm_flags, &notifier);
-			mmu_interval_notifier_remove(&notifier.notifier);
-		}
+		ret = nouveau_range_fault(svmm, svm->drm, &args.i,
+					sizeof(args), hmm_flags, &notifier);
 		mmput(mm);
 
 		limit = args.i.p.addr + args.i.p.size;
-- 
2.20.1

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com>
To: linux-mm@kvack.org, nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org,
	bskeggs@redhat.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	jhubbard@nvidia.com, rcampbell@nvidia.com, jglisse@redhat.com,
	Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 7/8] nouveau/svm: Refactor nouveau_range_fault
Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2021 06:16:44 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210304061645.29747-8-apopple@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210304061645.29747-1-apopple@nvidia.com>

Call mmu_interval_notifier_insert() as part of nouveau_range_fault().
This doesn't introduce any functional change but makes it easier for a
subsequent patch to alter the behaviour of nouveau_range_fault() to
support GPU atomic operations.

Signed-off-by: Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_svm.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_svm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_svm.c
index f18bd53da052..cd7b47c946cf 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_svm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_svm.c
@@ -567,18 +567,27 @@ static int nouveau_range_fault(struct nouveau_svmm *svmm,
 	unsigned long hmm_pfns[1];
 	struct hmm_range range = {
 		.notifier = &notifier->notifier,
-		.start = notifier->notifier.interval_tree.start,
-		.end = notifier->notifier.interval_tree.last + 1,
 		.default_flags = hmm_flags,
 		.hmm_pfns = hmm_pfns,
 		.dev_private_owner = drm->dev,
 	};
-	struct mm_struct *mm = notifier->notifier.mm;
+	struct mm_struct *mm = svmm->notifier.mm;
 	int ret;
 
+	ret = mmu_interval_notifier_insert(&notifier->notifier, mm,
+					args->p.addr, args->p.size,
+					&nouveau_svm_mni_ops);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	range.start = notifier->notifier.interval_tree.start;
+	range.end = notifier->notifier.interval_tree.last + 1;
+
 	while (true) {
-		if (time_after(jiffies, timeout))
-			return -EBUSY;
+		if (time_after(jiffies, timeout)) {
+			ret = -EBUSY;
+			goto out;
+		}
 
 		range.notifier_seq = mmu_interval_read_begin(range.notifier);
 		mmap_read_lock(mm);
@@ -587,7 +596,7 @@ static int nouveau_range_fault(struct nouveau_svmm *svmm,
 		if (ret) {
 			if (ret == -EBUSY)
 				continue;
-			return ret;
+			goto out;
 		}
 
 		mutex_lock(&svmm->mutex);
@@ -606,6 +615,9 @@ static int nouveau_range_fault(struct nouveau_svmm *svmm,
 	svmm->vmm->vmm.object.client->super = false;
 	mutex_unlock(&svmm->mutex);
 
+out:
+	mmu_interval_notifier_remove(&notifier->notifier);
+
 	return ret;
 }
 
@@ -727,14 +739,8 @@ nouveau_svm_fault(struct nvif_notify *notify)
 		}
 
 		notifier.svmm = svmm;
-		ret = mmu_interval_notifier_insert(&notifier.notifier, mm,
-						   args.i.p.addr, args.i.p.size,
-						   &nouveau_svm_mni_ops);
-		if (!ret) {
-			ret = nouveau_range_fault(svmm, svm->drm, &args.i,
-				sizeof(args), hmm_flags, &notifier);
-			mmu_interval_notifier_remove(&notifier.notifier);
-		}
+		ret = nouveau_range_fault(svmm, svm->drm, &args.i,
+					sizeof(args), hmm_flags, &notifier);
 		mmput(mm);
 
 		limit = args.i.p.addr + args.i.p.size;
-- 
2.20.1

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-03-04  6:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-04  6:16 [PATCH v4 0/8] Add support for SVM atomics in Nouveau Alistair Popple
2021-03-04  6:16 ` Alistair Popple
2021-03-04  6:16 ` Alistair Popple
2021-03-04  6:16 ` [Nouveau] " Alistair Popple
2021-03-04  6:16 ` [PATCH v4 1/8] mm: Remove special swap entry functions Alistair Popple
2021-03-04  6:16   ` Alistair Popple
2021-03-04  6:16   ` Alistair Popple
2021-03-04  6:16   ` [Nouveau] " Alistair Popple
2021-03-08 18:24   ` Ralph Campbell
2021-03-08 18:24     ` Ralph Campbell
2021-03-08 18:24     ` Ralph Campbell
2021-03-08 18:24     ` [Nouveau] " Ralph Campbell
2021-03-04  6:16 ` [PATCH v4 2/8] mm/swapops: Rework swap entry manipulation code Alistair Popple
2021-03-04  6:16   ` Alistair Popple
2021-03-04  6:16   ` Alistair Popple
2021-03-04  6:16   ` [Nouveau] " Alistair Popple
2021-03-08 18:30   ` Ralph Campbell
2021-03-08 18:30     ` Ralph Campbell
2021-03-08 18:30     ` Ralph Campbell
2021-03-08 18:30     ` [Nouveau] " Ralph Campbell
2021-03-04  6:16 ` [PATCH v4 3/8] mm/rmap: Split try_to_munlock from try_to_unmap Alistair Popple
2021-03-04  6:16   ` Alistair Popple
2021-03-04  6:16   ` Alistair Popple
2021-03-04  6:16   ` [Nouveau] " Alistair Popple
2021-03-08 18:39   ` Ralph Campbell
2021-03-08 18:39     ` Ralph Campbell
2021-03-08 18:39     ` Ralph Campbell
2021-03-08 18:39     ` [Nouveau] " Ralph Campbell
2021-03-04  6:16 ` [PATCH v4 4/8] mm/rmap: Split migration into its own function Alistair Popple
2021-03-04  6:16   ` Alistair Popple
2021-03-04  6:16   ` Alistair Popple
2021-03-04  6:16   ` [Nouveau] " Alistair Popple
2021-03-08 18:58   ` Ralph Campbell
2021-03-08 18:58     ` Ralph Campbell
2021-03-08 18:58     ` Ralph Campbell
2021-03-08 18:58     ` [Nouveau] " Ralph Campbell
2021-03-09  0:01     ` Alistair Popple
2021-03-09  0:01       ` Alistair Popple
2021-03-09  0:01       ` Alistair Popple
2021-03-09  0:01       ` [Nouveau] " Alistair Popple
2021-03-04  6:16 ` [PATCH v4 5/8] mm: Device exclusive memory access Alistair Popple
2021-03-04  6:16   ` Alistair Popple
2021-03-04  6:16   ` Alistair Popple
2021-03-04  6:16   ` [Nouveau] " Alistair Popple
2021-03-08 19:44   ` Ralph Campbell
2021-03-08 19:44     ` Ralph Campbell
2021-03-08 19:44     ` Ralph Campbell
2021-03-08 19:44     ` [Nouveau] " Ralph Campbell
2021-03-09  1:17     ` Alistair Popple
2021-03-09  1:17       ` Alistair Popple
2021-03-09  1:17       ` Alistair Popple
2021-03-09  1:17       ` [Nouveau] " Alistair Popple
2021-03-04  6:16 ` [PATCH v4 6/8] mm: Selftests for exclusive device memory Alistair Popple
2021-03-04  6:16   ` Alistair Popple
2021-03-04  6:16   ` Alistair Popple
2021-03-04  6:16   ` [Nouveau] " Alistair Popple
2021-03-04  6:16 ` Alistair Popple [this message]
2021-03-04  6:16   ` [PATCH v4 7/8] nouveau/svm: Refactor nouveau_range_fault Alistair Popple
2021-03-04  6:16   ` Alistair Popple
2021-03-04  6:16   ` [Nouveau] " Alistair Popple
2021-03-04  6:16 ` [PATCH v4 8/8] nouveau/svm: Implement atomic SVM access Alistair Popple
2021-03-04  6:16   ` Alistair Popple
2021-03-04  6:16   ` Alistair Popple
2021-03-04  6:16   ` [Nouveau] " Alistair Popple

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210304061645.29747-8-apopple@nvidia.com \
    --to=apopple@nvidia.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bskeggs@redhat.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jglisse@redhat.com \
    --cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
    --cc=kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=rcampbell@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.